Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:09:40.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecophysiological Responses of Giant Reed (Arundo donax) to Herbivory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Georgianne W. Moore ,
David A. Watts  and
John A. Goolsby
Georgianne W. Moore*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2138
David A. Watts
Affiliation:
Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2138
John A. Goolsby
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Weslaco, TX 78596
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of invasive species might be lessened if herbivores reduced transpiration and growth rates; however, simply removing photosynthetic material might not ensure that the transpiration rate of active leaf tissue decreases. We assessed whether biological control has an injurious effect on the target plant species, giant reed (Arundo donax), by quantifying leaf photosynthetic and transpiration responses to two herbivores: an armored scale, Rhizaspidiotus donacis, and a stem-galling wasp, Tetramesa romana. Herbivory by a sap-feeding scale and a stem-galling wasp both separately and together, reduces the rates of leaf level physiological processes in A. donax. The effect of the wasp increases with density and reduces photosynthesis by reducing the carboxylation rate of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase oxygenase, which controls CO2 fixation in photosynthesis. The scale insect reduces photosynthesis by decreasing the maximum rate of electron transport, which determines how much light energy can be captured in photosynthesis. The effect of the armored scale takes approximately 5 mo after infestation, which coincides with generation time. When both insects are present at the same time, the effect of their herbivory appears additive after time for the scale to reproduce. We conclude that a combination of two herbivores can have a stronger physiological effect than one type of herbivore, likely because of their different effects on leaf function.

Keywords

Arundo scale, Rhizaspidiotus donacis LeonardiArundo wasp, Tetramesa romana WalkerGiant reed, Arundo donax L.Biological controlleaf physiologyphotosynthesisRhizaspidiotus donacisTetramesa romanaTranspirationWater resources effect
Type
Symposium
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 521 - 529
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aldea, M., Hamilton, J. G., Resti, J. P., Zangerl, A. R., Berenbaum, M. R., and DeLucia, E. H. 2005. Indirect effects of insect herbivory on leaf gas exchange in soybean. Plant Cell Environ 28:402–411.Google Scholar
Aldea, M., Hamilton, J. G., Resti, J. P., Zangerl, A. R., Berenbaum, M. R., Frank, T. D., and DeLucia, E. H. 2006. Comparison of photosynthetic damage from arthropod herbivory and pathogen infection in understory hardwood saplings. Oecologia 149:221–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagatto, G., Paquette, L. C., and Shorthouse, J. D. 1996. Influence of galls of Phanacis taraxaci on carbon partitioning within common dandelion, Taraxacum officinale . Entomol. Exp. Appl 79:111–117.Google Scholar
Bell, G. P. 1997. Ecology and management of Arundo donax, and approaches to riparian habitat restoration in southern California. Pages 103–113. In Brock, J. H., Wade, M., Pysek, P., and Green, D. eds. Plant Invasions: Studies from North America and Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands Backhuys.Google Scholar
Boggs, C. L. 1992. Resource-allocation—exploring connections between foraging and life-history. Funct. Ecol 6:508–518.Google Scholar
Boose, A. B. and Holt, J. S. 1999. Environmental effects on asexual reproduction in Arundo donax . Weed Res 39:117–127.Google Scholar
Coffman, G. C. 2007. Factors Influencing Invasion of Giant Reed (Arundo donax) in Riparian Ecosystems of Mediterranean-type Climate Regions. Ph.D dissertation. Los Angeles, CA: University of California. 267 p.Google Scholar
Decruyenaere, J. G. and Holt, J. S. 2001. Seasonality of clonal propagation in giant reed (Arundo donax). Weed Sci 49:760–767.Google Scholar
Dorchin, N., Cramer, M. D., and Hoffmann, J. H. 2006. Photosynthesis and sink activity of wasp-induced galls in Acacia pycnantha . Ecology 87:1781–1791.Google Scholar
Doyle, R. D., Grodowitz, M., Smart, R. M., and Owens, C. 2002. Impact of herbivory by Hydrellia pakistanae (Diptera : Ephydridae) on growth and photosynthetic potential of Hydrilla verticillata . Biol. Control 24:221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudley, T. L. 2000. Arundo donax L. Pages 53–58. In Bossard, C. C., Randall, J. M., and Hoshovsky, M. C. eds. Invasive Plants of California's Wildlands. Berkeley, CA University of California Press.Google Scholar
Else, J. A. 1996. Post-Flood Establishment of Native Woody Species and an Exotic, Arundo donax, in a Southern California Riparian System. M.S. Thesis. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.Google Scholar
Fay, P. A., Hartnett, D. C., and Knapp, A. K. 1993. Increased photosynthesis and water potentials in Silphium integrifolium galled by cynipid wasps. Oecologia 93:114–120.Google Scholar
Fay, P. A., Hartnett, D. C., and Knapp, A. K. 1996. Plant tolerance of gall-insect attack and gall-insect performance. Ecology 77:521–534.Google Scholar
Florentine, S. K., Raman, A., and Dhileepan, K. 2005. Effects of gall induction by Epiblema strenuana on gas exchange, nutrients, and energetics in Parthenium hysterophorus . BioControl 50:787–801.Google Scholar
Gavloski, J. E. and Lamb, R. J. 2000. Compensation by cruciferous plants is specific to the type of simulated herbivory. Environ. Entomol 29:1273–1282.Google Scholar
Goolsby, J. A. and Moran, P. 2009. Host range of Tetramesa romana Walker (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae), a potential biological control of giant reed, Arundo donax L. in North America. Biol. Control 49:160–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goolsby, J. A., Moran, P. J., Adamczyk, J. J., Kirk, A. A., Jones, W. A., Marcos, M. A., and Cortes, E. 2009a. Host range of the European, rhizome–stem feeding scale Rhizaspidiotus donacis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), a candidate biological control agent for giant reed, Arundo donax (Poales: Poaceae) in North America. Biocontrol Sci. Technol 19:899–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goolsby, J. A., Spencer, D., and Whitehand, L. 2009b. Pre-release assessment of impact on Arundo donax by the candidate biological control agents Tetramesa romana (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) and Rhizaspidiotus donacis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae) under quarantine conditions. Southwest. Entomol 34:359–376.Google Scholar
Gullan, P. J. and Cranston, P. S. 1994. The Insects: An Outline of Entomology. London Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Herrera, A. M. and Dudley, T. L. 2003. Reduction of riparian arthropod abundance and diversity as a consequence of giant reed (Arundo donax) invasion. Biol. Invasions 5:167–177.Google Scholar
Hikosaka, K. 2004. Interspecific difference in the photosynthesis–nitrogen relationship: patterns, physiological causes, and ecological importance. J. Plant Res 117:481–494.Google Scholar
Hikosaka, K. 2005. Leaf canopy as a dynamic system: ecophysiology and optimality in leaf turnover. Ann Bot. (Lond.) 95:521–533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hikosaka, K. and Terashima, I. 1996. Nitrogen partitioning among photosynthetic components and its consequence in sun and shade plants. Funct. Ecol 10:335–343.Google Scholar
Hoshovsky, M. 1988. Element Stewardship Abstract: Arundo donax. San Francisco The Nature Conservancy. 10 p.Google Scholar
Karban, R. 1997. Induced Responses to Herbivory. In Interspecific Interactions. Karban, R. and Baldwin, I. T. eds. Chicago University of Chicago Press. 332.Google Scholar
Karban, R. and Myers, J. H. 1989. Induced plant-responses to herbivory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 20:331–348.Google Scholar
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S., and Pons, T. L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. New York Springer. 540 p.Google Scholar
Larcher, W. 2003. Physiological Plant Ecology: Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups. 4 ed. Berlin Springer. 513 p.Google Scholar
Larson, K. C. 1998. The impact of two gall-forming arthropods on the photosynthetic rates of their hosts. Oecologia 115:161–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, L. H., Yu, Q., Zheng, Y. F., Wang, J., and Fang, Q. X. 2006. Simulating the response of photosynthate partitioning during vegetative growth in winter wheat to environmental factors. Field Crops Res 96:133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, T. B., Peterson, R. K. D., Weaver, D. K., and Morrill, W. L. 2005. Wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus Norton, impact on wheat primary metabolism: an ecophysiological approach. Environ. Entomol 34:719–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, G. A. and Whitlow, T. H. 1992. Effects of leaf and sap feeding insects on photosynthetic rates of goldenrod. Oecologia 92:480–489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, D. H., Tunsuwan, K., Chittawong, V., Hedin, P. A., Kokpol, U., Ni, C. Z., and Clardy, J. 1993a. Agrochemical activity and isolation of N-(4′-bromophenyl)-2,2-diphenylacetanilide from the Thai plant Arundo donax . J. Nat. Prod 56:1590–1593.Google Scholar
Miles, D. H., Tunsuwan, K., Chittawong, V., Kokpol, U., Choudhary, M. I., and Clardy, J. 1993b. Boll-weevil antifeedants from Arundo donax . Phytochemistry 34:1277–1279.Google Scholar
Moran, P. J. and Goolsby, J. A. 2009. Biology of the galling wasp Tetramesa romana, a biological control agent of giant reed. Biol. Control 49:169–179.Google Scholar
Moran, P. J. and Goolsby, J. A. 2010. Biology of the armored scale Rhizaspidiotus donacis (Hemiptera: Diaspididae), a candidate agent for biological control of giant Rreed. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 103:252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakamura, M., Miyamoto, Y., and Ohgushi, T. 2003. Gall initiation enhances the availability of food resources for herbivorous insects. Funct. Ecol 17:851–857.Google Scholar
Ni, X. Z., Da, K. D., Buntin, D., and Brown, S. L. 2008. Physiological basis of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance in seedlings of maize inbred lines with varying levels of silk maysin. Fla. Entomol 91:537–545.Google Scholar
Oleksyn, J., Karolewski, P., Giertych, M. J., Zytkowiak, R., Reich, P. B., and Tjoelker, M. G. 1998. Primary and secondary host plants differ in leaf-level photosynthetic response to herbivory: evidence from Alnus and Betula grazed by the alder beetle, Agelastica alni . New Phytol 140:239–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perdue, R. E. 1958. Arundo donax—source of musical reeds and industrial cellulose. Econ. Bot 12:368–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. K. D. 2001. Photosynthesis, yield loss, and injury guilds. Pages 83–97. In Peterson, R. K. D. and Higley, L. G. eds. Biotic Stress and Yield Loss. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. K. D., Higley, L. G., and Spomer, S. M. 1996. Injury by Hyalaphora cecropia (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) and photosynthetic responses of apple and crabapple. Environ. Entomol 25:416–422.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. K. D., Sing, S. E., and Weaver, D. K. 2005. Differential physiological responses of Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica L. Miller, to injury from two insect biological control agents: implications for decision-making in biological control. Environ. Entomol 34:899–905.Google Scholar
Raghu, S. and Dhileepan, K. 2005. The value of simulating herbivory in selecting effective weed biological control agents. Biol. Control 34:265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghu, S., Dhileepan, K., and Trevino, M. 2006. Response of an invasive liana to simulated herbivory: implications for its biological control. Acta Oecol 29:335–345.Google Scholar
Rieger, J. P. and Kreager, D. A. 1989. Giant reed (Arundo donax): a climax community of the riparian zone. Pages. 222–225. in. Proceedings of the California Riparian Systems Conference. Berkeley, CA USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.Google Scholar
Risebrow, A. and Dixon, A. F. G. 1987. Nutritional ecology of phloem-feeding insects. Pages 421–428. In Slansky, F. and Rodriguez, J. G. eds. Nutritional Ecology of Insects, Mites, Spiders, and Related Invertebrates. New York John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sage, R. F. 2002. Variation in the k cat of Rubisco in C3 and C4 plants and some implications for photosynthetic performance at high and low temperature. J. Exp. Bot 53:609–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saner, M. A. and Mullerscharer, H. 1994. Impact of root mining by Eteobalea spp on clonal growth and sexual reproduction of common toadflax, Linaria vulgaris Mill. Weed Res 34:199–204.Google Scholar
Schaffer, B. and Mason, L. J. 1990. Effects of scale insect herbivory and shading on net gas-exchange and growth of a subtropical tree species (Guaiacum sanctum L). Oecologia 84:468–473.Google Scholar
Schroder, R., Forstreuter, M., and Hilker, M. 2005. A plant notices insect egg deposition and changes its rate of photosynthesis. Plant Physiol 138:470–477.Google Scholar
Sharkey, T. D., Bernacchi, C. J., Farquhar, G. D., and Singsaas, E. L. 2007. Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C-3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ 30:1035–1040.Google Scholar
Spence, K. O., Bicocca, V. T., and Rosenheim, J. A. 2007. Friend or foe?: A plant's induced response to an omnivore. Environ. Entomol 36:623–630.Google Scholar
Spencer, D., Sher, A., Thornby, D., Liow, P. S., Ksander, G., and Tan, W. L. 2007. Non-destructive assessment of Arundo donax (Poaceae) leaf quality. J. Freshw. Ecol 22:277–285.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. F., Ksander, G. G., and Whitehand, L. C. 2005. Spatial and temporal variation in RGR and leaf quality of a clonal riparian plant: Arundo donax . Aquat. Bot 81:27–36.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. F., Liow, P. S., Chan, W. K., Ksander, G. G., and Getsinger, K. D. 2006. Estimating Arundo donax shoot biomass. Aquat. Bot 84:272–276.Google Scholar
Trumble, J. T., Kolodnyhirsch, D. M., and Ting, I. P. 1993. Plant compensation for arthropod herbivory. Annu. Rev. Entomol 38:93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
vonCaemmerer, S. and Farquhar, G. D. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas-exchange of leaves. Planta 153:376–387.Google Scholar