Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:55:55.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Whose progress, which morals? Constructivism, normative IR theory and the limits and possibilities of studying ethics in world politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2012

Toni Erskine
Toni Erskine*
Affiliation:
Department of International Politics, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , November 2012 , pp. 449 - 468
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, Chris. 1992. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Chris 1994. “The Ethics of Political Restructuring in Europe: The Perspective of Constitutive Theory.” In Political Restructuring in Europe: Ethical Perspectives, edited by Chris Brown, 159–181. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Caney, Simon. 2005. Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cochran, Molly. 1999. Normative Theory in International Relations: A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Toni. 2007. “Qualifying Cosmopolitanism? Solidarity, Criticism and Michael Walzer's ‘View from the Cave’.” International Politics 44:125–149.Google Scholar
Erskine, Toni 2008. Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of ‘Dislocated’ Communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erskine, Toni 2010. “Normative IR Theory.” In International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, edited by Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, and Steve Smith, 2d ed., 36–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2008. “Paradoxes in Humanitarian Intervention.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard Price, 197–224. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Owen. 1992. Consciousness Reconsidered. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Frost, Mervyn. 1996. Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Havercroft, Jonathan. 2008. “Sovereignty, Recognition and Indigenous Peoples.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard Price, 112–137. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Marc. 2008. “Lie to Me: Sanctions on Iraq, Moral Argument and the International Politics of Hypocrisy.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard Price, 165–196. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard. 2008a. “Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard Price, 1–52. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Price, Richard 2008b. “Progress with a Price.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard Price, 281–304. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2008. “Constructivism and the Structure of Ethical Reasoning.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard Price, 53–82. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Fiona. 1999. Globalizing Care: Ethics, Feminist Theory and International Relations. Boulder, CO; London: Westview.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2008. “The Role of Consequences, Comparison and Counterfactuals in Constructivist Ethical Thought.” In Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics, edited by Richard Price, 83–111. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sutch, Peter. 2001. Ethics, Justice and International Relations: Constructing an International Community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valentini, Laura. 2011. “Justice and Practice-Dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism.” Journal of Political Philosophy 19(4):399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983a. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael 1983b. “‘Spheres of Justice’: An Exchange.” New York Review of Books 30:43–46.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael 1987. Interpretation and Social Criticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 2008. Shame and Necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar