¹ Ratner & Slaughter, ‘Appraising the Methods of International Law: A Prospectus for Readers’, in S. Ratner and A. Slaughter (eds), The Methods of International Law (2004) 1Google Scholar

² Cf. Daniel Bodansky, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law (2010), at 202–203.

³ See Koskenniemi, ‘Methodology of International Law’, in Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, available at www.mpepil.com.

⁴ Shapiro, S., ‘The “Hart-Dworkin” Debate: A Short Guide for the Perplexed’, in A. Ripstein (ed), Ronald Dworkin (2007) 22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵ See, e.g., Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, ICJ Reports (2007) 43, at paras. 161–62.

⁶ Cf. H.L.A. Hart, The Concept of Law (1961), at 199–200Google Scholar

⁷ Goodin and Ratner, ‘Democratizing International Law’, 2 Global Policy (2011) 241Google Scholar

⁸ Tams, ‘Individual States as Guardians of Community Interests’, in U. Fasternath et al. (eds), From Bilateralism to Community Interest: Essays in Honor of Judge Bruno Simma (2011) 379Google Scholar

⁹ Miller, ‘Distributing Responsibilities’, 9 J. Pol. Phil. (2001) 453Google Scholar

¹⁰ Simma, ‘From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law’, 250 Recueil des Cours de l'Academie de Droit International (1994) 217, at 229Google Scholar

¹¹ MacCormick, ‘Natural Law and the Separation of Law and Morals’, in R.P. George (ed), Natural Law Theory: Contemporary Essays (1992) 105, at 113Google Scholar

¹² Simma, supra note 10, at 233–234Google Scholar

¹³ Ibid.

¹⁴ Peters, ‘Humanity as the A and Ω of Sovereignty’, 20 EJIL (2009) 513Google Scholar

¹⁵ McDougal and Reisman, ‘The Prescribing Function in the World Constitutive Process: How International Law is Made’, in M.S. McDougal and W.M. Reisman (eds), International Law Essays (1981) 355, at 368–369Google Scholar

¹⁶ Wiessner and Willard, ‘Policy-Oriented Jurisprudence and Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflict: Toward a World Public Order of Human Dignity’, in S. Ratner and A. Slaughter, Methods, supra note 1, at 47, 61.

¹⁷ See Arts. 2(4), 42, and 51 of the United Nations Charter.

¹⁸ These are respect, power, wealth, skill, enlightenment, rectitude, affection, and well-being.

¹⁹ M. McDougal, H. Lasswell and L. Chen, Human Rights and World Public Order (1980) at 454 n.9, 459–460Google Scholar

²⁰ Gallie, ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, 56 Proc. Aristotelian Soc'y (1955) 167Google Scholar

²¹ Reisman, Compare, ‘Humanitarian Intervention to Protect the Ibos’, in R.B. Lillich (ed), Humanitarian Intervention and the United Nations (1973) 167Google Scholar

W. Michael Reisman, 87 ASIL Proc. (1993), at 258–259Google Scholar

²² See generally M. Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia (1989).

²³ Kennedy, ‘When Renewal Repeats: Thinking Against the Box’, 32 N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol. (2000) 355Google Scholar

²⁴ H. Charlesworth and C. Chinkin, The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (2000)Google Scholar

²⁵ Gathii, ‘TWAIL: A Brief History of its Origins, its Decentralized Network, and a Tentative Bibliography’, 3 Trade, Law, and Development (2011) 26Google Scholar

S. Pahuja, Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality (2011)Google Scholar

²⁶ Kingsbury, ‘Sovereignty and Inequality’, 9 EJIL (1998) 599Google Scholar

G. Simpson, Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (2004)Google Scholar

Alvarez, ‘Hegemonic International Law Revisited’, 97 AJIL (2003) 873Google Scholar

M. Byers and G. Nolte (eds), United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law (2003)Google Scholar

²⁷ Koskenniemi, ‘Carl Schmitt, Hans Morgenthau, and the Image of Law in International Relations’, in M. Byers (ed), The Role of Law in International Politics (2000) 17Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, ‘Global Governance and Public International Law’, 37 Kritische Justiz (2004) 241Google Scholar

D. Kennedy, The Dark Side of Virtue (2004)Google Scholar

²⁸ M. Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (2001), at 489–494Google Scholar

²⁹ Stone, ‘Approaches to the Notion of International Justice’, in R.A. Falk and C.E. Black (eds), The Future of the International Legal Order, vol. 1, (1969) 372Google Scholar

³⁰ T. Franck, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (1995)Google Scholar

³¹ Tasioulas, ‘International Law and the Limits of Fairness’, 13 EJIL (2002) 993, at 1008Google Scholar

³² Simpson, ‘Is International Law Fair?’, 17 Mich. J. Int'l L. (1996) 615Google Scholar

³³ Garcia, ‘Global Justice and the Bretton Woods Institutions’, 10 J. Int'l Econ. L. (2007) 461Google Scholar

C. Carmody, F.J. Garcia and J. Linarelli (eds), Global Justice and International Economic Law: Opportunities and Prospects (2012)Google Scholar

³⁴ P. Allott, Eunomia: A New Order for a New World (1990).

³⁵ Tesón, ‘The Kantian Theory of International Law’, 92 Colum. L. Rev. (1992) 53Google Scholar

F.R. Tesón, A Philosophy of International Law (1998)Google Scholar

³⁶ F.R. Tesón, Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality (2005), at 144–167Google Scholar

Tesón, ‘Ending Tyranny in Iraq’, 19 Ethics and Int'l Aff. no. 3 (2005) 1Google Scholar

³⁷ B.R. Roth, Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement: Premises of a Pluralist International Legal Order (2010)Google Scholar

³⁸ J. Donnelly, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice (2d ed, 2003)Google Scholar

³⁹ Stone, ‘Ethics and International Environmental Law’, in D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée and E. Hey (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (2007) 291Google Scholar

⁴⁰ On the latter, see, e.g., the works cited in Anghie and Chimni, ‘Third World Approaches to International Law and Individual Responsibility in Internal Conflict’, in S. Ratner and A. Slaughter, Methods, supra note 1, at 185, 187.

⁴¹ Continental Shelf, ICJ Reports (1985) 13, at para. 46.

⁴² Nardin, ‘International Ethics’, in C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Relations (2009), at 594Google Scholar

⁴³ S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law (2010)Google Scholar

⁴⁴ M. Walzer, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations (2d ed, 1992), at 45Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Luban, ‘A Theory of Crimes Against Humanity’, 29 Yale J. Int'l L. (2004) 85Google Scholar

J. McMahan, Killing in War (2009)Google Scholar

L. May, Aggression and Crimes Against Peace (2008)Google Scholar

D. Rodin, War and Self-Defense (2002)Google Scholar

Shue and Wippman, ‘Limiting Attacks on Dual-Use Facilities Performing Indispensable Civilian Functions’, 35 Cornell Int'l. L.J. (2002) 559Google Scholar

⁴⁶ J. Nickel, Making Sense of Human Rights (2d ed, 2006)Google Scholar

C. Beitz, The Idea of Human Rights (2009)Google Scholar

H. Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy (1980)Google Scholar

W. Talbot, Which Rights Should be Universal? (2005)Google Scholar

⁴⁷ C. Beitz, Political Theory and International Relations (1979), at 92–105Google Scholar

⁴⁸ M. Frost, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (1996), at chs. 4–5Google Scholar

⁴⁹ D. Held, Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance (1995), at 267–283Google Scholar

Held, ‘Law of States, Law of Peoples: Three Models of Sovereignty’, 8 Legal Theory (2002) 1Google Scholar

D. Archibugi, D. Held and M. Köhler (eds), Re-imagining Political Community: Studies in Cosmopolitan Democracy (1998)Google Scholar

⁵⁰ J. Habermas, The Divided West (2006), at 115–193Google Scholar

⁵¹ Held, Democracy, supra note 49, at 279; Archibugi, ‘Principles of Cosmopolitan Democracy’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 198, 221.

⁵² Ratner, ‘Do International Organizations Play Favorites?: An Impartialist Account’, in L.H. Meyer (ed), Legitimacy, Justice, and Public International Law (2009), at 123Google Scholar

Bienen, Rittberger and Wagner, ‘Democracy in the United Nations System: Cosmopolitan and Communitarian Principles’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 287Google Scholar

⁵³ Beetham, ‘Human Rights and Cosmopolitan Democracy’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 58Google Scholar

Hassner, ‘Refugees: a Special Case for Cosmopolitan Citizenship?’, in Re-imagining Political Community, supra note 49, at 273Google Scholar

R. Pierek and W. Werner (eds), Cosmopolitanism in Context: Perspectives from International Law and Political Theory (2010)Google Scholar

C. Barry and T.W. Pogge (eds), Global Institutions and Responsibilities: Achieving Global Justice (2005)Google Scholar

⁵⁴ A. Buchanan, Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination: Moral Foundations for International Law (2004), at 331–400Google Scholar

⁵⁵ T.W. Pogge, Realizing Rawls (1989)Google Scholar

T.W. Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms (2002)Google Scholar

Pogge, ‘Recognized and Violated by International Law: The Human Rights of the Global Poor’, 18 Leiden J. Int'l L. (2005) 717Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Nardin, ‘Legal Positivism as a Theory of International Society,’ in D.R. Mapel and T. Nardin (eds), International Society: Diverse Ethical Perspectives (1998), at 17Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Held, Democracy, supra note 49, at 101–11.

⁵⁸ D. Miller, National Responsibility and Global Justice (2007), at 224–230Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Mertens, ‘Defending the Rawlsian League of Peoples: A Critical Comment on Tan’, 18 Leiden J. Int'l L. (2005) 711, at 713–714Google Scholar

⁶⁰ P. Singer, One World: The Ethics of Globalization (2002), at 127–135Google Scholar

⁶¹ Goodin, ‘What is So Special About our Fellow Countrymen?’, 98 Ethics (1988) 663Google Scholar

⁶² K. Tan, Justice Without Borders: Cosmopolitanism, Nationalism, and Patriotism (2004), at 175–177Google Scholar

⁶³ Nagel, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, 33 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2005) 113Google Scholar

Cohen and Sabel, ‘Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia?’, 34 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2006) 147Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Cohen, ‘Minimalism About Human Rights: The Most We Can Hope For?’, 12 J. Pol. Phil. (2004) 190, at 194–199Google Scholar

C. Beitz, The Idea of Human Rights (2009)Google Scholar

Raz, ‘Human Rights Without Foundations’, in The Philosophy of International Law, supra note 43, at 321Google Scholar

⁶⁵ J.L. Brierly, The Law of Nations (6th ed, 1963)Google Scholar

⁶⁶ J. Rawls, The Law of Peoples (1999), at 37Google Scholar

⁶⁷ Buchanan, ‘Rawls's Law of Peoples: Rules for a Vanished Westphalian World’, 110 Ethics (2000) 697Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Meckled-Garcia, ‘On the Very Idea of Cosmopolitan Justice: Constructivism and International Agency’, 16 J. Pol. Phil. (2008) 245, at 261Google Scholar

Blake, ‘Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy’, 30 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2001) 257, at 280Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Cohen and Sabel, supra note 63Google Scholar

⁷⁰ S. Caney, Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (2005), at 162Google Scholar

Copp, ‘International Law and Morality in the Theory of Secession’, 2 J. Ethics (1998) 219, at 238Google Scholar

⁷¹ Pogge, ‘Cosmopolitanism and Sovereignty’, 103 Ethics (1992) 48, at 50–52Google Scholar

⁷² Singer, ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, 1 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (1972) 229Google Scholar

R. McKim and J. McMahan (eds), The Morality of Nationalism (1997)Google Scholar

Mason, ‘Special Obligations to Compatriots’, 107 Ethics (1997) 427Google Scholar

S. Scheffler, Boundaries and Allegiances: Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought (2001)Google Scholar

⁷³ G.A. Cohen, Rescuing Justice and Equality (2008), at 229–273Google Scholar

⁷⁴ Copp, supra note 70, at 222Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Buchanan, supra note 54, at 22–23Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Buchanan and Golove, ‘Philosophy of International Law’, in J. Coleman and S. Shapiro (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (2002), at 868, 870Google Scholar

Hurrell, ‘Norms and Ethics in International Relations’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B.A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations (2002), at 137, 139–141Google Scholar

⁷⁷ Buchanan and Golove, supra note 76, at 872–881Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Ratner, ‘Persuading to Comply: On the Deployment and Avoidance of Legal Argumentation’, in J. Dunoff and M. Pollack (eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art (2012)Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Beitz, ‘Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment’, 80 J. Phil. (1983) 591Google Scholar

Cohen and Sabel, supra note 63Google Scholar

Sangiovanni, ‘Global Justice, Reciprocity, and the State’, 35 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (2007) 3Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Barry, ‘Do Countries Have Moral Obligations? The Case of World Poverty’, in 2 The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (1981) 25, at 36Google Scholar

⁸¹ G. Hardin, The Tragedy of the Commons (1968)Google Scholar

⁸² Ratner, supra note 52, at 144–149Google Scholar

⁸³ Ratner, ‘Is International Law Impartial?’, 11 Legal Theory (2005) 39Google Scholar

⁸⁴ Hurrell, ‘International Law and the Making and Unmaking of Boundaries’, in A. Buchanan and M. Moore (eds), States, Nations, and Borders: The Ethics of Making Boundaries (2003), at 275, 277–278Google Scholar

R. Jackson, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (2000), at 416–417Google Scholar

⁸⁵ J. Crawford, The Creation of States in International Law (2d ed, 2006) at 417–418Google Scholar

T. Franck, Recourse to Force: State Action Against Threats and Armed Attacks (2002), at 135–173Google Scholar

⁸⁶ Luban, ‘Just War and Human Rights’, 9 Phil. & Pub. Aff. (1980) 161Google Scholar

Beitz, C., ‘The Moral Standing of States Revisited’, 23 Ethics and Int'l Aff. (2010) 325, at 333–345Google Scholar

A. Altman and C.H. Wellman, A Liberal Theory of International Justice (2009), at 96–117Google Scholar

T. Nardin and M.S. Williams (eds), Humanitarian Intervention: Nomos XLVII (2006)Google Scholar

Altman and Wellman, supra, at 43–68Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, ‘Statism and Nationalism: A Cosmopolitan Critique’, in I. Shapiro and L. Brilmayer (eds), Nomos XLI: Global Justice (1999) 12Google Scholar

Copp, supra note 70Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Tan, ‘International Toleration: Rawlsian versus Cosmopolitan’, 18 Leiden J. Int'l L. (2005) 685, at 703–704Google Scholar

⁸⁸ This seems to be the basis for Beitz's focus on this in Beitz, supra note 86.

⁸⁹ O. O'Neill, Bounds of Justice (2000), at 186–202Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Ratner, ‘Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States’, 90 AJIL (1996) 590Google Scholar

⁹¹ Erskine, ‘ “Citizen of nowhere” or “the point where circles intersect”? Impartialist and Embedded Cosmopolitanisms’, 28 Rev. Int'l Stud. (2002) 457Google Scholar

T. Erskine, Embedded Cosmopolitanism: Duties to Strangers and Enemies in a World of ‘Dislocated Communities’ (2008)Google Scholar

⁹² Spiro, ‘A New International Law of Citizenship’, 105 AJIL (2011) 694Google Scholar

⁹³ See, e.g., Declaration on the Establishment of the Arctic Council, 19 September 1996, available at www.arctic-council.org (participation by indigenous peoples).

⁹⁴ Wellman, ‘Immigration and Freedom of Association’, 119 Ethics (2008) 109Google Scholar

⁹⁵ Stilz, ‘Nations, States, and Territory’, 121 Ethics (2011) 572Google Scholar

⁹⁶ Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, GA Res. 2625 (XXV), 25 October 1970; Frontier Dispute, ICJ Reports (1986) 554.

⁹⁷ Philpott, ‘In Defense of Self-Determination’, 105 Ethics (1995) 352, at 382Google Scholar

Philpott, ‘Should Self-Determination be Legalized?’, 12 Terrorism & Pol. Violence, no. 3–4 (2000), 106, at 118–119Google Scholar

⁹⁸ See sources, supra note 96.

⁹⁹ H.J. Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (K.W. Thompson and W.D. Clinton eds., 7th ed 2006), at 240–269Google Scholar

E.H. Carr, The Twenty Years Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations (rev. ed 2001), at 135–155Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ For a fuller account of the ethical approaches within international relations, see The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, supra note 42.

¹⁰¹ For a review of the state of play, see Interdisciplinary Perspectives, supra note 78.

¹⁰² Buchanan and Keohane, ‘The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions,’ in 10 Ethics & Int'l Aff. no. 4 (2006) 405Google Scholar

Buchanan and Keohane, ‘Precommitment Regimes for Intervention: Supplementing the Security Council’, 25 Ethics and Int'l Aff. no. 1 (2011) 41Google Scholar

¹⁰³ Lutz and Sikkink, ‘International Human Rights Law in Practice: The Justice Cascade: The Evolution and Impact of Foreign Human Rights Trials in Latin America’, 2 Chicago J. International Law (2001) 1Google Scholar

¹⁰⁴ See Price, ‘The Ethics of Constructivism’, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, supra note 42, at 317.

¹⁰⁵ Bull, ‘The Anarchical Society: The Grotian Conception of International Society’, in K. Alderson and A. Hurrell (eds), Hedley Bull on International Society (2000)Google Scholar

¹⁰⁶ Compare R. Jackson, The Global Covenant (2000)Google Scholar

R.J. Vincent, Human Rights and International Relations (1986)Google Scholar

¹⁰⁷ From a very different direction, Terry Nardin makes the same contribution. See supra note 56.

¹⁰⁸ Hurrell, supra note 84Google Scholar

¹⁰⁹ Hurrell, supra note 106, at 84–86Google Scholar

Jackson, supra note 106, at 16–22Google Scholar

¹¹⁰ Cochrane, ‘The Ethics of the English School’, in The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, supra note 42, at 286Google Scholar

¹¹¹ Reus-Smit, ‘Imagining society: constructivism and the English School’, 4 British J. Pol. & Int'l Rel. (2002) 487Google Scholar

¹¹² H. Shue, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence and U.S. Foreign Policy (2d ed., 1996), at 52Google Scholar

¹¹³ Habermas, supra note 50, at 144Google Scholar

¹¹⁴ Koskenniemi, ‘Legitimacy, Rights, and Ideology: Notes Towards a Critique of the New Moral Internationalism’, 7 Associations: Journal for Legal and Social Theory (2003) 349, at 371Google Scholar

¹¹⁵ Lauterpacht, ‘Professor Carr on International Morality’, in E. Lauterpacht (ed), International Law: Being the Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht, vol. 2, (1975), at 67, 84–92Google Scholar

Brierly, J.L., ‘The Rule of Law in International Society’, in H. Lauterpacht and C.H.M. Waldock (eds), The Basis of Obligation in International Law and Other Papers by the Late James Leslie Brierly (1958), at 250Google Scholar

C. de Visscher, Théories et Réalités en Droit International Public (3d ed., 1960), at 116–130Google Scholar

¹¹⁶ Simma, supra note 10, at 234Google Scholar

¹¹⁷ McDougal, Lasswell and Chen, supra note 19, at 88Google Scholar

¹¹⁸ Franck, supra note 30, at 11Google Scholar

¹¹⁹ Ibid. at 13.

¹²⁰ Kritsiotis, ‘Imagining the International Community’, 13 EJIL (2002) 961Google Scholar

¹²¹ Beitz, supra note 79Google Scholar

Vincent, supra note 106, at 118–119Google Scholar

¹²² Habermas, supra note 50, at 135Google Scholar

¹²³ Cassese, ‘Soliloquy’, in P. Gaeta and S. Zappalà (eds), The Human Dimension of International Law: Selected Papers (2008)Google Scholar

¹²⁴ Lachs, ‘Quelques Réflexions sur la Communauté Internationale’, in M. Virally (ed), Le Droit International au Service de la Paix, de la Justice et du Développement (1991), at 349Google Scholar

¹²⁵ Paulus, ‘The influence of the United States on the concept of the ‘international community’, in United States Hegemony and the Foundations of International Law, supra note 26, at 57Google Scholar

¹²⁶ J. Rawls, Justice as Fairness: A Restatement (E. Kelly ed., 2001), at 192–195Google Scholar

¹²⁷ P. Cane, Responsibility in Law and Morality (2002), at 29–43Google Scholar

Miller, supra note 58, at 81–109Google Scholar

R.E. Goodin, Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of our Social Responsibilities (1985), at 113–114Google Scholar

¹²⁸ GA Res. 60/1, 24 October 2005, paras. 138–39.

¹²⁹ Singer, supra note 72Google Scholar

¹³⁰ Barry, supra note 80Google Scholar

O'Neill, ‘Who Can Endeavour Peace?’, in D. Copp (ed), Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Disarmament (1986), at 41Google Scholar

Erskine, ‘Assigning Responsibilities to Institutional Moral Agents: The Case of States and Quasi-States’, 15 Ethics & Int'l Aff. (2001) 67Google Scholar

¹³¹ Goodin, supra note 127, at 134–167Google Scholar

Shue, ‘Mediating Duties’, 98 Ethics (1998) 687Google Scholar

¹³² See, e.g., the essays in S.M. Gardiner et al. (eds), Climate Ethics: Essential Readings (2010).

¹³³ Miller, supra note 9Google Scholar

Miller, supra note 58Google Scholar

¹³⁴ Rawls, supra note 66, at 70Google Scholar

¹³⁵ Buchanan and Keohane, ‘Legitimacy’, supra note 102Google Scholar

¹³⁶ See sources, supra note 53.

¹³⁷ Anderson, ‘What is the Point of Equality?’, 109 Ethics (1999) 287Google Scholar

¹³⁸ Compare Beitz, ‘International Liberalism and Distributive Justice’, 51 World Politics (1999) 269 (distinguishing between international political justice and distributive justice), and Blake, ‘International Justice’, in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, para. 1, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/international-justice (focusing on distributive justice).