Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:01:44.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Reinventory of Invasive Weed Species in Dinosaur National Monument to Determine Management Effectiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Corey V. Ransom ,
Stephanie D. Christensen ,
Kimberly A. Edvarchuk  and
Tamara Naumann
Corey V. Ransom*
Affiliation:
Department of Plants, Soils, and Climate, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4820
Stephanie D. Christensen
Affiliation:
Department of Plants, Soils, and Climate, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4820
Kimberly A. Edvarchuk
Affiliation:
Department of Plants, Soils, and Climate, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-4820
Tamara Naumann
Affiliation:
Dinosaur National Monument, U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service, 4545 E. Hwy 40, Dinosaur, CO 81610-9724
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Invasive weed management in wildland areas is often challenging due to the need to protect and preserve the integrity of natural ecosystems. Russian knapweed is an aggressive, deep-rooted, creeping perennial forb that was first identified as a problematic species in Dinosaur National Monument in 1977. From 2002 to 2005, extensive nonnative plant inventories were conducted in portions of the monument. Results were used to develop and implement an aggressive weed management program beginning in 2005. Emphasis was placed on reducing Russian knapweed infestations around Josie's Ranch in the Cub Creek Watershed. Several other species were targeted as well. In 2010, a reinventory was conducted in selected areas to evaluate how implemented management strategies affected the overall distribution and abundance of targeted species on the landscape. Comparisons between inventories indicate that management strategies were successful in reducing the total infested area of Russian knapweed by 79%. Treatments used for other targeted species also appear to have been effective in reducing their overall distribution and abundance on the landscape. In addition, the reinventory identified several new species with the potential to become problematic in the area. Although this case study documents the substantial progress that has been made at Dinosaur National Monument toward obtaining specific weed management objectives, it more importantly illustrates the process and benefits of an adaptive approach in sustaining long-term invasive plant species management efforts.

Keywords

Russian knapweed, Acroptilon repens (L.) DC. CENRIInvasive weedswildland weed mappinginvasive weed managementadaptive management
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 2012 , pp. 300 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aslan, C. E., Hufford, M. B., Epanchin-Niell, R. S., Port, J. D., Sexton, J. P., and Waring, T. M. 2009. Practical challenges in private stewardship of rangeland ecosystems: yellow starthistle control in Sierra Nevada foothills. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 62:28–37.Google Scholar
Barnett, D. T., Stohlgren, T. J., Jarnevich, C. S., Chong, G. W., Ericson, J. A., Davern, T. R., and Simonson, S. E. 2007. The art and science of weed mapping. Environ. Monit. Assess. 132:235–252.Google Scholar
Beck, K. G. 2008. Russian Knapweed. Natural Resources Series no. #3.111. Colorado State University Extension, Fort Collins, CO. 3 p. http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/natres/03111.html. Accessed: January 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Benz, J. L., Beck, K. G., Whitson, T. D., and Koch, D. W. 1999. Reclaiming Russian knapweed infested rangeland. J. Range Manag. 52:351–356.Google Scholar
Bottoms, R. M. and Whitson, T. D. 1998. A systems approach for the management of Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens). Weed Technol. 12:363–366.Google Scholar
Brooks, M. L. 2007. Effects of land management practices on plant invasions in wildland areas. Pages 147–162 in Nentwig, W., ed. Biological Invasions. Ecological Studies, Vol. 193. Berlin Heidelberg Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Christensen, S. D., Ransom, C. V., Edvarchuk, K. A., and Rasmussen, V. P. 2011. Efficiency and accuracy of wildland weed mapping methods. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 4:458–465.Google Scholar
Dewey, S. A. and Andersen, K. A. 2004. Distinct roles of surveys, inventories, and monitoring in adaptive weed management. Weed Technol. 18:1449–1452.Google Scholar
Dewey, S. A. and Andersen, K. A. 2006. Landscape-scale wildland inventories/surveys: Utah State University methods. Chapter 3. Pages 22–32 in Rew, L. J., and Porkorny, M. L., eds. Inventory and Survey Methods for Nonindigenous Plant Species. Publication EB0171. Bozeman, MT Montana State University Extension.Google Scholar
Dewey, S. A., Jenkins, M. J., and Tonioli, R. C. 1995. Wildfire suppression—a paradigm for noxious weed management. Weed Technol. 9:621–627.Google Scholar
Duncan, C., Story, J., and Sheley, R. 2001. Montana Knapweeds: Identification, Biology, and Management. Montana Sheep Institute. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT. http://www.sheepinstitute.montana.edu/articles/eb311.html. Accessed: January 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Graham, J. and Johnson, W. S. 2004. Managing Russian knapweed. FS-04-37. Reno, NV University of Nevada Cooperative Extension. 4 p.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J. and Humphries, S. E. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol. 9:761–760.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. and Denny, K. 2006. Ecology and Management of Russian Knapweed [Acroptilon repens (L.) DC.]. Invasive Species Technical Note MT-7. BozemanCity, MT U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service.9 p.Google Scholar
Kettle, R. M. and Wilson, R. E. 1998. Management of Russian Knapweed in Nevada. SP-98-09. Reno, NV University of Nevada Cooperative Extension. 16 p.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10:689–710.Google Scholar
Mangold, J. M., Poulsen, C. L., and Carpinelli, M. F. 2007. Revegetating Russian knapweed (Acroptilon repens) infestations using morphologically diverse species and seedbed preparation. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 60:378–385.Google Scholar
Masters, R. A. and Sheley, R. L. 2001. Principles and practices for managing rangeland invasive plants. J. Range Manag. 54:502–517.Google Scholar
Moody, M. and Mack, R. N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 24:1009–1021.Google Scholar
Morris, C. and Call, C. 2005. Cub Creek Watershed: integrated weed management plan. Appendix C. Pages C-1–C-53 in [USDI–NPS] United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 2005. Dinosaur National Monument: Invasive Plant Management Plan & Environmental Assessment. Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado and Utah.Google Scholar
[NAWMA] North American Weed Management Association. 2002. North American Invasive Plant Mapping Standards. http://www.nawma.org/Mapping/MappingMain.pdf. Accessed: October 20, 2010.Google Scholar
Pearson, D. and Ortega, Y. 2009. Managing invasive plants in natural areas: moving beyond weed control. Pages 1–21 in Kingely, R. V., ed. Weeds: Management, Economic Impacts and Biology. New York, NY Nova Publishers.Google Scholar
Pysek, P. and Hulme, P. E. 2005. Spatio-temporal dynamics of plant invasions: linking pattern to process. Ecoscience. 12:302–315.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. 2000. Improving management of nonnative invasive plants in wilderness and other natural areas. Pages 64–73 in Cole, D. N., McCool, S. F., Borrie, W. T., and O'Loughlin, J., eds. Wilderness science in a time of change conference-Volume 5: Wilderness ecosystems, threats, and management. Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-5. Ogden, UT U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
Rew, L. J. and Pokorny, M. L., eds. 2006. Inventory and survey methods for nonindigenous plant species. 1st ed. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University Extension. 75 p.Google Scholar
Rinella, M. J., Masters, R. A., and Bellows, S. E. 2010. Growth regulator herbicides prevent invasive annual grass seed production under field conditions. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 63:487–490.Google Scholar
Sheley, R., Manoukian, M., and Marks, G. 1996. Preventing noxious weed invasion. Rangelands. 18:100–101.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L. 1994. The identification, distribution, impacts, biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 446. Pp. 332–346.Google Scholar
Skelly, J. 2005. Russian Knapweed Control. University of Nevada Cooperative Extension, Reno, NV. FS-05-51. 6 p. http://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/files/ho/2005/fs0551.pdf. Accessed: January 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Strayer, D. L., Eviner, V. T., Jeschke, J. M., and Pace, M. L. 2006. Understanding the long-term effects of species invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21:645–651.Google Scholar
Theoharides, K. and Dukes, J. S. 2007. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol. 176:256–273.Google Scholar
[USDI–NPS] United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 2005. Dinosaur National Monument: Invasive Plant Management Plan & Environmental Assessment. Dinosaur National Monument, Colorado and Utah. 414 p. http://www.nps.gov/dino/parkmgmt/upload/Full%20Invasive%20Plant%20Management%20Plan%20&%20EA.pdf. Accessed: January 13, 2011.Google Scholar
[USGS] United States Geological Survey. 2010. USGS Surface-Water Monthly Statistics for the Nation: USGS 09261000 Green River near Jensen, UT. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/inventory/?site_no=09261000&agency_cd=USGS& Accessed: March 2, 2011.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. E., Johnson, W. S., Swanson, S., and Donaldson, S. 1999. Nevada's War on Weeds Steps to Success: Step 3—Map Important Weeds for a Living Inventory. FS-99-77. University of Nevada Cooperative Extension, Reno, NV. 3 p. http://www.unce.unr.edu/publications/files/nr/other/FS9977.pdf. Accessed: October 20, 2010.Google Scholar