Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:24:41.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) Establishment in its Most Northern Range

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Erik A. Lehnhoff*
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120
Fabian D. Menalled
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120
Lisa J. Rew
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, 334 Leon Johnson Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Tamarisk, a shrub or small tree native to Eurasia, was introduced to North America in the early 1800s and is now naturalized throughout many riparian areas of the southwestern United States, where extensive research has been conducted. It is a more recent invader to the northern Great Plains, and fewer studies have been conducted on tamarisk ecology and management in this area. The objectives of this research were to investigate the overwintering potential of tamarisk seeds in Montana and the relationship between hydrologic conditions and historic tamarisk establishment. Emergence of seedlings from seeds stored for different time periods at a range of temperatures was evaluated in a greenhouse study. Emergence rates declined after a 7-d storage period, but storage time had no effect on subsequent emergence rates, and seeds stored at −14 C and 5 C had greater emergence rates than those stored at 20 C and 35 C. Patterns in tamarisk establishment were assessed through age and hydrologic data collected from a reservoir (Fort Peck), a regulated river (Bighorn), and an unregulated river (Yellowstone) in Montana. These data indicated that tamarisk establishment at the reservoir was closely related to historic water levels, whereas establishment on rivers was not related to flow. However, data from the rivers indicated that recruitment differed between regulated and unregulated rivers, with the regulated river having less recruitment after the period of initial colonization than the unregulated river. Our results show that tamarisk seeds have the ability to overwinter in Montana and can establish under a range of flow conditions, indicating potential recolonization of sites after tamarisk removal.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baum, B. R. 1978. The genus Tamarix. Jerusalem Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. 209 p.Google Scholar
Bay, R. F. and Sher, A. A. 2008. Success of active revegetation after Tamarix removal in riparian ecosytems of the southwestern United States: a quantitative assessment of past restoration projects. Restor. Ecol 16:113128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, D. E. and Smith, S. D. 1995. Mechanisms associated with decline of woody species in riparian ecosystems of the southwestern US. Ecol. Monogr 65:347370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, J. G. and Brotherson, J. D. 1982. Comparisons of sites infested and not infested with saltcedar (Tamarix pentandra) and Russian olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia). Weed Sci 30:360364.Google Scholar
Cleverly, J. R., Smith, S. D., Sala, A., and Devitt, D. A. 1997. Invasive capacity of Tamarix ramosissima in a Mojave Desert floodplain: the role of drought. Oecologia 111:1218.Google Scholar
Dewine, J. M. and Cooper, D. J. 2007. Effects of river regulation on riparian box elder (Acer negundo) forests in canyons of the upper Colorado River basin, USA. Wetlands 27:278289.Google Scholar
Dewine, J. M. and Cooper, D. J. 2008. Canopy shade and the successional replacement of tamarisk by native box elder. J. Appl. Ecol 45:505514.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 1998. Impact, biology and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol 12:326336.Google Scholar
Everitt, B. L. 1980. Ecology of saltcedar—a plea for research. Environ. Geol 3:7784.Google Scholar
Everitt, B. L. 1998. Chronology of the spread of tamarisk in the central Rio Grande. Wetlands 18:658668.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. F. and Kazmer, D. J. 2009. Introgression between invasive saltcedars (Tamarix chinensis and T. ramosissima) in the USA. Biol. Invasions 11:11211130.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. F. and Schaal, B. A. 2002. Hybrid Tamarix widespread in US invasion and undetected in native Asian range. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:1125611259.Google Scholar
Gaskin, J. F. and Schaal, B. A. 2003. Molecular phylogenetic investigation of US invasive Tamarix . Syst. Bot 28:8695.Google Scholar
Grubb, R. T., Sheley, R. L., and Carlstrom, R. D. 1997. Saltcedar (tamarisk). Bozeman, MT Montana State University Extension Service. 4 p.Google Scholar
Harms, R. S. and Hiebert, R. D. 2006. Vegetation response following invasive tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) removal and implications for riparian restoration. Restor. Ecol 14:461472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilborn, R. and Mangel, M. 1997. The Ecological Detective. Confronting Models with Data. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press. Monographs in Population Biology 28. 315 p.Google Scholar
Howe, W. H. and Knopf, F. L. 1991. On the imminent decline of Rio Grande cottonwoods in central New Mexico. Southwest. Nat 36:218224.Google Scholar
Lesica, P. and Miles, S. 2001. Tamarisk growth at the northern margin of its naturalized range in Montana, USA. Wetlands 21:240246.Google Scholar
Lesica, P. and Miles, S. 2004. Ecological strategies for managing tamarisk on the CM Russell National Wildlife Refuge, Montana, USA. Biol. Conserv 119:535543.Google Scholar
Lindgren, C., Pearce, C., and Alison, K. 2010. The Biology of Invasive Alien Plants in Canada. 11. Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb., T. chinensis Lour. and hybrids. Can. J. Plant Sci 90:111124.Google Scholar
Lite, S. J. and Stromberg, J. C. 2005. Surface water and ground-water thresholds for maintaining Populus–Salix forests, San Pedro River, Arizona. Biol. Conserv 125:153167.Google Scholar
Merkel, D. L. and Hopkins, H. H. 1957. Life history of salt cedar (Tamarix gallica L.). Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci 60:360369.Google Scholar
Merritt, D. M. and Poff, N. L. 2010. Shifting dominance of riparian Populus and Tamarix along gradients of flow alteration in western North American rivers. Ecol. Appl 20:135152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, C. M. and Smith, D. G. 2003. Saltcedar: distribution, abundance, and dispersal mechanisms, northern Montana, USA. Wetlands 23:215228.Google Scholar
Pearce, C. M. and Smith, D. G. 2007. Invasive saltcedar (Tamarix): its spread from the American southwest to the northern Great Plains. Phys. Geogr 28:507530.Google Scholar
Robinson, T. W. 1965. Introduction, Spread, and Areal Extent of Saltcedar (Tamarix) in the Western States. Washington, DC Geological Survey Professional Paper 491-A. 11 p.Google Scholar
Sexton, J. P., McKay, J. K., and Sala, A. 2002. Plasticity and genetic diversity may allow saltcedar to invade cold climates in North America. Ecol. Appl 12:16521660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sexton, J. P., Sala, A., and Murray, K. 2006. Occurrence, persistence, and expansion of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) populations in the Great Plains of Montana. West. N. Am. Nat 66:111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafroth, P. B., Auble, G. T., Stromberg, J. C., and Patten, D. T. 1998. Establishment of woody riparian vegetation in relation to annual patterns of streamflow, Bill Williams River, Arizona. Wetlands 18:577590.Google Scholar
Sher, A. A. and Marshall, D. L. 2003. Competition between native and exotic floodplain tree species across water regimes and soil textures. Am. J. Bot 90:413422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sher, A. A., Marshall, D. L., and Gilbert, S. A. 2000. Competition between native Populus deltoides and invasive Tamarix ramosissima and the implications for reestablishing flooding disturbance. Conserv. Biol 14:17441754.Google Scholar
Sher, A. A., Marshall, D. L., and Taylor, J. P. 2002. Establishment patterns of native Populus and Salix in the presence of invasive nonnative Tamarix . Ecol. Appl 12:760772.Google Scholar
Smith, S. D., Devitt, D. A., Sala, A., Cleverly, J. R., and Busch, D. E. 1998. Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions. Wetlands 18:687696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprenger, M. D., Smith, L. M., and Taylor, J. P. 2001. Testing control of saltcedar seedlings using fall flooding. Wetlands 21:437441.Google Scholar
Stromberg, J. 1998. Dynamics of Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii) and saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) populations along the San Pedro River, Arizona. J. Arid Environ 40:133155.Google Scholar
Swenson, J. W., Hendricks, P., and Farjon, A. 1982. Arrival and occurrence of Tamarix chinensis (tamarisk) along the Yellowstone River in Treasure and Rosebud counties, Montana. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci 41:6770.Google Scholar
United States Geologic Survey. 2010. USGS Real-Time Water Data for Montana. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/mt/nwis/rt. Accessed August 17, 2010.Google Scholar
University of Montana. 2010. University of Montana Herbarium. http://herbarium.dbs.umt.edu/database. Accessed August 17, 2010.Google Scholar
Warren, D. K. and Turner, R. L. 1975. Saltcedar (Tamarix chinensis) seed production, seedling establishment and response to inundation. J. Arizona Acad. Sci 10:135144.Google Scholar
Western Regional Climate Center. 2010. Montana Climate Summaries. http://www.wrcc.dri.edu/summary/Climsmemt.html. Accessed August 17, 2010.Google Scholar
Wilgus, F. and Hamilton, K. C. 1962. Germination of salt-cedar seed. Weeds 10:332333.Google Scholar
Young, J. A., Clements, C. D., and Harmon, D. 2004. Germination of seeds of Tamarix ramosissima . J. Range Manag 57:475481.Google Scholar
Zavaleta, E. 2000. The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub. Ambio 29:462467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar