Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:05:34.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mapping Giant Reed (Arundo donax) Infestations along the Texas–Mexico Portion of the Rio Grande with Aerial Photography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Chenghai Yang*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, 2413 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596
James H. Everitt
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, 2413 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596
John A. Goolsby
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, 2413 E. Highway 83, Weslaco, TX 78596
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Giant reed is an invasive weed throughout the southern half of the United States, with the densest stands growing along the coastal rivers of southern California and the Rio Grande in Texas. The objective of this study was to use aerial photography to map giant reed infestations and to estimate infested areas along the Texas–Mexico portion of the Rio Grande. Aerial color-infrared photographs were taken along the Rio Grande between Brownsville and El Paso, TX, in June and July 2002. Based on the aerial photographs and ground surveys, the portion of the river from San Ygnacio to Lajitas, which has a river length of 898 km (558 mi), was found to be infested with giant reed. To estimate infested areas along both sides of the river, 65 (13.5%) of the 480 aerial photographs taken between Lajitas and San Ygnacio were randomly selected. The aerial photographs were digitized, rectified to Google Earth imagery, and then classified using maximum-likelihood classification techniques. The infested areas on both sides of the river, as well as water area and river length, from each photographic image were determined. Based on the estimates from the 65 aerial photos, the ratio of giant reed area to water area and the ratio of giant reed area to river length were calculated. The total giant reed area along the Rio Grande between Lajitas and San Ygnacio was estimated to be 5,981 ha (14,779 ac) with 3,714 ha or 62% on the U.S. side and 2,267 ha or 38% on the Mexican side. This study provides the first accurate estimates of giant reed infestations along the Texas–Mexico portion of the Rio Grande and will be useful for both land owners and government agencies for the estimation of water usage and economic loss and for the management and control of giant reed.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America

References

Literature Cited

Bell, G. P. 1997. Ecology and management of Arundo donax and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in southern California. Pages 103113 in Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D., eds. Plant Invasion Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands Blackhuys Publishers.Google Scholar
Belsky, A. J., Matzke, A., and Uselman, S. 1999. Survey of livestock influences on stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. J. Soil Water Conserv. 54:419431.Google Scholar
Cleere, G. 2007. A Battle at the Border: Coping with Carrizo Cane. J. Homeland Secur. April 2007. http://www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/Default.aspx?oid=154&ocat=1. Accessed: October 28, 2010.Google Scholar
Congalton, R. G. and Green, K. 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices. Boca Raton, FL Lewis Publishers.Google Scholar
Culliney, T. W. 2005. Benefits of using classical biological control for managing invasive plants. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 24:131150.Google Scholar
DiPietro, D., Ustin, S. L., and Underwood, E. 2002. Mapping the invasive plant Arundo donax at Camp Pendleton Marine Base using AVIRIS. In Proceedings of the 10th JPL Airborne Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer (AVIRIS) Workshop. Pasadena, CA Jet Propulsion Lab.Google Scholar
Dudley, T. L. 2000. Arundo donax. Pages 5358 in Bossard, C. C., Randal, J. M., and Hosovsky, M. C., eds. Invasive Plants of California Wildlands. Berkeley, CA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Dudley, T. L. and Collins, B. 1995. Biological Invasions in California Wetlands: The Impacts and Control of Non-Indigenous Species in Natural Areas. Oakland, CA Pacific Institute for Studies in Development, Environment, and Security. 62 p.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. H., Yang, C., Alaniz, M. A., Davis, M. R., Nibling, F. L., and Deloach, C. J. 2004. Canopy spectra of giant reed and associated vegetation. J. Range Manag. 57:561569.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. H., Yang, C., and Deloach, C. J. 2005. Remote sensing of giant reed with QuickBird satellite imagery. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 43:8184.Google Scholar
Everitt, J. H., Yang, C., Fletcher, R. S., and Deloach, C. J. Jr. 2008. Comparison of QuickBird and SPOT 5 satellite imagery for mapping giant reed. J. Aquat. Plant Manag. 46:7782.Google Scholar
Goolsby, J. A. and Moran, P. 2009. Host range of Tetramesa romana Walker (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), a potential biological control of giant reed, Arundo donax L. in North America. Biol. Control 49(2):160168.Google Scholar
Goolsby, J. A., Moran, P., Kirk, A., et al. 2007. Arundo donax—giant reed, an invasive weed of the Rio Grande basin. Abstract 204 in Proceedings of the Weed Science Society Annual Meeting. Champaign, IL WSSA.Google Scholar
Herrera, A. M. and Dudley, T. L. 2003. Reduction of riparian arthropod abundance and diversity as a consequence of giant reed (Arundo donax) invasion. Biol. Invasions 5:167177.Google Scholar
Iverson, M. E. 1993. The impact of Arundo donax on water resources. Pages 1925 in Jackson, N. E., Frandsen, P., and Douthit, S., eds. Proceedings of Arundo donax Workshop. Ontario, CA Team Arundo del Norte.Google Scholar
Jansen, A. and Robertson, A. I. 2001. Relationships between livestock management and the ecological condition of riparian habitats along an Australian floodplain river. J. Appl. Ecol. 38:6375.Google Scholar
Khudamrongsawat, J., Tayyar, R., and Holt, J. S. 2004. Genetic diversity of giant reed (Arundo donax) in the Santa Ana River, California. Weed Sci. 52:395405.Google Scholar
Kisner, D. A. 2004. The Effect of Giant Reed (Arundo donax) on the Southern California Riparian Bird Community. MS thesis. San Diego, CA San Diego State University. 60 p.Google Scholar
Lillesand, T. M., Kiefer, R. W., and Chipman, J. W. 2004. Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ J Wiley.Google Scholar
Newhouser, M., Cornwall, C., and Dale, R. 1999. Arundo: A Landowner Handbook. Sacramento, CA Sonoma Ecology Center and California State University. 22 p.Google Scholar
Oakins, A. J. 2001. An Assessment and Management Protocol for Arundo donax in the Salinas Valley Watershed. Monterey Bay, CA California State University. 51 p.Google Scholar
Perdue, R. E. Jr. 1958. Arundo donax—a source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ. Bot. 12:368404.Google Scholar
Richards, J. A. 1999. Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Berlin Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schrader, S. and Pouncey, R. 2002. ERDAS Field Guide. 4th ed. Atlanta, GA ERDAS, Inc. 686 p.Google Scholar
Tracy, J. L. and Deloach, C. J. 1988. Suitability of classical biological control of giant reed (Arundo donax) in the United States. Pages 73109 in Bell, C. E., ed. Proceedings of Arundo and Saltcedar Workshop. Holtville, CA University of California Cooperative Extension Service.Google Scholar
Yang, C., Goolsby, J. A., and Everitt, J. H. 2009. Mapping giant reed with QuickBird imagery in the Mexican portion of the Rio Grande basin. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 3(1):033530 DOI:10.1117/1.3148866Google Scholar