Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:11:10.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between Ligustrum sinense Invasion, Biodiversity, and Development in a Mixed Bottomland Forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Justin L. Hart  and
Brittany N. Holmes
Justin L. Hart*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
Brittany N. Holmes
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Invasion of closed canopy forests by shade-tolerant alien plants has the potential to modify species composition, stand structure, ecosystem function, and long-term forest development patterns. Ligustrum sinense is a shade-tolerant alien shrub that has invaded bottomland forests throughout the southeastern United States. This species has received comparatively little attention in the literature despite its potential to drastically alter invaded sites. The overarching goal of our study was to document the relationships between Ligustrum sinense invasion and woody plant biodiversity and development patterns in an intact southeastern U.S. bottomland forest. The forest was dominated by Quercus nigra and Liquidambar styraciflua. Ligustrum sinense ranked fifth in basal area contribution, occurred in 97% of our plots, and represented 95% of all understory stems. Spearman's rho for dominance (based on basal area of stems > 5 cm diameter at breast height [dbh]) of L. sinense and woody plant species richness for each plot revealed a significant negative relationship (rs = −0.69, P < 0.01). A similar relationship was revealed between L. sinense density and woody plant species diversity (rs = −0.78, P < 0.01) and evenness (rs = −0.82, P < 0.01). Spearman's rho for L. sinense density and native understory stem density (individuals ≥ 1 m height, < 5 cm dbh) also revealed a significant negative association (rs = −0.48, P < 0.01). Under the current disturbance regime and without active management, we projected the forest would shift to support a stronger component of L. sinense and that structure would transition from tree to shrub dominance for sites within the forest.

Keywords

Chinese privet, Ligustrum sinense Loursweetgum, Liquidambar styraciflua L.water oak, Quercus nigra L.Alien shrubbiodiversitybottomland forestforest developmentshade-tolerantsoutheastern United States
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 175 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bazzaz, F. A. 1986. Life history of colonizing plants: some demographic, genetic, and physiological features. Pages 96–110 in Mooney, H. A. and Drake, J. A. eds. Ecology of Biological Invasions of North America and Hawaii. New York : Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Boyce, R. L. 2010. Invasive shrubs in Kentucky. Southeast. Nat. 17 :1–32.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. A., Blumenthal, D. M., Early, R., Grosholz, E. D., Lawler, J. J., Miller, L. P., Sorte, C. J. B., D'Antonio, C. M., Diez, J. M., Dukes, J. S., Ibanez, I., and Olden, J. D. 2012. Global change, global trade, and the next wave of plant invasions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10 :20–28.Google Scholar
Brantley, E. F. 2008. Influence of Chinese Privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.) on Riparian Forests of the Southern Piedmont: Net Primary Productivity, Carbon Sequestration, and Native Plant Regeneration. Ph.D Dissertation. Auburn, AL : Auburn University. 193 p.Google Scholar
Crawley, M. J. 1987. What makes a community invasible? Pages 429–453 in Gray, A. J., Crawley, M. J., and Edwards, P. J., eds. Colonization, Succession, and Stability. Oxford, U.K. : Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellison, A. M., Bank, M. S., Clinton, B. D., Colburn, E. A., Elliott, K., Ford, C. R., Foster, D. R., Kloeppe, B. D., Knoepp, J. D., Lovett, G. M., Mohan, J., Orwig, D. A., Rodenhouse, N. L., Sobczak, W. V., Stinson, K. A., Stone, J. K., Swan, C. M., Thompson, J., Von Holle, B., and Webster, J. R. 2005. Loss of foundation species: consequences for the structure and dynamics of forested ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3 :479–486.Google Scholar
Elton, C. S. 1958. The Ecology of Invasions by Plants and Animals. London : Methuen. 196 p.Google Scholar
Fenneman, N. M. 1938. Physiography of Eastern United States. New York : McGraw-Hill. 714 p.Google Scholar
Goelz, J. C. G. 1995. A stocking guide for southern bottomland hardwoods. South. J. Appl. For. 19 :103–104.Google Scholar
Gorchov, D. L. and Trissel, D. E. 2003. Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlings. Plant Ecol. 166 :13–24.Google Scholar
Grove, E. and Clarkson, B. D. 2005. An ecological study of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.) in the Waikato region. CBER Contract Report No. 41, prepared for Environment Waikato Regional Council. Hamilton, New Zealand : Centre for Biodiversity and Ecology Research, Department of Biological Sciences, The University of Waikato.Google Scholar
Hanula, J. L. and Horn, S. 2011. Removing an exotic shrub from riparian forest increases butterfly abundance and diversity. For. Ecol. Manag. 262 :674–680.Google Scholar
Hanula, J. L., Horn, S., and Taylor, J. W. 2009. Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) removal and its effects on native plant communities of riparian forests. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2 :292–300.Google Scholar
Harper, R. M. 1943. Forests of Alabama. Monograph 10. University, Alabama, State : Geological Survey of Alabama. 230 p.Google Scholar
Hart, J. L., Bhuta, A. A. R., and Schneider, R. M. 2011. Canopy disturbance patterns in secondary hardwood stands on the Highland Rim of Alabama. Castanea 76 :55–63.Google Scholar
Hart, J. L. and Grissino-Mayer, H. D. 2008. Vegetation patterns and dendroecology of a mixed hardwood forest on the Cumberland Plateau: implications for stand development. For. Ecol. Manag. 255 :1960–1975.Google Scholar
Hart, J. L. and Grissino-Mayer, H. D. 2009. Gap-scale disturbance processes in secondary hardwood stands on the Cumberland Plateau, Tennessee, USA. Plant Ecol. 201 :131–146.Google Scholar
Kennedy, T. A., Naeem, S., Howe, K. M., Knops, J. M. H., Tilman, D., and Reich, P. 2002. Biodiversity as a barrier to ecological invasion. Nature 417 :636–638.Google Scholar
Kittell, M. M. 2001. Relationships among Invasive Chinese Privet, Plant Diversity, and Small Mammal Captures in Southeastern Deciduous Forests. M.S. thesis. Clemson, SC : Clemson University. 35 p.Google Scholar
Klepac, J., Rummer, R. B., Hanula, J. L., and Horn, S. 2007. Mechanical Removal of Chinese Privet. Asheville, NC : U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station, SRS-43. 5 p.Google Scholar
Knapp, L. B. and Canham, C. D. 2000. Invasion of old-growth forests by Ailanthus altissima: sapling growth and recruitment in canopy gaps. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 127 :307–315.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M. 2000. Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local processes to community pattern. Science 288 :852–854.Google Scholar
Levine, J. M., Alder, P. B., and Yelenik, S. G. 2004. A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7 :975–989.Google Scholar
Lozon, J. D. and MacIsaac, H. J. 1997. Biological invasions: are they dependent on disturbance? Environ. Rev. 5 :131–144.Google Scholar
Ludwig, J. A. and Reynolds, J. F. 1988. Statistical Ecology. New York : John Wiley. 337 p.Google Scholar
Martin, P. H., Canham, C. D., and Marks, P. L. 2009. Why forests appear resistant to exotic plant invasions: intentional introductions, stand dynamics, and the role of shade tolerance. Front. Ecol. Environ. 7 :142–149.Google Scholar
Merriam, R. W. and Feil, E. 2003. The potential impacts of an introduced shrub on native plant diversity and forest regeneration. Biol. Invasions 4 :369–373.Google Scholar
Miller, J. H. 2003. Nonnative Invasive Plants of Southern Forests: A Field Guide for Identification and Control. Asheville, North Carolina : USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. GTR SRS-62. 93 p.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. D., Lockaby, B. G., and Brantley, E. F. 2011. Influence of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) on decomposition and nutrient availability in riparian forests. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 4 :437–447.Google Scholar
Morris, L. L., Walck, J. L., and Hidayati, S. N. 2002. Growth and reproduction of the invasive Ligustrum sinense and native Forestiera ligustrina (Oleaceae): implications for the invasion and persistence of a nonnative shrub. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163 :1001–1010.Google Scholar
Nesom, G. L. 2009. Taxonomic overview of Ligustrum (Oleaceae) naturalized in North America north of Mexico. Phytologia 91 :467–482.Google Scholar
Nyland, R. D. 2007. Silviculture: Concepts and Applications, 2nd ed. CityLong Grove, Illinois : Waveland Press. 682 p.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. D. and Larson, B. C. 1996. Forest Stand Dynamics. Update Edition. New York : John Wiley. 520 p.Google Scholar
Panetta, F. D. 2000. Fates of fruits and seeds of Ligustrum lucidum W. T. Ait and L. sinense Lour. maintained under natural rainfall or irrigation. Aust. J. Bot. 48 :701–705.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50 :53–65.Google Scholar
Powell, K. I., Chase, J. M., and Knight, T. M. 2011. A synthesis of plant invasion effects on biodiversity across spatial scales. Am. J. Bot. 98 :539–548.Google Scholar
PRISM Climate Group. 2012. PRISM Climate Group. http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/. Accessed April 1, 2012.Google Scholar
Reichard, S. H. and Hamilton, C. W. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Biol. 11 :193–203.Google Scholar
Reinhart, K. O., Greene, E., and Callaway, R. M. 2005. Effects of Acer platanoides invasion on understory plant communities and tree regeneration in the northern Rocky Mountains. Ecography 28 :573–582.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. 1989. Invasibility of plant communities. Pages 369–388 in Drake, J., diCastri, F., and Groves, R., eds. Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective. Chichester, U.K. : Wiley.Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M. and Richardson, D. M. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77 :1655–1661.Google Scholar
Richards, J. D. and Hart, J. L. 2011. Canopy gap dynamics and development patterns in secondary Quercus stands on the Cumberland Plateau, Alabama, USA. For. Ecol. Manag. 262 :2229–2239.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. M. and Pyšek, P. 2006. Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invisibility. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30 :409–431.Google Scholar
Richardson, D. M. and Rejmánek, M. 2011. Trees and shrubs as invasive alien species—a global review. Divers. Distrib. 17 :788–809.Google Scholar
Seabloom, E. W., Harpole, W. S., Reichman, O. J., and Tilman, D. 2003. Invasion, competitive dominance, and resource use by exotic and native California grassland species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100 :13384–13389.Google Scholar
Shankman, D. and Hart, J. L. 2007. The Fall Line: A physiographic forest-vegetation boundary. Geogr. Rev. 97 :502–519.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. and Von Holle, B. 1999. Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol. Invasions 1 :21–32.Google Scholar
Swarbrick, J. T., Timmins, S. M., and Bullen, K. M. 1999. The biology of Australian weeds, 36. Ligustrum lucidum Aiton and L. sinense Lour. Plant Prot. Q. 14 :122–129.Google Scholar
Thornthwaite, C. W. 1948. An approach toward rational classification of climate. Geographical Review 38 :55–94.Google Scholar
[US Census] United States Census. 2010. United States Census 2010. http://2010.census.gov/2010census/#. Accessed April 4, 2012).Google Scholar
[USDA NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2012a. USDA NRCS PLANTS Database. http://usda.plants.gov/. Accessed June 3, 2012.Google Scholar
[USDA NRCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service. 2012b. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed March 15, 2012.Google Scholar
[USDA SCS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1981. Soil Survey of Tuscaloosa County, Alabama. USDA Soil Conservation Service, 118 p.Google Scholar
[US NCDC] U.S. National Climate Data Center). 2012. National Climate Data Center. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov//. Accessed April 4, 2012.Google Scholar
Vila, M., Espinar, J. L., Hejda, M., Hulme, P. E., Jarosik, V., Maron, J. L., Pergl, J., Schaffner, U., Sun, Y., and Pyšek, P. 2011. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 14 :702–708.Google Scholar
Von Holle, B., Delacourt, H. R., and Simberloff, D. 2003. The importance of biological inertia in plant community resistance to invasion. J. Veg. Sci. 14 :425–432.Google Scholar
Ward, R. W. 2002. Extent and dispersal rates of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense) invasion on the upper Oconee River floodplain, north Georgia. Southeast. Geogr. 42 :29–48.Google Scholar
Westoby, M., Dalby, J., and Adams-Acton, L. 1983. Fruit production by two species of privet, Ligustrum sinense Lour. and L. lucidum W. T. Ait., in Syndey. Aust. Weeds 2 :127–129.Google Scholar
Wilcox, J. and Beck, C. W. 2007. Effects of Ligustrum sinense Lour. (Chinese privet) on abundance and diversity of songbirds and native plants in a southeastern nature preserve. Southeast. Nat. 6 :535–550.Google Scholar
Zeide, B. 2005. How to measure stand density. Trees 19 :1–14.Google Scholar