Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:17:00.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Colophons and Marginal Notes of the Avestan Manuscripts of the Pouladi’s Collection in Yazd

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Saloumeh Gholami
Affiliation:
Faculty of Linguistics, Cultures and Arts, at Goethe-Universität. Frankfurt a. Main
Mehraban Pouladi
Affiliation:
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran

Abstract

About 150 years ago, after Avestan researchers such as Jackson, Browne, and Westergaard had unsuccessfully attempted to discover new manuscripts in Iran, it was assumed that there were few or no Avestan manuscripts remaining in Iran. However, recent research and fieldwork in Iran have resulted in important findings disproving this assumption. Since 2011, more than eighty-five Avestan manuscripts have been discovered in Iran. One of these important discoveries has been Pouladi’s Collection, which was found in February 2016 in a Zoroastrian house in the Priests’ Quarter (Mahalle-ye Dastūrān) in Yazd. This article deals with the secondary life of Avestan manuscripts of Pouladi’s Collection, focusing on colophons and marginal notes.

The article makes available a collection of Middle Persian and New Persian colophons and marginal notes, all which have been excerpted, transcribed, and translated for the first time from the Avestan manuscripts of Pouladi’s Collection, copied mostly in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Based on different types of colophons, this contribution establishes a classification of colophons and marginal notes of this collection with regard to formal, contextual, and functional characteristics.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Association For Iranian Studies, Inc 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This article is based on the author’s lecture, “Newly Found Avestan Manuscripts from Yazd,” given at the Corpus Avesticum III: Phonetics and Phonology in Avestan and Beyond held in Paris, 25‒26 April 2017.

References

Afshar, Iraj.Maqām-e anğāmeh dar nosḫeh.” Nāme-ye Bahārestān 3, no. 1, daftar-e 5, Bahār va tābestān-e 1381 (2002): 30–100.Google Scholar
Afshar, Iraj, and Mazdapour, Katayoon.Vandīdād-e Sāde (Avestā 976) be khat-e Frēdōn Marzbān-e Kermāni [Videvdād Sāde (Avestā 976), scribed by Frēdōn Marzbān-e Kermāni].Tehran: Fravahr, 2013.Google Scholar
Beit-Arié Malachi. “Colophons in Hebrew Manuscripts: Source of Information on Book Production and Text Transmission.” In: Scribi e colofoni, ed. E. Condello, and G. De Gregorio. Spoleto: Centro italiano di studi sull'alto medioevo, 1995, 495–504.Google Scholar
Borumand Amin, Bahram.Kātebān-e nosḫehā-ye pahlavī va avestāyī az ḫāndān-e Marzbān” [Scribes of Avestan and Pahlavi manuscripts from the Marzbān family].Nāme-ye Bahārestān 6, no.1‒2, daftar 11‒12 (2007): 126–17.Google Scholar
Cantera, Alberto.Remarks on the Colophon of the Avestan Manuscripts Pt4 and Mf4.” Studia Iranica 34 (2005): 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantera, Alberto.Buildīng Trees: Genealogical Relations between the Manuscripts of Videvdad.” In: The Transmission of the Avesta [Iranica 20], ed. Cantera, Alberto.Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2012, 279–346.Google Scholar
Cantera, Alberto.Preface.” In The transmission of the Avesta [Iranica 20], ed. Cantera, Alberto.Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2012, vii‒xviii.Google Scholar
Drogin, Marc. Anathema! Medieval Scribes and the History of Book Curses.Totowa, NJ: Allanheld & Schram, 1983.Google Scholar
Geldner, K.F. Avesta, The Sacred Books of the Parsis.Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1886.Google Scholar
Gholami, Saloumeh.Remnants of Zoroastrian Dari in the Colophons and Sālmargs of Iranian Avestan Manuscripts.” Iranian Studies 51, no. 2 (2018): 195–211.Google Scholar
Golob, N. “A few Comments on Glagolic Colophons (14th and 15th Centuries).” In: Ed., Condello and De Gregorio, 1995, 449–461.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, K., and Narten, J..Der Sasanidische Archetypus Untersuchungen zu Schreibung und Lautgestalt des Avestischen.Wiesbaden: Reichert, 1989.Google Scholar
Humbach, H.Beobachtungen zur Überlieferungsgeschichte des Awesta.” Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 31 (1973): 109–22.Google Scholar
Jahanpour, Fatemeh. The Vandīdād of the Āstān-e Qods Library.Tehran: Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopaedia, 2011.Google Scholar
Martínez-Porro, Jaime.The Avestan Manuscript 4162 of the Pouladi Collection. Is it the Eldest Iranian Videvdād SādeManuscript?” In Fәrā amәsh spәṇtā gāθā° g uruuāin. Homenağe a Helmut Humbach en su 95 aniversario, ed. Cantera, A. and Ferrer, J.J..Estudios Iranios y Turanios 3 (2017): 99–117.Google Scholar
Mazdapour, Katayoun. “Sarāghāz e yazišn” [The beginning of Yazišn].Farhang 9, no. 1, payāpay17 (1997): 71–84.Google Scholar
Mazdapour, Katayoun. “no yāftehā ye kohansāl” [Old new findings].Ğahān e Ketāb 7, no. 7‒8 (2003): 10–12.Google Scholar
Mazdapour, Katayoun. “Bon neveštehā ye kohan” [the ancient colophons].Nāme-ye Bahārestān 3, no. 1, daftar 5 (2003): 253–8.Google Scholar
Mazdapour, Katayoun. “Čand dastnevis e no-yafteye Avesta” [Some newly discovered Avestan manuscripts].Nāme-ye Irān-e Bāstān 8, nos. 1‒2, 2008‒9 (2010): 3–19.Google Scholar
Mazdapour, Katayoun. “Vandidād e dastur Rawāniyān (Avesta 1001)” [The Videvdād of Dastur Rawānyān].Nāme-ye Bahārestān 10, daftar 15 (2010): 245-252.Google Scholar
Moradiyan, Bahman.Dastnevešte-yi no yāfte az Avesta.” In: Ranj o Ganj, Arjnāme-ye Dr. Zohre Zarshenās, ed. Naddaf, V. Goshtasb, F., and Shokri Fumeshi, M..Tehran: Pazhuheshgāh-e ʽolum e Ensāni va Motāleʽāt-e Farhangi, 2013, 405–10.Google Scholar
Sanjian, A.K. Colophons of Armenian Manuscripts. A source for Middle Eastern History, Selected, Translated and Annotated by A.K. Sanjian, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.1969, 1301–1480.Google Scholar
Sanjana, D.P. The Zand ȋ javȋt shêda dâd. The Pahlavi Version of the Avesta Vendidâd.Bombay, Education Society’s Steam Press, 1895.Google Scholar
Schiegg, Markus.Scribes’ Voices: The Relevance and Types of Early Medieval Colophons.” Studia Neophilologica (Taylor & Francis, The British Library Board) 88, no. 2 (2016): 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Stone, M. “Colophons in Armenian Manuscripts.” In: Ed., Condello and De Gregorio.1995, 463–471.Google Scholar
Tremblay, Xavier.Ibant obscuri uaria sub nocte: Les textes avestiques et leurs recensions des Sassanides au XIIIe s. ad en particulier d’apres l’alphabet avestique. Notes de lecture avestiques VIII.” In The transmission of the Avesta [Iranica 20], ed. Cantera, Alberto.Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2012, 98–135.Google Scholar
Unvala, Jamshedji Maneckji. Collection of Colophons of Manuscripts Bearing on Zoroastrianism in Some Libraries of Europe.Bombay: Trustees of the Funds and Properties of the Parsi Punchayet, 1940.Google Scholar
Westergaard, N.L. Zendavesta, or The Religious Books of the Zoroastrians.Copenhagen 1852.Google Scholar
Zetzel, James E.G.Emendavi ad Tironem: Some Notes on Scholarship in the Second Century A.D.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 77 (1973): 225–43.Google Scholar