Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:05:24.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management of Ventenata dubia in the inland Pacific Northwest with indaziflam

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2019

Lindsay E. Koby ,
Timothy S. Prather ,
Harold Quicke ,
Jared Beuschlein  and
Ian C. Burke Open the ORCID record for Ian C. Burke [Opens in a new window]
Lindsay E. Koby
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Washington State University, Pullman WA, USA
Timothy S. Prather
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA
Harold Quicke
Affiliation:
Western Vegetation Management Stewardship and Development Manager, Bayer CropScience LP, Windsor, CO, USA
Jared Beuschlein
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Washington State University, Pullman WA, USA
Ian C. Burke*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Washington State University, Pullman WA, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Ian C. Burke, Department of Crop and Soil Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-6420. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ventenata [Ventenata dubia (Leers) Cross] is a winter annual grass relatively new to the inland Pacific Northwest that is capable of displacing desired vegetation. Indaziflam was evaluated for the management of V. dubia on two Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) sites near Moscow, ID, and Pullman, WA. While perennial grasses were dormant, applications of indaziflam in mixture with various herbicides were made in spring 2016. Treatment effects were evaluated for 2 yr by visual assessments of community composition and canopy cover of V. dubia and other non-weedy species (assessments occurred 3 to 6 mo after treatment, depending on location) and by representative cover class assessments. Biomass samples of all plant species were collected in the summer of 2017. Reduced V. dubia cover was observed in 2016, except when glyphosate was used alone. In 2017 indaziflam applied alone or in mixture with rimsulfuron effectively controlled V. dubia with minimal impact on desirable vegetation. Plant biomass from nontreated plots averaged 40 g m−2 for V. dubia and 100 to 179 g m−2 for perennial grasses. Plant biomass averaged <11 g m−2 for V. dubia and 371 to 490 g m−2 for perennial grasses when indaziflam at 102 g ai ha−1 plus glyphosate at 474 g ai ha−1 was applied. Smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.) biomass was positively associated with the reduction of V. dubia, and there was a decrease in diversity associated with the removal of V. dubia through effective treatments. Indaziflam is an effective tool for the management of V. dubia in perennial grass stands, and spring applications of indaziflam should be in mixture with herbicides with POST activity.

Keywords

CoverPalouse Prairiespecies richness
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , December 2019 , pp. 223 - 228
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Jane M. Mangold, Montana State University

References

Brabham, C, Lei, L, Gu, Y, Stork, J, Barrett, M, DeBolt, S (2014) Indaziflam herbicidal action: a potent cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor. Plant Physiol 166:1177–1185 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[CABI] CAB International (2018) Ventenata dubia [original text by Timothy Prather]. In Invasive Species Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CABI. https://www.cabi.org/isc. Accessed: March 23, 2018Google Scholar
Dittel, JW, Sanchez, D, Ellsworth, LM, Morozumi, CN, Mata-Gonzalez, R (2018) Vegetation response to juniper reduction and grazing exclusion in sagebrush-steppe habitat in eastern Oregon. Rangeland Ecol Manag 71:213–219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heip, C, Engels, P (1974) Comparing species diversity and evenness indices. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 54:559–563 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, LC, Norton, N, Prather, TS (2018) Indicators of ventenata (Ventenata dubia) invasion in sagebrush steppe rangelands. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 11:1–9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyser, GB, Ditomaso, JM, Doran, MP, Orloff, SB, Wilson, RG, Lancaster, DL, Lile, DF, Porath, ML (2007) Control of medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae) and other annual grasses with imazapic. Weed Technol 21:66–75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Looney, C, Eigenbrode, SD (2012) Characteristics and distribution of Palouse Prairie remnants: implications for conservation planning. Nat Area J 32:75–85 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangold, J, Parkinson, H, Duncan, C, Rice, P, Davis, E, Menalled, F (2013) Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control with imazapic on Montana grasslands. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 6:554–558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCune, B, Mefford, MJ (2011) PC-ORD. Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data. Version 6. Gleneden Beach, OR: MjM Software Google Scholar
McIntosh, MS (2015) Can analysis of variance be more significant? Agron J 107:706–717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, KJ, Dixon, PM (2015) Analysis of combined experiments revisited. Agron J 107:763–771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, KE, Caruso, T, Buscot, F, Fischer, M, Hancock, C, Maier, TS, Meiners, T, Muller, C, Obermaier, E, Prati, D, Socher, SA, Sonnemann, I, Waschke, N, Wubet, T, Wurst, S, Rillig, MC (2014) Choosing and using diversity indices: insights for ecological applications from the German biodiversity exploratories. Ecol Evol 4: 3514–3524 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabba, RP, Vaughn, KC (1999) Herbicides that inhibit cellulose biosynthesis. Weed Sci 47:757–763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastian, DJ, Nissen, SJ, De, J, Rodrigues, S (2016a) Preemergence control of six invasive winter annual grasses with imazapic and indaziflam. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 9:308–316 Google Scholar
Sebastian, DJ, Nissen, SJ, Sebastian, JR, Meiman, PJ, Beck, KG (2017) Preemergence control of nine invasive weeds with aminocyclopyrachlor, aminopyralid, and indaziflam. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 10:99–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebastian, DJ, Sebastian, JR, Nissen, SJ, Beck, KG (2016b) A potential new herbicide for invasive annual grass control on rangeland. Rangeland Ecol Manag 69:195–198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaner, DL (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 513 p Google Scholar
Sheley, RL, Carpinelli, MF, Morghan, KJR (2007) Effects of imazapic on target and nontarget vegetation during revegetation. Weed Technol 21:1071–1081 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spellerberg, I, Fedor, P (2003) A tribute to Claude Shannon (1916–2001) and a plea for more rigorous use of species richness, species diversity and the “Shannon–Wiener” Index. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:177–179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, JM, Pavek, PLS, Prather, TS (2015) Ecological characteristics of Ventenata dubia in the intermountain Pacific Northwest. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 8:57–71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, JM, Prather, TS (2016) Herbicide control strategies for Ventenata dubia in the intermountain Pacific Northwest. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 9:128–137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, RJ, Willis, KJ, Field, R (2001) Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. J Biogeogr 28:453–470 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, B (2013) North Africa Grass. Page 71 in Mealor, B, Collier, T, Miller, S, Burnett, S, eds. Weed Watchlist Field Guide. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming Extension: B-1227Google Scholar