Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:57:43.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Amulets, Symbols, or Idols?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

E. Douglas van Buren
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During his excavations of the successive cities of Troy, Schliemann uncovered a few clay pots adorned in relief with a crudely moulded human face, presumably female, which might have been thought to be in the tradition of the vase decorated in relief and painting with a female face from Hassuna and the pots with moulded faces from Kish. Professor Frankfort, however, in his most interesting article Ishtar in Troy, proposes quite a different derivation for these pots, termed by him “face-urns”, which implies that they were used for funerary purposes, although they did not contain human remains and were not found in graves, but in dwellings, which suggests that they may have been domestic utensils. A piece bearing rudimentary indications of a human face was also discovered and, although not found in the same level as the pots, has been thought to be the cover which fitted over the mouth and neck of one of the vessels. From this fact Frankfort concludes that the derivation of this type of pot can be traced back to certain objects of stone and clay which consist of a bell-shaped base surmounted by double volutes with perforated centres which were not uncommon at various sites in strata of the Protoliterate d (= Uruk III, Jamdat Naṣr) period.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1950 , pp. 139 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 139 note 1 Schliemann, , Ilios, English ed., 340–1, 520–2, Fig. 231Google Scholar; Hubert Schmidt, Trojanische Altertümer, Nos. 306, 309, 327, 1044, 1051.

page 139 note 2 Lloyd, Seton and Safar, Fuad, J.N.E.S., IV (1945), 281, pl. XVII: 1Google Scholar.

page 139 note 3 Mackay, , The “A” Cemetery at Kish, 21–3, pls. 1: 5Google Scholar; II: 1–9; IX: 1–15; X: 16–14; XLV: 6–8, 11–13.

page 139 note 4 J.N.E.S., VIII, 3 (1949), 194–9, Fig. 1: 1–14Google Scholar; Fig. 2: 15–28.

page 139 note 5 Perkins, , S.A.O.C., No. 25, 191Google Scholar.

page 139 note 6 Mallowan, , Excav. at Brak: Iraq, IX (1947), 34–5, 154–8, 200–5, Pls. XXV: 10, 11; XXVI: 3–5, 8–9, 11–12; LI: 1–2, 26–34Google Scholar.

page 139 note 7 Andrae, , Ionische Säule, 32–3, Fig. 45Google Scholar.

page 139 note 8 As. 32.141.

page 139 note 9 Henrich, , Kleinfunde, 43, pl. 33, qGoogle Scholar.

page 139 note 10 O.I.P., LVIII, 29, Fig. 24Google Scholar.

page 139 note 11 Perkins, , S.A.O.C., No. 25, 191Google Scholar.

page 139 note 12 Speiser, , Excav. at Tepe Gawra I, 99–100, pl. XLIV, c.Google Scholar

page 139 note 13 Iraq, IX, 198, pl. LI: 1Google Scholar.

page 140 note 1 Belaiew, , Métrologie élamite: D.P.M., XXV, 134–43Google Scholar.

page 140 note 2 B.A.S.O.R., No. 62, 7 (Bache), 10, 12 (Speiser), an opinion modified in Excav. at Tepe Gawra I, 99–100Google Scholar.

page 140 note 3 Tobler, Excav. at Tepe Gawra II as cited by Perkins, , S.A.O.C., No. 25, 192Google Scholar.

page 140 note 4 Lamb, , Excav. at Thermi in Lesbos, Pl. X: 340–1, 481Google Scholar.

page 140 note 5 Mallowan, , Iraq, IX, 156, Pl. XXVI: 2Google Scholar.

page 140 note 6 Ashmolean Museum, Hogarth, Hittite Seals, 29, No. 64Google Scholar.

page 140 note 7 Gadd, and Legtain, , Royal Inscriptions, 54–6, Nos. 173–82Google Scholar.

page 140 note 8 Iraq, IX, 33–4, 150–4, 157–, 198–200, 205–10, Figs. 1–5, Pls. XXV: 1–9, XXVI, Nos. to, 13, LI, Nos. 3–15, 35–48Google Scholar.

page 140 note 9 op. cit., 204.

page 141 note 1 op. cit., 151.

page 141 note 2 op. cit., 151, 153, 155, 156, 209.

page 141 note 3 op. cit., 156.

page 141 note 4 op. cit., 209.

page 141 note 5 op. cit., 153, 156.

page 142 note 1 Buten, Van, Clay Figurines of Babylonia and Assyria, 144–9, Nos. 603–712, Figs. 189–95Google Scholar.

page 142 note 2 Andtae, , Die archaischen Ischtar-Tempel in Assur, Deutsche Orient-Gesellschaft, Wissenschaftlich Veröffentlichungen, XXXIX, 54–5Google Scholar, pls. 27, a, 28, c; Smith, , Early History of Assyria, 65–7, fig. 5, B.M. 118996Google Scholar.

page 142 note 3 Iraq IX, 204Google Scholar.

page 142 note 4 op. cit., 33, Fig. 3.

page 142 note 5 op. cit., 156.

page 142 note 6 op. cit., 200, 205.

page 142 note 7 op. cit., 155, 202.

page 143 note 1 V.A. 10112, Andrae, , Ionische Sǎule, 30–2, 39, pl. III: a–cGoogle Scholar.

page 143 note 2 op. cit., pp. 32–3, Fig. 45.

page 143 note 3 op. cit., p. 56.

page 143 note 4 B.M.Q., III (1928), pp. 40–1, Pl. XXII, bGoogle Scholar; Andrae, , Berliner Museen: Amtl. Berichte LI (1930), pp. 2–4, Figs. 3–6Google Scholar; Delaporte, , Cat. des cyl. or … Mus. du Louvre, p. 98, A.25, Pl. 63, Fig. 3, bGoogle Scholar; Frankfort, , J.N.E.S., VIII (1949), p. 195, Fig. 1, Nos. 1, 3Google Scholar.

page 143 note 5 Frankfort, op. cit., p. 195.

page 143 note 6 op. cit., pp. 195, 198.

page 144 note 1 Iraq, IX, 203Google Scholar.

page 144 note 2 op. cit., 203, 205, an opinion reiterated on pp. 155, 46, 157. 204.

page 144 note 3 op. cit., 203.

page 144 note 4 op. cit., 205.

page 144 note 5 Webster's, New International Dictionary (1928), 2097, 1068Google Scholar; see also The Concise Oxford Dictionary (1934), 1239, 563Google Scholar.

page 145 note 1 Deimel, , Šumerisches Lexicon IGoogle Scholar, No. 103, 1 and Keilschrift-Paläographie, 34; Falkenstein, , Archaische Texte, 59, Sign List Nos. 208–9Google Scholar.

page 144 note 2 Buren, Van, Symbols of the Gods, 44–7Google Scholar.