Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:13:48.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Does a Trend in Declining Stem Density of Lepidium latifolium Indicate a Phosphorus Limitation? A Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert R. Blank*
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit, 920 Valley Road, Reno NV 89512
Tye Morgan
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service, Great Basin Rangelands Research Unit, 920 Valley Road, Reno NV 89512
*
Corresponding author's E-mail:[email protected]

Abstract

Lepidium latifolium (perennial pepperweed) is a weedy alien crucifer that has invaded wetlands throughout the western United States. We monitored L. latifolium invasion of an Elytrigia elongata (tall wheatgrass) community at the Honey Lake Wildlife Refuge in northeastern California. In 1993, a 40-m2 plot was delineated, at which time only two single plants of L. latifolium were present. Beginning in 1994, L. latifolium stem density was measured yearly until 2011. From 1994 through 2000, the density of L. latifolium increased to greater than 120 stems m−2. At its height of stem density and stature between 1998 and 2000, it appeared that E. elongata had been extirpated. From 2001 through 2006, stem density and plant stature of L. latifolium declined, but there were still areas of the plot where stem density exceeded 60 stems m−2. From 2007 through 2009, stem density decreased considerably and averaged less than 30 stems m−2 and a healthy recovery of E. elongata occurred. In the years 2010 and especially 2011, stem density increased, but individual plants were small in stature. Soil bicarbonate-extractable phosphorus data suggest that phosphorus availability may be crucial to the invasiveness of L. latifolium. Long-term biogeochemical cycling by L. latifolium may reduce soil phosphorus availability in deeper soil horizons and enrich availability in the soil surface, which alters the competitive relationship between L. latifolium and E. elongata.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barber, SA (1995) Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach. New York Wiley 417 pGoogle Scholar
Bhadoria, PBS, Kaselowsky, J, Claassen, N, Jungk, A (1991) Phosphate diffusion coefficients in soil as affected by bulk density and water content. Z Pflanz Bodenkunde 154:5357.Google Scholar
Blank, RR, Qualls, RG, Young, JA (2002) Lepidium latifolium: plant nutrient competition-soil interactions. Biol Fert Soils 35:458464.Google Scholar
Blank, RR, Young, JA (2002) Influence of the exotic invasive crucifer, Lepidium latifolium, on soil properties and elemental cycling. Soil Sci 167:821829.Google Scholar
Blank, RR, Young, JA (2004) Influence of three weed species on soil nutrient dynamics. Soil Sci 169:385397.Google Scholar
Cross, AF, Schlesinger, WH (1995) A literature review and evaluation of the Hedley fractionation: application to the biogeochemical cycle of soil phosphorus in natural ecosystems. Geoderma 64:197214.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, JG (2003) Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6:503523.Google Scholar
Fitter, AH (1991) Characteristics and functions of root systems. Pages 325 in Waisel, Y, Eshel, A, Kafkafi, U, eds. Plant Roots—The Hidden Half. New York Marcel Dekker Google Scholar
Francis, A, Warwick, SI (2007) The biology of invasive alien plants in Canada. 8. Lepidium latifolium L. Can J Plant Sci 87:639658.Google Scholar
Ho, MD, Rosas, JC, Brown, KM, Lynch, JP (2005) Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition. Funct Plant Biol 32:737748.Google Scholar
Jobbågy, EG, Jackson, RB (2004) The uplift of soil nutrients by plants: biogeochemical consequences across scales. Ecology 85:23802389.Google Scholar
Mahtab, SK, Godfrey, CL, Swobada, AR, Thomas, GW (1971) Phosphorus diffusion in soils: I. The effects of applied P, clay content, and water content. Soil Sci Soc Am J 35:393397.Google Scholar
McBride, MB (1994) Environmental Chemistry of Soils. New York Oxford University Press 406 pGoogle Scholar
[NOAA] National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2014) Susan River – Susanville (SUSC1). www.cnrfc.noaa.gov/graphicalRVF.php?id=susc1. Accessed October 20, 2013Google Scholar
Olsen, SR, Sommers, LE (1982) Phosphorus. Pages 403430 in Page, AL, ed. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2.—Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison WI American Society of Agronomy Google Scholar
PRISM Climate Group (2004) www.prism.oregonstate.edu/. Accessed November 12, 2013Google Scholar
Renz, MJ, Blank, RR (2004) Influence of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium) biology and plant–soil relationships on management and restoration. Weed Technol 18:13591363.Google Scholar
Young, JA, Palmquist, DE, Blank, RR (1998) The ecology and control of perennial pepperweed (Lepidium latifolium L.). Weed Technol 12:402405.Google Scholar