Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:41:10.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution and Biomass Allocation in Relation to Depth of Flowering Rush (Butomus umbellatus) in the Detroit Lakes, Minnesota

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John D. Madsen ,
Ryan M. Wersal  and
Michelle D. Marko
John D. Madsen*
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS EIW, University of California–Davis, Department of Plant Sciences, Davis, CA 95616
Ryan M. Wersal
Affiliation:
Lonza, 1200 Bluegrass Lakes Parkway, Alpharetta, GA 30004
Michelle D. Marko
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Concordia College, 901 8th Street S, Moorhead, MN 56562
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Detroit Lakes chain of lakes consists of five basins in northwest Minnesota adjacent to the town of Detroit Lakes. Flowering rush has been established in these basins since the 1960s. We evaluated the distribution of flowering rush in the five basins using a point intercept method, with 830 points distributed in a grid with points 150 m apart. These data were analyzed to determine whether invasive and native species frequencies were different between 2010 and 2011. We also assessed co-occurrence of flowering rush with native hardstem bulrush. The distribution of both flowering rush and hardstem bulrush was unchanged from 2010 to 2011. Flowering rush is invading areas with native plants and not establishing in unvegetated areas. Although flowering rush is found as deep as 4.5 m, it is most frequent at a depth of 1.3 m. We also examined the distribution of biomass and growth across a depth gradient from 0.3 to 3.0 m in 0.3-m intervals. At each 0.3-m interval, three biomass samples were collected at each of 10 transects for a total of 30 samples per depth interval or 300 biomass samples. At each point, leaf height, emergent leaf height, water depth, number of ramets, and number of rhizome buds were counted. Biomass samples were collected in a 0.018-m2 core sampler, sorted to shoots and belowground biomass. We found that flowering rush height and biomass peaked at 1.3 m and declined with greater depth. Bud density was negatively related to water depth. Bud density averaged 300 buds m–2, which was three times the average ramet density (100 ramets m–2).

Keywords

Flowering rush, Butomus umbellatus L.hardstem bulrush, Schoenoplectus acutus (Muhl. ex Bigelow) Á. & D. LöveAquatic invasive speciesaquatic macrophytebiomass allocationdepth distributionemergent plantlittoral zone plant
Type
Research Article
Information
Invasive Plant Science and Management , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 161 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alpert, P, Bone, E, Holzapfel, C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol 3:52–66 Google Scholar
Birks, HH, Whiteside, MC, Stark, DM, Bright, RC (1976) Recent paleolimnology of three lakes in northwestern Minnesota. Quarternary Res 6:249–272 Google Scholar
Blindow, I, Hargeby, A, Hilt, S (2014) Facilitation of clear-water conditions in shallow lakes by macrophytes: differences between charophyte and angiosperm dominance. Hydrobiologia 737:99–110 Google Scholar
Boylen, CW, Eichler, LW, Madsen, JD (1999) Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian watermilfoil. Hydrobiologia 415:207–211 Google Scholar
Brown, JS, Eckert, CG (2005) Evolutionary increase in sexual and clonal reproductive capacity during biological invasion in an aquatic plant Butomus umbellatus (Butomaceae). Am J Bot 92:495–502 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buell, MF, Facey, V (1960) Forest-prairie transition west of Itaska Park, Minnesota. Bull Torrey Bot Club 87:46–58 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, MJW, Grime, JP (1996) An experimental study of plant community invasibility. Ecology 77:776–790 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capers, RS, Selsky, R, Bugbee, GJ, White, JC (2007) Aquatic plant community invasibility and scale-dependent patterns in native and invasive species richness. Ecology 88:3135–3143 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Core, EL (1941) Butomus umbellatus in America. Ohio J Sci 41:79–85 Google Scholar
Countryman, WD (1970) The history, spread and present distribution of some immigrant aquatic weeds in New England. Hyacinth Control J 8:50–52 Google Scholar
Cowardin, LM, Pietz, PJ, Lokeman, JT, Sklebar, HT, Sargeant, GA (1998) Response of nesting ducks to predator exclosures and water conditions during drought. J Wildl Manage 62:152–163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delisle, F, Lavoie, C, Jean, M, Lachance, D (2003) Reconstructing the spread of invasive plants: taking into account biases associated with herbarium specimens. J Biogeogr 30:1033–1042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, CG, Lui, K, Bronson, K, Corradini, P, Bruneau, A (2003) Population genetic consequences of extreme variation in sexual and clonal reproduction in an aquatic plant. Mol Ecol 12:331–344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, CG, Massonnet, B, Thomas, JJ (2000) Variation in sexual and clonal reproduction among introduced populations of flowering rush, Butomus umbellatus (Butomaceae). Can J Bot 78:437–446 Google Scholar
Gaiser, LO (1949) Further distribution of Butomus umbellatus in the Great Lakes region. Rhodora 51:385–390 Google Scholar
Getsinger, KD, Turner, EG, Madsen, JD, Netherland, MD (1997) Restoring native vegetation in Eurasian water milfoil-dominated plant community using the herbicide triclopyr. Regul River 13:357–375 Google Scholar
Grace, JB (1989) Effects of water depth on Typha latifolia and Typha domingensis . Am J Bot 76:762–768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, JB, Wetzel, RG (1981) Habitat partitioning and competitive displacement in cattails ( Typha): experimental field studies. Am Nat 118:463–474 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansel-Welch, N, Butler, MG, Carlson, TJ, Hanson, MA (2003) Changes in macrophyte community structure in Lake Christina (Minnesota), a large shallow lake, following biomanipulation. Aquat Bot 75:323–337 Google Scholar
Hewitt, OH (1942) Management of an artificial marsh in southern Ontario for ducks and muskrats. Trans N Am Wildl Conf 7:278–283 Google Scholar
Hobbs, WO, Ramstack Hobbs, JM, LaFrancois, T, Zimmer, KD, Theissen, KM, Edlund, MB, Michelutti, N, Butler, MB, Hanson, MA, Carlson, TJ (2012) A 200-year perspective on alternative stable state theory and lake management from a biomanipulated shallow lake. Ecol Appl 22:1483–1496 Google Scholar
Hroudová, Z (1989) Growth of Butomus umbellatus at a stable water level. Folia Geobot Phytotax 24:371–385 Google Scholar
Hroudová, Z, Krahulcová, A, Zákravský, P, Jarolímová, V (1996) The biology of Butomus umbellatus in shallow waters with fluctuating water level. Hydrobiologia 340:27–30 Google Scholar
Hroudová, Z, Zákravksý, P (2003) Germination response of diploid Butomus umbellatus to light, temperature and flooding. Flora 198:37–44 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudon, C (2004) Shift in wetland plant composition and biomass following low-level episodes in the St. Lawrence River: looking into the future. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:603–617 Google Scholar
Jones, CG, Lawton, JH, Shachak, M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, CG, Lawton, JH, Shachak, M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957 Google Scholar
Kirschner, J, Bartish, I, Hroudová, Z, Kirshnerová, L, Zákravský, P (2004) Contrasting patterns of spatial genetic structure of diploid and triploid populations of the clonal aquaic species, Butomus umbellatus (Butomaceae) in Central Europe. Folia Geobot 39:13–26 Google Scholar
Knowlton, CH (1930) Butomus umbellatus at Lake Champlain. Rhodora 32:18–19 Google Scholar
Krahulcová, A, Jarolímová, V (1993) Ecology of two cytotypes of Butomus umbellatus I. Karyology and breeding. Folia Geobotan Phytotaxon 28: 385–411 Google Scholar
Lavoie, C, Jean, M, Delisle, F, Letourneau, G (2003) Exotic plant species of the St Lawrence River wetlands: a spatial and historical analysis. J Biogeogr 30:537–549 Google Scholar
Les, DH, Mehrhoff, LJ (1999) Introduction of nonindigenous aquatic vascular plants in southern New England: a historical perspective. Biol Invasions 1:281–300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lui, K, Thompson, FL, Eckert, CG (2005) Causes and consequences of extreme variation in reproductive strategy and vegetative growth among invasive populations of a clonal aquatic plant, Butomus umbellatus L. (Butomaceae). Biol Invasions 7:427–444 Google Scholar
Madsen, JD (1993a) Biomass techniques for monitoring and assessing control of aquatic vegetation. Lake Reserv Manage 7:141–154 Google Scholar
Madsen, JD (1993b) Waterchestnut seed production and management in Watervliet Reservoir, New York. J Aquat Plant Manage 31:271–272 Google Scholar
Madsen, JD (1999) Point and Line Intercept Methods for Aquatic Plant Management. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center APCRP Technical Notes Collection (TN APCRP-M1-02). 16 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, JD (2007) Ecologically-based invasive aquatic plant management: using life history analysis to manage aquatic weeds. Pages 94–100 in Proceedings of the 37th Annual Mississippi Water Resources Conference Google Scholar
Madsen, JD, Dick, GO, Honnell, D, Shearer, J, Smart, RM (1994) Ecological Assessment of Kirk Pond. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station Miscellaneous Paper A-94-1. 86 pGoogle Scholar
Madsen, JD, Sutherland, JW, Bloomfield, JA, Eichler, LW, Boylen, CW (1991) The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J Aquat Plant Manage 29:94–99 Google Scholar
Madsen, JD, Wersal, RM, Marko, MD, Skogerboe, JG (2012) Ecology and Management of Flowering Rush (Butomus umbellatus) in the Detroit Lakes, Minnesota. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Geosystems Research Institute Rep. 5054. 43 pGoogle Scholar
Madsen, JD, Wersal, RM, Woolf, TE (2007) A new core sampler for estimating biomass of submersed aquatic macrophytes. J Aquat Plant Manage 45:31–34 Google Scholar
Mäemets, J, Freiberg, L, Haldna, M, Möls, T (2006) Inter-annual variability of Potamogeton perfoliatus stands. Aquat Bot 85:177–183 Google Scholar
Marko, MD, Madsen, JD, Smith, RA, Sartain, B, Olson, CL (2015) Ecology and phenology of flowering rush in the Detroit Lakes Chain of Lakes, Minnesota. J Aquat Plant Manage 53:54–63 Google Scholar
Maron, J, Marler, M (2007) Native plant diversity resists invasion at both low and high resource levels. Ecology 88:2651–2661 Google Scholar
Martin, AC, Uhler, FM (1939) Food of Game Ducks in the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture Bureau of Biological Survey Technical Bull. 634. 157 pGoogle Scholar
Muenscher, WC (1930) Butomus umbellatus in the Lake Champlain basin. Rhodora 32:19 Google Scholar
Mullin, BH, Anderson, LWJ, DiTomaso, JM, Eplee, RE, Getsinger, KD (2000) Invasive Plant Species. Ames, IA: Council for Agricultural Science and Technology IP13. 18 pGoogle Scholar
Netherland, MD (1997) Turion ecology of hydrilla. J Aquat Plant Manage 35:1–10 Google Scholar
Poovey, AG, Mudge, CR, Thum, RA, James, C, Getsinger, KD (2012) Evaluations of contact aquatic herbicides for controlling two populations of submersed flowering rush. J Aquat Plant Manage 50:48–54 Google Scholar
Pot, R, ter Heerdt, GNJ (2014) Succession dynamics of aquatic lake vegetation after restoration measures: increased stability after 6 years of development. Hydrobiologia 737:333–345 Google Scholar
Quinn, LD, Holt, JS (2009) Restoration for resistance to invasion by giant reed ( Arundo donax). Invasive Plant Sci Manage 2:279–291 Google Scholar
Roberts, ML (1972) Butomus umbellatus in the Mississippi watershed. Castanea 37:83–85 Google Scholar
Stohlgren, TJ, Barnett, DT, Kartesz, JT (2003) The rich get richer: pattern of plant invasions in the United States. Front Ecol Environ 1:11–14 Google Scholar
Stohlgren, TJ, Binkley, D, Chong, GW, Kalkhan, MA, Schell, LD, Bull, KA, Otsuki, Y, Newman, G, Bashkin, M, Son, Y (1999) Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecol Monogr 69:25–46 Google Scholar
Stokes, ME, Davis, CS, Koch, GG (2000) Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. 2nd edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 648 pGoogle Scholar
Stuckey, RL (1968) Distribution of Butomus umbellatus (flowering-rush) in the western Lake Erie and Lake St. Clair region. Mich Bot 7:134–142 Google Scholar
Thompson, FL, Eckert, CG (2004) Trade-offs between sexual and clonal reproduction in an aquatic plant: experimental manipulations vs. phenotypic correlations. J Evol Biol 17:581–592 Google Scholar
Trebitz, AS, Taylor, DL (2007) Exotic and invasive aquatic plants in Great Lakes coastal wetlands: distribution and relation to watershed land use and plant richness and cover. J Great Lakes Res 33:705–721 Google Scholar
Waters, I, Shay, JM (1992) Effect of water depth on population parameters of a Typha glauca stand. Can J Bot 70:349–351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wersal, RM, Madsen, JD (2011) Comparative effects of water level variations on growth characteristics of Myriophyllum aquaticum . Weed Res 51:386–393 Google Scholar
Wersal, RM, Madsen, JD, Cheshier, J (2010) Aquatic Plant Monitoring in Noxon Rapids Reservoir and Cabinet Gorge Reservoir for 2010. Mississippi State, MS: Mississippi State University Geosystems Research Institute Rep. 5042. 18 pGoogle Scholar
Witmer, SW (1964) Butomus umbellatus L. in Indiana. Castanea 29:117–119 Google Scholar
Woolf, TE, Madsen, JD (2003) Seasonal biomass and carbohydrate allocation patterns in southern Minnesota curlyleaf pondweed populations. J Aquat Plant Manage 41:113–118 Google Scholar
Wright, JP, Jones, CG (2006) The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: progress, limitations, and challenges. BioScience 56:203–209 CrossRefGoogle Scholar