Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:40:04.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Afghanistan and the Opium World Market: Poppy Production and Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Hermann Kreutzmann
Hermann Kreutzmann*
Affiliation:
Department of Geographic Sciences and Centre for Development Studies Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Afghan poppy cultivation is presented here as a case in point to exemplify the linkages between external influences and local effects. World market and power relations have influenced cultivation patterns, processing, and trafficking. At the same time, poppy cultivation pinpoints an internal development which is strongly linked to deteriorating state control, warlordism, and regional power politics. Opium production has served as a major source of revenue for the upholding of disparate political structures which reflect the present political map of Afghanistan. Poppy cultivation in Afghanistan gained a substantial push during the last quarter century, from an annual production of 200 tons in 1979 to 4,200 tons in 2004, making use of former development efforts in creating irrigated oases in Helmand and Nangarhar. Prices rose after the Taliban's 2001 ban on production, raising farmers' incomes substantially and turning opium into an unrivalled cash crop. Fairly new production zones have been added in recent times; for example, Badakhshan—the stronghold of the Northern Alliance—has gained the third position with major increases in the last few years. Afghanistan's poppy cultivation and opium production has to be interpreted in terms of globalization and fragmentation. Drug trafficking affects the neighboring states, namely, Iran, Tajikistan, and Pakistan, as they function as consumer markets as well as trade routes for contraband drugs heading towards the West. Consequently, the Afghan poppy cultivation is interpreted in a holistic manner.

Type
Research Article
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , December 2007 , pp. 605 - 621
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Iranian Studies 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Braudel, F., Civilisation matérielle, économique und capitalisme, Xve-XVIIIe siècle. Le temps du monde (Paris, 1979)Google Scholar; Chaudhuri, K. N., The Trading World of Asia and the English East India Company 1600–1760 (Cambridge, 1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Crosby, A. W., Ecological Imperialism. The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900–1900 (Cambridge, 1986Google Scholar); Fieldhouse, D. K., The West and the Third World: Trade, Colonialism, Dependence and Development (Oxford, 1999)Google Scholar; Frank, A. G., ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wallerstein, I., The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York, 1974)Google Scholar; Wallerstein, I., “Evolution of the Modern World System,” ed. Preyer, G., Strukturelle Evolution und das Weltsystem. Theorien, Sozialstruktur und evolutionäre Entwicklung (Frankfurt/Main, 1998), 305–315Google Scholar; Wolf, E. R., Europe and the People Without History (Berkeley, Los Angeles, 1982)Google Scholar.

2 Mintz, S., Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History (Battleboro, VT, 1985)Google Scholar; Rothermund, D., Europa und Asien im Zeitalter des Merkantilismus (Darmstadt, 1978)Google Scholar; Trocki, C. A., Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy. A Study of the Asian Opium Trade 1750–1950 (London and New York, 1999)Google Scholar.

3 Trocki, C. A., Opium, Empire and the Global Political Economy. A Study of the Asian Opium Trade 1750–1950 (London and New York 1999), 187Google Scholar.

4 Zheng, Yangweng, “The Social Life of Opium in China, 1483–1999,” Modern Asian Studies 37 (2003), 1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5 Chaudhuri, K. N., “Foreign Trade and Balance of Payments (1757–1947),” The Cambridge History of India. vol. 2: c.1757–c.1970 (Cambridge, 1982), 846CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Kreutzmann, H., “The Chitral Triangle: Rise and Decline of Trans-montane Central Asian Trade, 1895–1935,” Asien-Afrika-Lateinamerika 26 no. 3 (1998), 289–327Google Scholar; Millward, J., Beyond the Pass. Economy, Ethnicity, and Empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759–1864 (Stanford, 1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Goodhand, J., “From Holy War to Opium War? A Case Study of the Opium Economy in North Eastern Afghanistan,” Central Asian Survey 19, no. 2 (2000): 265:280CrossRefGoogle Scholar: McCoy, A. W., “Requiem for a Drug Lord. State and Commodity in the Career of Khun Sa,” in States and illegal practices, ed. Heyman, J. (Oxford, 1999) 126:168Google Scholar.

8 UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2006 (Vienna, 2006).

9 UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2006 (Vienna, 2006), 212.

10 Chouvi, P., “Narco-terrorism in Afghanistan,” in The Jamestown Foundation Terrorism Monitor 2, no. 6 (2004) 1–4Google Scholar.

11 Rashid, A., Taliban, Islam, Oil and the New Great Game in Central Asia (London, 2000)Google Scholar; Rubin, B., “The Political Economy of War and Peace in Afganistan,” World Development 28, no. 10 (2000) 1789–1803CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Rashid, Taliban, 117–127.

13 UNDCP, United Nations International Drug Control Programme (1999), “Afghanistan,” Annual Opium Poppy Survey 1999 (Islamabad, 1999); UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003); UNODC b, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Afghanistan. Opium Survey 2003 (Vienna, 2003); UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2006 (Vienna, 2006).

14 UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003), 40.

15 Humlum, J., La géographie de l'Afghanistan (Copenhague, 1959), 237Google Scholar.

16 Waller, P. P., “Vorläufiger Bericht über eine Reise nach Afghanistan (Hilmend-und Nangahar-Bewässerungsprojekte),” Die Erde 91, no. 1 (1967), 61–70Google Scholar.

17 UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003), 45-47.

18 UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2006 (Vienna, 2006), 213.

19 UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2006 (Vienna, 2006), 211.

20 MCN & UNODC, Ministry of Narcotics & United Nations International Drug Control Programme, Afghanistan Opium Rapid Assessment Survey February 2006 (Kabul, 2006).

21 Giustozzi, A., “The Debate on Warlordism: The Importance of Military Legitimacy,” Crisis States Discussion Papers 13 (London, 2005)Google Scholar, fig. 2.

22 Cf. UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003).

23 UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Afghanistan. Opium Survey 2004 (Vienna, 2004).

24 UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, Afghanistan. Opium Survey 2004 (Vienna, 2004), 111.

25 UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003), 8.

26 UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003), 8.

27 UNODC, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, World Drug Report 2006 (Vienna, 2006), 212.

28 Felmy, S. & Kreutzmann, H., “Wakhan Woluswali in Badakhshan. Observations and Reflections from Afghanistan's Periphery,” Erdkunde 58, no. 2 (2004), 97–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Mansfield, D., “Coping Strategies, Accumulated Wealth and Shifting Markets. The Story of Opium Poppy Cultivation in Badakhshan 2000–2003,” AKDN (Geneva, 2004)Google Scholar.

30 Cf. UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003), 13.

31 UNODC a, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, The Opium Economy of Afghanistan. An International Problem (New York, 2003), 15.

32 Adolf, M., “Opiumökonomie Afghanistan,” in Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, no. 1 (2006), 75–81Google Scholar.

33 Adolf, M., “Opiumökonomie Afghanistan,” in Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, no. 1 (2006), 79Google Scholar.

34 Adolf, M., “Opiumökonomie Afghanistan,” in Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik, no. 1 (2006), 81Google Scholar.

35 Mansfield, D. and Pain, A., “Alternative Livelihoods: Substance or Slogan?” AREU Briefing Paper (Kabul, 2005)Google Scholar.