Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:38:49.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Invasion Success in Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica): A Population Genetic Approach Exploring Genetic Diversity and Historical Introductions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Rima D. Lucardi ,
Lisa E. Wallace  and
Gary N. Ervin
Rima D. Lucardi*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Lisa E. Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
Gary N. Ervin
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Propagule pressure significantly contributes to and limits the potential success of a biological invasion, especially during transport, introduction, and establishment. Events such as multiple introductions of foreign parent material and gene flow among them can increase genetic diversity in founding populations, often leading to greater invasion success. We applied the tools and theory of population genetics to better understand the dynamics of successful biological invasion. The focal species, cogongrass, is a perennial invasive grass species significantly affecting the Gulf Coast and southeastern region of the United States. The literature indicates separate, allopatric introductions of material from East Asia (Philippines and Japan) into the U.S. states of Mississippi and Alabama. Molecular analysis of samples from those two states utilized amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers on 388 individuals from 21 localities. We hypothesized that previously isolated lineages of cogongrass are present and crossing in the Southeast. We observed genetic variation within localities (0.013 ≤ heterozygosity (He) ≤ 0.051, mean = 0.028 ± 0.001) with significant and substantial population structure (FST = 0.534, P < 0.001). Population structure analyses detected two genetically defined and statistically supported populations, which appear to have experienced some admixture. The geographic distribution of those populations was consistent with the two-introduction scenario reported previously. These results are also consistent with contact in the invasive range of previously isolated lineages from the native range.

Keywords

Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. IMCYAFLPAlabamagenetic diversityImperataMississippiPoaceaepopulation structure
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 59 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Al-Jaboory, BA, Hassawy, GS (1980) Comparative morphological development of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) in Iraq. Weed Sci 28:324–326 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsellem, L, Noyer, JL, LeBourgeois, T, Hossaert-McKey, M (2000) Comparison of genetic diversity of the invasive weed Rubus alcefolius Poir. (Rosaceae) in its native range and in areas of introduction, using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Mol Ecol 9:443–455 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bąba, W, Kurowska, M, Kompała-Bąba, A, Wilczek, A, Długosz, J, Szarejko, I (2012) Genetic diversity of populations of Brachypodium pinnatum (L.) P. Beauv.: expansive grass in a fragmented landscape. Pol J Ecol 60:31–40 Google Scholar
Baker, SA, Dyer, RJ (2011) Invasion genetics of Microstegium vimineum (Poaceae) within the James River Basin of Virginia, USA. Conserv Genet 12:793–803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonin, A, Ehrich, D, Manel, S (2007) Statistical analysis of amplified fragment length polymorphism data: a toolbox for molecular ecologists and evolutionists. Mol Ecol 16:3737–3758 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, CT, Carter, R (1993) Cogongrass, Imperata cylindrica, in the United States. Weed Technol 7:1005–1009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, CT, Krutz, LJ, Ervin, GN, Reddy, KN, Byrd, JD Jr. (2010) Ecotype variability and edaphic characteristics for cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) populations in Mississippi. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:199–207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussell, JD, Waycott, M, Chappill, JA (2005) Arbitrarily amplified DNA markers as characters for phylogenetic inference. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 7:3–26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caballero, A, Quesada, H, Rolán-Alvarez, E (2008) Impact of amplified fragment length polymorphism size homoplasy on the estimation on population genetic diversity and the detection of selective loci. Genetics 179:539–554 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, D, Duchense, P, Bernatchez, L (2003) AFLP utility for population assignment studies: analytical investigation and empirical comparison with microsatellites. Mol Ecol 12:1979–1991 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Capo-chichi, LJA, Faircloth, WH, Williamson, AG, Patterson, MG, Miller, JH, van Santen, E (2008) Invasion dynamics and genotypic diversity of cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) at the point of introduction in the southeastern United States. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:133–141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, JA, Jansson, R, Nilsson, C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15:22–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, K-T, Chou, C-H (1997) Ecotypic variation of Imperata cylindrica populations in Taiwan: I. Morphological and molecular evidences. Bot Bull Acad Sin 38:215–223 Google Scholar
Chou, C-H, Tsai, C-C (1999) Genetic variation in the intergenic spacer of ribosomal DNA of Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv. var. major (cogongrass) populations in Taiwan. Bot Bull Acad Sin 40:319–327 Google Scholar
Coulatti, R, Grigorovich, I, MacIsaac, H (2006) Propagule pressure: a null model for biological invasions. Biol Invasions 8:1023–1037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dlugosch, KM, Parker, IM (2008) Founding events in species invasion: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrich, D (2006) AFLPDAT: a collection of R functions for convenient handling of AFLP data. Mol Ecol Notes 6:603–604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellstrand, NC, Roose, ML (1987) Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am J Bot 74:123–131 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppstein, MJ, Molofsky, J (2007) Invasiveness in plant communities with feedbacks. Ecol Lett 10:253–263 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ervin, GN, Holly, DC (2011) Examining local transferability of predictive species distribution models for invasive plants: an example with cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:390–401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evanno, G, Regnaut, S, Goudet, J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Excoffier, L, Lischer, HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver. 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Excoffier, L, Smouse, PE, Quattro, JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabel, ML (1982) A Biosystematic Study of the Genus Imperata (Gramineae: Andropogoneae). Ph.D dissertation. Ames, IA: Iowa State University. 94 pGoogle Scholar
Genton, BJ, Shykoff, JA, Giraud, T (2005) High genetic diversity in French invasive populations of common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, as a result of multiple sources of introduction. Mol Ecol 14:4275–4285 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holly, DC, Ervin, GN (2006) Characterization and quantitative assessment of rhizome penetration by cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv.). Weed Biol Manag 6:120–123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbard, CE, Gray, AP, Brown, D, Whyte, RO (1944) Imperata cylindrica: Taxonomy, Distribution, Economic Significance, and Control. Oxford, Great Britain Imperial Agricultural Bureaux Joint Publ 7. 63 pGoogle Scholar
Huff, DR, Peakall, R, Smouse, PE (1993) RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss [Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.]. Theor Appl Genet 86:927–934 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hughes, AR, Inouye, BD, Johnson, MTJ (2008) Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol Lett 11:609–623 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolbe, JJ, Glor, RE, Schettino, LRG, Lara, AC, Larson, A, Losos, JB (2004) Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431:177–181 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koopman, WJM, Gort, G (2004) Significance tests and weighted values for AFLP similarities, based on Arabidopsis in silica AFLP fragment length distributions. Genetics 167:1915–1928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreivi, M, Rautiainen, P, Aspi, J, Hyvärinen, M (2005) Genetic structure and gene flow in an endangered perennial grass, Arctophila fulva var. pendulina . Conserv Genet 6:683–696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavergne, S, Molofsky, J (2007) Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 104:3883–3888 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Z, Ferdinandez, YSN, Coulman, B (2006) An assessment of genetic variation and relationships of smooth bromegrass cultivars and accessions using AFLP markers. Can J Plant Sci 86:453–458 Google Scholar
Lockwood, JL, Cassey, P, Blackburn, T (2005) The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20:223–228 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lonsdale, WM (1999) Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80:1522–1536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucardi, RD (2012) Multi-scale Population Genetic Analysis of Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica) in the Southeastern United States: Introduction History, Range Expansion, and Hybridization. Ph.D dissertation, Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University. 155 pGoogle Scholar
Luikart, G, Sherwin, WB, Steele, BM, Allendorf, FW (1998) Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Mol Ecol 7:963–974 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDonald, GE (2004) Cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica)—biology, ecology, and management. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23:367–380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariette, S, LeCorre, V, Austerlitz, F, Kremer, A (2002) Sampling within the genome for measuring within-population diversity: trade-offs between markers. Mol Ecol 11:1145–1156 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mellish, A, Coulman, B, Ferdiandez, Y (2002) Genetic relationships among selected wheatgrass cultivars and species determined on the basis of AFLP markers. Crop Sci 42:1662–1668 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meudt, HM, Clarke, AC (2007) Almost forgotten or latest practice? AFLP applications, analyses and advances. Trends Plant Sci 12:106–117 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nei, M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosities and genetic distances from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M (1987) Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York, NY Columbia University Press. 513 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissar, MF, Iram, S, Akhtar, Y, Majeed, A, Ismail, S, Lin, F (2010) AFLP based analysis of genetic diversity in buffle grass. World Appl Sci J 10:560–567 Google Scholar
Nybom, H (2004) Comparison of different nuclear DNA markers for estimating intraspecific genetic diversity in plans. Mol Ecol 13:1143–1155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Hanlon, PC, Peakall, R, Briese, DT (1999) Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) reveals introgression in weedy Onopordum thistles: hybridization and invasion. Mol Ecol 8:1239–1246 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pappert, RA, Hamrick, JL, Donovan, LA (2000) Genetic variation in Pueraria lobata (Fabaceae), an introduced, clonal, invasive plant of the southeastern United States. Am J Bot 87:1240–1245 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, ED Jr. (1979) Ecological implications of clonal diversity in parthenogenetic morphospecies. Am Zool 19:753–762 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pashley, CH, Bailey, JP, Ferris, C (2007) Clonal diversity in British populations of the alien invasive giant knotweed, Fallopia sachalinensis (F. Schmidt) Ronse Decraene in the context of European and Japanese plants. Watsonia 26:359–371 Google Scholar
Peakall, R, Smouse, PE (2006) GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, J, Weller, SG, Sakai, AK (2005) Genetic diversity does not affect the invasiveness of fountain grass (Pennisetum setaceum) in Arizona, California, and Hawaii. Divers Distrib 11:241–247 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M, Donnelly, P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salmon, A, Ainouche, ML, Wendel, JF (2005) Genetic and epigenetic consequences of recent hybridization and polyploidy in Spartina (Poaceae). Mol Ecol 14:1163–1175 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherwin, WB, Jobot, F, Rush, R, Rossetto, M (2006) Measurement of biological information with applications from genes to landscapes. Mol Ecol 15:2857–2869 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tabor, P (1949) Cogon grass, Imperata cylindrica (L.) Beauv., in the Southeastern United States. Agron J 41:270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabor, P (1952) Cogongrass in Mobile County, Alabama. Agron J 44:50 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsutsui, ND, Suarez, AV, Holway, DA, Case, TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 97:5948–5953 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellend, M, Drummond, EBM, Tomimatsu, H (2010) Effects of genotype identity and diversity on the invasiveness and invasibility of plant populations. Oecologia 162:371–381 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vergara, R, Minno, MC, Minno, M, Soltis, DE, Soltis, PS (2008) Preliminary study using ISSRs to differentiate Imperata taxa (Poaceae: Andropogoneae) growing in the U.S. Southeast Nat 7:267–276 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vos, P, Hogers, R, Bleeker, M, Reijans, M, Van de Lee, T, Hornes, M, Friters, A, Pot, J, Paleman, J, Kuiper, M, Zabeau, M (1995) AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4407–4414 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, NF, Hulme, PE, Hoelzel, AR (2003) Population genetics of an invasive species, Heracleum mantegazzianum: implications for the role of life history, demographics and independent introductions. Mol Ecol 12:1747–1756 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walls, RL (2010) Hybridization and plasticity contribute to divergence among coastal and wetland populations of invasive hybrid Japanese knotweed s.l. (Fallopia spp.). Estuaries Coasts 33:902–918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, SM, Gaskin, JF, Wilson, LM (2008) Ecological genetics of plant invasion: What do we know? Invasive Plant Sci Manag 1:98–109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar