Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:12:42.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The founding of Nineveh and Babylon in Greek historiography1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Menko Vlaardingerbroek
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Well, as for Nineveh, skipper, it was wiped out long ago. There's not a trace of it left, and one can't even guess where it was. Babylon's over there [pointing it out], the place with great towers and a huge wall round it — but before long it will be just as hard to find as Nineveh” (Lucianus Charon 23). Lucianus evidently did not know much about the Assyrian Empire and its capital Nineveh. The same goes for most Greek authors. Xenophon passed by Mespila, which he calls a Median city, without being aware that it was Nineveh (Xen. An. 3.4.10–12). The Greeks knew even less about the Neo-Babylonian empire, but they thought they knew quite a lot about the city of Babylon. Classical authors were especially interested in the wonders of Nineveh and Babylon and in the founding stories of both cities. Unfortunately, most texts discussing the founding of Nineveh and Babylon have been lost, but enough remains to get a picture of the development of these founding stories, which show a mixture of Babylonian and Greek elements. The founding of Nineveh is always attributed to Ninos, and the founding of Babylon sometimes to Semiramis and sometimes to Belos. When Christianity began to spread, new motifs were introduced, as historians tried to reconcile the Greek founding stories with what was said about Babylon and Nineveh in the Bible.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 66: Nineveh. Papers of the XLIXe Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Part One , 2004 , pp. 233 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2002 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I want to thank Professor R. J. van der Spek, who supervises the writing of my PhD thesis on Assyria in Greek and Israelite historiography, for his comments on an earlier version of this article.

References

Editions and translations cited

Chronicon Paschale, ed. Dindorf, Ludwig, 1832. Bonn.Google Scholar
Diodorus. The Antiquities of Asia. A Translation with Notes of Book II of the Library of History of Diodorus Siculus, trans. Murphy, Edwin, 1989. New Brunswick and Oxford.Google Scholar
Diodorus. The Library of History, trans. Oldfather, C. H., 1933. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Eusebius. Eusebius Werke. Fünfter Band. Die Chronik, trans. Karst, Josef, 1911. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lucianus. Satirical Sketches, trans. Turner, Paul, 1968. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Moses Khorenats'i. History of the Armenians, trans. Thomson, Robert W., 1978. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar
Die Pseudoklementinen. Vol. 1. Homilien, ed. Strecker, Georg, 1992. Berlin.Google Scholar
Die Pseudoklementinen. Vol. 2. Rekognitionen, ed. Strecker, Georg, 1994. Berlin.Google Scholar
“Recognitions of Clement” and “Clementine Homilies”, trans. Smith, Thomas, 1886. Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 8, ed. Roberts, Alexander and Donaldson, James. Peabody (reprinted 1994).Google Scholar
Bar-Kochva, Bezalel. 1996. Pseudo-Hecataeus. On the Jews. Legitimizing the Jewish Diaspora. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.Google Scholar
Binder, Gerhard. 1964. Die Aussetzung des Königskindes. Kyros und Romulus. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Boncquet, Jan. 1987. Diodorus Siculus (II, 1–34) over Mesopotamië. Een historische kommentaar. Brussels.Google Scholar
Bousset, Wilhelm. 1907 (1973). Hauptprobleme der Gnosis. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. 1995. “Lydia between East and West or How to Date the Trojan War: a Study in Herodotus”. The Ages of Homer: A Tribute to Emily Townsend Vermeule, ed. Carter, Jane B. and Morris, Sarah P.. Austin.Google Scholar
Burton, Anne. 1972. Diodorus Siculus. Book I. A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar
Dalley, Stephanie. 2000. Myths from Mesopotamia. Oxford.Google Scholar
Dijk, Jan van. 1962. “Die Inschriftfunde. II. Die Tontafeln aus dem rēš-Heiligtum”. UVB 18: 43–61.Google Scholar
Dillmann, August. 1892. Die Genesis. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Drews, Robert. 1965. “Assyria in Classical Universal Histories”. Historia 14: 129–42.Google Scholar
Drews, Robert. 1970. “Herodotus' Other Logoi ”. AJPh 91: 181–91.Google Scholar
Drews, Robert. 1973. The Greek Accounts of Eastern History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Drews, Robert. 1974. “Sargon, Cyrus and Mesopotamian Folk History”. JNES 33: 387–93.Google Scholar
Ebach, Jürgen. 1979. Weltentstehung und Kulturentwicklung bei Philo von Byblos. Berlin, Cologne and Mainz.Google Scholar
Eilers, Wilhelm. 1971. Semiramis. Entstehung und Nachhall einer altorientalischen Sage. Vienna.Google Scholar
Forrer, E. 1932. “Assyrien”. RLA 1: 228–303.Google Scholar
Fowler, Robert L. 2000. Early Greek Mythography. Oxford.Google Scholar
Freudenthal, J. 1875. Alexander Polyhistor und die von ihm erhaltenen Reste judäischer und samaritanischer Geschichtswerke. Hellenistische Studien 1–2. Breslau.Google Scholar
Helm, Peyton Randolph. 1980. “Greeks” in the Neo-Assyrian Levant and “Assyria” in Early Greek Writers.Google Scholar
Holladay, Carl R. 1983. Fragments from Hellenistic Jewish Authors. Volume I. Historians. Chico.Google Scholar
Hommel, F. 1921. “Zu Semiramis = Istar”. Klio 17: 286.Google Scholar
Hort, Fenton John Anthony. 1901. Notes Introductory to the Study of the Clementine Recognitions. London.Google Scholar
Huxley, George, 1965. “A Fragment of the Ἀσσύριοι λόγοι”. GRBS 6: 207–12.Google Scholar
Jacob, B. 1934. Das erste Buch der Tora. Genesis. Berlin.Google Scholar
Jeremias, Alfred. 1891. Izdubar-Nimrod. Eine altbabylonische Heldensage. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley. 1995. An Ancient Jewish Christian Source on the History of Christianity. Atlanta (Georgia).Google Scholar
Jones, F. Stanley. 2001. “Eros and Astrology in the Περίοδοι Πέτρον. The Sense of the Pseudo-Clementine Novel”. Apocrypha 12: 53–78.Google Scholar
Klengel, Horst. 1961. “Tukulti-Ninurta I., König von Assyrien”. Das Altertum 1: 67–77.Google Scholar
König, Friedrich Wilhelm. 1972. Die Persika des Ktesias. Graz.Google Scholar
Kuhrt, Amélie. 1982. “Assyrian and Babylonian Traditions in Classical Authors: A Critical Synthesis”. Mesopotamien und seine Nachbarn, ed. Nissen, Hans-Jörg and Renger, Johannes. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jozef de. 1982. “Leben und Tod assyrischer Städte nach den Berichten Xenophons”. AfO Beiheft 19: 210–14.Google Scholar
Lemche, Niels Peter. 2001. “The Old Testament — A Hellenistic Book?” In Did Moses Speak Attic? Jewish Historiography and Scripture in the Hellenistic Period, ed. Lester, L. Grabbe. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Levin, Yigal. 2002. “Nimrod the Mighty, King of Kish, King of Sumer and Akkad”. VT 52: 350–66.Google Scholar
Lewis, Brian. 1980. The Sargon Legend: A Study of the Akkadian Text and the Tale of the Hero who was Exposed at Birth. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lewy, Hildegard. 1952. “Nitokris — Naqî'a”. JNES 11: 264–86.Google Scholar
Lipinski, E. 1966. “Nimrod et Aššur”. RB 73: 77–93.Google Scholar
Machinist, Peter. 1992. “Nimrod”. ABD 4: 1116–18.Google Scholar
Oded, B. 1986. “The Table of Nations (Genesis 10) — A Socio-Cultural Approach”. ZAW 98: 14–31.Google Scholar
Pettinato, Giovanni. 1991. Semiramis. Herrin über Assur und Babylon. Munich.Google Scholar
Reade, Julian E. 2000. “Ninive (Nineveh)”. RLA 9: 388–433.Google Scholar
Sasson, Jack M. 1978. “A Genealogical » Convention « in Biblical Chronography?” VT 90: 171–85.Google Scholar
Schoeps, Hans Jochim. 1950. Aus frúhchristlicher Zeit. Religionsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Schwartz, E. 1895. “Die Königslisten des Eratosthenes und Kastor mit Excursen über die Interpolationen bei Aficanus und Eusebios”. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Seters, John van. 1992. Prologue to History. The Yahwist as Historian in Genesis. Louisville.Google Scholar
Soden, Wolfram von. 1954. Herrscher im alten Orient. Berlin, Göttingen and Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Speiser, E. A. 1967. “In Search of Nimrod”. Oriental and Biblical Studies. Collected writings of E. A. Speiser, ed. Finkelstein, J. J. and Greenberg, Moshe. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Strecker, Georg. 1981. Das Judenchristentum in den Pseudoklementinen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Toorn, Karel van der, and van der Horst, P. W.. 1990. “Nimrod before and after the Bible”. HTR 83: 1–29.Google Scholar
Uehlinger, Cristoph. 1999. “Nimrod”. DDD 627–30.Google Scholar
Vielberg, Meinolf. 2000. Klemens in den Pseudoklementinischen Rekognitionen. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wacholder, Ben Zion. 1974. Eupolemus. A Study of Judaeo-Greek Literature. Cincinnati, New York, Los Angeles and Jerusalem.Google Scholar
Hans, Waitz̦. 1904. Die Pseudoklementinen. Homilien und Rekognitionen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. 1936. “Ninos”. RE 17: 634–43.Google Scholar
Wesselius, Jan-Wim. 2002. The Origin of the History of Israel. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Zawadzki, Stefan. 1984. “Herodotus' Assyrian History”. Eos 72: 253–67.Google Scholar