Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:33:31.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conflicting Worldviews: Shaykh Aḥmad al-Aḥsāʾī’s Risālat al-Rashtīyah and the Problematic of Akbarīan Mysticism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Leila Chamankhah
Leila Chamankhah*
Affiliation:
University of Dayton, Ohio, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Since its earliest exposure to Iranian Sufis in the mid-seventh century, Ibn ʿArabī’s mysticism has been the subject of lively discussion and examination. It has also left its imprint on many intellectual tendencies, particularly Sufism, esotericism and ḥikmat discourse. The way Ibn ʿArabī’s books were read, interpreted and commented upon by his Iranian followers is indicative of the fact that al-Shaykh al-Akbar was too grand a figure to ignore. Even scholars such as Shaykh Aḥmad al-Aḥsāʾī (d. 1241 AH/1826), who never hesitated in showing his distaste for Mumīt al-Dīn Ibn ʿArabī in one way or another, was influenced by his discourse. However, despite the general interest of a few scholars in al-Aḥsāʾī’s so-called “love–hate relationship” with Akbarīan mysticism, our knowledge of the nature of this relationship is quite limited. Different dimensions need to be examined to see how these two apparently conflicting worldviews understood mysticism and its fundamental tenets, including the doctrines of wilāya, theophany (tajallī), tawḥīd and divine knowledge. This article cites and analyzes al-Aḥsāʾī’s key texts, focusing on Risālat al-Rashtīyah, to examine how he understands Akbarīan mysticism, and how he develops his alternative by emphasizing a definition of the correct mysticism (maʿrifah/gnosis) in its relation to the teachings of the imāms. It explains how by distancing himself from Sufism in general, and from Ibn ʿArabī’s mysticism in particular, al-Aḥsāʾī seeks to draw the boundaries of the Shaykhī cause, not only as the true representative of Twelver Shīʿīsm, but also as the arch enemy of Ibn ʿArabī’s teachings that were but misunderstandings of Islam and of the teachings of the imāms.

Keywords

Ibn ʿArabīShaykh Aḥmad al-AḥsāʾīAkbarīan MysticismShaykhī SchoolRisālat al-Rashtīyah
Type
Hermeneutics and Religious Texts
Information
Iranian Studies , Volume 54 , Issue 3-4 , July 2021 , pp. 521 - 547
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author is very grateful to anonymous readers and the editors of Iranian Studies who provided her with invaluable comments during different stages of the review and publication process.

References

Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. Sharḥ al-Zīyārat al-Jāmiʿat al-Kabīrah [Commentary on the Grand Comprehensive Visitation]. Vol. 1. Beirut: Dār al-Mufīd Publication, 1420/1999.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. Sharḥ al-Zīyārat al-Jāmiʿat al-Kabīrah [Commentary on the Grand Comprehensive Visitation]. Vol. 2. Beirut: Dār al-Mufīd Publication, 1420/1999.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Al-Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim. Vol. 1. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr Publication, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Al-Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim. Vol. 5. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr Publication, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. “Fihrist al-Risāla fī Jawāb al-Shaykh Aḥmad ibn Ṣāliḥ ibn Ṭawq ʿAn Khamsa ʿAsharah Masʾalah” [Index of the Treatise in Response to al-Shaykh Aḥmad ibn Ṣāliḥ ibn Ṭawq in Finfteen Questions]. In Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim [Comprehensive Words]. Vol. 8, 5–29. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. “Risāla fī Jawāb al-Shaykh Ramadhān ibn Ibrāhīm” [Treatise in Response to al-Shaykh Ramadhān ibn Ibrāhīm]. In Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim [Comprehensive Words]. Vol. 1, 153–171. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. “Risāla fī Sharḥ al-Risālat al-ʿilmīyyah Lil Mullā Muḥsin Fayḍ” [Treatise in the Explanation of the Epistle of Knowledge of Mullā Muḥsin Fayḍ]. In Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim [Comprehensive Words]. Vol. 2, 18–121. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. “Jawāb al-Mullā Kāẓim al-Simnānī” [A Response to Mullā Kāẓim al-Simnānī]. In Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim [Comprehensive Words]. Vol. 2, 283–318. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. “Jawāb al-Mullā Muḥammad Rashtī” [A Response to Mullā Muḥammad Rashtī]. in Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim [Comprehensive Words]. Vol. 2, 357–378. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Al-Aḥsāʾī, Aḥmad. “Risālat al-Rashtīyah” [The Rashtī Treatise]. In Jawāmiʿ al-Kalim [Comprehensive Words]. Vol. 8, 309–457. Baṣra: Al-ghadīr, 1430/2009.Google Scholar
Amanat, Abbas. Resurrection and Renewal: The Making of the Babi Movement in Iran, 1844–1850. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali. Spirituality of Shi’i Islam; Beliefs and Practices. London: I. B. Tauris and Institute of Ismaili Studies, 2011.Google Scholar
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali. “Remarques sur les critères d’authenticité du hadîth et l’autorité du juriste dans le shiʿisme imâmite.” Studia Islamica 85 (1997): 5–39. doi: 10.2307/1595870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amir-Moezzi, Mohammad Ali, and Jambet, Christian. What Is Shīʿī Islam? An Introduction. Trans. Casler, Kenneth and Ormsby, Eric. London: Routledge, 2018.Google Scholar
Anzali, Ata. Mysticism in Iran: the Safavid Roots of a Modern Concept. Columbia: The University of South Carolina Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babayan, Kathryn. “Sufis, Dervishes and Mullas: the Controversy over Spiritual and Temporal Dominion in Seventeenth-Century Iran.” In Safavid Persia, the History and Politics of an Islamic Society, ed. Melville, Charles, 117–138. London: I. B. Tauris in association with the Centre of Middle Eastern Studies, University of Cambridge, 1996.Google Scholar
Bausani, Alessandro. “Al-Aḥsāʾī.” 2012. https://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-2/al-ahsai-SIM_0435?s.num=9&s.rows=20&s.f.s2_parent=s.f.book.encyclopaedia-of-islam-2&s.q=BausaniGoogle Scholar
Bayat, Mangol. Mysticism and Dissent: Socioreligious Thought in Qajar Iran. New York: Syracuse University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Burns, Dylan M. “Gnosticism, Gnostics and Gnosis.” In The Gnostic World, ed. Trompf, Garry W., Gunner B. Mikkelsen, Jay Johnston, 9–26. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Chamankhah, Leila. “Wilāya in the Shīʿa Islam.” In Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion, ed. Leeming, D.. Berlin: Springer, 2018.Google Scholar
Chamankhah, Leila. The Conceptualization of Guardianship in Iranian Intellectual History (1800–1989); Reading Ibn ʿArabī’s Theory of Wilāya in the Shīʿa World. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019, 115–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chittick, William C. “Rūmī and Waḥdat al-Wujūd.” In Poetry and Mysticism in Islam: The Heritage of Rūmī, ed. Banani, Amin, Hovannisian, Richard, and Sabagh, Georges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Chittick, William C. “Waḥdat al-Wujūd.” In Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World, ed. Martin, Richard C.. Vol. 2. New York: Mcmillan Reference USA, 2004.Google Scholar
Chodkiewicz, Michel. Seal of the Saints: Prophethood and Sainthood in the Doctrine of Ibn ʿArabī. Cambridge: Islamic Text Society, 1993.Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry. Spiritual Body and Celestial Earth from Mazdean Iran to Shiite Iran, trans. Nancy Pearson, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Corbin, Henry. Maktab-i Shaykhī az Ḥikmat-i Ilāhī-ya Shīʿī [L’ecole Shaykhie en Theologie Shìite]. Trans. and intro. Bahmanyār, Aḥmad. n.p.: Tābān Publication, 1346/1967.Google Scholar
Dagli, Caner K. Ibn al-ʿArabī and Islamic Intellectual Culture: From Mysticism to Philosophy. London: Routledge, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dajani, Samer M.K. “Ibn ʿArabī’s Conception of Ijtihād: Its Origins and Later Reception.” PhD diss., SOAS, University of London, 2015.Google Scholar
Eschraghi, Armin. “Kāẓem Raŝti.” 2013. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/kazem-rasti-sayyedGoogle Scholar
Hamid, Idris Samawi. “Shaykh Aḥmad al-Aḥsāʾī.” In Philosophy in Qajar Iran, ed. Pourjavady, Reza, 66–124. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Hamid, Idris Samawi. “The Metaphysics and Cosmology of Process According to Shaykh Ahmad Ahsai.” PhD diss., State University of New York, 1998.Google Scholar
Hermann, Denis. Kirmānī Shaykhism and the Ijtihād: A Study of Abū al-Qāsim Khān Ibrāhīmī’s Ijtihad Wa Taqlid .Bibliotheca academica, Reihe Orientalistik, Band 24. Wurzburg: Ergon-Verlag GmbH, 2015.Google Scholar
Hermann, Denis. “Shaykhism.” 2017. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/shaykhismGoogle Scholar
Ibn ʿArabī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī ibn Muḥammad. Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam [Bezels of Wisdom]. Ed. ʿAfīfī, Abu al-ʿAlā. 2 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī, 1423/2002.Google Scholar
Ibn Taymīyyah, Aḥmad. Minhāj al-Sunnat al-Nabawīyyah fī Naqdh Kalām al-Shīʿa wa al-Qadarīyyah [The Righteous Path of the Prophetic Tradition in Refuting the Ideas of (Twelver) Shīʿīsm and of Qadarīyyah]. Ed. Sālim, Muḥammad Rashād. 9 Vols. n.p.: Jāmiʿat al-Imām Muḥammad ibn Suʿūd al-Islāmīyyah, 1406/1986. http://waqfeya.com/book.php?bid=589Google Scholar
Ibrāhīmī, Zayn al-ʿĀbidīn. “Aḥsāʾī.” 1373 Shamsī. https://www.cgie.org.ir/fa/publication/entryview/3983.Google Scholar
Ibrāhīmī, Abu al-Qāsim Khān. “Fihrist-i Kutub-i Mashāyikh-i ʿIẓām.” 1388/1969. https://www.alabrar.info/library/FHRSTJ1.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Toshihiko. Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study of Key Philosophical Concepts of Ibn ‘Arabi and Lao-tzu and Chuang-tzu. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1983.Google Scholar
Karbāsī Zādih Iṣfahānī, ʿAlī. Ḥakīm Mutiʾallih Bīdābādī: Iḥyāgar-i Ḥikmat-i Shīʿa dar Qarn-i Davāzdahum-i Hijrī [The Theologian Ḥakīm Bīdābādī: The Reviver of the Shīʿa Ḥikmat in the Twelfth Century]. Tehran: Pazhūhishgāh ʿUlūm-i Islāmī wa Muṭāliʿāt-i Farhangī, 1381/2009.Google Scholar
Kazemi Moussavi, Ahmad. Religious Authority in Shiite Islam: From the Office of Mufti to the Institution of Marja. Kuala Lumpur: International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 1996.Google Scholar
Kirmānī, Muḥammad Karīm. Irshād al-ʿAwām [The Guidance of Masses]. Vol. 4. n.p.: n.p., 1267/1850.Google Scholar
Knysh, Alexander D. Ibn ʿArabi in the Later Islamic Tradition: The Making of a Polemical Image in Medieval Islam. Albany: State University of New York, 1999.Google Scholar
Al-Kulaynī Al-Rāzi, Abū Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Yaʿqūb ibn Isḥāq. Kitāb al-Kāfī [The Sufficient Book]. 6 vols. Edition and intro. Muḥammad Bāqir Kamaraʾī. Qum: Uswah Publication, 1375 Shamsī.Google Scholar
Lawson, Todd. “Orthodoxy and Heterodoxy in Twelver Shīʿīsm: Aḥmad Aḥsāʾī on Fayḍ Kāshānī (the Risālat al-ʿIlmiyya).” In Religion and Society in Qajar Iran, ed. Gleave, Robert, 127–154. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Lewisohn, Leonard. “A Socio-Cultural Profile of Sufism from the Dhahabī Revival to the Present Day.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 62, no. 1 (1999): 36–59. doi: 10.1017/S0041977X00017559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEoin, Denis M. The Messiah of Shiraz. Vol. 3. Leiden: Brill, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacEoin, Denis M. “Ahsai, Shaikh Ahmad.” 2011. http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/ahsai-shaikh-ahmadGoogle Scholar
Milani, Milad. “Classic Sufism and Gnosis.” In The Gnostic World, ed. Trompf, Garry W., Mikkelsen, Gunner B., Johnston, Jay, 328–337. London: Routledge, 2019.Google Scholar
Nabīl Zarandī, Mullā Muḥammad. The Dawn-Breakers: Nabīl’s Narrative of the Early Days of the Bahāʾī Revelation. Trans. and ed. Effendi, Shoghi. Wilmette, IL: Bahāʾī Publishing Trust, 1970.Google Scholar
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. Islamic Philosophy from its Origin to the Present. New York: State University of New York Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein, Dagli, Caner K., Dakake, Maria Massi, Lumbard, Joseph E. B., eds. The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary. New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 2015.Google Scholar
Newman, Andrew J. The Formative Period of Twelver Shīʿīsm: Ḥādīth and Discourse between Qum and Baghdad. London: Routledge, 2000.Google Scholar
Newman, Andrew. “The Limits of ‘Orthodoxy’? Notes on the Anti-Abū Muslim Polemic of Early 11th/17th-Century Iran.” in Shi’i Islam and Sufism, Classical Views and Modern Perspectives, ed. Hermann, Denis and Terrier, Mathieu, 65–119. London: I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies. Kindle edition, 2020.Google Scholar
Papas, Alexandre. “The Khāksār Shi‘i Sufi Order: An Updated Introduction.” In Shi’i Islam and Sufism, Classical Views and Modern Perspectives, ed. Hermann, Denis and Terrier, Mathieu, 291–304. London: I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies. Kindle edition,2020.Google Scholar
Nasrollah, Pourjavady. “Opposition to Sufism in Twelver Shiism.” In Islamic Mysticism Contested: Thirteen Centuries of Controversies and Polemics, ed. Jong, Frederick De and Radtke, Bernd, 614–623. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar
Qumī, Muḥammad ibn ʿAlī ibn al-Ḥussayn ibn Babawayh. Man lā Yaḥẓaruhu-l-Faqīh [For Him Who is Not in the Presence of a Jurisconsult]. 4 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Aẓwāʾ, 1405/1984.Google Scholar
Rashtī, Kāẓim. Risālat al-Ḥujjat al-Bālighah [Treatise of Certain Proof]. n.p.: n.d.Google Scholar
Rashtī, Kāẓim. Maqāmat ul-ʿĀrifīn [The Stations of the Mystics]. n.p: n.d.Google Scholar
Rashtī, Kāẓim, Dalīl al-Mutaḥayyarīn [Proof of the Astonished]. n.p: n.d.Google Scholar
Ridgeon, Lloyd. “‘Ajam Sufis and Shi‘i Spirituality in 19th-Century Iran.” In Shi’i Islam and Sufism, Classical Views and Modern Perspectives, ed. Hermann, Denis and Terrier, Mathieu, 305–324. London: I.B. Tauris in association with the Institute of Ismaili Studies. Kindle edition. 2020.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad. “Mullā ʿAlī Nūrī.” In Philosophy in Qajar Iran, ed) Pourjavady, Reza, 125–178. Leiden: Brill, 2019.Google Scholar
Rizvi, Sajjad. “Being (Wujūd) and Sanctity (Wilāya): Two Poles of Intellectual and Mystical Enquiry in Qajar Iran.” In Religion and Society in Qajar Iran, ed. Gleave, Robert, 113–126. London: Routlege Curzon, 2005.Google Scholar
Rūdgar, Muḥammad Javād. Sirr al-Sulūk, Tarjumah wa Sharḥ-i Risālt al-Wilāya Ḥakīm Mutiʾallih Mīrzā Aḥmad Ashtīyānī [The Mystery of Wayfaring: Translation and Commentary Upon “Treatise of the Wilāya” of Ḥakīm Mīrzā Aḥmad Ashtīyānī]. Qum: Āyat-i Ishrāq, 1387 Shamsī/2008.Google Scholar
Sayyid Wakīlī, Sayyid Ḥādī. “Bāzshināsī-yi Taʾthīr Padhīrī-yi Shaykh Aḥmad-i Aḥsāʾī az Makātibi Fikrī.” Quarterly Journal of Theological–Doctrinal Research 5, no:23(Autumn 2016):39–58.Google Scholar
Shaikh, Saʿdiyya. Sufi Narratives of Intimacy: Ibn ʿArabī, Gender and Sexuality. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shīrāzī, Muḥammad Maʿṣūm. Ṭarāʾiq ul-Ḥaqāʾiq [The Paths of the Truths]. Ed. Jaʿfar Maḥjūb, Muḥammad. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. Tehran: Sanāʾī, 1382Shamsī/2003.Google Scholar
Simnānī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dawlah. Khumkhāna-yi Waḥdat [The Unity House of Wine]. Ed. Ḥaqīqat, ʿAbd ul-Rafīʿ. Tehran: Kūmish Publication, 1385Shamsī/2006.Google Scholar
Simnānī, ʿAlāʾ al-Dawlah. ʿUrwa li Ahl-i Khalwat wa Jalwat [The Reliable Hold for the People of the Seclusion and the Public]. Ed. Māyil, NajībHirawī. Tehran: Kūmish Publication, 1362Shamsī/1983.Google Scholar
Takeshita, Masataka. “Ibn Arabi’s Theory of the Perfect Man and Its Place in the History of Islamic Thought.” PhD diss., University of Chicago, 1986.Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Abī Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Ḥassan ibn ʿAlī. Tahdhīb al-Aḥkām fī Sharḥ al-Muqnīʿah [Rectification of the Statutes in Explaining the Disguised]. Ed. and intro. Ghaffārī, ʿAlī Akbar. 10 Vols. Tehran: Ṣadūq, 1417/1996.Google Scholar
Ṭūsī, Abī Jaʿfar Muḥammad ibn Ḥassan ibn ʿAlī. Al-Istibṣār Fī Ma-khtalafa Min al-Akhbār [Reflection upon the Disputed Traditions]. Ed. and intro. Ghaffārī, ʿAlī Akbar. 4 vols. Qum: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1380Shamsī/2000.Google Scholar