Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Jeffery, Renée
2014.
The promise and problems of the neuroscientific approach to emotions.
International Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
584.
Linklater, Andrew
2014.
Anger and world politics: how collective emotions shift over time.
International Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
574.
Mattern, Janice Bially
2014.
On being convinced: an emotional epistemology of international relations.
International Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
589.
Fierke, K.M.
2014.
Emotion and intentionality.
International Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
563.
Reus-Smit, Christian
2014.
Emotions and the social.
International Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
568.
Hutchison, Emma
and
Bleiker, Roland
2014.
Theorizing emotions in world politics.
International Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
491.
McDermott, Rose
2014.
The body doesn’t lie: a somatic approach to the study of emotions in world politics.
International Theory,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
557.
Holmes, Marcus
and
Traven, David
2015.
Acting Rationally Without Really Thinking: The Logic of Rational Intuitionism for International Relations Theory.
International Studies Review,
p.
n/a.
Leander, Anna
2015.
Ethnographic Contributions to Method Development: “Strong Objectivity” in Security Studies.
International Studies Perspectives,
p.
ekv021.
Holmes, Marcus
2015.
Believing This and Alieving That: Theorizing Affect and Intuitions in International Politics.
International Studies Quarterly,
p.
n/a.
Jackson, Richard
2015.
Terrorism, Taboo, and Discursive Resistance: The Agonistic Potential of the Terrorism Novel.
International Studies Review,
p.
n/a.
2016.
Affective Communities in World Politics.
p.
1.
Roach, Steven C
2016.
Affective values in international relations: Theorizing emotional actions and the value of resilience.
Politics,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 4,
p.
400.
2016.
Affective Communities in World Politics.
p.
267.
Holmes, Marcus
and
Yarhi-Milo, Keren
2016.
The Psychological Logic of Peace Summits: How Empathy Shapes Outcomes of Diplomatic Negotiations: Table 1..
International Studies Quarterly,
p.
sqw034.
Branch, Jordan
2016.
How should states be shaped? Contiguity, compactness, and territorial rights.
International Theory,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Ariffin, Yohan
2016.
Emotions in International Politics.
p.
1.
Crawford, Neta C
2016.
What is war good for? Background ideas and assumptions about the legitimacy, utility, and costs of offensive war.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 2,
p.
282.
Head, Naomi
2016.
Costly encounters of the empathic kind: a typology.
International Theory,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 1,
p.
171.
2016.
Affective Communities in World Politics.
p.
72.