Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:23:29.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another recension of Išme-Dagan O: BM 114862 (CT 58 25)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Gábor Zólyomi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

BM 114862 (1921-2-12, 3) is a fragmentary one-column tablet, a copy of which was published as CT 58 25. The provenance of the tablet is unknown; it was acquired from the dealer J. E. Gejou. Its size is 6.5 × 14.5 cm. B. Alster and M. Geller, editors of CT 58, claimed (CT 58: 16) that the text preserved on the tablet is a duplicate of UM 29-15-132, a tablet from Nippur, Išme-Dagan O (2.5.4.15), published by Sjöberg (1974–5: 161–3, 172–4, 178). The present paper contains a transliteration and a translation of BM 114862 based on the author's collations. A new copy of part of the reverse (ll. 1–17) is also provided (Fig. 1).

The main conclusions of the paper are that i) BM 114862 is not an exact duplicate of UM 29-15-132, but probably a different recension of the same composition; ii) BM 114862 preserved the whole text of Išme-Dagan O, for UM 29-15-132 can be shown to be a collective tablet whose reverse preserved Išme-Dagan M (2.5.4.13) and a catchline referring to Išme-Dagan B (2.5.4.02); iii) Išme-Dagan O was probably a tigi of Ninurta.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 63 , 2001 , pp. 139 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, Jeremyet al. (1998–), The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (http://www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/). Oxford.Google Scholar
Cavigneaux, Antoine and Al-Rawi, Farouk N. H. (2000), Gilgameš et la Mort. Textes de Tell Haddad VI, avec un appendice sur les textes funéraires sumériens (Cuneiform Monographs, 19). Groningen: Styx Publications.Google Scholar
Cooper, Jerrold S. (1978), The Return of Ninurta to Nippur: an-gim dim2-ma (AnOr 52). Roma: Pontificum Institutum Biblicum.Google Scholar
Cooper, Jerrold S. (forthcoming), “Right Writing: Talking about Sumerian Orthography and Texts”, Acta Sumerologica 22.Google Scholar
Dijk, J. J. A van (1960), Sumerische Götterlieder, II. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Flückiger-Hawker, Esther (1999), Urnamma of Ur in Sumerian Literary Tradition (Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis, 166). Fribourg, Suisse: Editions Universitaires / Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark Glenn (1985), A Study of the Sumerian Moon-God, Nanna/Suen. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Römer, W. H. Ph. (1965), Sumerische “Königshymnen” der Isin-Zeit (Documenta et Monumenta Orientis Antiqui, 13). Leiden: E. J. Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöberg, Åke W. (1973), “Nungal in the Ekur”, AfO 24, 19–46.Google Scholar
Sjöberg, Åke W. (1974–1975), “Miscellaneous Sumerian Texts, I”, OrSuec 23–4, 159–81.Google Scholar
Tinney, Steve (1996), The Nippur Lament. Royal Rhetoric and Divine Legitimation in the Reign of Išme-Dagan of Isin (1953–1935 B.C.) (OPSNKF 16). Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Zólyomi, Gábor (forthcoming), “Structural Interference from Akkadian in Old Babylonian Sumerian”, Acta Sumerologica 22.Google Scholar