Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:54:39.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating Alternative Weed Management Strategies for Three Montana Landscapes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Leonardo Frid ,
David Hanna ,
Nathan Korb ,
Brad Bauer ,
Katherine Bryan ,
Brian Martin  and
Brett Holzer
Leonardo Frid*
Affiliation:
Apex Resource Management Solutions Ltd., Bowen Island, BC, Canada V0N 1G1
David Hanna
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy of Montana, Helena, MT 59601
Nathan Korb
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy of Montana, Helena, MT 59601
Brad Bauer
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy of Montana, Helena, MT 59601
Katherine Bryan
Affiliation:
ESSA Technologies, Vancouver, BC Canada V6H 2H4
Brian Martin
Affiliation:
The Nature Conservancy of Montana, Helena, MT 59601
Brett Holzer
Affiliation:
Bozeman, MT 59718
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Determining the best strategy for allocating weed management resources across and between landscapes is challenging because of the uncertainties and large temporal and spatial scales involved. Ecological models of invasive plant spread and control provide a practical tool with which to evaluate alternative management strategies at landscape scales. We developed a spatially explicit model for the spread and control of spotted knapweed and leafy spurge across three Montana landscapes. The objective of the model was to determine the ecological and economic costs and benefits of alternative strategies across landscapes of varying size and stages of infestation. Our results indicate that (1) in the absence of management the area infested will continue to increase exponentially leading to a substantial cost in foregone grazing revenues; (2) even though the costs of management actions are substantial, there is a net economic benefit associated with a broad range of management strategies; (3) strategies a that prioritize targeting small new infestations consistently outperform strategies that target large established patches; and (4) inconsistent treatment and short-term delays can greatly reduce the economic and ecological benefits of management.

Keywords

Leafy spurge, Euphorbia esula L. EPHESspotted knapweed, Centaurea stoebe L. CENMASpatially explicit simulation modellandscape scalemanagement strategyMontanacost benefit analysisearly detection and rapid response
Type
Research
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 48 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, G. L., Prosser, C. W., Wendel, L. E., Delfosse, E. S., and Faust, R. M. 2003. The Ecological Areawide Management (TEAM) of leafy spurge purge program of the United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service. Pest Manag. Sci. 59 :609–613.Google Scholar
Arbaugh, M. J., Schilling, S., Merzenich, J., and van Wagtendon, J. W. 2000. A test of the strategic fuels management model VDDT using historical data from Yosemite National Park. Pages 85–89 in Neuenschwander, L. F., and Ryan, K. C., tech., eds. Proceedings of the Joint Fire Science Conference and Workshop, Volume II. Boise, ID : University of Idaho and International Association of Wildland Fire.Google Scholar
Bergelson, J., Newman, J., and Floresroux, E. 1993. Rates of weed spread in spatially heterogeneous environments. Ecology 74 :999–1011.Google Scholar
Beukema, S. J., Kurz, W. A., Klenner, W., Merzenich, J., and Arbaugh, M. 2003. Applying TELSA to assess alternative management scenarios. Pages 145–154 in Arthaud, G. J., and Barrett, T. M., eds. Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Butler, J. L., Parker, M. S., and Murphy, J. T. 2006. Efficacy of flea beetle control of leafy spurge in Montana and South Dakota. Rangeland Ecol. Manag. 59 :453–461.Google Scholar
Chong, G. W., Otsuki, Y., Stohlgren, T. J., Guenther, D., Evangelista, P., Villa, C., and Waters, A. 2006. Evaluating plant invasions from both habitat and species perspectives. West. N. Am. Nat. 66 (1):92–105.Google Scholar
Chornesky, E. A., Bartuska, A. M., Aplet, G. H., Britton, K. O., Cummings-Carlson, J., Davis, F. W., Eskow, J., Gordon, F. R., Gottschalk, K. W., Haack, R. A., Hansen, A. J., Mack, R. N., Rahel, F. J., Shannon, M. A., Wainger, L. A., and Wigley, T. B. 2005. Science priorities for reducing the threat of invasive species to sustainable forestry. Bioscience 55 (4):335–348.Google Scholar
Clark, J. S., Fastie, C., Hurtt, G., and Jackson, S. T. 1998. Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration. BioScience 48 :13–24.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, J. M. 2000. Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts and management. Weed Sci. 48 :255–265.Google Scholar
Eiswerth, M. and Cornelis van Kooten, G. 2002. Uncertainty, economics, and the spread of invasive plant species. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84 (5):1317–322.Google Scholar
ESSA Technologies. 2007. Vegetation Dynamics Development Tool User Guide, Version 6.0. Vancouver, BC, Canada : ESSA Technologies. 196 p.Google Scholar
ESSA Technologies. 2008. TELSA—Tool for Exploratory Landscape Scenario Analyses: User's Guide Version 3.6. Vancouver, BC, Canada : ESSA Technologies. 235 p.Google Scholar
Forbis, T. A., Provencher, L., Frid, L., and Medlyn, G. 2006. Great Basin land management planning using ecological modeling. Environ. Manag. 38 (1):62–83.Google Scholar
Frid, L. and Wilmshurst, J. 2009. Decision analysis to evaluate control strategies for crested wheatgrass in Grasslands National Park of Canada. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 2 :324–336.Google Scholar
Hemstrom, M. A., Korol, J. J., and Hann, W. J. 2001. Trends in terrestrial plant communities and landscape health indicate the effects of alternative management strategies in the interior Columbia River basin. For. Ecol. Manag. 153 :105–125.Google Scholar
Higgins, S., Nathan, R., and Cain, M. 2003. Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal? Ecology 84 (8):1945–1956.Google Scholar
Higgins, S. I., Richardson, D. M., and Cowling, R. M. 2000. A dynamic spatial model for managing alien plant invasions at the landscape extent. Ecol. Appl. 10 :1833–1848.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. S., Sheley, R. L., Spencer, N. R., and Anderson, G. L. 2001. Relationships among edaphic, climatic and vegetation conditions at release sites and Aphthona nigriscutis population density. Biol. Control 22 :46–50.Google Scholar
Jonsen, I. D., Bourchier, R. S., and Roland, J. 2001. The influence of matrix habitat on Aphthona flea beetle immigration to leafy spurge patches. Oecologia 127 :287–294.Google Scholar
Kurz, W. A., Beukema, S. J., Klenner, W., Greenough, J. A., Robinson, D. C. E., Sharpe, A. D., and Webb, T. M. 2000. TELSA: the tool for exploratory landscape scenario analyses. Comput. Electron. Agric. 27 :227–242.Google Scholar
Lajeunesse, S., Sheley, R. L., Duncan, C., and Lym, R. 1999. Leafy spurge. Pages 249–260 in Sheley, R. L., and Petroff, J. K., eds. Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds Corvallis, OR : Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Lesica, P. and Hanna, D. 2004. Indirect effects of biological control on plant diversity vary across sites in Montana grasslands. Conserv. Biol. 18 :444–454.Google Scholar
Leung, B., Finnoff, D., Shogren, J., and Lodge, D. 2005. Managing invasive species: rules of thumb for rapid assessment. Ecol. Econ. 55 :24–36.Google Scholar
Lym, R. G. and Messersmith, C. G. 1985. Leafy spurge control with herbicides in North Dakota: 20-year summary. J. Range Manag. 38 (2):149–154.Google Scholar
Mack, R. N., Simberloff, D., Lonsdale, W. M., Evans, H., Clout, M., and Bazzaz, F. A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10 (3):689–710.Google Scholar
Martin, B., Hanna, D., Korb, N., and Frid, L. 2007. Decision Analysis of Alternative Invasive Weed Management Strategies for Three Montana Landscapes. Helena, MT : The Nature Conservancy. 33 p.Google Scholar
Merritt, S., Hirsch, D., and Nelson, D. 2002. Biological Control of Leafy Spurge. Sidney, MT : U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. TEAM Leafy Spurge Area-Wide IPM Program. Northern Plains Agricultural Laboratory.Google Scholar
Merzenich, J., and Frid, L. 2005. Projecting landscape conditions in southern Utah using VDDT. Pages 157–163 in Bevers, M., and Barrett, comps, T. M. Systems Analysis in Forest Resources: Proceedings of the 2003 Symposium. Portland, OR : U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-656.Google Scholar
Merzenich, J., Kurz, W. A., Beukema, S., Arbaugh, M., and Schilling, S. 2003. Determining forest fuel treatments for the Bitterroot Front using VDDT. Pages 47–59 in Arthaud, G. J., and Barrett, T. M., eds. Systems Analysis in Forest Resources. Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Mico, M. and Shay, J. M. 2002. Effect of flea beetles (Aphthona nigriscutis) on prairie invaded by leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) in Manitoba. Great Plains Res. 12 :167–184.Google Scholar
Montana Department of Agriculture. 2008. The Montana Weed Management Plan. Montana Noxious Weed Summit Advisory Council and Weed Management Task Force. 100 p.Google Scholar
Moody, M. E. and Mack, R. N. 1988. Controlling the spread of plant invasions: the importance of nascent foci. J. Appl. Ecol. 25 :1009–1021.Google Scholar
Neubert, M. and Caswell, H. 2000. Demography and dispersal: calculation and sensitivity analysis of invasion speed for structured populations. Ecology 81 (6):1613–1628.Google Scholar
Pearson, D. and Ortega, Y. 2009. Managing invasive plants in natural areas: moving beyond weed control. Pages 1–21 in Kingely, R. V., ed. Weeds: Management, Economic Impacts and Biology. New York : Nova.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ. 52 :273–288.Google Scholar
Provencher, L., Campbell, J., and Nachlinger, J. 2008. Implementation of mid-scale fire regime condition class mapping. Int. J. Wildland Fire 17 :390–406.Google Scholar
Provencher, L., Forbis, T., Frid, L., and Medlyn, G. 2007. Comparing alternative management strategies of fire, grazing, and weed control using spatial modeling. Ecol. Model. 209 :249–263.Google Scholar
Rejmanek, M. and Pitcairn, M. J. 2002. When is eradication of exotic plants a realistic goal? Pages 249–253 in Veitch, C. R., and Clout, M. N., editors. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK : World Conservation Union (IUCN) SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group, IUCN.Google Scholar
Rew, L. J., Maxwell, B. D., and Aspinall, R. 2005. Predicting the occurrence of nonindigenous species using environmental and remotely sensed data. Weed Sci. 53 (2):236–241.Google Scholar
Robertson, B. C. and Gemmell, N. J. 2004. Defining eradication units to control invasive pests. J. Appl. Ecol. 41 :1042–1048.Google Scholar
Shea, K., Possingham, H. P., Murdoch, W. W., and Roush, R. 2002. Active adaptive management in insect pest and weed control: intervention with a plan for learning. Ecol. Appl. 12 (3):927–936.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L., Jacobs, J. S., and Carpinelli, M. F. 1998. Distribution, biology, and management of diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa) and spotted knapweed (Centaurea maculosa). Weed Technol. 12 (2):353–362.Google Scholar
Sheley, R. L. and Kruger-Mangold, J. 2003. Principles for restoring invasive plant infested rangeland. Weed Sci. 51 (2):260–265.Google Scholar
Stern, N. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press. 692 p.Google Scholar
Strand, E. K., Vierling, L. A., and Bunting, S. C. 2009. A spatially explicit model to predict future landscape composition of aspen woodlands under various management scenarios. Ecol. Model. 220 (2):175–191.Google Scholar
Svejcar, T. 2003. Applying ecological principles to wildland weed management. Weed Sci. 51 :266–270.Google Scholar
Swaidon, L., Drlik, T., and Woo, I. 1998. Integrated control of leafy spurge. IPM Practit. 20 (7):1–11.Google Scholar
The Nature Conservancy. 1999. Ecoregional planning in the Northern Great Plains Steppe. http://conserveonline.org/coldocs/2002/12/ngps_final_feb99.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2012.Google Scholar
The Nature Conservancy. 2000. Middle Rockies – Blue Mountains ecoregional conservation plan. http://conserveonline.org/coldocs/2002/05/ERP_with_appendices.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2012.Google Scholar
[USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service] U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2009. Private Grazing Fee Rates: Average Rates by Method of Payment, Montana, USA.http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Montana/Publications/economic/prices/grazefee.htm. Accessed: June 2, 2011.Google Scholar
USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1987. 1987 National Resources Inventory—Montana. Unpublished survey information. Bozeman, MT : USDA Soil Conservation Service.Google Scholar
U.S. Office of Management and Budget. 2009. Circular No. A-94: Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs. Revised December 2009. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/a94/a094.pdf. Accessed: June 2, 2011.Google Scholar
Wadsworth, R. A., Collingham, Y. C., Willis, S. G., Huntley, B., and Hulme, P. E. 2000. Simulating the spread and management of alien riparian weeds: are they out of control? J. Appl. Ecol. 37 :28–38.Google Scholar
With, K. A. 2002. The landscape ecology of invasive spread. Conserv. Biol. 16 (5):1192–1203.Google Scholar