Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:22:34.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How international law works: a response to commentators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Andrew T. Guzman
Andrew T. Guzman*
Affiliation:
Berkeley Law School, University of California, Berleley, CA 94720, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Symposium on Andrew Guzman's How International Law Works
Information
International Theory , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , July 2009 , pp. 335 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, K.W.Snidal, D. (2000), ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’, International Organization 54: 421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewster, R. (2009), ‘The limits of reputation on compliance’, International Theory 1(2): 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A.T. (2008a), How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A.T. (2008b), ‘International tribunals: a rational choice analysis’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 157: 171–235.Google Scholar
Guzman, A.T.Simmons, B.A. (2002), ‘To settle or empanel? An empirical analysis of litigation and settlement at the WTO’, Journal of Legal Studies 31: S205–S235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guzman, A.T.Simmons, B.A. (2005), ‘Power plays and capacity constraints: the selection of defendants in WTO disputes’, Journal of Legal Studies 34: 557–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hathaway, O.A. (2008), ‘Treaties’ end: the past, present, and future of international lawmaking in the United States’, Yale Law Journal 117: 1236–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydd, A.H. (2009), ‘A bridge too near? Guzman on international law’, International Theory 1(2): 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L.L. (2000), Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, B.A. (2000), ‘International law and state behavior: commitment and compliance in international monetary affairs’, American Political Science Review 94(4): 819–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, A. (2009), ‘The rational enforcement of international law: overcoming the sanctioners’ dilemma’, International Theory 1(2): 307–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomz, M. (2007), Reputation and International Cooperation, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar