Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:45:33.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Archaeological Evidence for Metallurgy and Related Technologies in Mesopotamia, c. 5500–2100 B.C.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

P. R. S. Moorey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the remarkable expansion of archaeometallurgical studies in the last fifteen or twenty years Mesopotamia, where much pioneer work was done fifty years ago, has steadily slipped from view. This is in marked contrast to the time when Woolley's discoveries in the “Royal Cemetery” at Ur gave the Sumerians an assured place in general studies of early metallurgy. As research priorities in archaeometallurgy in the Near East moved to the investigation of the primary processes of metal exploitation and the development of support technologies, the source zones of Anatolia, of the Negev and Sinai, and of Iran inevitably eclipsed a region which had always been an importer of metals, to a greater or lesser degree already processed. This excluded Mesopotamia from a role as innovator in the basic techniques of metal recovery, and also probably in pioneering the skills of smelting and of alloying copper. Nor, for the same reasons, has Mesopotamia been drawn into the lively debate about the relative significance of external forces and internal transformation mechanisms in the development of metallurgy in prehistoric Europe, for which the primary eastern point of reference was Anatolia. But the certain fact that Mesopotamia had to import all her metal has kept metallurgy among the factors considered in current debates over explanatory models for the emergence of a complex society there in the later fourth and earlier third millennium B.C., some-times giving rise to conclusions hard to reconcile with the sparse archaeological record.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 44 , Issue 1 , Spring 1982 , pp. 13 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Woolley, C. L., Ur Excavations (UE hereafter) II (London, 1934), passimGoogle Scholar; Aitchison, L., A History of Metals I (London, 1960)Google Scholar, this widely ranging book summarizes the state of research and interpretation at mid century; for a first class earlier reference book see the relevant parts of Partington, J. R., The Origins and History of Applied Chemistry (London, 1935)Google Scholar. Regrettably, as many reviewers have pointed out, the books of Forbes, J. R. in the series Studies in Ancient Technology (Brill, Leiden)Google Scholar are just not con¬sistently reliable enough; the wise reader will always refer back to the basic sources quoted.

2 Renfrew, C., Proc. Prehist. Soc. 36 (1969), 12 ff.Google Scholar; Antiquity 52 (1978), 199 ff.Google Scholar; various papers in the IX Congrès, Union Internationale des Sciences Préhistoriques et Protohistoriques, Nice 1976, Colloque XXIII: Les Débuts de la Métallurgie, particularly U. Esin on Anatolia. Muhly, J. D., Supplement to Copper and Tin (Transactions of the Connecticut Academy of Arts and Sciences, no. 46, 1976), 110Google Scholar, noted the absence of a recent survey of Mesopotamian metallurgy. I am grateful to Professor Muhly for comments on the first draft of this paper.

3 Smith, C. S., Technology and Culture 11 (1970), 499Google Scholar.

4 Anatolian workshops perhaps came closest, but lifesize copper castings, for instance, are not yet evident there and the dating of crucial finds is still debated. Egyptian craft traditions were less various and inventive. See the excellent review of Anatolian evidence: de Jesus, Prentiss S., The Development of Prehistoric Mining and Metallurgy in Anatolia (BAR International Series 74, Oxford, 1980)Google Scholar.

5 Limet, H., Le Travail du métal au pays de Sumer au temps de la IIIe Dynastie d'Ur (Paris, 1960)Google Scholar deals with the earliest period for which textual evidence highlights this disparity.

6 Wright, G. A., Obsidian Analyses and Prehistoric Near Eastern Trade 7500 to 3500 B.C. (Anthropological Papers, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, no. 37, 1969)Google Scholar.

7 Hole, F., Studies in the Archaeological History of the Deh Luran Plain: The Excavation of Chaga Sefid (Ann Arbor, 1977), 21Google Scholar; on turquoise trade: Tosi, M., Studi di Paletnologia, Paleoantropologia, Paleontologia e Geologia del Quaternario 2 (1974), 147 ffGoogle Scholar. (a reference I owe to Professor Muhly).

8 For this period cf. Zwicker, U., “Investigations on the Metallurgy of Cu/Sb/As … from Norsun Tepe on the Upper Euphrates (3500–2800 B.C.) in Oddy, W. A. (ed.), Aspects of Early Metallurgy (British Museum, 1977), 13 ffGoogle Scholar.

9 Heinrich, E.et al., MDOG 105 (1973), 6 ff.Google Scholar; van Loon, M., in Ex Horreo (ed. van Beek, B. L.et al., Amsterdam, 1977), 114 ff.Google Scholar; earlier links up the Gulf are increasingly evident, Oates, J.et al., Antiquity 51 (1977), 221 ffGoogle Scholar.

10 Muhly, J. D., Iraq 39 (1977), 78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11 Hastings, A.et al., The Journal of Oman Studies (JOS) 1 (1975), 9 ff.Google Scholar; M. Tosi, ibid., 187 ff.

12 Goettler, G. W.et al., JOS 2 (1977), 43 ffGoogle Scholar. For third millennium: Hauptmann, A. and Weisgerber, G., Revue d'Archéométrie: Supplément (1981), 131 ffGoogle Scholar.

13 I have benefited particularly from reading Potts, Daniel, “Towards an integrated history of cultural change in the Arabian Gulf Area” (Harvard, 1978; manuscript)Google Scholar; now JOS 4 (1978), 29 ffGoogle Scholar.

14 Pettinato, G., Orientalia 44 (1975), 365Google Scholar; Biblical Archaeologist, 05, 1976, 44 ffGoogle Scholar.

15 Maxwell-Hyslop, R., Iraq 39 (1977), 83 ff.Google Scholar; Meeks, N. D. and Tite, M. S., Journal of Archaeological Science 7 (1980), 267 ffGoogle Scholar.

16 Prag, K. in Archaeology in the Levant: Essays for Kathleen Kenyan (ed. Moorey, R. and Parr, P. J., Warminster, 1978), 36 ff.Google Scholar; Wertime, T., Science 182 (30th 11, 1973), 883, n. 81Google Scholar, Prentiss S. de Jesus, op. cit. in note 4, 75 ff.

17 Muhly, J. D., Copper and Tin (Archon Books, Hamden, Connecticut, 1973)Google Scholar and its Supplement (see note 2 here) give comprehensive bibliography for metal trade, sources, copper and copper alloys; see also Lambert, M., RA 47 (1953), 57–69, 105–120 (Telloh)Google Scholar; Sumer 9 (1953), 198–213Google Scholar; Pettinato, G., Mesopotamia VII (1972), 43 ff.Google Scholar; see McKerrell, H., Pact 1 (1977), 167Google Scholar for late appearance of tin-bronze in Bahrein.

18 Hansman, J., Iran 10 (1972), 101 ff.Google Scholar; Reiner, E., RA 67 (1973), 57 ff.Google Scholar; on the vexed question of the source of Near Eastern tin see recently Franklin, A. D.et al. (ed.), The Search for Ancient Tin (Smithsonian Institute, Washington, 1978)Google Scholar; see Green, M., JNES 39 (1980), 16 ff.Google Scholar, for what may be references to Aratta in the “Jamdat Nasr” texts from Uruk.

19 See essays by Potts, D., Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. and Tosi, M. in Deshayes, J. (ed.), Le Plateau Iranien … à la Conquête Islamique (Paris, 1977)Google Scholar; Muhly, J. D., Supplement, 110Google Scholar.

20 UVB XVI (1960), 10, Pl. 39. 3b, 4a–dGoogle Scholar.

21 Ibid., Pl. 4d–e.

22 Nissen, H. J., Baghdader Mitteilungen 5 (1970), 110 ff. pl. VIGoogle Scholar.

23 Paléorient 2 (1974), 243 ff., esp. 893CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 Davey, C. J., Levant 11 (1979), 101 ff.Google Scholar; for tuyères see Tylecote, R. F., Levant 13 (1981), 107 ffGoogle Scholar.

25 Cros, G., Nouvelles Fouilles de Tello (Paris, 1910), 151, Fig. DGoogle Scholar; Levey, M., Chemistry and Chemical Technology in Ancient Mesopotamia (Amsterdam, 1959), 17Google Scholar.

26 Solecki, R., Antiquity 43 (1969), 311 ff.Google Scholar; Smith, C. S., Metallurgical Transactions (1975), 606–608, Fig. 2Google Scholar.

27 Çambel, H., Belleten 38 (1974), 361–7Google Scholar; Smith, C. S. in Hole, F.et al., Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Deh Luran Plain (Ann Arbor, 1969), 437 ff.Google Scholar; France-Lanord, A. and de Contenson, H., Paléorient 1 (1973), 109 ffGoogle Scholar.

28 Merpert, N. I.et al., Iraq 37 (1975), 65 ff.Google Scholar; Iraq 38 (1976), 77 ff.Google Scholar; Sumer 33 (1977), 82Google Scholar; the reference to “brass” here should read “lead”.

29 Al-a‘Damai, , Sumer 24 (1968), 59Google Scholar; also Sumer 20 (1964), p. 2Google Scholar; compare Fukai, S., Sumer 33 (1977), 48Google Scholar: from Telul eth-Thalathat, level XVa.

30 For a full metallurgical report see Sov. Arkh. 1977 (3), 154 ffGoogle Scholar. (Russian with a French resumé); on detecting native copper see Tylecote, R. F., A History of Metallurgy (London, 1976), 1 ff.Google Scholar; native copper at Talmessi in Iran contains small quantities of arsenic; the presence of small quantities of tin in an analysis may always indicate smelted not native copper; Maddin, R.et al., Journal of Archaeological Science 7 (1980), 211 ffGoogle Scholar.

31 Merpert, N. I., Sumer 33 (1977), 84, Pl. XII 2Google Scholar.

32 Mellaart, J., Çatal Hüyük (London, 1967), 217, Pl. 104Google Scholar.

33 Aitchison, L., A History of Metals I, 43, 184–5Google Scholar.

34 Tylecote, R. F., A History of Metallurgy, 5Google Scholar argues that the absence of iron silicates “suggests it is neither a crucible melting slag nor a smelting slag”.

35 Merpert, N. I., Iraq 35 (1973), 96, 102, Pl. XXXVIGoogle Scholar; cf. the Iranian evidence: Majidzadeh, Y.Paléorient 3 (1975–1977), 207 ff.Google Scholar; modifying the conclusions of Delacroix, G. and Huot, J. L., Syria 49 (1972), 35 ffGoogle Scholar.

36 Glazed pottery was a second millennium innovation in Mesopotamia, closely associated in some way with the earliest manufacture of glass vessels. The earliest certain evidence of Near Eastern smelters are open hearths, cf. R. F. Tylecote, op. cit, 6–7; Rothenberg, B.et al., Chalcolithic Copper Smelting (Institute for Archaeo-Metallurgical Studies, London, 1978)Google Scholar.

37 Tite, M. S. and Maniatis, Y., Nature, 127 (1975), 122–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Noll, W.et al., Angewandte Chemie 14 (9) (09 1975), 602–13Google Scholar (International Edition in English); Acta praehistorica et archaeologica 7/8 (1976–1977), 15 ffGoogle Scholar.

39 Merpert, N. I., Sumer 33 (1977), 95Google Scholar.

40 Mallowan, M. E. L., Iraq 2 (1935), 104CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. de Jesus, op. cit. in note 4, p. 307.

41 Smith, C. S. in Mortensen, P., Tell Shimshara: The Hassuna Period (Copenhagen, 1970), 133–4Google Scholar.

42 Mallowan, M. E. L., Iraq 3 (1936), 36–7Google Scholar.

43 Schmidt, H., Tell Halaf I (Berlin, 1943), Pl. CXIV 33–6Google Scholar.

44 Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, 193Google Scholar; Ehrich, E. (ed.), COWA, 145–6, 177Google Scholar.

45 Woolley, C. L., UE IV, 185Google Scholar: U.16981; cf. Maxwell-Hyslop, K. R., Iraq 39 (1977), 83 ffGoogle Scholar. on Sumerian gold sources.

46 Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, 813, Pl. XCVIIIa, 5–6Google Scholar.

47 Mallowan, M. E. L., Iraq 2 (1935), 104, Pl. XICrossRefGoogle Scholar.

48 Mallowan, M. E. L., LAAA 20 (1933), 145, Pl. LXVIII.5Google Scholar.

49 Woolley, C. L., UE IV, 21, Pl. 30Google Scholar; U. 14993; analysis: UE II, 391Google Scholar; for Elam, Amiet, P., Antiquity 53 (1979), 198Google Scholar.

50 Woolley, C. L., Antiquaries Journal 10 (1930), 336Google Scholar; Childe, V. G., New Light on the Most Ancient East (4th. ed., 1953), 116Google Scholar.

51 McAdams, R. and Nissen, H. J., The Uruk Countryside (Chicago, 1973), 305 ffGoogle Scholar.

52 Lloyd, S., JNES 2 (1943), Pls. XVIb, XXIXaGoogle Scholar.

53 Cf. BM 134493; 56–9–8, 137 from Ur; Genouillac, de, Fouilles de Telloh I (Paris, 1934), Pl. 44.3Google Scholar; I am grateful to Dr. E. Sollberger for permission to study the British Museum examples.

54 Woolley, C. L., UE I, Pl. XLVI: T.O.40Google Scholar.

55 BM 56–9–8, 41 (from Ur; cf. Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, Pl. XCIVdGoogle Scholar, e: (Stratum XIA); for Khuzistan see the remarks of Deshayes, J., Syria 51 (1974), 262, n. 1Google Scholar.

56 Deshayes, J., Les Outils de Bronze de l'Indus au Danube II (Paris, 1960), 408–9Google Scholar.

57 Arpachiyah: Mallowan, M. E. L., Iraq 2 (1935), 38Google Scholar; Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, 187, 193, 193 (level XVI) = 348 (level XVII)Google Scholar; Stone, J. F. S. and Thomas, L. C., Proc. Prehist. Soc. 32 (1956), 37 ff.Google Scholar; the early glazes are part of the history of pigment processing and of evolving metallurgy.

58 Lucas, A., Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries (London, 1963), 464–5Google Scholar; a single bead of uncertain context at Tall-i-Muski in Fars, Iran, may indicate very early production there: Fukai, S.et al., Marv-Dasht III (Tokyo, 1973), 65 (English), colour plate, Pl. LV.35Google Scholar.

59 Israel Exploration Journal 5 (1955), 79Google Scholar.

60 A. Lucas, op. cit., 173.

61 The possibility of some kind of “lost bitumen” technique was suggested long ago in an Elamite context (de Mecquenem, , Mémoires de la Délégation en Perse VII (1905), pp. 126–7Google Scholar), and deserves further research; for the moment I have retained the traditional explanation. Nor has the use of a “lost-lead” process in Mesopotamia ever been investigated.

62 E. Heinrich, Kleinfunde, Pl. 30d, cf. 35d; on the dating, Goff, B., Symbols of Prehistoric Mesopotamia (New Haven, 1963), 265 ffGoogle Scholar.

63 E. Heinrich, op. cit., 40, Pl. 29.

64 Ibid., 41, Pl. 30c.

65 Ibid., 28–9, Pl. 17a–b.

66 Ibid., 25, 47, Pl. 13a.

67 UVB VIII (1937), 13, 231, Pl. 23q–s, 24bGoogle Scholar.

68 UVB XIV (1958), 9, Pl. 17, 18bGoogle Scholar.

69 UVB IX (1938), 25Google Scholar; cf. UVB XV (1959), 10Google Scholar.

70 UVB III (1932), 30Google Scholar.

71 UVB VIII (1937), 53Google Scholar.

72 Heinrich, E., Kleinfunde, 47Google Scholar.

73 Adams, R. McC. and Nissen, H. J., The Uruk Countryside, 205–6Google Scholar.

74 Speiser, E., Tepe Gawra, I, 103Google Scholar.

75 Selimchanov, I. R., Germania 55 (1977), 1 ff.Google Scholar; Eaton, E. R. and McKerrell, H., World Archaeology 8 (1976), 169 ff.Google Scholar: the general conclusions are sound in respect of the restricted sample, but details are arguable and the philology is largely unacceptable; McKerrell, H., Pact 1 (1977), 138 ff.Google Scholar; also in Franklin, A. D. (ed.) The Search for Ancient Tin (Smithsonian Institute, Washington, 1978), 7 ffGoogle Scholar.

76 Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, 213, Pl. CLXXXII. 2Google Scholar.

77 Speiser, E. A., Tepe Gawra I, 102Google Scholar.

78 Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, 88, n. 30Google Scholar.

79 Tobler, A. J., Tepe Gawra II, 92, Pl. LIXb = CVIII, Fig. 65Google Scholar.

80 The dating of these graves is controversial, some scholars dating the later ones into the Early Dynastic period; for an assessment of the sequence see: Korbel, G. and Youzan, H., Baghdader Mitteilungen 10 (1979), 9 ffGoogle Scholar.

81 UE IV, 104 ffGoogle Scholar.

82 Cf. the earliest graves at Khafajah: Delougaz, P.Private Houses …, 58 ffGoogle Scholar.

83 Desch, C. H. in UE IV, 165Google Scholar.

84 Woolley, C. L., UE IV, nos. U.14439–40; 14447; 14460a; 144461a; 14497–9; 14922–4; 14952; 14969; 14980; see also U. 18570 from pit “W”Google Scholar.

85 UE IV, 30–1, Fig. 6: U.18556Google Scholar.

86 Mackay, E., Report on Excavations at Jemdet Nasr, Iraq (Chicago, 1931), passimGoogle Scholar; for analyses: Moorey, P. R. S. and Schweizer, F., Archaeometry 14 (1972), 180Google Scholar.

87 de Genouillac, , Fouilles de Telloh I (Paris, 1934), 44 f.Google Scholar; Buchanan, B., JAOS 87 (1967), 535 ffGoogle Scholar.

88 de Genouillac, , Fouilles de Telloh I, 50: two analysesGoogle Scholar.

89 Ibid., 46, Pl. 10.2–5, grave XXV.

90 Mellink, M. J. and Filip, J., Frühen Stufen der Kunst (Berlin, 1974), Pl. XII, 163Google Scholar.

91 Schenk, E. C., Gallery Notes, Albright Art Gallery, Buffalo, New Tork 17 (1953), 2 ff.Google Scholar; Rubin, I. E. (ed.), The Guennol Collection I (Metropolitan Museum, New York, 1975), 33–7, with bibliographyGoogle Scholar.

92 Cf. Barnett, R. D., Syria 43 (1966), 265 ff.Google Scholar; Nagel, W., Berl.Jb. Vorg. 8 (1968), 116Google Scholar.

93 Woolley, C. L., UE IV, 30, 63: U.14422, Fig. 9dGoogle Scholar.

94 Ibid., 66, U. 14908, Pl. 26g.

95 Delougaz, P. and Lloyd, S., Pre-Sargonid Temples in the Diyala Region (Chicago, 1942), 137, 142Google Scholar.

96 de Genouillac, , Fouilles de Telloh I, 36–7, 61Google Scholar.

97 Frankfort, H., Cylinder Seals (London, 1939), 35Google Scholar; Stratified Cylinder Seals from the Diyala Region (Chicago, 1955), Pl. 11–15Google Scholar; Protoliterate “d”; Buchanan, B., Catalogue of Ancient Near Eastern Seals in the Ashmolean Museum I: Cylinder Seals (Oxford, 1966), 15–6Google Scholar; for analyses see Moorey, P. R. S., Excavations at Kish 1923–33 (Oxford, 1978), microfiches, AppendixGoogle Scholar.

98 Burrows, E. T., UET I, 11Google Scholar; Moorey, P. R. S. and Schweizer, F., Archaeometry 14 (1972), 185 ffGoogle Scholar. for analyses; see note 77 on Gawra; the extent to which Mesopotamia used tin is a complex question for which far more analyses of both textual and arte-factual evidence are needed before conclusions like those in McKerrell, H. in Franklin, A. D. (ed.), The Search for Ancient Tin (Smithsonian Institute, Washington, 1978), 7 ffGoogle Scholar. may be accepted as proven.

99 Hall, H. R. and Woolley, C. L., UE I, graves C.52, C.83Google Scholar.

100 The Administration of Rural Production in an Early Mesopotamian Town (Ann Arbor, 1969), 77Google Scholar.

101 UE I, graves C.11, 37, 37, 46, 63, 76, 77, 92.

102 UE I, graves C.28, 91.

103 UE I, graves C.3, 37, 65, 73.

104 UE I, grave C.77.

105 UE I, graves C.3, 4, 59, 73.

106 UE I, Pl. XLVI. 2.

107 Moorey, P. R. S., Iraq 28 (1966), 38 ff.Google Scholar; in detail: Excavations at Kish, 1923–33 (Oxford, 1978)Google Scholar, catalogue on microfiches.

108 Delougaz, P., Private Houses …, 59 ff.Google Scholar; graves 1, 4, 5, 8, 18.

109 Ibid., graves 66, 67 and 83.

110 Ibid., graves 86, 87, 89, 91, 92, 94, 97, 108, 109, 110, 113, 114, 119A.

111 Watelin, L. Ch., Excavations at Kish IV, 1.XX 1–2Google Scholar; for Kish analyses: Moorey, P. R. S. and Schweizer, F., Archaeometry 14 (1972) 180 ff.Google Scholar; the stands have not been analysed.

112 Baghdad, National Museum of Antiquities, public display, 1977.

113 Berthoud, Th., Lettre d'Information Européenne, Archéologie Orientale I (05, 1980) 14Google Scholar; see p. 38 here.

114 Woolley, C. L., UE IV, 38, Pl. 29.77Google Scholar.

115 Archaeology and the Sumerian Problem (1932), 16, noteGoogle Scholar.

116 Frankfort, H., Sculpture of the Third Millennium B.C. … (Chicago, 1939), 38 ff., Pl. 98–103Google Scholar.

117 Ibid., 11, Pl. 55.

118 Ibid., 11–12, Pl. 56.

119 Ibid., 12–13, Pl. 58.

120 Ibid., 12, Pl. 54.

121 Frankfort, H., More Sculpture … (Chicago, 1943), 11, Pl. 61, 311–12Google Scholar; Baghdad, National Museum of Antiquities, public display, 1977.

122 Hall, H. R. and Woolley, C. L., UE I, passimGoogle Scholar; on technique Maryon, H.AJA 53 (1949), 99Google Scholar; and in Singer, C., A History of Technology I (Oxford, 1954), 626Google Scholar.

123 Frankfort, H., Sculpture of the Third Millennium B.C. …, 42, Pl. 104Google Scholar.

124 Berlin VA 3142: Moortgat, A., The Art of Ancient Mesopotamia (London, 1969), Pl. 53 (22·9 cm H)Google Scholar; Telloh: de Sarzec, , Découvertes en Chaldée (Paris, 1884–1913) Pl. 5 ter: 2a, b (c. 18·75 cm H; now in the Louvre)Google Scholar; City Art Museum, St. Louis, Parrot, A., Sumer (London, 1960), 186 (22·5 cm H)Google Scholar; cf. from Bahrein, Glob, P. V., Kuml (1955), 191, Fig. 1Google Scholar; other animal heads: Hilprecht, H. V., Explorations in Bible Lands (Edinburgh, 1903), 539, Fig. on 540Google Scholar; Frankfort, H., Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient, 29B (incorrectly as Nippur),Google Scholar.

125 Maryon, H., AJA 53 (1949), 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

126 Roberts, P. M., Welding and Metal Fabrication 42 (1974), 415–6, Fig. 12–13 (BM 121574)Google Scholar; also a hard solder for soldering gold lugs to a silver bowl: Lang, J. in Oddy, W. A. (ed.), Aspects of Early Metallurgy (British Museum, 1977), 169Google Scholar.

127 1974. 190; about 40 cm high; The Metropolitan Museum of Art: Notable Acquisitions, 1965–75 (New York, 1975), Fig. on p. 40Google Scholar. The technical report was prepared by Lynda Aussenberg and Pieter Meyers for Dr. Vaughn Crawford; I am much indebted to them for permission to cite it here.

128 Louvre: Contenau, G., Mon.Piot. 37 (1940), 37 ff., Pl. IVGoogle Scholar; Manuel IV, 2031, Fig. 1124Google Scholar: AO 19523; Metropolitan: Crawford, V. E., BMMFA 04, 1960, 246 ff., Fig. 6Google Scholar; Schimmel: Muscarella, O. (ed.), Ancient Art: The Norbert Schimmel Collection (Mainz, 1974), no. 106Google Scholar.

129 Ellis, R., Foundation Deposits in Ancient Mesopotamia (Yale, 1968), 46 ff.Google Scholar; an Ur-Nanshe example in the British Museum (116685) is cast copper.

130 Berlin VAT 4853: Spycket, A., Les statues de culte dans les textes mésopotamiens … (Paris, 1968), 34–5Google Scholar.

131 Woolley, C. L., UE II, chp. XIVGoogle Scholar; Maryon, H., AJA 53 (1949), 93 ff.Google Scholar; Roberts, P. M., Gold Bulletin, 6 (4), 10 1973, 112 ff.Google Scholar; Maxwell-Hyslop, K. R., Western Asiatic Jewellery c. 3000–612 B.C. (London, 1971), 1 ffGoogle Scholar.

132 de Sarzec, , Découvertes en Chaldée I (Paris, 1884–1912), 261–4, Pl. 43, 43bGoogle Scholar.

133 Tylecote, R. F., A History of Metallurgy (London, 1976), 2–3, 40Google Scholar. Now fully discussed by Waldbaum, Jane C. in Wertime, T. A. and Muhly, J. D. (ed.), The Coming of the Age of Iron (Yale, 1980), 69 ff.Google Scholar; for Samarra see Herzfeld, E., Die Ausgrabungen von Samarra II (Berlin, 1930), 5, Fig. f, Pl. 47Google Scholar.

134 Woolley, C. L., UE II, 49, 433 (U.9139)Google Scholar; the reference to the fragment from ‘Ubaid on p. 293 is not clear and might be a confusion with the PG/580 piece, as it is not mentioned in UE I; Bjorkman, J. K., Meteors and Meteorites in the Ancient Near East (Arizona State University, 1973)Google Scholar.

135 Mallowan, M. E. L., Iraq 3 (1936), 26Google Scholar; Iraq 4 (1937), 98Google Scholar; Frankfort, H., OIC 17 (1933), 56, 61–2Google Scholar; Man (1950), no. 160.

136 Mackay, E., A Sumerian Palace … (AM I.2, Chicago, 1929), 123–4Google Scholar; an iron ring was reported from a grave in the slightly later cemetery A, but not kept by the excavators.

137 Delougaz, P., Private Houses …, 198, 244Google Scholar.

138 Parrot, A., Le Temple d'Ishtar (Paris, 1956), 180–1Google Scholar; see the earlier oblique reference, Afo 12 (1937–1939), 151–2Google Scholar.

139 Limet, H., Le Travail du Métal, 29Google Scholar with comments of Sollberger, E., AfO 20 (1963), 175 ff.Google Scholar; Landsberger, B., JNES 24 (1965), 290–1, n. 25Google Scholar.

140 Delougaz, P., Private Houses …, 28Google Scholar; Delougaz, P. and Lloyd, S., Pre-Sargonid Temples …, 268, 281Google Scholar; Moortgat, A., Tell Chuera in Nordost Syrien … 1964 (Berlin, 1967), 34–5, Pl. 23Google Scholar.

141 Watelin, L. Ch., Excavations at Kish IV (Paris, 1934), Pl. XXXI. 7Google Scholar; Moorey, P. R. S., Iraq 32 (1970), 127–8, in BaghdadGoogle Scholar.

142 Woolley, C. L., UE II (London, 1934), U.13531, 13598, from graves PG/1517, 1601Google Scholar; for the cosmetic pigments in use at Ur see Bimson, M., Iraq 42 (1980), 75 ffGoogle Scholar.

143 Laurie, A. P.et al., Proc. Royal Society 89 (1914), 418–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; A. Lucas, op. cit., 340 ff.

144 In general see Lambert, M., Sumer 9 (1952), 198 ff.Google Scholar; Sumer 10 (1954), 150 ff.Google Scholar; Kramer, S. N., TheSumerians (Chicago, 1963), 73 ff.Google Scholar; Tyumenev, A. I., Ancient Mesopotamia (ed. Diakonoff, I. M.; Moscow, 1969), 70 ffGoogle Scholar. (in English).

145 Ekholm, K. and Friedman, J., in Larsen, M. T. (ed.), Power and Propaganda (Mesopotamia 7, Copenhagen, 1979), 47Google Scholar.

146 Ibid., 47; see references in note 75 here on arsenical coppers.

147 Adams, R. McC.. The Evolution of Urban Society (Chicago, 1966), 98 ffGoogle Scholar.

148 Matthiae, P., Ebla: an Empire Rediscovered (London, 1980), 172–3, 181–2Google Scholar.

149 Compare, for the Old Babylonian period, Moorey, P. R. S., Iraq 33 (1971), 61 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

150 Payne, J. C., Iraq 42 (1980), 105 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

151 An even more broadly based inquiry would be required to see how archaeological contrasts in weapon typology and grave furnishings support Diakonoff's distinction between a Late Prehistoric “military democracy” and the emergence in the Early Dynastic period of ranked troops of charioteers and heavy infantry controlled by the ruler or temple authorities, argued in Ancient Mesopotamia (Moscow, 1969), 184 ffGoogle ScholarPubMed. Professional armies were not characteristic of Mesopotamian society in antiquity.

152 Postgate, J. N., Iraq 39 (1977), 286–7, Pl. XXXIIcGoogle Scholar; note how rare spearheads and arrow-heads are in Kish “A”: Mackay, E., A Sumerian Palace and the “A” Cemetery at Kish, Mesopotamia (Chicago, 1929), 164–6Google Scholar; the count at Ur is relatively small too when it is appreciated that javelin and harpoon heads are classified in Woolley's “arrow-head” category.

153 Adams, R. McC., in Sabloff, J. A. and Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C. (eds.), Ancient Civilization and Trade (Albuquerque, 1975), 451 ffGoogle Scholar. Kohl, P. L., South Asian Archaeology, 1977 (ed. Taddei, M., Naples 1979), I, 55 ffGoogle Scholar.

154 See essays by Potts, D., Lamberg-Karlovsky, C. C., Tosi, M. and Deshayes, J. in Deshayes, J. (ed.), Le Plateau Iranien et l'Asie Centrale des Origines à la Conquête Islamique (CNRS, Paris, 1977)Google Scholar.

155 Deshayes, J., Les outils de bronze de l'Indus au Danube (IVe au IIe millénaire) (Paris, 1960), II, 178, 411Google Scholar. The history of metalworking in Iran shows many strong local traditions not yet comprehensively surveyed, except in the relatively narrow range of this book; see, in general, Moorey, P. R. S., Iran 20 (1982), in pressGoogle Scholar.

156 Maxwell-Hyslop, K. R., Western Asiatic Jewellery c. 3000–612 B.C., 36–7Google Scholar.

157 Limet, H., JESHO 15 (1972), 3–24Google Scholar; for the Ur Sargonid graves see Nissen, H. J., Zur Datierung des Königsfriedhofes von Ur (Bonn, 1966)Google Scholar.

158 Thompson, R. C., LAAA 19 (1932), 72Google Scholar: original discovery in what seems to be a late seventh century B.C. context. I am most grateful to Professor Carl Nylander for discussing this head with me, showing me detailed photographs taken during a recent exhibition of it in Europe and telling me of a recent analysis; see Nylander, C., AJA 84 (1980), 329 ffGoogle Scholar.

159 Musée de l'Ermitage, trav. du département oriental IV (Leningrad, 1947), 117–8 (English summary)Google Scholar; see also Porada, E., Ancient Iran (London, 1965), 62, Fig. 38, n. 34Google Scholar for later dating. Pope, A. U., A Survey of Persian Art (Oxford, 1939), IV, Pl. 105, 106Google Scholar: Metropolitan Museum, New York 47.100.80. I am grateful to Dr. Pieter Meyers for information on an analysis done by a commercial laboratory in 1951; the head is 34·3 cm high. The original source is unknown: Muscarella, O. in Schmandt-Besserat, D. (ed.), Ancient Persia: The Art of an Empire (Undena Publications 1979), 34–5Google Scholar.

160 A. U. Pope, op. cit., Pl. 107 (14·7 cm high).

161 Al-Fouadi, A. H., Sumer 32 (1976), 63 ff.Google Scholar; Madhloom, T., Sumer 32 (1976), 41 ff. (Arabic)Google Scholar; Raschid, F., Sumer 32 (1976), 49 ff. (Arabic)Google Scholar; Oates, J., Babylon (London, 1979), Pl. 17Google Scholar.

162 Reade, J., Iraq 30 (1968), 244–5, 249Google Scholar; Iraq 33 (1971), 98, Pl. XXVdGoogle Scholar; Iraq 35 (1973), 165, Pl. LXXVd, LXVIIIb, 167, Pl. LXVIIb, LXVIId, left, centreGoogle Scholar; see Parrot, A., Le Temple d'Ishtar (MAM I, Paris, 1956), Pl. LII.1047, p. 121Google Scholar.

163 Thompson, R. C., LAAA 38 (1931), 82Google Scholar; Beck, H. C., Antiquity 5 (1931), 427–37Google Scholar; Ancient Egypt (1934–1935), 69–83Google Scholar; (1935), 19–37; cf. Reade, J., Iraq 35 (1973), Pl. LXVIIbGoogle Scholar.

164 The yellow is particularly interesting; cf. a frog amulet of the Ur III to Isin-Larsa period from Telloh glazed yellow: de Genouillac, , Fouilles de Telloh I (1930), 182, 185Google Scholar; II (1936), 107, Fig. 4b; both yellow and red pigments are recorded at Tell Asmar, Delougaz, P., The Private Houses …, 235, 244, 247–8Google Scholar.

165 Watelin, L. Ch., Excavations at Kish IV (Paris, 1934), Pl. XXXI. 4–5Google Scholar; Haller, A., Gräber und Grüfte von Assur (Berlin, 1954), 6 ff, Pl. 7 fGoogle Scholar.

166 As possibly Beck, H. C., LAAA 20 (1933), 179–183Google Scholar, from Nineveh IV; Braidwood, R. J., Mounds in the Plain of Antioch (OIP 60, 1960), 341, Fig. 258 (Amuq G)Google Scholar; generally Beck, H. C., Ancient Egypt (1934–1935), 7 ffGoogle Scholar.

167 Starr, R. F. S., Nuzi (Camb., Mass, 1939), 380, 515Google Scholar.

168 Delougaz, P., Private Houses … (Chicago, 1967), 246: As. 31: 671Google Scholar.

169 Garner, H., Iraq 18 (1956), 147 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

170 Brill, R. H., Iraq 40 (1978), 23 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

171 See references in note 15 here.

172 Systematic laboratory study of Mesopotamian faience, frit etc. has only just begun and few results have yet been published.

173 For a general review of the Iranian evidence see Moorey, P. R. S., Iran 20 (1982), in pressCrossRefGoogle Scholar.