Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T01:31:46.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extending the Timeframe for Rapid Response and Best Management Practices of Flood-Dispersed Japanese Knotweed (Fallopia japonica)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Brian P. Colleran  and
Katherine E. Goodall
Brian P. Colleran*
Affiliation:
Polatin Ecological Services, P.O. Box 511, Turners Falls, MA 01376
Katherine E. Goodall
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies Program, Wellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA 02481
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this article is to extend the reported period in which flood-distributed knotweed propagules may be successfully managed using only manual labor. During a second round of early detection and rapid response (EDRR) management along the Green River in Guilford, VT, we collected and measured all Japanese knotweed propagules that had been distributed by flooding approximately 21 mo earlier, in August 2011, at a single site. Our data suggest that knotweed s.l. prioritizes the growth of new stems over new rhizomes at the start of a growing season. Because the limiting factor for successful removal of new knotweed s.l. plants by hand is the size of the rhizome system, our findings support extending the time frame for EDRR management of flood-distributed knotweed s.l. into the second spring after its initial dispersal. Additionally, in November 2013, surveys of our work sites found no new knotweed s.l. plants in locations accessible to work crews. In addition to validating our EDRR management techniques, this implies that knotweed s.l. fragment viability does not extend past the second spring following its dispersal.

Keywords

Knotweed sensu latoJapanese knotweedPolygonum cuspidatum Siebold & Zucc.Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) Ronse Decr.Reynoutria japonica Houtt.Climate changeearly detectionerosionfloodingknotweed growthknotweed propagulesknotweed spreadrapid responseriparian invasivesTropical Storm Irenevolunteer knotweed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 250 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aguilera, AG, Alpert, P, Dukes, JS, Harrington, R (2009) Impacts of the invasive plant Fallopia japonica (Houtt.) on plant communities and ecosystem processes. Biol Invasions 12:1243–1252 Google Scholar
Bailey, JP (1994) Reproductive biology and fertility of Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed) and its hybrids in the British Isles. Pages 27–37 in de Waal, LC, Child, LE, Wade, PM, Brock, JH, eds. Ecology and Management of Invasive Riverside Plants. Hoboken, NJ Wiley Google Scholar
Bailey, JP, Bímová, K, Mandák, B (2008) Asexual spread versus sexual reproduction and evolution in Japanese knotweed s.l. sets the stage for the “battle of the clones.” Biol Invasions 11:1189–1203 Google Scholar
Bailey, JP, Conolly, AP (2000) Prize-winners to pariahs—a history of Japanese knotweed s.l. (Polygonaceae) in the British Isles. Watsonia 110:93–110 Google Scholar
Colleran, BC, Goodall, KE (2014) In situ growth and rapid response management of flood-dispersed Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7:84–92 Google Scholar
De Waal, LC (2001) A viability study of Fallopia japonica stem tissue. Weed Res 41:447–460 Google Scholar
DiTomaso, JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management. Weed Sci 48:255–265 Google Scholar
Dyckman, LJ, Hoy, JB (2001) Invasive species: Obstacles Hinder Federal Rapid Response to Growing Threat. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Accountability Office Rep. GAO-01-724. Pages 48 pGoogle Scholar
Elliott, V (2011) Couple are forced to demolish their £300k four-bed home after it was invaded by Japanese knotweed. Daily Mail, October 23, 2011 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052337/Hertfordshire-couple-demolish-300k-home-rid-japanese-knotweed.html. Accessed July 27, 2013Google Scholar
Forman, J, Kesseli, RV (2003) Sexual reproduction in the invasive species Fallopia japonica (Polygonaceae). Am J Bot 90:586–592 Google Scholar
Gammon, MA, Baack, E, Orth, JF, Kesseli, RV (2010) Viability, growth, and fertility of knotweed cytotypes in North America. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3:208–218 Google Scholar
Gammon, MA, Grimsby, JL, Tsirelson, D, Kesseli, RV (2007) Molecular and morphological evidence reveals introgression in swarms of the invasive taxa Fallopia japonica, F. sachalinensis, and F. × Bohemica (Polygonaceae) in the United States. Am J Bot 94:948–956 Google Scholar
Gerber, E, Krebs, C, Murrell, C, Moretti, M, Rocklin, R, Schaffner, U (2008) Exotic invasive knotweeds (Fallopia spp.) negatively affect native plant and invertebrate assemblages in European riparian habitats. Biol Conserv 141:646–654 Google Scholar
Lecerf, A, Patfield, D, Boiché, A, Riipinen, MP, Chauvet, E, Dobson, M (2007) Stream ecosystems respond to riparian invasion by Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 64:1273–1283 Google Scholar
Locandro, RR (1973) Reproduction Ecology of Polygonum cuspidatum. Ph.D Dissertation. New Brunswick, NJ Rutgers University. 133 pGoogle Scholar
Maerz, JC, Blossey, B, Nuzzo, V (2005) Green frogs show reduced foraging success in habitats invaded by Japanese knotweed. Biol Conserv 14:2901–2911 Google Scholar
McNeely, J, Neville, LE, Rejmanek, M (2003) When is eradication a sound investment? Conserv Pract 4:30–31 Google Scholar
Moody, ME, Mack, RN (1988) Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J Appl Ecol 25:1009–1021 Google Scholar
Nagel, J (2012) Concrete-busting knotweed menaces Metro landscape. Surrey-North Delta Leader, July 5, 2012. http://www.surreyleader.com/news/161471115.html. Accessed July 27, 2013Google Scholar
Naylor, RL (2000) The economics of alien species invasions. Pages 241–259 in Mooney, HA, Hobbs, RJ, eds. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington, DC Island Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M (2000) Invasive plants: approaches and predictions. Aust Ecol 25:497–506 Google Scholar
Rejmánek, M, Pitcairn, MJ (2002) When is eradication of exotic plant pests a realistic goal? Pages 249–253 in Veitch, CR, Clout, MN, eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland; Cambridge, UK IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group. 414 pGoogle Scholar
Rejmánek, M, Richardson, DM, Pysěk, P (2005) Plant invasions and invasibility of plant communities. Pages 332–355 in van der, Maarel, ed. Vegetation Ecology. Oxford, UK Blackwell Google Scholar
Rouifed, S, Puijalon, S, Viricel, MR, Piola, F (2011) Achene buoyancy and germinability of the terrestrial invasive Fallopia x bohemica in aquatic environment: a new vector of dispersion? Ecoscience 18:79–84 Google Scholar
Sásik, R, Pavol, E Jr (2006) Rhizome regeneration of Fallopia japonica (Japanese knotweed) (Houtt.) Ronse Decr, I: regeneration rate and size of regenerated plants. Folia Biol Oecol 33:57–63 Google Scholar
Simberloff, D (2003) Eradication-preventing invasion at the outset. Weed Sci 51:247–253 Google Scholar
Stoll, P, Gatzsch, K, Rusterholz, HP, Baur, B (2012) Response of plant and gastropod species to knotweed invasion. Basic Appl Ecol 13:232–240 Google Scholar
Westbrooks, RG (2004) New approaches for early detection and rapid response to invasive plants in the United States. Weed Technol 18:1468–1471 Google Scholar
Williams, F, Eschen, R, Harris, A, Djeddour, D, Pratt, C, Shaw, RS, Varia, S, Lamontagne-Godwin, JD, Thomas, SE, Murphy, ST (2010) The economic cost of invasive non-native species on Great Britain. Wallingford, UK: CABI Project VM10066. 199 pGoogle Scholar
Wittenberg, R, Cock, MJW (2001) Invasive Alien Species: A Toolkit for Best Prevention and Management Practices. Wallingford, UK: CABI. 228 pGoogle Scholar