Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:02:18.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

English Ivy (Hedera spp., Araliaceae) Response to Goat Browsing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Claudia S. Ingham  and
Michael M. Borman
Claudia S. Ingham*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
Michael M. Borman
Affiliation:
Department of Rangeland Ecology and Management, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

English ivy is an exotic liana that invades forests by forming dense monocultures on forest floors and by climbing trees. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of high-intensity–short-duration goat browsing to control English ivy in the Willamette Valley of Oregon. Species composition and percent cover were determined in August 2006 before the first browsing treatment and before and after treatments in 2006 and 2007. A final assessment was made in July 2008. Browsing effects were evaluated by comparison of multiple means statistical methods. English ivy cover declined significantly in samples browsed once or twice compared with untreated samples. The difference between levels of browsing was also significant, indicating that repetition of browsing for a second year is effective. Species composition change was minimal, with the appearance of sword fern and removal of Himalayan blackberry from 2006 to 2008.

Keywords

English ivy, Hedera spp., goats, Himalayan blackberry, Rubus armeniacus Focke, RUBDIEnglish ivyhigh-intensity–short-duration browsingold field plant communitymixed conifer–broadleaf tree canopyinvasive plant control
Type
Case Studies
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , August 2010 , pp. 178 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2000. “Wanted: Dead English Ivy!”. Portland, OR Environmental Services, City of Portland. 6.Google Scholar
Biggerstaff, M. S. and Beck, C. W. 2006. Effects of English ivy (Hedera helix) on seed bank formation and germination. Am. Mid. Nat 157:250–257.Google Scholar
Butaye, J., Jacquemyn, H., and Hermy, M. 2001. Differential colonization causing non-random forest plant community structure in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecography 24:369–380.Google Scholar
Cheeke, P. R. 1998. Natural Toxicants in Feeds, Forages, and Poisonous Plants. 2nd ed. Danville, IL Interstate Publishers. 479.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. M., Reichard, S. H., and Hamilton, C. W. 2006. Prevalence of different horticultural taxa of ivy (Hedera spp., Araliaceae) in invading populations. Biol. Invasions 8 (2):149–157.Google Scholar
Derr, J. F. 1992. Weed control in nursery crops. Pages 105–116. in. Pest Management Guide for Horticultural and Forest Crops. Blacksburg, VA Virginia Cooperative Extension Pub. 456-017.Google Scholar
Derr, J. F. 1993. English ivy (Hedera helix) response to post emergence herbicides. J. Environ. Hortic 11 (2):45–48.Google Scholar
Distel, R. A. and Provenza, F. D. 1991. Experience early in life affects voluntary intake of blackbrush by goats. J. Chem. Ecol 17 (2):431–450.Google Scholar
Frey, D. and Frick, H. 1987. Altered partitioning of new dry matter in Hedera helix L. (Araliaceae) induced by altered orientation. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 114 (4):407–411.Google Scholar
Heitschmidt, R. K. 1990. The role of livestock and other herbivores in improving rangeland vegetation. Rangelands 12 (2):112–115.Google Scholar
Laskurain, N. A., Escudero, A., Olano, J. M., and Loidi, J. 2004. Seedling dynamics of shrubs in a fully closed temperate forest: greater than expected. Ecography 27:650–658.Google Scholar
National Weather Service 2008. NWS Portland. http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/pqr/climate/pdx_clisummary.php. Accessed: September 12, 2008.Google Scholar
[ODA Plant Division] Oregon Department of Agriculture Plant Division 2008. Noxious Weed Control. http://oregon.gov/ODA/PLANT/WEEDS/profile_englishivy.shtml. Accessed: November 19, 2008.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J. S., and Ghersa, C. M. 2007. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management. Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Randall, J. M. 1996. Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technol 10:370–383.Google Scholar
Reichard, S. 2007. Hedera helix. University of California, Davis. http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/datastore/detailreport.cfm?usernumber=55&surveynumber=182. Accessed: October 20, 2007.Google Scholar
Sack, L. 2004. Response of temperate woody seedlings to shade and drought: do trade-offs limit potential niche differentiation? Oikos 107:110–127.Google Scholar
SAS 2003. SAS 9.1.3 Service Pack 4. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Schnitzler, A. and Heuzé, P. 2006. Ivy (Hedera helix L.) dynamics in riverine forests: effects of river regulation and forest disturbance. For. Ecol. Manag 236:12–17.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Survey Staff 2008. Official Soil Series Descriptions. Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html. Accessed: October 2, 2008.Google Scholar
Soll, J. 2005. Controlling English ivy (Hedera helix) in the Pacific Northwest. http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/moredocs//hedhe102.pdf. Accessed: October 23, 2007.Google Scholar
Zotz, G., Cueni, N., and Körner, C. 2006. In situ growth stimulation of a temperate zone liana (Hedera helix) in elevated CO2 . Funct. Ecol 20:763–769.Google Scholar