Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:37:07.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Olga Chekhovich: Two Facets of a Soviet Academic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Ulfatbek Abdurasulov*
Affiliation:
Institute of Iranian Studies, Academy of Sciences, Austria

Abstract

The essay focuses on the personality and work of Olga Dmitrievna Chekhovich (1912–1982), an eminent Soviet and Uzbekistani scholar of mediaeval history whose entire academic career was spent in Tashkent. Based upon on the documents of her personal archive I try to reconstruct Chekhovich’s two facets - a Communist Party propagandist and a scholar. In doing so, I argue that the two facets of Olga Chekhovich are not oppositional but rather complementary; insofar as, taken together, they constitute a holistic image of a Soviet Oriental Studies scholar in the particular social and political space. What we see as duplicity was in fact a consistent form of the scholar’s self-presentation both within the academic community and in the social milieu beyond it. It let the scholar safely stay within the confines of the social and political system, becoming an integral part of it; and at the same time shape her or his own social and intellectual space within which she or he could advance and defend her or his positions, opinions, and views. In the larger scheme of things, this case study lets us address the question of whether one can view the Soviet school of Oriental studies as ideologically uniform, isolationist, and conforming solely to the directives of the ‘center’. The overall picture appears even more complicated if we pay more attention to the contradictory nature of Oriental studies—the various currents and struggles, the movement of scholars between center and periphery, their familiarity with scholarly works produced in the West, as well as a certain degree of autonomy from ideology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Iranian Studies 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alimova, D., and Abdurasulov, U., eds. Akademia nauk v intellektual'noi istorii Uzbekistana. Tashkent: Yangi nashr, 2012.Google Scholar
Akramova, K., and Akramov, N., Vostokoved Mikhail Stepanovich Andreev (nauchno-biograficheskii ocherk). Dushanbe: Irfon, 1973.Google Scholar
Arends, A. K., Khalidov, A. B., Khalidov, A. S., and Chekhovich, O. D.. Bukharskii vakf XIII v.: facsimile. Moscow: Nauka, 1979.Google Scholar
Babadzhanov, B. M.K voprosu o vospriiatii statusa sufiiskogo sheikha (na primere Khoja Ahrara).” In Arabia Vitalis: Arabskii vostok, islam, drevniaia Araviia, edited by Sedov, A. V. and Smilianskaia, I. M., 177190. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 2005.Google Scholar
Babadzhanov, B. M.Andidzhanskoe vosstanie 1898 goda i ‘musul'manskii vopros’ v Turkestane (vzgliady ‘kolonizatorov’ i ‘kolonizirovannykh’).” Ab Imperio, no. 2 (2009): 155200.Google Scholar
Boldyrev, A. N.Eshche raz k voprosu o Khoja Ahrare.” In Dukhovenstvo i politicheskaia zhizn’ na Blizhnem i Srednem Vostoke v period feodalizma, edited by Kim, G. F., Girs, G. F., and Davidovich, E. A., 4763. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 1985.Google Scholar
Braginskii, I., Radzhabov, S., and Romodin, V.. “K voprosu o znachenii prisoedineniia Srednei Azii k Rossii.” Voprosy istorii, no. 8 (1953): 1432.Google Scholar
Bregel, Y. E., ed. Dokumenty arkhiva khivinskikh khanov po istorii i etnografii karakalpakov. Introduction, annotated and translated by Bregel, Y. E.. Moscow: Nauka, 1967.Google Scholar
Cahen, Claude, and Mohammed, Khadr. “Deux Actes de waqf d'un Qarakhanide d'Asie Centrale, avec une introduction par Claude Cahen.” Journal Asiatique 255 (1967): 305334.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D. Dokumenty k istorii agrarnykh otnoshenii v Bukharskom khanstve: Akty feodal'noi sobstvennosti na zemliu XVII–XIX v. Edited and translated, with an introduction and comments by Chekhovich, O. D.. Tashkent: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk UzSSR, 1954.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D.Bukharskiie pozemel'nye akty XVI–XIX v.” In Problemy istochnikovedeniia, edited by Novosel'skii, A. A., 223242. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1955.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D.O nekotorykh voprosakh istorii Srednei Azii XVIII–XIX vv.” Voprosy istorii, no. 3 (1956): 8495.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D. Bukharskie dokumenty XIV veka. Tashkent: Izdatel'stvo ‘Nauka’ Akademii nauk UzSSR, 1965.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D.K istorii feodal'nykh otnoshenii v Bukhare XVII v.” In Materialy po istorii Uzbekistana, edited by Ziiaev, Kh. Z., Rashidov, G., and Akilov, K. A., 314. Tashkent: Fan, 1973.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D. Samarkandskie dokumenty XV–XVI vv. (O vladenii Khoja Ahrara v Srednei Azii i Afganistane). Edited and translated, with comments and introduction by Chekhovich, O. D.. Moscow: Nauka, 1974.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D.K voprosu o vospitatele Ulugbeka.” In Iz istorii nauki epokhi Ulugbeka, edited by Arends, A.K., 1018. Tashkent: Fan, 1979.Google Scholar
Chekhovich, O. D.Istoriia razvitiia aktov yuridicheskogo oformleniia feodal'nykh otnoshenii v Srednei Azii XII–XVI vv.” Unpublished manuscript, Tashkent, 1979.Google Scholar
Germanov, ValeriiSheikh Turkestana. Vostokoved A. A. Semenov.” Vostok svyshe: Dukhovnoe i literaturno-istoricheskoe izdanie, no. 3. Tashkent, (2002): 6569.Google Scholar
Horst, Heribert. Die Sttatsverwaltung der Grosselǧuqen und Ḫāraẕmšāhs (1038 – 1231), Eine Untersuchung Nach Urkundenformularen der Zeit von Heribert Horst. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH, 1964.Google Scholar
Ivanov, P. P. Arkhiv khivinskikh khanov XIX v. Issledovaniie i opisaniie dokumentov s istoricheskim vvedeniem. Leningrad, 1940.Google Scholar
Materialy ob'edinennoi nauchnoi sessii, posviashchennoi istorii Srednei Azii i Kazakhstana v dorevoliutsionnyi period. Tashkent: Akademiia nauk UzSSR, 1955.Google Scholar
Mohamed, Khadr. “Deux actes de waqf d'un Qarahanide d'Asie Centrale avec une introduction par Claude Cahen”, Journal Asiatique, CCLV (1967): 305334.Google Scholar
Mukhtarov, A. Materialy po istorii Ura-Tiube: Sbornik aktov XVII–XIX v. Translated with an introduction by A. Mukhtarov. Moscow: Vostochnaia literatura, 1963.Google Scholar
Nationalism and Progress.” Central Asian Review V, no. 1 (1957): 14.Google Scholar
Rybakov, Anatoli. Deti Arbata. Tashkent: Izdatel'stvo imeni Gafura Gulyama, 1989.Google Scholar
Wakin, Jeannete A., ed. The Function of Documents in Islamic Law: The Chapters on Sales From Ṭaḥawī’s Kitāb al-Shurūṭ al-Kabīr. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Yegani, A. A., and Chekhovich, O. D.. “Regesty sredneaziatskikh aktov (s fotovosproizvedeniiem publikuemykh vpervye).” In Pis'mennye Pamiatniki Vostoka: Istoriko-filologicheskiie issledovaniia: Ezhegodnik: 1974, 5763. Moscow: Nauka, 1981.Google Scholar