Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:51:25.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Simmelian approach to space in world politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2018

Orit Gazit
Orit Gazit*
Affiliation:
Martin Buber Society of Fellows, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assumptions regarding space and spatiality exist in all major theoretical traditions in international relations, from realism to constructivism, but the mutual constitution of space and social interaction in the study of world politics requires further conceptual development in its own right. This article suggests a preliminary research agenda for the study of space and social relations in IR by lending insight from Georg Simmel’s classical sociology of space. Simmel’s approach offers scholars of contemporary world politics an innovative conceptualization of the relations between physical and symbolic space (‘the physical-symbolic axis’) and between space and time (‘the spatio-temporal axis’); and a set of practical analytical tools to apply in IR research by defining the foundational qualities of space (exclusivity, divisibility, containment, positioning, and mobility) and suggesting a typology of distinct sociospatial formations: organized space, governed space, fixed space, and empty space. The article discusses the potential of Simmel’s nuanced relational approach to contribute to the contemporary study of world politics, and demonstrates its utility in two particular areas of research: the study of unbundled sovereignty and mobility in late modernity; and the study of empty spaces in IR.

Keywords

Simmelspatialityunbundled sovereigntythe strangerontological securityempty space
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , July 2018 , pp. 219 - 252
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel. 2010. “Europe as a Civilizational Community of Practice.” In Civilizations in World Politics: Plural and Pluralist Perspectives, edited by Peter J. Katzenstein, 67–90. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Emanuel. 2013. “Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates.” In Handbook of International Relations, edited by Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons, 112–144. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent. 2011. “International Practices.” International Theory 3(1):1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca. ed. 2013. Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Agnew, John. 1994. “The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory.” Review of International Political Economy 1(1):53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, John. 2016. “Space.” In Critical Imaginations in International Relations, edited by Mhurchú, Aoileann N., and Reiko Shindo, 195–211. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnew, John, and Corbridge, Stuart. 2002. Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathias. 1998. “On Boundaries, Territory and Postmodernity: An International Relations Perspective.” Geopolitics 3(1):53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathias, Buzan, Barry, and Zürn, Michael. eds 2013. Bringing Sociology to International Relations: World Politics as Differentiation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, Mathias, Jacobson, David, and Lapid, Yosef. 1999. Identity, Borders, Orders: New Directions in International Relations Theory . London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Alvarez, Robert R. 1995. “The Mexican–US Border: The Making of an Anthropology of Borderlands.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24:447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Aradau, Claudia, Huysmans, Jef, and Squire, Vicki. 2010. “Acts of European Citizenship: A Political Sociology of Mobility.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 48(4):945–965.Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1987. “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 12:403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atzili, Boaz, and Kantel, Anne. 2015. “Accepting the Unacceptable: Lessons from West Germany’s Changing Border Politics.” International Studies Review 17:588–616.Google Scholar
Atzili, Boaz, and Pearlman, Wendy. 2012. “Triadic Deterrence: Coercing Strength, Beaten by Weakness.” Security Studies 21(2):301–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banai, Ayelet, Moore, Margaret, Miller, David, Nine, Cara, and Dietrich, Frank. 2014. “Symposium ‘Theories of Territory beyond Westphalia’.” International Theory 6(1):98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak, Oren, and Cohen, Chanan. 2013. “The ‘Modern Sherwood Forest’: Theoretical and Practical Challenges.” In Nonstate Actors in Intrastate Conflicts, edited by Dan Miodownik, and Oren Barak, 12–33. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassin, Mark. 2004. “The Two Faces of Contemporary Geopolitics.” Progress in Human Geography 28(5):620–626.Google Scholar
Billé, Franck, Delaplace, Grégory, and Humphrey, Caroline. eds. 2012. Frontier Encounters: Knowledge and Practice at the Russian, Chinese and Mongolian Border. Cambridge: Open Book Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, Iain. 1997. “Space Beyond: Spatiality and the City in the Writings of Georg Simmel.” The Journal of Architecture 2(4):313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2013. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2016. “How Should States be Shaped? Contiguity, Compactness, and Territorial Rights.” International Theory 8(1):1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Christopher S. 2015. “Nation Branding, National Self-esteem, and the Constitution of Subjectivity in Late Modernity.” Foreign Policy Analysis 11(2):195–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Christopher S., and Joenniemi, Pertti. 2013. “From Fratricide to Security Community: Re-theorising Difference in the Constitution of Nordic Peace.” Journal of International Relations and Development 16(4):483–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buber, Martin. 1970. I and Thou . New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Cairo, Heriberto. 2004. “The Field of Mars: Heterotopias of Territory and War.” Political Geography 23(8):1009–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B. 2010. “The Strategy of Territorial Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science 54(4):969–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Stephen, De Haas, Hein, and Miller, Mark J.. 2014. The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik, and Daase, Christopher. 2003. “Endogenizing Corporate Identities: The Next Step in Constructivist IR Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 9(1):5–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerny, Philip G. 2000. “The New Security Dilemma: Divisibility, Defection and Disorder in the Global Era.” Review of International Studies 26(4):623–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clifford, James. 1994. “Diasporas.” Cultural Anthropology 9(3):302–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict, vol. 9. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Couclelis, Helen. 1999. “Space, Time, Geography.” Geographical Information Systems 1:29–38.Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1983. “Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 12(2):162–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, Stuart. 2012. “Constructing Ontological Insecurity: The Insecuritization of Britain’s Muslims.” Contemporary Security Policy 33(2):219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahme, Heinz-Jürgen. 1990. “On the Current Rediscovery of Georg Simmel’s Sociology: A European Point of View.” In Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology, edited by Michael Kaern, et al., 13–38. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalby, Simon. 2010. “Recontextualising Violence, Power and Nature: The Next Twenty Years of Critical Geopolitics?” Political Geography 29(5):280–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, Mitchell. 2010. Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Delaney, David, and Leitner, Helga. 1997. “The Political Construction of Scale.” Political Geography 16(2):93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diehl, Paul F., and Goertz, Gary. 1988. “Territorial Changes and Militarized Conflict.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 32(1):103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 2013. The Rules of Sociological Method, and Selected Texts on Sociology and its Method. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2008. “Reconstituting Iraq.” In War, Citizenship, Territory, edited by Deborah Cowen, and Emily Gilbert, 147–176. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2009. Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Elden, Stuart. 2013. The Birth of Territory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elkins, David J. 1995. Beyond Sovereignty: Territory and Political Economy in the Twenty-First Century. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2004. The Curious Feminist: Searching for Women in a New Age of Empire. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enloe, Cynthia. 2014. Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ethington, Philip J. 1997. “The Intellectual Construction of ‘Social Distance’: Toward a Recovery of Georg Simmel’s Social Geometry.” Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography 30.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49(3):379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, Yale H., and Jones, R. J. Barry. eds 2002. Political Space: Frontiers of Change and Governance in a Globalizing World . Albany, NY: SUNY Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flint, Colin, Diehl, Paul, Scheffran, Jürgen, Vasquez, John, and Chi, Sang-hyun. 2009. “Conceptualizing Conflictspace: Toward a Geography of Relational Power and Embeddedness in the Analysis of Interstate Conflict.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99(5):827–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisby, David. 1984. Georg Simmel. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Frisby, David. 1992. Simmel and Since: Essays on Georg Simmel’s Social Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Frisby, David. 2013. Sociological Impressionism: A Reassessment of Georg Simmel’s Social Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, Matthew, and Tir, Jaroslav. 2009. “Territorial Dimensions of Enduring Internal Rivalries.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 26(4):307–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2009. “Brokering Change: Networks and Entrepreneurs in International Politics.” International Theory 1(2):249–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E. 2010. Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Stacie E., Jeremy, Pressman, and Hassner, Ron E.. 2008. “Time and the Intractability of Territorial Disputes.” International Security 32(3):191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Kahler, Miles, and Montgomery, Alexander H.. 2009. “Network Analysis for International Relations.” International Organization 63(3):559–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamizrachi, Beate. 1988. The Emergence of the South Lebanon Security Belt. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hassner, Ron E. 2009. War on Sacred Grounds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Helle, Horst J. 1997. “Introduction.” In Essays on Religion, edited by Georg Simmel, xi–xx. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Helle, Horst J. 2009. “Introduction.” In Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms, by Georg Simmel, edited by Anthony J. Blasi, Anton K. Jacobs and Mathew Kanjirathinkal, 1–18. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Helle, Horst J. 2013. Messages from Georg Simmel. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John H. 1957. “The Rise and Demise of the Territorial State.” World Politics 9:473–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Alan. 2000. “Offshoreness, Globalization and Sovereignty: A Postmodern Geo-Political Economy?”.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 25(3):269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberley. 2007. “Happy Anniversary! Time and Critique in International Relations Theory.” Review of International Studies 33(1):71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huysmans, Jef. 1998. “Security! What do you Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier.” European Journal of International Relations 4(2):226–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Innes, Alexandria J. 2010. “When the Threatened become the Threat: The Construciton of Asylum Seekers in British Media Narratives.” International Relations 24(4):456–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Patrick Thaddeus, and Nexon, Daniel H.. 1999. “Relations Before States: Substance, Process and the Study of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 5(3):291–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Gary Dean. 1998. “Contested Canon: Simmel Scholarship at Columbia and the New School.” The American Sociologist 29(2):4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, Bob, Brenner, Neil, and Jones, Martin. 2008. “Theorizing Sociospatial Relations.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26(3):389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Martin. 2009. “Phase Space: Geography, Relational Thinking, and Beyond.” Progress in Human Geography 33(4):487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, Patrick. 2003. The Rule of Freedom: Liberalism and the Modern City. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Kacowicz, Arie M. 1994. Peaceful Territorial Change. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Kadercan, Burak. 2015. “Triangulating Territory: A Case for Pragmatic Interaction Between Political Science, Political Geography, and Critical IR.” International Theory 7(1):125–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaern, Michael. 1990. “The World as Human Construction.” In Georg Simmel and Contemporary Sociology, edited by Michael Kaern, et al, 13–38. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaern, Michael. 1994. “Georg Simmel’s The Bridge and the Door.” Qualitative Sociology 17(4):397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 2006. “Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization.” In Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization, edited by Miles Kahler, and Barbara F. Walter, 1–21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearns, Gerry. 2008. “Progressive Geopolitics.” Geography Compass 2(5):1599–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemple, Thomas M. 2007. “Introduction—Allosociality: Bridges and Doors to Simmel’s Social Theory of the Limit.” Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8):1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2004. “Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security.” Political psychology 25(5):741–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinnvall, Catarina, and Lindén, Jitka. 2010. “Dialogical Selves Between Security and Insecurity: Migration, Multiculturalism, and the Challenge of the Global.” Theory and Psychology 20(5):595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopstein, Jeffrey. 2007. “Max Weber, Objectivity, and the Classics of Comparative Politics.” In Max Weber’s “Objectivity” Revisited, edited by Laurence McFalls, 309–321. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.” International Organization 55(4):761–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. ed 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1986. “Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System.” World Politics 39(1):27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., and O’Mahony, Angela. 2006. “Territory and War: State Size and Patterns of Interstate Conflict.” In Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization, edited by Miles Kahler, and Barbara F. Walter, 133–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamont, Michèle, and Molnár, Virág. 2002. “The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences.” Annual Review of Sociology 28(1):167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larkins, Jeremy. 2010. From Hierarchy to Anarchy: Territory and Politics Before Westphalia. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 2004. Rhythmanalysis: Space, Time and Everyday Life. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 2009. “Reflections on the Politics of Space.” In State, Space, World, edited by Niel Brenner and Stuart Elden. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald N. 1991. “Simmel and Parsons Reconsidered.” American Journal of Sociology 96(5):1097–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Donald N., Carter, Ellwood B., and Gorman, Eleanor Miller. 1976. “Simmel’s Influence on American Sociology I.” American Journal of Sociology 81(4):813–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Marc A., Young, Oran R., and Zürn, Michael. 1995. “The Study of International Regimes.” European Journal of International Relations 1(3):267–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löwenheim, Oded. 2008. “Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International ‘Governance Indicators’.” Third World Quarterly 29(2):255–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1993. Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mackinder, Halford J. 1904. “The Geographical Pivot of History.” Geographical Journal 13:421–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manners, Ian. 2002. “European [Security] Union: From Existential Threat to Ontological Security.” Working Paper No. 5 Peace Research Institute, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Miodownik, Dan, and Cartrite, Britt. 2006. “Demarking Political Space: Territoriality and the Ethnoregional Party Family.” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 12(1):53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miodownik, Dan, and Barak, Oren. eds 2013. Nonstate Actors in Intrastate Conflicts. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukerji, Chandra. 2010. “The Territorial State as a Figured World of Power: Strategics, Logistics, and Impersonal Rule.” Sociological Theory 28(4):402–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natali, Denise. 2005. The Kurds and the State: Evolving National Identity in Iraq, Turkey, and Iran. New York: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. 1996. “Self and Other in International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 2(2):139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, David. 1989. “Civilian and Military Presence as Strategies of Territorial Control: The Arab-Israel Conflict.” Political Geography Quarterly 8(3):215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, David. 1998. “Geopolitics Renaissant: Territory, Sovereignty and the World Political Map.” Geopolitics 3(1):1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, David. 2006. “Borders and Bordering Towards an Interdisciplinary Dialogue.” European Journal of Social Theory 9(2):171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nexon, Daniel H., and Pouliot, Vincent. 2013. “‘Things of Networks’: Situating ANT in International Relations.” International Political Sociology 7(3):342–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, Anne. 1988. Reflections on Political Identity. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ó Tuathail, Gearóid. 1996. Critical Geopolitics: The Politics of Writing Global Space. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ó Tuathail, Gearóid. 2000. “The Postmodern Geopolitical Condition: States, Statecraft, and Security at the Millennium.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90(1):166–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ó Tuathail, Gearóid, and Agnew, John. 1992. “Geopolitics and Discourse: Practical Geopolitical Reasoning in American Foreign Policy.” Political Geography 11(2):190–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paasi, Anssi. 1999. “Boundaries as Social Practice and Discourse: The Finnish‐Russian Border.” Regional Studies 33(7):669–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Noel, and Vaughan-Williams, Nick. 2012. “Critical Border Studies: Broadening and Deepening the ‘Lines in the Sand’ Agenda.” Geopolitics 17(4):727–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietila, Kauko. 2011. Reason of Sociology: George Simmel and Beyond. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, John R. V.. 2015. Political Frontiers and Boundaries. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rasler, Karen A., and Thompson, William R.. 2006. “Contested Territory, Strategic Rivalries, and Conflict Escalation.” International Studies Quarterly 50(1):145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian. 2001. “Human Rights and the Social Construction of Sovereignty.” Review of International Studies 27(4):519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roe, Paul. 2006. “Reconstructing Identities or Managing Minorities? Desecuritizing Minority Rights: A Response to Jutila.” Security Dialogue 37(3):425–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1966. Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy: The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1993. “Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in International Relations.” International Organization 47(1):139–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 2004. “Reconstituting the Global Public Domain: Issues, Actors, and Practices.” European Journal of International Relations 10(4):499–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelili, Bahar. 2015. “Identity and Desecuritisation: The Pitfalls of Conflating Ontological and Physical Security.” Journal of International Relations and Development 18:52–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sack, Robert D. 1986. Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter. 1989. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, Mark B. 2007. “Governmentalities of an Airport: Heterotopia and Confession.” International Political Sociology 1:49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, Mark B. 2012. “Theory of the /: The Suture and Critical Border Studies.” Geopolitics 17(4):734–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, Saskia. 2002. “Global Cities and Diasporic Networks: Microsites in Global Civil Society.” In Global Civil Society, edited by Helmut Anheier, et al., 217–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Allen. ed 2002. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sela, Avraham. 2007. “Civil Society, the Military, and National Security: The Case of Israel’s Security Zone in South Lebanon.” Israel Studies 12(1):53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selg, Peeter. 2016. “Two Faces of the ‘Relational Turn’.” PS: Political Science and Politics 49(1):27–31.Google Scholar
Shelef, Nadav G. 2016. “Unequal Ground: Homelands and Conflict.” International Organization 70(1):33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1904. “The Sociology of Conflict I.” The American Journal of Sociology 9(4):490–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1994 [1909]. “Bridge and Door.” Theory, Culture and Society 11(1):5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1997 [1911]. “The Adventure.” In Simmel On Culture: Selected Writings, edited by David Frisby, and Mike Featherston, 221–232. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 2004. The Philosophy of Money. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 2009. Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura. 2013. Gendering Global Conflict: Toward a Feminist Theory of War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Sjoberg, Laura, and Gentry, Caron E.. 2007. Mothers, Monsters, Whores: Women’s Violence in Global Politics. London & New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Škorić, Marko, Kišjuhas, Aleksej, and Škorić, Jovana. 2013. “Excursus on the Stranger in the Context of Simmel’s Sociology of Space.” Sociológia 6(45):589–602.Google Scholar
Smith, Barry. 1996. “Mereotopology: A Theory of Parts and Boundaries.” Data & Knowledge Engineering 20(3):287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stansfield, Gareth. 2014. “The Islamic State, The Kurdistan Region and the Future of Iraq: Assessing UK Policy Options.” International Affairs 90(6):1329–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 1978. “‘Opportunity’ and ‘Willingness’ as Ordering Concepts in the Study of War.” International Interactions 4(4):363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Harvey. 2013. On Geopolitics: Space, Place, and International Relations. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Brent J. 2017. “Organizational Processes and Ontological (In)security: Torture, the CIA and the United States.” Cooperation and Conflict 52(1):69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, Jill. 2009. “Unbundling Sovereignty, Territory and the State in Outer Space: Two Approaches.” In Securing Outer Space: International Relations Theory and the Politics of Space, edited by Natalie Bormann, and Michael Sheehan, 8–23. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tir, Jaroslav, Schafer, Philip, Diehl, Paul F., and Goertz, Gary. 1998. “Territorial Changes, 1816–1996: Procedures and Data.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 16(1):89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2003. The Geography of Ethnic Violence: Identity, Interests, and the Indivisibility of Territory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2014. “Territory and War.” Journal of Peace Research 51(2):185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tölölyan, Khachig. 1996. “Rethinking Diaspora(s): Stateless Power in the Transnational Moment.” Diaspora: A Journal of Transnational Studies 5(1):3–36.Google Scholar
Van Gennep, Arnold. 1960 [1909]. The Rites of Passage . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1983. “The Tangibility of Issues and Global Conflict: A Test of Rosenau’s Issue Area Typology.” Journal of Peace Research 20(2):179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A., and Henehan, Marie T.. 2011. Territory, War, and Peace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Vidler, Anthony. 1991. “Agoraphobia: Spatial Estrangement in Georg Simmel and Siegfried Kracauer.” New German Critique 54:31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Rob B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walter, Barbara F. 2009. Reputation and Civil War: Why Separatist Conflicts are so Violent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Martin. 2015. “On the History and Politics of the Social Turn.” Review of International Studies 41(4):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, Deena, and Weinstein, Michael A.. 1993. Postmodern(ized) Simmel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20(1):71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yair, Gad, and Soyer, Michaela. 2008. The Golem in German Social Theory. Lanham, MD: Lexington.Google Scholar