Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:30:16.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some New Early Dynastic Pottery from Abu Salabikh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Jane Moon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Of the excavations that have taken place in Iraq since the 1930s, many have revealed remains dating to the Early Dynastic period. None of these has been published as fully as the Diyala sites excavated by the Iraq Expedition of the Oriental Institute of Chicago from 1930 to 1938. (Frankfort, 1939, 1943, 1955; Delougaz, 1940, 1952, Delougaz and Lloyd, 1942; Delougaz, Hill and Lloyd, 1967.) It is these sites that still provide the largest collection of well-stratified pottery for this period, and thus material from newly-excavated sites has always been compared to that from the Diyala region.

There are two major disadvantages to this state of affairs. Firstly, it is undesirable that any kind of archaeological material comparison should be limited to just one region or site; and secondly, notwithstanding the importance of the city of Eshnunna (Tell Asmar), the Diyala region was a fringe area, and the style of its pottery should not have to be accepted as the norm for Southern Mesopotamia or anywhere else.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Spring 1981 , pp. 47 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1989 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amiet, P., 1961. La Glyptique Mésopotamienne Archaïque (Paris).Google Scholar
Childe, V. G., 1956. Piecing Together the Past: the interpretation of archaeological data (London).Google Scholar
Delougaz, P., 1940. The Temple Oval at Khafajah. OIP LIII (Chicago).Google Scholar
Delougaz, P., 1952. Pottery from the Diyala Region. OIP LXIII (Chicago).Google Scholar
Delougaz, P., Hill, H. and Lloyd, S., 1967. Private Houses and Graves in the Diyala Region. OIP LXXXVIII (Chicago).Google Scholar
Delougaz, P. and Lloyd, S., 1942. Pre-Sargonid Temples in the Diyala Region. OIP LVIII (Chicago).Google Scholar
Frankfort, H., 1939. Sculpture of the Third Millennium B.C. from Tell Asmar and Khafajah. OIP XLIV (Chicago).Google Scholar
Frankfort, H., 1943. More Sculpture from the Diyala Region. OIP LX (Chicago).Google Scholar
Frankfort, H., 1955. Stratified Seals from the Diyala Region. OIP LXXII (Chicago).Google Scholar
Hrouda, B., and Karstens, K., 1967. “Zur inneren Chronologie des Friedhofes “A” in Ingharra/Chursagkalamma bei Kish.” In ZA N.F. 24 (1967), 256–267.Google Scholar
Kühne, H., 1976. Die Keramik vom Teil Chuera (Berlin).Google Scholar
McCown, D., et al., 1978. Nippur II: The North Temple and Sounding E. OIP XCVII (Chicago).Google Scholar
Mackay, E., 1925 and 1929. Report on the Excavation of the “A” Cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia (Chicago).Google Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1979. “Unpublished Early Dynastic Sealings from Ur in the British Museum.” In Iraq XLI (1979), 105–120.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N., 1977. “Excavations at Abu Salabikh 1976.” In Iraq XXXIX (1977), 269–299.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N., 1978. “Excavations at Abu Salabikh 1977.” In Iraq XL (1978), 77–86.Google Scholar
Postgate, J. N. and Moorey, P. R. S., 1976. “Excavations at Abu Salabikh 1975.” In Iraq XXXVIII (1976), 133–169.Google Scholar
Whelan, E., 1978. “Dating the A cemetery at Kish, a Reconsideration.” in JFA 5 (1978), 79–96.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L., 1934. The Royal Cemetery. Ur Excavations 2 (London).Google Scholar