Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:39:50.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A CONSIDERATION OF EASTWARD SPREAD OF THE SAMARRAN PHENOMENON IN THE LIGHT OF NEW EVIDENCE ALONG THE ZAGROS PIEDMONT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2020

Abstract

The Samarran phenomenon has been under discussion since the early 20th century. Over the past several decades, increasing evidence has indicated that it was geographically distributed in a very large area across the Near East. In this regard, the eastward spread of the Samarran phenomenon across the Iranian frontier was little known, because related finds had mostly been recovered in the 1960–70s. This article highlights the discovery of new evidence in the transitional zone that connects the Zagros highlands with the Mesopotamian lowlands. During recent surveys in the plains of Mehran, Meimak, Soumar and Sarpol-e Zahab, a number of sites were found. They yielded ceramics identical with those already reported from nearby late Samarran sites such as Chogha Mami, Songor A and Rihan I. Chronologically, surface materials indicate that these newly found Iranian sites should belong to the late phase of Samarran period, coinciding with the so-called Chogha Mami Transitional (CMT). As seen from the natural setting of the sites along streams, and due to the predominance of nomadic herders in this transitional zone, we may assume that transhumant herders played a role in the eastward spread of the late Samarran phenomenon via the river valleys and that the site's inhabitants might have been familiar with a primitive irrigation system. Furthermore, it is speculated that the cold dry climatic event of 8.2 kya might have resulted in an increased intensity of population in the lowlands. Nevertheless, the subsequent climatic optimum appears to have paved the way for the eastward spread of late Samarran/CMT elements. Regardless of what was the major trigger of such an expansion, however, intensive economic interactions of societies probably played a role in the very early sixth millennium B.C., when natural raw materials such as bitumen were imported from western/southwestern Iran to central/southern Mesopotamia.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 82 , December 2020 , pp. 95 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu al-Soof, B. 1968. “Tell es-Sawwan, Excavations of the Fourth Season (Spring 1967)”. Sumer 24: 315.Google Scholar
Abu al-Soof, B. 1971. “Tell es-Sawwan, Fifth Season's Excavations (Winter 1967, 1968)”. Sumer 27: 37.Google Scholar
Akkermans, P. 1989. Excavations at Tell Sabi Abyad – Prehistoric Excavations in the Balikh Valley, Northern Syria. BAR Int. Series 468. Oxford: BAR Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alibaigi, S. 2015. A Report of Archaeological Survey in the Sarpol-e Zahab Region. Iranian Center for Archaeological Research (Archive report).Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. 1994. Die Auflösung der häuslichen Produktionsweise. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Bernbeck, R. 1995. “Lasting Alliances and Emerging Competition: Economic Developments in Early Mesopotamia”. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 14: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernbeck, R. 2008. “Taming time and timing the tamed” in Córdoba, J. M., Molist, M., Pérez, M. C., Rubio, I. and Martínez, S., eds., Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, Vol. III. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, pp. 709728.Google Scholar
Blackham, M. 1996. “Further Investigations as to the Relationship of Samarran and Ubaid Ceramic Assemblages”. Iraq 58: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidwood, R. J., Braidwood, L. S., Tulane, E. and Perkins, A.L.. 1944. “New Chalcolithic Material of Samarran Type and Its Implications: A Report on Chalcolithic Material of the Samarran Type Found at Baghouz on the Euphrates, and a Reconsideration of the Samarran Material in General (Especially the Painted Pottery) in the Light of This New Material”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 3(1): 4772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidwood, R.J. 1945. “Prefatory Remarks” in Lloyd, S. and Safar, F., Tell Hassuna Excavations by the Iraq Government Directorate General of Antiquities in 1943 and 1944. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 4(4): 255259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidwood, R.J., Braidwood, L. S., Smith, J. G. and Leslie, C.. 1952. “Matarrah: A Southern Variant of the Hassunan Assemblage, Excavated in 1948”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 11: 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. A. and Philip, G., eds. 2010. Beyond the Ubaid: Transformation and Integration in the Late Prehistoric Societies of the Middle East. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 63. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Casana, J. and Glatz, C.. 2017. “The Land Behind the Land Behind Baghdad: Archaeological Landscapes of the Upper Diyala (Sirwan) River valley”. Iraq 79: 4769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connan, J. 1999. “Use and trade of bitumen in antiquity and prehistory: Molecular archaeology reveals secrets of past civilizations”. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 354 (1379): 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darabi, H., Javanmardzadeh, A., Beshkani, A. and Jami-Alahmadi, M.. 2012. “Palaeolithic Occupation of the Mehran Plain in Southwestern Iran.” Documenta Praehistorica 39: 443451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darabi, H. and Javanmardzadeh, A.. 2015. “A Survey of Prehistoric Sites in the Meimak District, Ilam Province, Western Iran”. Archäologische Mitteilungen aus Iran und Turan 47: 4961.Google Scholar
Gibson, M. 1979. “Chicago–Copenhagen Excavations at Uch Tepe, Hamrin”. Sumer 35: 461467.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, E. 1930. Die vorgeschichtlichen Töpfern von Samarra. Forschungen zur Islamischen Kunst II, Die Ausgrabungen von Samarra 5. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Hole, F. 1977. Studies in the Archaeological History of the Deh Luran Plain: The Excavation of Chaga Sefid. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hole, F. 1987. The Archaeology of Western Iran. Smithsonian Series in Archaeological Inquiry. Washington D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hole, F. 2011. “Interactions Between Western Iran and Mesopotamia from the 9th– 4th Millennia BC”. Iranian Journal of Archaeological Studies 1: 114.Google Scholar
Huot, J.-L. 1971. “Tell El Oueili”. Sumer 27: 4558.Google Scholar
Jasim, S. A. 1981. “Excavation at Tell Abada, Iraq”. Paléorient 7(2): 101104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasim, S. A. 1985. The Ubaid Period in Iraq, Recent Excavations in the Hamrin Region. BAR International Series 267. Oxford: BAR Publications.Google Scholar
Javanmardzadeh, A., Fazeli Nashli, H. and Darabi, H.. 2013. “Mehran Archaeological Project: The Village Settlements”. Archaeological Studies 5(1):1 130 (in Persian).Google Scholar
Kantor, H., Delougaz, P. and Alizadeh, A.. 1996. Chogha Mish Vol 1: The First five Seasons of Excavations, 1961–1971. Oriental Institute Publications 101. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Lebeau, M. 1985. “A First Report on Pre-Eridu Pottery from Tell El Oueili”. Sumer 44: 88108.Google Scholar
Lloyd, S. and Safar, F.. 1945. “Tell Hassuna Excavations by the Iraq Government Directorate General of Antiquities in 1943 and 1944”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 4(4): 259289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, K. 1987. “The Samarran Period at Tell Songor A” in Huot, J.-L., ed. Préhistoire de la Mésopotamie: La Mésopotamie Préhistorique et l'Exploration recent du Djbel Hamrin. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, pp. 189198.Google Scholar
Matthews, R. 2000. Early Prehistory of Mesopotamia. Subartu V. Turnhout: Brepols.Google Scholar
Mazaheri, K. M. 2018. “Ubaid Ceramic Production in the Hilly Flanks of Northwestern Posht-I Kuh (Ilam-West Iran)”. Iraq 80: 167180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merpert, N. and Munchaev, R. M. 1969. “The Investigations of the Soviet Archaeological Expedition in Iraq in the Spring 1969, Excavations at Yarim Tepe, First Preliminary Report”. Sumer 25: 125131.Google Scholar
Moghaddam, A. 2014. “Excavation at the Site of Chah-e Naft and the Survey of Northeastern Behbahan”. Report of the 13th Annual Symposium on Iranian Archaeology. Tehran: CHHTO Press, pp. 287289 (in Persian).Google Scholar
Mortensen, P. 1970. Tell Shimshara: The Hassuna Period. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Nieuwenhuyse, O. P. 1999. “Tell Baghouz Reconsidered: A collection of ‘Classic’ Samarra sherds from the Louvre”. Syria 76: 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuyse, O.P., Jacobs, L., Van As, B., Broekmans, T. and Adriaens, A. M.. 2001. “Making Samarra Fine Ware – Technological Observations on Ceramics from Tell Baghouz (Syria)”. Paléorient 27(1): 147165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nokandeh, J. 2010. “Archaeological survey in the Mehran Plain, South Western Iran” in Matthiae, P., Pinnock, F., Nigro, L. and Marchetti, N., eds., Proceedings of the 6th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, Excavations, Surveys and Restorations: Reports on Recent Field Archeology in the Near East. Volume 2. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 483509.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 1960. “Ur and Eridu, The Prehistory.” Iraq 22: 3250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J. 1968. “Prehistoric Investigations near Mandali, Iraq”. Iraq 30: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J. 1969. “Choga Mami 1967–68, A Preliminary Report”. Iraq 31: 115152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oates, J. 1984. “Ubaid Mesopotamia Reconsidered” in Young, T. C. Jr., Smith, P. E. L. and Mortensen, P., eds., The Hilly Flanks and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 251282.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 1987. “Chogha Mami Transitional” in Huot, J.-L., ed., Prehistoire de la Mesopotamie: La Mésopotamie Préhistorique et l'Exploration recent du Djbel Hamrin, Paris: CNRS, pp. 163180.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 2010. “More Thoughts on the Ubaid Period” in Carter, R.A. and Philip, G., eds. Beyond the Ubaid: Transformation and Integration in the Late Prehistoric Societies of the Middle East. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 63. Chicago: The Oriental Institute, pp. 4549.Google Scholar
Oates, J. 2013. “Samarran issues” in Nieuwenhuyse, O., Bernbeck, R., Akkermans, P. and Rogasch, J., eds., Interpreting the Late Neolithic of Upper Mesopotamia. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 407416.Google Scholar
Perkins, A. L. 1949. The Comparative Archaeology of Early Mesopotamia. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization 25. Chicago: The Oriental Institute.Google Scholar
Tekin, H. 2005. “Hakemi Use: A new discovery regarding the northern distribution of Hassunan/Samarran pottery in the Near East”. Antiquity 79, N.303, March 2005, Article number 79008 (Project Gallery).Google Scholar
Tekin, H. 2012. “The Contribution of Hakemi Use to the prehistory of Upper Mesopotamia”. In: Nieuwenhuyse, O., Bernbeck, R., Akkermans, P. and Rogasch, J., eds., Interpreting the Late Neolithic of Upper Mesopotamia. Turnhout: Brepols, pp. 493502.Google Scholar
Tekin, H. 2015. “The First Painted Potteries of the Upper Mesopotamia: Hassuna, Samarra and Halaf. New Interpretations and Approaches. Volume 1: Hassuna and Samarra. OLBA 23: 157 (in Turkish).Google Scholar