Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:04:05.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Kuwait-British Archaeological Expedition to as-Sabiyah: Report on the third season's work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

A third season of excavation by the joint Kuwaiti-British team took place at the Ubaid-related site of H3 in northern Kuwait during the spring of 2001. Permission to excavate was again granted by Dr al Rumayhi, Secretary General of the National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters, to whom we are most grateful. The work was only possible because of the generosity of a number of funding bodies: the NCCAL in Kuwait; the British School of Archaeology in Iraq; the Institute of Archaeology, University College London; the Charlotte Bonham-Carter Charitable Trust; the Central Research fund of London University; the Society for Arabian Studies; and, above all, Kuwait Shell, our industrial sponsor. The success of the season was due to their generosity and to the dedication and skill of all members of the two teams.

Objectives this year included the continuation of work in the multi-cellular building in Area A identified in the second season, and the uncovering of the building visible on the surface in the adjacent Area C. The multi-cellular building proved to be structurally complex and had an unexpected depth of deposit in its chambers. These deposits proved to be extremely rich in finds which will greatly enhance our understanding of the site when analyses are completed. In Area C, the new building was defined and excavated to its base although its relationship with the adjacent building(s) in Area A remains to be defined. Limited work was also carried out in the previously excavated military dug-out, or foxhole, Area F, where work was completed. Two teams worked in Area A which was subdivided this season into an east and a west sector, while a third team investigated Area C.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Biagi, P. and Nisbet, R.. 1989. Some aspects of the 1982-1985 excavations at the aceramic coastal site of RH5 at Qurm (Muscat — Sultanate of Oman). In: Costa, P. M. and Tosi, M. (eds.), Oman Studies. Serie Orientale 63. Istituto italiano per il medio ed estremo oriente. Rome: 3146.Google Scholar
Calvet, Y. 1983. Le sondage profond en Y27 (1981). In: Huot, 1983: 1570.Google Scholar
Calvet, Y. 1987a. Le sondage X 36 de Tell el ‘Oueili. In: Huot, 1987: 3393.Google Scholar
Calvet, Y. 1987b. La phase Oueili de l'époque d'Obeid. In: Préhistoire de la Mésopotamie: 129–39. Paris, CNRS.Google Scholar
de Cardi, B. (ed.). 1978. Qatar Archaeological Report: Excavations 1973. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and Crawford, H. E. W.. 2001. The Kuwait-British archaeological expedition to as-Sabiyah: Report on the second season's work. Iraq 63: 120.Google Scholar
Cleuziou, S. and Tosi, M.. 1994. Black Boats of Magan. In: Parpola, A. and Koskikallio, P. (eds.), South Asian Archaeology 1993, vol. 2: 745–62.Google Scholar
Cleuziou, S. and Tosi, M.. 2000. Ra's al-Jinz and the prehistoric coastal cultures of the Ja'alan. Journal of Oman Studies 11: 1973.Google Scholar
Courtois, L. and Velde, B.. 1987a. Analyse à la microsonde et description matérielle de quelques céramiques Obeid 0 à Obeid 3 de Tell el Oueili. In: Huot, 1987: 121–39.Google Scholar
Courtois, L. and Velde, B.. 1987b. Observations techniques sur quelques poteries de Tell Oueili (Phases Obeid 0 à Obeid 3). In: Préhistoire de la Mésopotamie: 153–62. Paris, CNRS.Google Scholar
Dittman, R. Finkbeiner, U. and Hauptmann, H. (eds.). 1995. Beiträge zur Kulturgeschichte Vorderasiens: Festschrift für Rainer Michael Boehmer. Mainz, von Zabern.Google Scholar
Durante, S. and Tosi, M.. 1980. The aceramic middens of Ra's al-Hamra: A preliminary note. Journal of Oman Studies 3: 137–62.Google Scholar
Hall, H. R. and Woolley, C. L.. 1927. Al-'Ubaid. Ur Excavations I. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hermansen, B. D. 1993. ‘Ubaid and ED pottery from five sites at ‘Ain as-Sayh, Saudi Arabia. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 4: 126–44.Google Scholar
Hijara, I. 1997. The Halaf Period in Northern Mesopotamia. EDUBBA 6. Nabu Publications.Google Scholar
Hole, F., Flannery, K. V. and Neely, J. A.. 1969. Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Deh Luran plain. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan 1. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Huot, J.-L. (ed.). 1983. Larsa et Oueili: Traveaux de 1978-1981. Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations. Paris.Google Scholar
Huot, J.-L. (ed.). 1987. Larsa et Oueili: Rapport préliminaire. Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations, Mémoire No. 73. Paris.Google Scholar
Huot, J.-L. (ed.). 1991. ‘Oueili: Travaux de 1985. Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations. Paris.Google Scholar
Huot, J.-L. (ed.). 1996. ‘Oueili: travaux de 1987 et 1989. Editions Recherche sur les Civilisations.Google Scholar
Jasim, S. 1981. Excavation at Tell Abada, Iraq. Paléorient 7/2: 101–85.Google Scholar
Lebeau, M. 1983a. La céramique du niveau Obeid 4 de Tell el Oueili, rapport préliminaire. In Huot, 1983: 81132.Google Scholar
Lebeau, M. 1991. Les céramiques Obeid 2 et 3 de Tell el Oueili. Rapport préliminaire. In Huot, 1991: 241–66.Google Scholar
McClure, H. A. and al-Shaikh, N. Y.. 1993. Palaeogeography of an ‘Ubaid archaeological site, Saudi Arabia. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 4: 107–25.Google Scholar
Masry, A. H. 1974. Prehistory in Northeastern Arabia: The Problem of Interregional Interaction. Field Research Projects. Coconut Grove. Florida.Google Scholar
Nayeem, M. A. 1998. Qatar. Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 1976. Prehistory in Northeastern Arabia. In Antiquity: 2031.Google Scholar
Oates, J., Davidson, T. E., Kamilli, D. and McKerrell, H.. 1977. The seafaring merchants of Ur? Antiquity 51: 221–34.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 1983. Ubaid Mesopotamia reconsidered. In: Young, et al. 1983: 251–81.Google Scholar
Potts, D. T. 1995. Watercraft of the Lower Sea. In: Dittman, et al. 1998: 559–71.Google Scholar
Roaf, M. 1976. Excavations at al-Markh. In Proceedings of the Seminar for Arabian Studies 6: 144–60.Google Scholar
Rouault, O. and Waller, M.. 2000. La Djéziré et l'Euphrate syriens: De la protohistoire à la fin du Ile millénaire av. J.-C: tendances dans l'interprétation historique des données nouvelles. Subartu 7. Turnhout, Brepols.Google Scholar
Safar, F. and Lloyd, S.. 1981. Eridu. Baghdad, Ministry of Culture and Information.Google Scholar
Smith, G. H. 1978. Two prehistoric sites on Ras Abaruk, Site 4. In: de Cardi, 1978: 81106.Google Scholar
Stronach, D. 1961. Excavations at Ras al ‘Amiya. Iraq 23: 95137.Google Scholar
Theusen, I. 2000. Ubaid expansion in the Khabur. New evidence from Tell Mashnaqa. In: Rouait, and Wäfler, 2000: 71–9.Google Scholar
Uerpmann, M. 1992. Structuring the Late Stone Age of Southeastern Arabia. Arabian Archaeology and Epigraphy 3: 65109.Google Scholar
Valladas, H., Evin, J. and Arnold, M.. Datation par la méthode carbone 14 des couches Obeid 0 et 1 de Tell el Oueili (Iraq). In Huot, 1996.Google Scholar
Vosmer, T. 1996. Watercraft and navigation in the Indian Ocean: An evolutionary perspective. In: Afanas'ev, G., Cleuziou, S., Lukacs, J. and Tosi, M. (eds.). 1996. The Prehistory of Asia and Oceania. XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohostoric Sciences. Forli: 223–42.Google Scholar
Vosmer, T. 2000. Model of a third millennium reed boat based on evidence from Ra's al-Jinz. Journal of Oman Studies 11: 149–52.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L. 1956. The Early Periods. Ur Excavations IV. London.Google Scholar
Young, T. C., Smith, P. E. C. and Mortensen, P.. 1983. The Hilly Flanks and Beyond: Essays in the Prehistory of Southwestern Asia Presented to Robert J. Braidwood. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 36. Chicago. University of Chicago Press Google Scholar