Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:29:01.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The asymmetric war discourse and its moral economies: a critique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2011

Yves Winter
Yves Winter*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary military conflicts are frequently referred to as ‘new’, ‘irregular’, or ‘asymmetric’, labels that are meant to distinguish contemporary conflict formations from previous ones. Yet the language of asymmetry is not just a conveniently vague gloss for a variety of conflicts; it also introduces a normative schema that moralizes and depoliticizes the difference between states and non-state actors. The description of contemporary conflicts as asymmetric allows states to be portrayed as victims of non-state actors, as vulnerable to strategic constellations they ostensibly cannot win. ‘Asymmetry’ is today's idiom to distinguish between civilized and uncivilized warfare, an idiom that converts ostensibly technological or strategic differences between state and non-state actors into moral and civilizational hierarchies. Furthermore, the claim that these types of conflicts are new is used to justify attempts to revisit and rewrite the international laws of armed conflicts. While such attempts are unlikely to succeed in the formal arena, informally, a transformation of the international normative order is already underway. At the heart of this transformation is how states interpret a key cornerstone of international humanitarian law: the principle of discrimination between combatants and civilians.

Keywords

asymmetric warirregular warfaremilitary discoursepostcolonial theoryinternational lawcivilians
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , 20 September 2011 , pp. 488 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Translated by Kevin Attell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ancker, Clinton J., Burke, Michael D.. 2003. “Doctrine for Asymmetric Warfare.” Military Review 83:18–25.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 2006. Fear of Small Numbers: An Essay on the Geography of Anger. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Arquilla, John. 2007. “The End of War as We Knew it? Insurgency, Counterinsurgency and Lessons From the Forgotten History of Early Terror Networks.” Third World Quarterly 28:369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arreguín-Toft, Ivan. 2001. “How the Weak Win Wars: A Theory of Asymmetric Conflict.” International Security 26:93–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asad, Talal. 2007. On Suicide Bombing. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, Roger. 2003. Asymmetric Warfare: Today's Challenge to U.S. Military Power. Washington, DC: Brassey's.Google Scholar
Bellamy, Christopher. 2002. “ ‘Tools of Ill-Omen’: The Shifted Conflict Paradigm and Reduced Role of Conventional Military Power.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 15(1):149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berdal, Mats R., Malone, David M.. 2000. Greed & Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Wendy. 2001. Politics Out of History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Cebrowski, Arthur K., Garstka, John J.. 1998. “Network-Centric Warfare: Its Origin and Future.” Proceedings 124:28–35.Google Scholar
Chojnacki, Sven. 2004. “Wandel der Kriegsformen? – Ein kritischer Literaturbericht.” Leviathan 32:402–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Wesley K. 2000. “How to Fight an Asymmetric War.” Time, October 23. Accessed November 16, 2009. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,998272,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
Colby, Elbridge. 1927. “How to Fight Savage Tribes.” American Journal of International Law 21:279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Thomas. 2001. “Is the ‘New Terrorism’ Really New?: An Analysis of the New Paradigm for Terrorism.” Journal of Conflict Studies 21:7–27.Google Scholar
Crawley, Vince. 2005. “Wanted: Creative Warriors – Pentagon Forming Asymmetric Warfare Group.” Armed Forces Journal 142:16.Google Scholar
Duffield, Mark. 2001. Global Governance and the New Wars. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1994. A Dying Colonialism. Translated by Haakon Chevalier. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha. 2003. The Purpose of Intervention: Changing Beliefs About the Use of Force. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52:887–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galula, David. 1964. Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gates, Robert M. 2008. “Beyond Guns and Steel: Reviving the Nonmilitary Instruments of American Power.” Military Review 88(January–Feburary):2–9.Google Scholar
Gregory, Derek. 2004. The Colonial Present: Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gurr, Ted Robert. 1988. “War, Revolution, and the Growth of the Coercive State.” Comparative Political Studies 21:45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller-Roazen, Daniel. 2009. The Enemy of All: Piracy and the Law of Nations. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Helms, Elissa. 2003. “Women as Agents of Ethnic Reconciliation? Women's NGOs and International Intervention in Postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina.” Women's Studies International Forum 26:15–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi. 1996. The State, War, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaac, Jeffrey C., Biddle, Stephen, Kalyvas, Stathis N., Brown, WendyOllivant, Douglas A.. 2008. “Review Symposium: The New U.S. Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual as Political Science and Political Praxis.” Perspectives on Politics 6:347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Richard. 2007. “Language, Policy and the Construction of a Torture Culture in the War on Terrorism.” Review of International Studies 33:353–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. 1966. Revolutionary Change. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Kahl, Martin, Teusch, Ulrich. 2004. “Sind die ‘neuen Kriege’ wirklich neu?” Leviathan 32:382–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 2001. New & Old Wars. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2001. “ ‘New’ and ‘Old’ Civil Wars: A Valid Distinction?” World Politics 54:99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, Stathis N., Balcells, Laia. 2010. “International System and Technologies of Rebellion: How the End of the Cold War Shaped Internal Conflict.” American Political Science Review 104:415–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Robert D. 1994. “The Coming Anarchy: How Scarcity, Crime, Overpopulation and Disease Are Threatening the Social Fabric of Our Planet.” Atlantic Monthly 273(February):44–76.Google Scholar
Kinsella, Helen M. 2005a. “Discourses of Difference: Civilians, Combatants, and Compliance With the Laws of War.” Review of International Studies 31:163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsella, Helen M. 2005b. “Securing the Civilian: Sex and Gender in the Laws of War.” In Power in Global Governance, edited by Michael M. Barnett, and Raymond Duvall, 249–272. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitson, Frank. 1971. Low Intensity Operations: Subversion, Insurgency, Peace-Keeping. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Lake, David A., Rothchild, Donald. 1996. “Containing Fear: The Origins and Management of Ethnic Conflict.” International Security 21:41–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leites, NathanWolf, Charles. 1970. Rebellion and Authority: An Analytic Essay on Insurgent Conflicts. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Lind, William S. 2004. “Understanding Fourth Generation War.” Military Review 84(September/October):12–16.Google Scholar
Lind, William S., Nightengale, Keith, Schmitt, John F., Sutton, Joseph W.Wilson, Gary I.. 1989. “The Changing Face of War: Into the Fourth Generation.” Marine Corps Gazette 73(October):22–26.Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian. 1993. Unsettled States, Disputed Lands: Britain and Ireland, France and Algeria, Israel and the West Bank-Gaza. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. 1995. “Toward Post-Heroic Warfare.” Foreign Affairs 74:109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N. 1996. “A Post-Heroic Military Policy.” Foreign Affairs 75:33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Andrew. 1975. “Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict.” World Politics 27:175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood. 2004. Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Mattis, James N., Hoffman, Frank. 2005. “Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars.” Proceedings 131:18–19.Google Scholar
Mazarr, Michael J. 2008. “The Folly of ‘Asymmetric War’.” The Washington Quarterly 31:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meigs, Montgomery C. 2003. “Unorthodox Thoughts About Asymmetric Warfare.” Parameters 33:4–19.Google Scholar
Melzer, Nils. 2009. Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities Under International Humanitarian Law. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.Google Scholar
Merom, Gil. 2003. How Democracies Lose Small Wars: State, Society, and the Failures of France in Algeria, Israel in Lebanon, and the United States in Vietnam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Münkler, Herfried. 2006. Der Wandel des Krieges: Von der Symmetrie zur Asymmetrie. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
Münkler, Herfried. 2005. The New Wars. Translated by Patrick Camiller. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Network of Concerned Anthropologists. (ed.) 2009. The Counter-Counterinsurgency Manual. Or, Notes on Demilitarizing American Society. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. 1994. Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation By Weaker Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, Andreas, Vashakmadze, Mindia. 2009. “Asymmetrical War and the Notion of Armed Conflict: A Tentative Conceptualization.” International Review of the Red Cross 91:95–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Retort, . 2005. Afflicted Powers: Capital and Spectacle in a New Age of War. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Rogers, Clifford J. 1993. “The Military Revolutions of the Hundred Years’ War.” The Journal of Military History 57:241–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Carl. 2007. Theory of the Partisan: Intermediate Commentary on the Concept of the Political. Translated by G. L. Ulmen. New York: Telos.Google Scholar
Sechser, Todd S. 2010. “Goliath's Curse: Coercive Threats and Asymmetric Power.” International Organization 64:627–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Michael J. 1996. “Warring Bodies and Bodies Politic: Tribal Warriors Versus State Soldiers.” In Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities, edited by Michael J. Shapiro, and Hayward R. Alker, 455–480. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Martin. 2005. The New Western Way of War. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Thornton, Rod. 2007. Asymmetric Warfare: Threat and Response in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
U.S. Marine Corps. 1940. Small Wars Manual. NAVMC 2890.Google Scholar
U.S. Army Field Manual 3-24. 2006. Counterinsurgency. (Marine Corps Warfighting Publication 3-33.5). Washington D.C.: Department of the Army and United States Marine Corps.Google Scholar
U.S. Army Field Manual Interim 3-24.2. 2009. Tactics in Counterinsurgency. Washington D.C.: Department of the Army.Google Scholar
van Creveld, Martin. 1991. The Transformation of War. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weizman, Eyal. 2009. Lawfare in Gaza: Legislative Attack. openDemocracy. Accessed June 11, 2010. http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/legislative-attackCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Yves. 2008. “Gewaltökonomien und Unsicherheit: Zur Gouvernementalität der ‘neuen Kriege’.” In Gouvernementalität und Sicherheit: Zeitdiagnostische Beiträge im Anschluss an Foucault, edited by Patricia Purtschert, Katrin Meyer, and Yves Winter, 49–74. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Eric R. 1969. Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar