Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T08:59:03.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding Factors that Correlate or Contribute to Exotic Russian-olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) Invasion at a Wildland–Urban Interface Ecosystem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Buddhika D. Madurapperuma ,
Peter G. Oduor ,
Mohammad J. Anar  and
Larry A. Kotchman
Buddhika D. Madurapperuma*
Affiliation:
Environment and Conservation Science Program, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108
Peter G. Oduor
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108
Mohammad J. Anar
Affiliation:
Environment and Conservation Science Program, North Dakota State University, P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108
Larry A. Kotchman
Affiliation:
North Dakota Forest Service, 307 1st Street East, Bottineau, ND 58310
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Understanding the ecological distribution range of exotic trees in an arboreal ecosystem is essential to managing natural forest resources sustainably. Forest resource mapping can be applied as a powerful tool in the identification of forest resource threat patterns, and in monitoring ongoing changes associated with a landscape. This study offers an insight on Russian-olive and its impact on a spatially bound ecosystem, namely, Bismarck–Mandan Wildland–Urban Interface (BMWUI). Data from the National Agricultural Imagery Program collected in 2005 and 2010 and in situ reference data were used to estimate the potential habitat of Russian-olive using ArcGIS ArcInfo® 9.3 (ESRI, Redlands, CA). Russian-olive plants are discernible on aerial photographs with a fine spatial resolution because of silvery gray-green leaves in the upper strata of their canopies. Results showed that Russian-olive occupied 110 ha (272 acres) in BMWUI in 2005 and of that, 13 ha (12%) was in inundated habitats. In addition, Russian-olive in 2010 covered 125 ha within the BMWUI and of that, 25 ha (20%) was in inundated habitats. Russian-olive showed a close association with the silt loam and silty clay soil type, which occurs along the Missouri River floodplain. Our findings revealed that the species is well established in riparian habitats and other open habitats such as roadside and agricultural lands. There is a greater likelihood of lateral spread of Russian-olive throughout the BMWUI that may require active management to avert undesirable conservation impacts.

Keywords

Russian-olive, Elaeagnus angustifolia L.Russian-oliveriparian habitatssoil typesCART
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 130 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bertrand, L. J. and Lalonde, M. 1985. In vitro propagation and nodulation by Frankia of actinorhizal Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.). Plant Soil 87 :143–152.Google Scholar
Carman, J. G. and Brotherson, J. D. 1982. Comparisons of sites infested and not infested with saltcedar (Tamarix pentantra) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Weed Sci. 30 :360–364.Google Scholar
Christiansen, E. M. 1963. Naturalization of Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.) in Utah. Am. Midl. Nat. 70 :133–137.Google Scholar
Elias, T. S. 1980. The Complete Trees of North America. Field Guide and Natural History. New York : Van Nostrand Reinhold. 948 p.Google Scholar
Friedman, J. M., Auble, G. T., Shafroth, P. B., Scott, M. L., Merigliano, M. F., Freehling, M. D., and Griffin, E. R. 2005. Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA. Biol. Invasions 7 :747–751.Google Scholar
[FRMA] Forestry Resource Management Applications. 2008. North Dakota Forest Service Decision Support System. http://ndfsdss.ndsu.nodak.edu. Accessed May 30, 2010.Google Scholar
Gaddis, M. 2008. Environmental Impact of Restoration of Riparian Ecosystems: Fitting Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) into the Picture. M.Sc. dissertation. Denver, CO : University of Denver. 78 p.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R., Megown, K., Lachowski, H., and Campbell, R. 2006. Mapping Russian Olive: Using Remote Sensing to Map an Invasive Tree. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Remote Sensing Application Center RSAC-0087-RPT1. http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/rsac/invasivespecies/documents/0087-RPT1.pdf. Accessed: September 15, 2011.Google Scholar
Hammer, R. B. and Radeloff, V. C. 2003. North Dakota Housing Density: Census Block 2000. http://silvis.forest.wisc.edu/old/Library/Maps/wht_image/hdblk00/states/nd_hdblk_00_pln.gif. Accessed: December 06, 2011.Google Scholar
Harner, M. J., Crenshaw, C. L., Abelho, M., Stursova, M., Follstad, , Shah, J. J., and Sinsabaugh, R. L. 2009. Decomposition of leaf litter from a native tree and an actinorhizal invasive across riparian habitats. Ecol. Appl. 19 :1135–1146.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J. D., Narumalani, S., Mishra, D. R., Merani, P., and Wilson, R. G. 2008. Predicting potential occurrence and spread of invasive plant species along the North Platte River, Nebraska. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 1 :359–367.Google Scholar
Jarnevich, C. S. and Reynolds, L. V. 2011. Challenges of predicting the potential distribution of a slow-spreading invader: a habitat suitability map for an invasive riparian tree. Biol. Invasions 13 :153–163.Google Scholar
Kangas, M. 2003. North Dakota Forest Health Report 2001–2001. North Dakota Forest Service. http://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/ndfs/docs/forest_health/20012002_forest_health_report.pdf. Accessed: September 21, 2011.Google Scholar
Kangas, M. 2006. North Dakota Forest Health Report 2005–2006. North Dakota Forest Service. http://www.ndsu.edu/fileadmin/ndfs/docs/forest_health/05-06nd_forest_health.pdf. Accessed: August 10, 2011.Google Scholar
Katz, G. L. and Shafroth, P. B. 2003. Biology, ecology and management of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. (Russian olive) in western North America. Wetlands 23 :763–777.Google Scholar
Lesica, P. and Miles, S. 1999. Russian olive invasion into cottonwood forests along a regulated river in north-central Montana. Can. J. Bot. 77 :1077–1083.Google Scholar
Lesica, P. and Miles, S. 2001. Natural history and invasion of Russian olive along eastern Montana rivers. West. N. Am. Nat. 61 :1–10.Google Scholar
Little, E. L. 1961. Sixty Trees from Foreign Lands: Agriculture Handbook No. 212. Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 30 p.Google Scholar
Madurapperuma, B. D., Anar, M. J., Oduor, P. G., and Kotchman, L. A. 2012. Geospatial Analysis of Ecosystem Invasion: Russian olive in Bismarck–Mandan Wildland–Urban Interface. Proceedings of the MidAmerica GIS Conference. http://www.magicgis.org/magic/symposiums/2012/programschedule.cfm Accessed: April 22, 2012.Google Scholar
Madurapperuma, B. D., Oduor, P. G., and Kotchman, L. A. 2011. Challenges of potential distribution of Russian olive in lower Missouri River basin in North Dakota. Pages 38 in Proceedings of the ND-SD 2011 Joint EPSCoR Conference. Fargo, ND : North Dakota State University.Google Scholar
McGregor, R. L., Barkley, T. M., Barker, W. T., Brooks, R. E., Churchill, S. P., Kaul, R. B., Kolstad, O. A., Sutherland, D. M., Bruggen, T. V., Weedon, R. R., and Wilson, J. S. 1977. Atlas of the Flora of the Great Plains. Ames, IA : Iowa State University Press. Pp. 203–204.Google Scholar
Nagler, P. L., Glenn, E. P., Jarnevich, C. S., and Shafroth, P. B. 2011. Distribution and abundance of saltcedar and Russian olive in the western United States. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30 :508–523.Google Scholar
[NRCS] Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. USDA-NRCS Geospatial Data Gateway. http://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed March 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Olson, T. E. and Knopf, F. L. 1986. Naturalization of Russian olive in the western United States. West. J. Appl. For. 1 :65–69.Google Scholar
Peper, P. J., McPherson, E. G., and Simpson, J. R. 2004. City of Bismarck, North Dakota Street Tree Resource Analysis. Center for Urban Forest Research. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/products/cufr554_Street_Trees_Bismarck.pdf. Accessed: January 06, 2012.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. V. and Cooper, D. J. 2010. Environmental tolerance of an invasive riparian tree and its potential for continued spread in the southwestern US. J. Veg. Sci. DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01179.x.Google Scholar
Rozario, P. F., Anar, M. J., Wamono, A. W., and Madurapperuma, B. D. 2011. An assessment of inundated riparian forests along Missouri River at Bismarck–Mandan wildland urban interface in North Dakota. Pages 24 in Proceedings of the North Dakota GIS Users Conference 2011. Grand Forks, ND : University of North Dakota.Google Scholar
Shafroth, P. B., Auble, G. T., and Scott, M. L. 1995. Germination and establishment of the native plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides Marshall Sub sp. monilifera) and the exotic Russian-olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia L). Conserv. Biol. 9 :1169–1175.Google Scholar
Stannaer, M., Ogle, D., Holzworth, L., Scianna, J., and Sunleaf, E. 2002. Plant Materials Technical Note: History, Ecology, Suppression, and Revegetation of Russian-Olive Sites (Elaeagnus angustifolia L.). Bozeman, Montana : U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Plant Materials Technical Note MT-43. 14 p.Google Scholar
Stannard, M. 2003. Russian-olive: once the ideal dryland tree—now eastern Washington's pervasive, spiny, riparian weed. For. Steward. Notes 12 :11–13.Google Scholar
Tiborcz, V., Zagyvai, G., Korda, M., Schmidt, D., Csiszár, Á., Šporčić, D., Teleki, B., and Bartha, D. 2011. Distribution and significance of some invasive alien woody plant species in Hungary. http://www.wsl.ch/epub/ewrs/sessions/posters_EN?ID=11. Accessed February 08, 2012.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 2010. State and County Quick Facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/38/3807200.html. Accessed May 25, 2012.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of the Interior. 2001. Urban wildland interface communities within vicinity of Federal lands that are at high risk from wildfire. Fed. Register 66 :751–777.Google Scholar
[USGS] United States Geological Survey. 2006. National Landcover Dataset 2001. http://www.mrlc.gov/mrlc2k_nlcd.asp. Accessed June 25, 2011.Google Scholar
[USGS] United States Geological Survey. 2011. Global Visualization Viewer (GLOVIS). Landsat data archive. http://glovis.usgs.gov. Accessed June 15, 2011.Google Scholar