Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:46:46.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nineveh: From ideology to topography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

In Mesopotamian belief the city was the result of an act of creation, a tangible sign and visible image of the cosmic order, and a necessary element to guarantee and safeguard the continuation of the creation's order. To demonstrate this we can read a Babylonian liturgical text (CT 35–8), commonly called the Bilingual Creation of the World by Marduk, inserted in a ritual text for the renewal of a temple. There the city is seen as the first act of creation even before the making of the world and the birth of mankind: when all the land was only sea, Eridu was raised from the middle of Apsû, Babylon was built and Esagila was completed.

When a king builds or rebuilds a city he acts, ritually, in the same way as the god of creation in mythical time. This act has strong ideological implications because, as asserted by Liverani, “colloca il re fondatore nella lista degli esseri (in ordine di tempo: divini, eroici, regali) che hanno contribuito all'opera di ordinamento del mondo”. It is from this perspective, proven by a large quantity of extant documentation, that the attention given by the Assyrian kings to the founding of a city has to be evaluated. The building processes of the founding, or most of the time the refounding, of the city are the expression of the state's renewal and of the reconstitution of the cosmic order.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2004 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Università “La Sapienza” di Roma.

References

Bottéro, J. 1985. Mythes et rites de Babylone, Paris.Google Scholar
Brüschweiler, F. 1983. “La ville dans les textes littéraires sumériens”, in La ville dans le Proche-Orient ancien. Actes du Colloque de Cartigny 1979 (Les Cahiers du CEPOA 1), Leuven, pp. 181–98Google Scholar
Frahm, E. 1997. Einleitung in die Sanherib-Inschriften (AfO Beiheft 26), Vienna.Google Scholar
George, A. R. 1992. Babylonian Topographical Texts (OLA 40), Leuven.Google Scholar
Horowitz, W. 1998. Mesopotamian Cosmic Geography, Winona Lake.Google Scholar
Lackenbacher, S. 1982. Le roi bâtisseur. Les récits de construction assyriens des origines à Teglatphalasar III, Paris.Google Scholar
Lambert, W. G. 1997. “The Assyrian Recension of Enūma éliš”, in Waetzoldt, H., Hauptmann, H. (eds.), Assyrien im Wandel der Zeiten (CRRAI 39), Heidelberg, pp. 77–9.Google Scholar
Liverani, M. 1973. “Memorandum on the Approach to Historiographie Texts”, Orientalia 42, pp. 178–94Google Scholar
Liverani, M. 1979. “The Ideology of the Assyrian Empire”, in Larsen, M. T. (ed.), Power and Propaganda. A Symposium on Ancient Empires (Mesopotamia 7), Copenhagen, pp. 297317.Google Scholar
Liverani, M. 1994. “Ideologia delle nuove fondazioni urbane in età neo-assira”, in Mazzoni, S. (ed.), Nuove fondazioni nel Vicino Oriente antico: realtà e ideologia, Pisa, pp. 375–83.Google Scholar
Luckenbill, D. D. 1924. The Annals of Sennacherib (OIP II), Chicago.Google Scholar
Matthiae, P. 1998. Ninive, Milan.Google Scholar
Reade, J. E. 1975. “Sources for Sennacherib — The Prisms”, JCS 27, pp. 189–96Google Scholar
Russell, J. M. 1991. Sennacherib's Palace Without Rival at Nineveh, Chicago-London.Google Scholar
Tadmor, H. 1981. “History and Ideology in the Assyrian Royal Inscriptions”, in Fales, F. M. (ed.), Assyrian Royal Inscriptions: New Horizons (Orientis Antiqui Collectio XVII), Rome, pp. 1333.Google Scholar
Xella, P. 1994. “La città divina. Cultura urbana e politeismo nel Vicino Oriente antico”, in Cardini, F. (ed.), La città e il sacro, Milan, pp. 342.Google Scholar