Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:12:25.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Mapping wild chervil (Anthriscus sylvestris) and anise (Myrrhis odorata) in urban green spaces: a subarctic case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 December 2024

Mervi Orvokki Luoma*
Affiliation:
Master’s Student, Environment and Natural Resources, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 101, Reykjavík, Iceland
Mariana Tamayo
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Environment and Natural Resources, University of Iceland, Sturlugata 7, 101, Reykjavík, Iceland
Snorri Sigurðsson
Affiliation:
Director of Nature Conservation, Icelandic Institute of Natural History, Urriðaholtsstræti 6-8, 210 Garðabær, Iceland
*
Author for correspondence: Mervi Orvokki Luoma; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Urban areas are increasingly recognized as important centers of biodiversity. Nonetheless, invasive species can reduce this biodiversity, and cities can be hubs for alien plant invasions, highlighting the need to monitor urban biodiversity and problematic alien species. The goal of our study was to assess the distribution of wild chervil (Anthriscus sylvestris (L.) Hoffm.) and anise (Myrrhis odorata (L.) Scop.) in green spaces of Reykjavík, Iceland. This information is necessary to implement the city´s biodiversity strategy regarding invasive species. Both of these alien plants are spreading throughout Iceland, and Reykjavík´s high latitude (≥63° N) location and remoteness makes it an ideal case study to assess alien plant introductions and invasions in subarctic urban areas. We surveyed from May to October 2017 four green spaces (Laugarnes, Vatnsmýri, Elliðaárdalur, and Ægisiða), using AllTrailsPro and ArcGIS mobile applications. ANOVA and Bonferroni correction (post-hoc test) were used to compare the distribution and patch sizes of A. sylvestris and M. odorata among the study sites. We found that A. sylvestris covered at least 10% (15.5 ha) of the total area surveyed (158 ha), while M. odorata only covered ≤1 ha. Both plants were abundant near buildings, pathways, riversides, and streams, and they are expanding their distribution in Reykjavík´s green spaces. While A. sylvestris is clearly more established and widespread with larger patches (>100 m2), the distribution of M. odorata is more localized, occurring mainly in smaller patches (<100 m2). We recommend long-term monitoring to further assess M. odorata´s invasive potential, as well as testing and adopting integrated weed management strategies via adaptive management to control the distribution of A. sylvestris and that of other problematic alien plants. These actions, which are applicable to other subarctic cities, will help foster more proactive management encouraging urban biodiversity.

Type
Case Study
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2024