Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:06:20.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FIRST STEPS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY OF ASSYRIA: BOTTA'S LETTERS AND THE “EXCAVATION HOUSE” AT KHORSABAD

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2019

B. Genç
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Paolo Emilio Botta, who was sent to Mosul as the French Consul in 1842, explored at Kuyunjik and Nebi Yunus and then began investigating ancient stone foundations at Nebi Yunus. Muhammed/Mehmed Pasha and local religious leaders, who were worried that the tomb of prophet Yunus (Jonah) and a local mosque would be destroyed by the excavations, opposed these investigations and the work stopped as a result. After Nebi Yunus, Botta started to work at Kuyunjik in December 1842. While his workers were busy at Kuyunjik, someone from the village of Khorsabad talked about stones with inscriptions and reliefs on them on top of a hill. After three months of exhaustive work at Kuyunjik, on March 20th, 1843 Botta sent a group of workers to Khorsabad for excavation. However, problems arose about Botta's work in Mosul. The Pasha of the province in particular created obstructions. We have done research in the Ottoman Archives of the Prime Ministry of Turkey on Botta's excavation permits and documents, the obstructions created by the Pasha of Mosul, the details of the story of Botta's experiences at Khorsabad and the relevant correspondence. In these archives we have found documents about the problems Botta experienced at Khorsabad, the conditions for excavation permits and the construction of an excavation house, the plan of the excavation house mentioned by Botta, which was drafted like a fortress next to the village houses and sent to Istanbul, as well as petitions of the villagers opposing Botta's work and his excavation house. Here, we attempt to re-read Botta's excavation seasons, permits and the problems he encountered through the documents in the Ottoman Archives in order to understand how this period is to be understood. Through these documents and correspondence, we were able to study the problems that arose between the Ottoman State and France as a result of Botta's excavations at Khorsabad.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 81 , December 2019 , pp. 145 - 171
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography and Abbreviations

Bahrani, Z. 2011. “Mezopotamya'nın Keşfinin Anlatılmamış Hikayesi” in Bahrani, Z., Çelik, Z., Eldem, E. (eds) Geçmişe Hücum: Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda Arkeolojinin Öyküsü 1753–1914. İstanbul: Salt/Garanti Kültür A.Ş. Pp. 125–155.Google Scholar
Bonomi, J. 1857. Nineveh and Its Palaces: The Discoveries of Botta and Layard, Applied to the Elucidation of Holy Writ. London: H. G. Bohn.Google Scholar
Botta, P.-É., Flandin, E. N. 1849. Monument de Ninive: découvert et décrit par M.P.E. Botta; mesuré et dessiné par M.E. Flandin. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Botta, P.-É., Flandin, E. N. 1850. Monument de Ninive: découvert et décrit par M.P.E. Botta; mesuré et dessiné par M.E. Flandin. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Buckingham, J. S. 1851. The buried city of the East, Nineveh: a narrative of the discoveries of Mr. Layard and M. Botta at Nimroud and Khorsabad; with descriptions of the exhumed sculptures, and particulars of the early history of the ancient Ninevite kingdom. London: Office of the National Illustrated Library.Google Scholar
Çal, H. 1997. “Osmanlı Devletinde Asar-ı Atika Nizamnameleri”. Vakıflar Dergisi, Ankara 26: 391–400.Google Scholar
Eriş, M. Ü. 2012. “Asar-ı Atika Nizamnamelerinden 2863 Sayılı Kültür ve Tabiat Varlıklarını Koruma Kanununa Mevzuatın Karşılaştırmalı Bir İncelemesi”. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü. Ankara.Google Scholar
Gates, C. 2011. Ancient Cities. The Archaeology of Urban Life in the Ancient Near East and Egypt, Greece, and Rome, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hilprecht, H. V. 1903. Explorations in Bible Lands: During the 19th Century. Philadelphia: A. J. Homan and Company.Google Scholar
Larsen, M. T. 1996. The Conquest of Assyria: Excavations in an Antique Land 1840–1860. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McGovern, F. H., McGovern, J. N. 1986. “BA Portrait: Paul Émile Botta.” The Biblical Archaeologist 49 (2): 109–113.Google Scholar
Mohl, J. 1843. “Lettres de M. Botta”. Journal Asiatique II (7): 61–72.Google Scholar
Mohl, J. 1845. Lettres de M. Botta sur ses découvertes a Khorsabad, près de Ninive. Paris: Imprimerie royale.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, C. 1778. Reisebeschreibung nach Arabien und den umliegenden Ländern, Kopenhagen: Nicolaus Möller.Google Scholar
Parrot, A. 1946. Archaeologie mesopotamienne: Les Étapes. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Rich, C. J. 1836. Narrative of a Residence in Koordistan, and on the Site of Ancient Nineveh, Vol. I-II. London: James Duncan.Google Scholar
Russell, J. M. 2017. “Assyrian Art”. In Frahm, E. (ed.) A companion to Assyria. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Pp. 453–510.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. C. 1934. “The Buildings on Quyunjiq, the Larger Mound of Nineveh.” Iraq 1 (1): 95–104.Google Scholar
Turner, G. 1970. “Tell Nebi Yūnus: The ekal māšarti of Nineveh.” Iraq 32 (1): 68–85.Google Scholar