Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:08:20.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implementing Strategic Weed Prevention Programs to Protect Rangeland Ecosystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brenda S. Smith  and
Roger L. Sheley
Brenda S. Smith*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 67826-A Hwy. 205, Burns, OR 97720
Roger L. Sheley
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Oregon Agricultural Research Center, 67826-A Hwy. 205, Burns, OR 97720
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed prevention is recognized as one of the most cost-effective management strategies for invasive plants. In the field of invasive plant management increasing emphasis is being directed toward proactive management. However, land managers are still somewhat reluctant to aggressively employ prevention programs. Part of this reluctance could be due to lack of understanding of what a comprehensive prevention program entails. The purpose of this paper is to improve strategic decision-making for site-specific prevention programs, such as those on ranches or in watersheds. Our interest is in advancing prevention planning for land managers—the people who are faced with the constant pressure of potential invasive species infestations on a day-to-day basis. To facilitate more widespread use of prevention programs we are proposing definitions for key terminology to standardize and facilitate communication about prevention programs. Additionally, we present a flow model with the steps necessary to successfully implement such programs. The model has three categories from which specific prevention planning occurs: (1) education, (2) early detection and eradication, and (3) interruption of movement. The flow model directs users through a series of interlinked steps. Finally, we provide a case study in which a ranch manager implemented a prevention program using this framework. By using this model, managers are poised to conduct more strategic planning. This model also has applications in outreach and education programs to assist land managers in prevention planning.

Keywords

Containment zoneearly detectionhigh-risk areaprevention frameworkprotection zoneweed awareness
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 233 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Brunson, MW, Huntsinger, L (2008) Ranching as a conservation strategy: can old ranchers save the New West? Rangeland Ecol Manag 61:137–147 Google Scholar
[Cal-IPC] California Invasive Plant Council (2012) Preventing the Spread of Invasive Plants: Best Management Practices for Land Managers. 3rd edn. Berkeley, CA California Invasive Plant Council Publication 2012-03. 80 p. Available at http://www.cal-ipc.org. Accessed September 25, 2013Google Scholar
Carrick, PJ, Krüger, R (2007) Restoring degraded landscapes in lowland Namaqualand: lessons from the mining experience and from regional ecological dynamics. J Arid Environ 70:767–781 Google Scholar
Christensen, S, Ransom, C, Sheley, R, Smith, B, Whitesides, R (2011) Establishing a weed prevention area: a step by step user's guide. Burns, OR USA U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service. 40 pGoogle Scholar
Cusack, C, Harte, M, Chan, S (2009) The economics of invasive species. Corvallis, OR Oregon Sea Grant. 12 pGoogle Scholar
Daab, MT, Flint, CG (2010) Public reaction to invasive plant species in a disturbed Colorado landscape. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:390–401 Google Scholar
Davies, KW (2008) Medusahead dispersal and establishment in sagebrush steppe plant communities. Rangeland Ecol Manag 61:110–115 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Johnson, DD (2009) Prevention: a proactive approach to the control of invasive plants on wildlands. Pages 82–96 in Wilcox, CP, Turpin, RP, eds. Invasive Species: Detection, Impact and Control. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Johnson, DD (2011) Are we “missing the boat” on preventing the spread of invasive plants in rangelands? Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:166–171 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Nafus, AM, Madsen, MD (2013) Medusahead invasion along unimproved roads, animal trails, and random transects. West N Am Nat 73:54–59 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Nafus, AM, Sheley, RL (2010) Non-native competitive perennial grass impedes the spread of an invasive annual grass. Biol Invasions 12:3187–3194 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Sheley, RL (2007) A conceptual framework for preventing the spatial dispersal of invasive plants. Weed Sci 55:178–184 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Sheley, RL (2011) Promoting native vegetation and diversity in exotic annual grass infestations. Restor Ecol 19:159–165 Google Scholar
Davies, KW, Svejcar, TJ (2008) Comparison of medusahead-invaded and noninvaded Wyoming big sagebrush stepped in southeastern Oregon. Rangeland Ecol Manag 61:623–629 Google Scholar
DiTomaso, JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265 Google Scholar
Duncan, CA, Jachetta, JJ (2005) Introduction. Pages 1–7 in Duncan, CL, Clark, JK, eds. Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and Their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America Google Scholar
Gelbard, JL, Belnap, J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semi-arid landscape. Conserv Biol 17:420–432 Google Scholar
Goodwin, K, Jacobs, J (2007) Developing invasive weed prevention areas for rangeland ecosystems. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bozeman MTInvasive Species Technical Note No. MT-15. Pages 7 pGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, K, Sheley, R, Jacobs, J, Wood, S, Manoukian, M, Schuldt, M, Miller, E, Sackman, S (2012) Cooperative prevention systems to protect rangelands from the spread of invasive plants. Rangeland J 34:26–31 Google Scholar
Halle, S, Fattorini, M (2004) Advances in restoration ecology: insights from aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Pages 10–33 in Temperton, VM, Hobbs, RJ, Nuttle, T, Halle, S, eds. Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice. Washington, DC Island Press Google Scholar
Havstad, KM, Peters, DPC, Skaggs, R, Brown, J, Bestelmeyer, B, Fredrickson, E, Herrick, J, Wright, J (2007) Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States. Ecol Econ 64:261–268 Google Scholar
Hemstrom, MA, Wisdom, MJ, Hann, , Rowland, MM, Wales, BC, Gravenmier, RA (2002) Sagebrush-steppe vegetation dynamics and restoration potential in the interior Columbia Basin, USA. Conserv Biol 16:1243–1255 Google Scholar
Hobbs, RJ, Humphries, SE (1995) An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 9:761–770 Google Scholar
Hulme, PE (2006) Beyond control: wider implications for the management of invasions. J Appl Ecol 43:835–847 Google Scholar
Huntsinger, L, Johnson, M, Stafford, M, Fried, J (2010) Hardwood rangeland landowners in California from 1985 to 2004: production, ecosystem services and permanence. Rangeland Ecol Manag 63:324–334 Google Scholar
Jacobs, J (2007) Invasive plant management: options and actions. Chapter 10 in Invasive Plant Management: CIPM Online Textbook Center for Invasive Plant Management. Bozeman, MT Center for Invasive Plant Management. http://www.weedcenter.org/index.html. Accessed September 25, 2013Google Scholar
James, JJ, Davies, KW, Sheley, RL, Aanderud, ZT (2008) Linking nitrogen partitioning and species abundance to invasion resistance in the Great Basin. Oecologia 156:637–648 Google Scholar
Kulmatiski, A, Beard, KH, Stark, JM (2006) Exotic plant communities shift water-use timing in a shrub-steppe ecosystem. Plant Soil 288:271–284 Google Scholar
Lee, M. (2001) Non-Native Plant Invasions in Rocky Mountain National Park: Linking Species Traits and Habitat Characteristics. Master's thesis. Fort Collins, CO Colorado State University 218 pGoogle Scholar
Moody, ME, Mack, RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J Appl Ecol 25:1009–1021 Google Scholar
National Invasive Species Council, (2008) 2008–2012 National Invasive Species Management Plan, Accessed August 12, 2013, at http://www.doi.gov/invasivespecies/upload/2008-2012-National-Invasive-Species-Management-Plan.pdf. 35 pGoogle Scholar
Panetta, FD, Mitchell, ND (1991) Homocline analysis and the prediction of weediness. Weed Res 31:273–284 Google Scholar
North American Invasive Species Management Association. 2014. North American invasive species mapping standards. http://www.naisma.org/images/NAISMA_Mapping_Standards2014_1.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2014Google Scholar
Pimentel, D, Zuniga, R, Morrison, D (2005) Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. J Ecol Econ 52:273–288 Google Scholar
Pokorny, ML, Kreuger-Mangold, JM (2007) Evaluating Montana's dyer's woad (Isastis tinctoria) cooperative eradication project. Weed Technol 21:262–269 Google Scholar
Radosevich, SR, Holt, JS, Ghersa, CM (2007) Ecology of weeds and invasive plants: relationship to agriculture and natural resource management. 3rd edn. Hoboken, NJ J. Wiley. 454 pGoogle Scholar
Ransom, CV, Whitesides, RE (2012) Proactive EBIPM—establishing weed prevention areas. Rangeland J 34:35–38 Google Scholar
Reeves, MC, Mitchell, JE (2012) A Synoptic Review of U.S. rangelands: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Fort Collins, CO U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-288. 128 pGoogle Scholar
Rejmánek, M, Pitcairn, MJ (2002) When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? Pages 249–253 in Veitch, CR, Clout, MN, eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Invasive Species Specialist Group Google Scholar
Rew, L, Maxwell, B (2007) Monitoring non-native plant populations. Chapter 7 in Center for Invasive Plant Management, ed. Invasive Plant Management: CIPM Online Textbook Bozeman, MT Center for Invasive Plant Management. http://www.weedcenter.org/textbook/index.html. Accessed August 12, 2013Google Scholar
Rew, LJ, Pokorny, ML eds (2006) Inventory and Survey Methods for Nonindigenous Plant Species. Bozeman, MT Montana State University Extension. Extension Service Bulletin EB 4503. 75 pGoogle Scholar
Sheley, RL, James, JJ, Rinella, MJ, Blumenthal, DM, DiTomaso, JM (2011) Invasive plant management on anticipated conservation benefits: a scientific assessment. Pages 291–336 in Briske, DD, ed. Conservation Benefits of Rangeland Practices: Assessment, Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps. Washington, DC United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service Google Scholar
Sheley, R, James, J, Smith, B, Vasquez, E (2010) Applying ecologically based invasive plant management. Rangeland Ecol Manag 63:605–613 Google Scholar
Sheley, RL, Kedzie-Webb, S, Maxwell, BD (1999) Integrated weed management on rangeland. Pages 57–68 in Sheley, RL, Petroff, JK, eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds. Corvallis, OR Oregon State University Press Google Scholar
Sheley, RL, Smith, BS (2012) Prioritizing invasive plant management strategies. Rangeland J 34(6):11–14 Google Scholar
Travest, A, Richardson, DM (2006) Biological invasions as disruptors of plant reproductive mutualisms. Trends Ecol Evol 21:208–216 Google Scholar
U.S. Economic Research Service 2011. Value of U.S. Cattle and Calf Production. http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/animal-products/cattle-beef/statistics-information.aspx. Accessed September 12, 2013.Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service 2011. Utah Field Office Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting Botanical Inventories and Monitoring of Federally Listed, Proposed and Candidate Plants. Utah Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, West Valley City, UT19 pGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, PM, D’Antonio, CM, Loupe, LL, Rejmanek, M, Westbrooks, R (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. N Z J Ecol 21:1–16 Google Scholar
Zimmerman, C, Jordan, M, Sargis, G, Smith, H, Schwager, K (2011) An Invasive Plant Management Decision Tool. Version 1.1. Arlington, VA The Nature Conservancy. 43 pGoogle Scholar