Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:13:59.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE BATTLE OF GAUGAMELA AND THE QUESTION OF VISIBILITY ON THE BATTLEFIELD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2021

Michał Marciak Open the ORCID record for Michał Marciak [Opens in a new window] ,
Bartłomiej Szypuła Open the ORCID record for Bartłomiej Szypuła [Opens in a new window] ,
Marcin Sobiech  and
Tomasz Pirowski Open the ORCID record for Tomasz Pirowski [Opens in a new window]
Michał Marciak
Affiliation:
Department of Jewish Studies, Faculty of HistoryJagiellonian University in Kraków, [email protected]
Bartłomiej Szypuła
Affiliation:
Institute of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Natural Sciences,University of Silesia in Katowice, Sosnowiec, [email protected]
Marcin Sobiech
Affiliation:
EXGEO Professional Map87-100 Toruń, [email protected]
Tomasz Pirowski
Affiliation:
AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Mining Surveying and Environmental Engineering,Department of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing of Environment and Spatial EngineeringAl. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Kraków, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to contribute to the long-standing topographical enigma of the identification of Gaugamela. In this study, a GIS method known as viewshed analysis is employed to solve a certain historical problem.1 According to ancient sources, on the eve of the battle the approaching Macedonian army and the Persian troops that were waiting on the battlefield could not see each other because of intervening hills at a distance of c. 12 km. However, the two armies gained a full view of their respective positions once the Macedonians reached the hills c. six km away from the Persian positions. Our analysis shows that the identification of the battlefield near Tell Gomel, in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, is consistent with the visibility requirements of the ancient sources, while the previous identifications of the battlefield in the vicinity of Karamleis and Qaraqosh (Stein 1942; Sushko 1936; Zouboulakis 2015, 2016) feature poor results in terms of expected visibility.

الهدف من هذا البحث هو المساهمة في حل لغز طبوغرافي طويل الأمد لتحديد غوغميلا Gaugamela من خلال دراسة جانب محدد للغاية : ففي هذه الدراسة بصورة خاصة، استخدم نظام المعلومات الجغرافية GIS والمعروف باسم viewshed لحل مشكلة تاريخية خاصة . وبالتحديد، وفقًا لمصادر قديمة، عشية المعركة وعند اقتراب الجيش المقدوني من القوات الفارسية التي كانت تنتظر في ساحة المعركة لم يتمكنوا من رؤية بعضهم البعض بسبب تلال متداخلة على مسافة اثني عشر كيلومترًا تقريبًا . ولكن، حصل الجيشان على رؤية كاملة لمواقعهما بمجرد وصول المقدونيين إلى التلال التي تبعد حوالي ست كيلومترات عن المواقع الفارسية . يُظهر تحليلنا أن تحديد ساحة المعركة بالقرب من تل غوميل يتوافق مع متطلبات الرؤية الواردة في المصادر القديمة، بينما كان التحديد السابق لموقع المعركة قرب كرمليس و قرقوش (Stein, Sushko and Zouboulakis) يعرض نتائج مشكوك في صحتها من حيث الرؤية المتوقعة

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 83 , December 2021 , pp. 87 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper presents an aspect of research conducted within the project entitled “Location of the Battle of Gaugamela in the Light of Multidisciplinary Research” (no. 2017/26/M/HS3/00750), financed by the National Science Centre, Poland. The project is affiliated at Jagiellonian University in Poland and is conducted in cooperation with the Land of Nineveh Archaeological Project of the University of Udine. We wish to thank Prof. Daniele Morandi Bonacossi, Director of the Land of Nineveh Project, for his support. Likewise, Rocco Palermo should be acknowledged as the first to suggest the use of viewshed analysis in our search for the location of the battlefield of Gaugamela. We also extend our thanks to Dr Tiffany Earley-Spadoni, whose feedback helped us considerably to improve our paper.

References

Arras, C., Melis, M., Afrasinei, G., Buttau, C., Carletti, A. and Ghiglieri, G.. 2017. “Evaluation and Validation of SRTMGL1 and ASTER GDEM2 for Two Maghreb Regions (Biskra, Algeria and Medenine, Tunisia)” in Ouessar, M., Gabriels, D., Tsunekawa, A. and Evett, S., eds., Water and Land Security in Drylands: Response to Climate Change. Cham: Springer, pp. 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badian, E. 2000. “Gaugamela”. Encyclopaedia Iranica 10: 332–333.Google Scholar
Bernard, P. 1990. “Nouvelle contribution de l’épigraphie cunéiforme à l'histoire Hellénistique”. Bulletin de Correspondance Hellénique 114: 513–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. 1980. A Historical Commentary on Arrian's History of Alexander. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, B. and Blom, R.. 2013. “Synthetic Aperture Radar, Technology, Past and Future Applications to Archaeology” in Comer, D.C. and Harrower, M.J., eds., Mapping Archaeological Landscapes from Space. New York: Springer, pp. 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowa, E. 1988. Gaugamela 331 p.n.e. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Ministerstwa Obrony Narodowej.Google Scholar
Devine, A. 1975. “Grand Tactics at Gaugamela”. Phoenix, 29(4): 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, A. M. 1986. “The Battle of Gaugamela: A Tactical and Source-Critical Study”. Ancient World 13: 87–115.Google Scholar
Doumit, J. 2013. “Comparison of SRTM DEM and ASTER GDEM Derived Digital Elevation Models with Elevation Points over the Lebanese Territory”. Hannon: Journal of Lebanese Society of Geographers 27: 7–28.Google Scholar
Droysen, J. G. 1877. Geschichte des Hellenismus, Vol. I, 1–2, Geschichte Alexanders des Grossen. Gotha : F. A. Perthes.Google Scholar
Fiey, J. M. 1965. Assyrie chrétienne. Contribution à l’étude de l'histoire et de la géographie ecclésiastiques et monastiques du nord de l'Iraq. Beirut: Institut des lettres orientales de Beyrouth.Google Scholar
Florinsky, I. V. 2012. “Digital Elevation Models” in Florinsky, I. V., Digital Terrain Analysis in Soil Science and Geology. Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forkuor, G. and Maathuis, B. H. P.. 2012. “Comparison of SRTM and ASTER derived digital elevation models over two regions in Ghana: Implications for hydrological and environmental modeling” in Piacentini, T., ed., Studies on Environmental and Applied Geomorphology. London: IntechOpen, pp. 219–240.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. F. C. 1958. The generalship of Alexander the Great. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
Hackmann, F. 1902. Die Schlacht bei Gaugamela: Eine Untersuchung zur Geschichte Alexanders d. Gr. und ihren Quellen nebst einer Beilage. Haale: Heinrich John.Google Scholar
Hawker, L., Bates, P., Neal, J. and Rougier, J.. 2018. “Perspectives on Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Simulation for Flood Modeling in the Absence of a High-Accuracy Open Access Global DEM”. Frontiers in Earth Sciences 6: 233. doi: 10.3389/feart.2018.00233Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E. 1907. “Untersuchungen über die historische Topographie der Landschaft am Tigris, kleinen Zab und Gebel Ḥamrîn”. Memnon 1: 89–143, 217–238.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, G. 1880. Auszüge aus Syrischen Akten Persischer Märtyrer. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Holt, F. L. 2003. Alexander the Great and the Mystery of the Elephant Medallions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jones, E. 2006. “Using Viewshed Analysis to Explore Settlement Choice: A Case Study of the Onondaga Iroquois”. American Antiquity 71: 523–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judeich, W. 1931. “Gaugamela”. In Kromayer, J. and Veith, G., eds. Antike Schlachtfelder IV. Berlin: Weidmann, pp. 372–384.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. L. and Gregory, S.. 1985. Sir Aurel Stein's Limes report: the full text of M.A. Stein's unpublished Limes report (his aerial and ground reconnaissances in Iraq and Transjordan in 1938–39). Edited and with a commentary and bibliography by Shelagh Gregory and David Kennedy; with maps and figures drawn by Julie Kennedy. Oxford: B.A.R.Google Scholar
Kopanias, K. and MacGinnis, J., eds. 2016. Archaeological Research in the Kurdistan and Adjacent Regions. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Kromayer, J. and Veith, G.. 1929. Schlachten-Atlas zur antiken Kriegsgeschichte: 120 Karten auf 34 Tafeln; mit begleitendem Text (5.1 Lieferung, Griechische Abteilung 2: Makedonisch-hellenist. Zeit (Alexander der Große). Leipzig: Wagner and Debes.Google Scholar
Lake, M. and Woodman, P.. 2003. “Visibility Studies in Archaeology: A Review and Case Study”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30: 689–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane-Fox, R. 1986. Alexander the Great. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Layard, A. H. 1856. Discoveries in the Ruins of Nineveh and Babylon; with Travels in Armenia, Kurdistan and the Desert: being the Result of a Second Expedition Undertaken for the Trustees of the British Museum. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar
MacGinnis, J. 2014. “Kurdistan: A new dawn breaks for Near Eastern archaeology”. Current World Archaeology 67: 30–33.Google Scholar
Marciak, M., Sobiech, M. and Pirowski, T.. 2020. “Alexander the Great's Route to Gaugamela and Arbela”. Klio. Beiträge zur Alten Geschichte 102: 536–559. https://doi.org/10.1515/klio-2020-1005Google Scholar
Markwart, J. 1905. Untersuchungen zur Geschichte von Eran, B. 10, H. 1. Göttingen: Dieterich'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Theodor Weicher.Google Scholar
Marsden, E. W. 1964. The Campaign of Gaugamela. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Morandi Bonacossi, D. 2016. “The Land of Nineveh Archaeological Project. Assyrian Settlement in the Nineveh Hinterland: A View from the Centre” in MacGinnis, J., Wicke, D. and Greenfield, T., eds. The Provincial Archaeology of the Assyrian Empire. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 141–150.Google Scholar
Morandi Bonacossi, D. and Iamoni, M.. 2015. “Landscape and Settlement in the Eastern Upper Iraqi Tigris and Navkur Plains: The Land of Nineveh Archaeological Project, Seasons 2012–2013″. Iraq 77: 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawotka, K. 2010. Alexander the Great. Cambridge: Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, C. 1776. Carsten Niebuhrs Reisebeschreibung nach Arabien und andern umliegenden Ländern (Band 2). Copenhagen: N. Müller.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, M. 1899. Vom Mittelmeer zum Persischen Golf durch den Haurän, die Syrische Wüste und Mesopotamien, Berlin: D. Reimer.Google Scholar
Palermo, R. 2016. “Filling the Gap: The Upper Tigris Region from the Fall of Nineveh to the Sasanians. Historical and Archaeological Reconstruction through the Data from The Land of Nineveh Archaeological Project” in Kopanias, K. and MacGinnis, J., eds. Archaeological Research in the Kurdistan and Adjacent Regions. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 266–276.Google Scholar
Parcak, S. 2009. Satellite remote sensing for Archaeology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietrykowski, J. 2012. Great Battles of the Hellenistic World. Barnsley: Pen and Sword Books.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 1998. “Greco-Parthian Nineveh”. Iraq 60: 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, J. E. and Anderson, J. R.. 2013. “Gunduk, Khanes, Gaugamela, Gali Zardak – Notes on Navkur and nearby rock-cut sculptures in Kurdistan”. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 103: 69–123.Google Scholar
Rich, C. J. 1836. Narrative of a residence in Koordistan: and on the site of ancient Nineveh; with journal of a voyage down the Tigris to Bagdad and an account of a visit to Shirauz and Persepolis. London: Duncan.Google Scholar
Richey, S. W. 2014. Desperately Seeking The Location of Gaugamela Battlefield. http://www.locationofgaugamelabattlefield.com/essay.html (accessed April 8, 2021)Google Scholar
Robson, E. I. [trans.] 1954. Arrian with an English Translation by E.I. Robson. Anabasis Alexandri Books I-IV: In Two Volumes: Vol. I. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rolfe, J. C. [trans.] 1962. Quintus Curtius, History of Alexander with an English Translation by J.C. Rolfe in Two Volumes. Vol. I: Books I-V. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sachau, E. 1883. Reise in Syrien und Mesopotamien. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Schachermeyr, F. 1973. Alexander der Grosse: Das Problem seiner Persönlichkeit und seines Wirkens. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Seibert, J. 1972. Alexander der Grosse. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Stein, A. 1942. “Notes on Alexander's crossing of the Tigris and the Battle of Arbela”. Geographical Journal 100: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streck, M. 1910. “Gaugamela”. Paulys Realenencyclopädie der Classischen Alterturmswissenschaft 13: 862–865.Google Scholar
Sushko, S. 1936. Gaugamela, the Modern Qaraqosh. Chicago, IL: The Ukrainian Academy of Sciences of America.Google Scholar
Tarn, W. 1952. Hellenistic Civilization. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Ur, J. 2017. “The Archaeological Renaissance in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq”. Near Eastern Archaeology 80: 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uuemaa, E., Ahi, S., Montibeller, B., Muru, M. and Kmoch, A.. 2020. “Vertical Accuracy of Freely Available Global Digital Elevation Models (ASTER, AW3D30, MERIT, TanDEM-X, SRTM, and NASADEM)”. Remote Sensing 12 (21): 3482. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12213482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varga, M. and Bašić, T.. 2015. “Accuracy validation and comparison of global digital elevation models over Croatia”. International Journal of Remote Sensing 36: 170–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J.P. and Gallant, J. C.. 2000. “Digital Terrain Analysis” in Wilson, J. P. and Gallant, J. C., eds., Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications. New York: Wiley, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
Zouboulakis, K. 2015. “The Topography of the Battle of Gaugamela: Contributing to an Old Controversy”. Pharos 21: 31–62.Google Scholar
Zouboulakis, K. 2016. “‘Carrying the Glory of the Great Battle’ The Gaugamela Battlefield: ancient sources, modern views and topographical problems” in Kopanias, K. and McGinnis, J., eds., The Archaeology of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and Adjacent Regions. Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar