Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:56:22.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mesopotamia and the Gulf: The history of a relationship1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

The economic relationship between Mesopotamia and the Gulf is a long one which spans millennia, rather than just a few centuries, and which took many forms. Indeed, it can be suggested that the changing nature of this relationship reflects the economic and social changes taking place in southern Iraq and of the related changes in Dilmun. There was an increasing demand by Mesopotamia for both raw materials and exotica from the sixth millennium, when we have the earliest evidence for a relationship, until the annexation of Dilmun by the Kassites in the mid-second millennium. This increasing demand seems to reflect the growing complexity in social organisation in the region. The emergence of an elite group within society in southern Sumer, first seen in the late Uruk phase, and then notably in the mid-third millennium when the group expanded, encouraged an increased demand for status goods and materials (Van De Mieroop 2002). Such goods are used initially to enhance the power and prestige of the group itself, both by display and by gift-giving, because gift-giving binds both men and gods, through offerings, ever more closely into the group. In Mesopotamia such exotic materials also played a role in the birth of what Baines and Yoffee have called “high culture” in these newly emergent complex societies. Baines and Yoffee define this high culture as “the production and consumption of aesthetic items under the control, and for the benefit of, the inner elite of a civilization” (Baines and Yoffee 1998: 235). High culture becomes a vital part of the identity of any civilization. Maintaining a supply of luxuries thus becomes a political necessity, rather than an indulgence, as it helps the essential identity of the group to survive.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

This paper is a revised version of one first given at a seminar at the Metropolitan Museum in May 2003 to mark the opening of the magnificent “Art of the First Cities” exhibition. I would like to express my warmest thanks to Joan Aruz for inviting me to take part in the seminar.

References

Algaze, G. 2001. Initial social complexity in south-western Asia. In: Current Anthropology 42/1–2: 199215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baines, J. and Yoffee, N. 1998. Order, legitimacy and wealth in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia. In: Chiefdoms and early states in the Near East. Eds. Stein, G. and Rothman, M. S.: 153–74. School of American Research. Santa Fe.Google Scholar
Breniquet, C. 1984. Le cimetière A de Kish: Essai d'interpretation. Iraq 46: 1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. and Crawford, H. 2001. The Kuwait-British Archaeological Expedition to as-Sabiyah: Report on the second season's work. Iraq 46: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. and Crawford, H. 2002. The Kuwait-British Archaeological Expedition to as-Sabiyah: Report on the third season's work. Iraq 46: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, H. 2001. Early Dilmun seals from Saar. Archaeology International. Ludlow.Google Scholar
Englund, R. 1983. Dilmun in the archaic Uruk corpus. In: Dilmun: New studies in the archaeology and early history of Bahrain. Ed. Potts, D. T.. Berliner Beiträge zum Vorderen Orient 2.Google Scholar
Foster, B. R. 1993. “International” trade at Sargonic Sumer. Altorientalische Forschungen 20: 5968.Google Scholar
Højlund, F. and Anderson, H. 1994. Qala'at al-Bahrain I. The northern city wall and the Islamic fortress. Jutland Archaeological Society Publications XXX. 1.Google Scholar
Masry, A. H. 1997. Prehistory in northeastern Arabia: The problem of interregional interaction. 2nd ed. Kegan Paul International.Google Scholar
Neumann, H. 1999. Ur-Dumuzida and Ur-Dun. In: Trade and finance in ancient Mesopotamia. Ed. Dercksen, J. G.. Leiden.Google Scholar
Oates, J.et al. 1977. Seafaring merchants of Ur? Antiquity 51: 221–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postgate, J. N. 2003. Learning the lessons of the future: Trade in prehistory through a historian's lens. Bibliohteca Orientalis 60/1–2: 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reade, J. E. 2001. Assyrian king lists, the Royal tombs of Ur and Indus origins. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 60/1: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, D. T. 1990. The Arabian Gulf in Antiquity I. From prehistory to the fall of the Achaemenid empire. Clarendon Press. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1992. Before writing. Vol. 1. Texas.Google Scholar
Stein, G. 1999. Rethinking world systems. University of Arizona Press. Tuscon.Google Scholar
Van De Mieroop, M. 2002. In search of prestige: Foreign contacts and the rise of an elite in Early Dynastic Babylonia. In: Leaving no stones unturned. Ed. Ehrenberg, E.. Eisenbraun: 125–38.Google Scholar
Vine, P. 1993. Bahrain National Museum. State of Bahrain Ministry of Information/Immel Publishing.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L. 1934. Ur excavations II: The Royal Cemetery. 2 vols. London.Google Scholar