Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T10:34:57.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk Assessment and Implications of Common Crupina Rust Disease for Biological Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William L. Bruckart III*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Foreign Disease—Weed Science Research Unit (FDWSRU), 1301 Ditto Ave., Ft. Detrick, MD 21702
Farivar M. Eskandari
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Foreign Disease—Weed Science Research Unit (FDWSRU), 1301 Ditto Ave., Ft. Detrick, MD 21702
Dana K. Berner
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Foreign Disease—Weed Science Research Unit (FDWSRU), 1301 Ditto Ave., Ft. Detrick, MD 21702
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Evaluation of Puccinia crupinae, the causal agent of a rust disease on common crupina (Crupina vulgaris), for biological control is described. Susceptibility of accessions of common crupina that represent both varieties of the target from the five populations in the United States indicate that the disease has potential to control common crupina, but differences were noted between accessions on the basis of pustule count, yield (i.e., number and weight of achenes per plant), and shoot dry weight data after multiple inoculations. One accession from Modoc, CA, was not affected in greenhouse tests and would likely not be affected in the field if a permit to release P. crupinae were granted. None of the nontarget species of 26 taxa from the tribes Cardueae and Cichoriae were symptomatic, so the pathogen is likely safe to use in North America.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bennett, AR, Bruckart, WL, Shishkoff, N (1991) Effects of dew, plant age, and leaf position on the susceptibility of yellow starthistle to Puccinia jaceae . Plant Dis 75:499501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruckart, W, Cavin, C, Vajna, L, Schwarczinger, I, Ryan, FJ (2004) Differential susceptibility of Russian thistle accessions to Colletotrichum gloeosporioides . Biol Control 30:306311 Google Scholar
Bruckart, WL, Eskandari, FM, Berner, DK (2014) Characterization and evaluation of Ramularia crupinae, a candidate for biological control, and of its host, two varieties of Crupina vulgaris in the United States. Biol Control 71:4048 Google Scholar
Burdon, JJ, Groves, RH, Cullen, JM (1981) The impact of biological control on the distribution and abundance of Chondrilla juncea in south-eastern Australia. J Appl Ecol 18:957966 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[CDFA] California Department of Food and Agriculture (n.d.) Encycloweedia: Data Sheets, Common Crupina or Bearded creeper. California Department of Food and Agriculture. https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/plant/IPC/encycloweedia/weedinfo/crupina.htm. Accessed July 25, 2014Google Scholar
Couderc-LeVaillant, M, Roché, CT (1993) Evidence of multiple introduction of Crupina vulgaris infestations in the western United States. Madroño 40:6365 Google Scholar
Emge, RG, Melching, JS, Kingsolver, CH (1981) Epidemiology of Puccinia chondrillina, a rust pathogen for the biological control of rush skeleton weed in the United States. Phytopathology 71:839843 Google Scholar
Gamarra, R, Roché, CT (2002) Distribution of the genus Crupina in the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands. Madroño 49:137142 Google Scholar
Garcia-Jacas, N, Susanna, A, Garnatje, T, Vilatersana, R (2001) Generic delimitation and phylogeny of the Subtribe Centaureinae (Asteraceae): A combined nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Bot 87: 503515 Google Scholar
Garnatje, T, Susanna, A, Messeguer, R (1998) Isozyme studies in the genus Cheirolophus (Asteraceae: Cardueae—Centaureinae) in the Iberian Peninsula, North Africa and the Canary Islands. Plant Syst Evol 213:5770 Google Scholar
Hasan, S, Sobhian, R, Knutson, L (1999) Preliminary studies on Ramularia crupinae sp. nov. as a potential biological control agent for common crupina (Crupina vulgaris) in the USA. Ann Appl Biol 135:489494 Google Scholar
Hrusa, GF, Gaskin, JF (2008) The Salsola tragus complex in California (Chenopodiaceae): characterization and status of Salsola australis and the autochthonous allopolyploid Salsola ryannii sp. nov . Madroño 55:113131 Google Scholar
Miller, T, Thill, D (1983) Today's weed: common crupina. Weeds Today 14:1011 Google Scholar
Patterson, DT, Mortensen, DA (1985) Effects of temperature and photoperiod on common crupina (Crupina vulgaris ). Weed Sci 33:333339 Google Scholar
Prather, TS, Callihan, RH (1993) Weed eradication using geographic information system. Weed Technol 7:265269 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roché, CT, Thill, DC (2001) Biology of common crupina and yellow starthistle, two Mediterranean winter annual invaders in western North America. Weed Sci 49:439447 Google Scholar
Roché, CT, Thill, D, Shafii, B (1997) Prediction of flowering in common crupina (Crupina vulgaris ). Weed Sci 45:519528 Google Scholar
Roché, CT, Vilatersana, R, Garnatje, T, Garcia-Jacas, N, Susanna, A, Thill, DC (2003) Tracking an invader to its origins: the invasion case history of Crupina vulgaris . Weed Res 43:177189 Google Scholar
Ryan, FJ, Ayres, DR (2000) Molecular markers indicate two cryptic, genetically divergent populations of Russian thistle (Salsola tragus) in California Can J Bot 78:5967 Google Scholar
Susanna, A, Garcia-Jacas, N, Hidalgo, O, Vilatersana, R, Garnatje, T (2006) The Cardueae (Compositae) revisited: insights from ITS, trnL-trnF, and matK nuclear and chloroplast DNA analysis. Ann Mo Bot Gard 93:150171 Google Scholar
Thomas, SE, Ellison, CA, Tomley, AJ (2006) Studies on the rust Prospodium tuberculatum, a new classical biological control agent released against the invasive alien weed Lantana camara in Australia. 2. Host range. Australas Plant Pathol 35:321328 Google Scholar
[USDA, APHIS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (2015) Federal Noxious Weed List. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/weeds/downloads/weedlist.pdf. Accessed September 28, 2015Google Scholar
[USDA, NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (2014) The PLANTS Database. http://plants.usda.gov. Accessed July 30, 2014Google Scholar