Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T01:05:43.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Arsacid Temple Records

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

The use of cuneiform as a recording medium survived in Babylonia some 500 years after the loss of political independence. Records from the Arsacid period, however, are not numerous nor have those published been subject to systematic study. The texts presented here are among the latest administrative records in cuneiform and are concerned primarily with recording the income and expenditures of the temples of Babylon. The texts were originally housed in the Bodleian library but now are kept in the Ashmolean museum. They were first described by R. Campbell Thompson in his Catalogue of the Late Babylonian Tablets in the Bodleian Library, where he described the tablets without giving copies or transliterations.

The temple accounts published here consist of an introductory statement giving the amount of the income of a certain temple for a specific period of time, which is usually either approximately one month or multiples of a month. This is followed by a list of specific expenditures and the remainder, which was then deposited or re-deposited, as the case may be, with a private banker. We know from other sources that the right to act as banker was leased by the temples for specific periods to private individuals, who put in tenders to the temple assembly for this right.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , Autumn 1981 , pp. 131 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Strassmaier edited seven texts from this archive in ZA 3 (1888), 129 ff.Google ScholarPubMed (nos. 1 and 3–8). All but the last of these were re-edited by Kennedy in CT XLIX, along with a number of new texts from the Arsacid era. Aside from transcriptions and cursory notes given by Strassmaier in his article, however, there has been no attempt to edit these texts.

2 The writer wishes to express his gratitude to the Visitors of the Ashmolean Museum for granting permission to publish these texts, and to Dr. P. R. S. Moorey of that institution for his help and courtesy, while studying the texts. He has also profited from discussions with Prof. Dr. W. Röllig of Tübingen, who offered several valuable suggestions and improvements.

3 Thompson, , CLBT, 28 f.Google Scholar It should be noted that AB 246, despite being dated on the same day as Strassmaier, , ZA 3, no. 6 (CT XLIX, 161)Google Scholar is not a duplicate.

4 CT XLIX, 160Google Scholar.

5 Cf. Oppenheim, , JNES 6 (1947), 117Google Scholar.

6 See Oppenheim, , Or NS 42 (1973), 324 ff.Google Scholar

7 See Oppenheim, , JNES 6 (1947), 117 f.Google Scholar

8 For Greek attestations, see Preisigke, , Namenbuch, 238Google Scholar.

9 Jastrow, , Dictionary of the Targumim, etc., 1255 b.Google Scholar