Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:44:25.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The concept of normative threat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2011

Ingrid Creppell
Ingrid Creppell*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and the Elliott School of International Affairs, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Why are some acts, events, or people elevated to a status of a threat, when no hostile action or direct physical damage appears imminent? Why are some relationships of threat infused with intense emotionality and ethical language? In this paper, I argue that puzzles such as these can be understood if we develop a concept of normative threat. The role of ethical values and beliefs has not been sufficiently integrated with the threat literature. Many writers assume that ethical language tied to constructions of threat serves merely to disguise and palliate the underlying hard reality of struggles for power. This is too simplistic. I offer an approach that takes seriously the normativity of the threat experience for people as members of political bodies. I argue that perceptions of threat emerge and carry a heightened emotional and moral energy when basic features of a political body's normative order appear to be at stake and people believe action affirming their strength as a collective body is required. Normative order comprises a set of principles citizens believe to be necessary for the functioning, justifiability, and indeed ‘reality’ of their political body. A normative threat is perceived as a promise of harm to the political body through defiance of basic principles of order and right that constitute one's group. The paper describes three main types of normative threat: transgression/grievance, subversion/insecurity, abomination/indignant aversion.

Keywords

threatordernormative beliefsbody politicemotionsidentity
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , 20 September 2011 , pp. 450 - 487
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, Thomas. 1988. “The Summa of Theology, Qu.11.3 ‘On Heresy’ .” In St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics, edited by Paul Sigmund. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1995. Politics, edited and translated by Ernest Barker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, Daniel, Halperin, Eran, de Rivera, Joseph. 2007. “Collective Emotions in Conflict Situations: Societal Implications.” Journal of Social Issues 63(2):441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berinsky, Adam. 2009. In Time of War, Understanding American Pubic Opinion from World War II to Iraq. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blascovich, Jim, Mendes, Wendy Berry, Seery, Mark D.. 2002. “Intergroup Encounters and Threat.” In From Prejudice to Intergroup Emotions, Differentiated Reactions to Social Groups, edited by Diane M. Mackie and Eliot R. Smith, 89–109. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted, Valentino, Nicholas A., Suhay, Elizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4):959–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Marilynn B. 1999. “The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate?” Journal of Social Issues 55(3):429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1995. The Anarchical Society. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, David. 1992/1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis, MN: University Of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Neta C. 2000. “The Passion of World Politics.” International Security 24(4):116–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diefenback, Michael A., Miller, Suzanne M., Porter, Matthew, Peters, Ellen, Stefanek, Michael, Leventhal, Howard. 2008. “Emotions and Health Behavior: A Self-Regulation Perspective.” In Handbook of Emotions, edited by Michael Lewis, Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones and Lisa F. Barrett, 3d ed., 645–660. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
DiGiuseppe, RaymondTafrate, Raymond Chip. 2007. Understanding Anger Disorders. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dower, John W. 1986. War without Mercy. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Edelman, Murray. 1964/1985. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Evrigenis, Ioannis. 2008. Fear of Enemies and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Margaret. 2006. A Theory of Political Obligation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladstone, Arthur. 1959. “The Conception of the Enemy.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 3(2):132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Jeffrey. 2008. “The Wars of John McCain.” The Atlantic Monthly, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/10/the-wars-of-john-mccain/6991/Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Philip. 1998. We Wish to Inform You That Tomorrow We Will Be Killed With Our Families, Stories from Rwanda. New York, NY: Picador.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K. 2003. “Image Theory and Strategic Interaction in International Relations.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology, edited by David O. Sears, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Jervis, 285–314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Richard K., Fischerkeller, Michael P.. 1995. “Beyond the Enemy Image and Spiral Model: Cognitive-Strategic Research after the Cold War.” International Organization 49(3):415–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1996. Leviathan, edited by Richard Tuck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hogg, Michael A., Mullin, Barbara-A. 1999. “Joining Groups to Reduce Uncertainty: Subjective Uncertainty Reduction and Group Identification.” In Social Identity and Social Cognition, edited by Dominic Abrams and Michael A. Hogg, 249–279. New York, NY: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hough, Peter. 2008. Understanding Global Security, 2d ed. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huddy, Leonie, Feldman, Stanley, Weber, Christopher. 2007. “The Political Consequences of Perceived Threat and Felt Insecurity.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614:131–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurwitz, Jon, Peffley, Mark. 1987. “How are Foreign Policy Attitudes Structured? A Hierarchical Model.” American Political Science Review 81(4):1099–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert 1989. The Logic of Images in International Relations. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel, Renshon, Jonathan. 2007. “Why Hawks Win.” In Foreign Policy, 34–38.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N., Shapiro, Ian, Masoud, Tarek, eds. 2008. Order, Conflict and Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sam. 1991. Faces of the Enemy. New York, NY: Harpercollins.Google Scholar
Kelman, Herbert C. 1965. “Social-Psychological Approaches to the Study of International Relations.” In International Behavior, edited by Herbert Kelman, 3–39. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Krebs, Ronald R., Lobasz, Jennifer K.. 2007. “Fixing the Meaning of 9/11: Hegemony, Coercion, and the Road to War in Iraq.” Security Studies 16(3):409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipschutz, Ronnie D., ed. 1995. On Security. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Locke 1988. Two Treatises of Government, edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lupsa, Peter A. 1971. “Explanation of Political Violence: Some Psychological Theories Versus Indignation.” Politics & Society 2(1):89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, Andrew F. 2009. “Islamic Legal Theory, Secularism and Religious Pluralism: Is Modern Religious Freedom Sufficient for the Shari'a ‘Maqsid’ of ‘Hifz al-din’?” Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Conference, Toronto, Canada.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Pearl-Alice. 1995. “Grassroots Statecraft and Citizens’ Challenges to U.S. National Security.” In On Security, edited by Ronnie D. Lipschutz, 124–148. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan. 1995. “Anarchy and Identity.” International Organization 49(2):229–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. “Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma.” European Journal of International Relations 12(3):341–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans. 1948. Politics Among Nations. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Ohman, Arne. 2000. “Fear and Anxiety: Evolutionary, Cognitive, and Clinical Perspectives.” In Handbook of Emotions, edited by Michael Lewis and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, 2d ed., New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, David L., Garcia-Retamero, Rocio. 2007. “Identity, Power, and Threat Perception: A Cross-National Experimental Study.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(5):744–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, David. 2006. Identifying Threats and Threatening Identities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, George, Matthew, Richard,, McDonald, Bryan. 2009. “Perceptions of Threat, Trust in Government and Policy Support in Democratic Societies.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association, Annual Conference, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Shambaugh, George, Matthew, Richard,, McDonald, Bryan 2010. “Public Perceptions of Traumatic Events and Policy Preferences during the George W. Bush Administration: A Portrait of America in Turbulent Times.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33(1):55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shayo, Moses. 2009. “A model of social identity with an application to political economy: Nation, class, and redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103:147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, Jim, Pratto, Felicia. 1999. Social Dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group-Affiliations. Translated by Kurt H. Wolff and Reinhard Bendix. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Janice. 1988. “Building Politics into Psychology: The Misperception of Threat.” Political Psychology 9(2):245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stenner, Karen. 2005. The Authoritarian Dynamic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, Henri 1970. “Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination.” Scientific American 223(2):96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theiler, Tobias. 2003. “Societal Security and Social Psychology.” Review of International Studies 29:249–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrall, A. Trevor, Cramer, Jane K., eds. 2009. American Foreign Policy and the Politics of Fear: Threat Inflation Since 9/11. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna, Sunstein, Cass R.. 2001. “Inequality and Indignation.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 30(4):337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origin of Alliances. Ithaca, IL: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, David A. 1993. Justice and the Genesis of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Michael C. 1998. “Identity and the Politics of Security.” European Journal of International Relations 4(2):204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael C 2003. “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47:511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar