Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T16:11:15.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The recognitive practices of declaring and constituting statehood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2013

Eva Erman
Eva Erman*
Affiliation:
Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 129 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahcheli, Tozun, Bartmann, Barry, Srebrnik, Henry. 2004. De Facto States: The Quest for Sovereignty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bartelson, Jens. 1998. “Second Natures: Is the State Identical With Itself?” European Journal of International Relations 4(3):295–326.Google Scholar
Borgen, Christopher. 2010. “States and International Law: The Problems of Self-determination, Secession and Recognition.” In International Law for International Relations, edited by Cali B., 191–212; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert. 1994. Making it Explicit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 1999. “Some Pragmatist Themes in Hegel's Idealism.” European Journal of Philosophy 7(2):164–189.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert 2002. Tales of the Mighty Dead: Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Philip. 1942. “The Effects of Recognition.” The American Journal of International Law 36(1):106–108.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. 2006. The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan. 1995. “Defence of Thick Concepts.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20(1):263–279.Google Scholar
Dancy, Jonathan 2004. Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Erman, Eva. 2006. “Reconciling Communicative Action with Recognition.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 32(3):377–400.Google Scholar
Erman, Eva 2007. “Conflict and Universal Moral Theory: From Reasonableness to Reason-Giving.” Political Theory 35(5):598–623.Google Scholar
Erman, Eva 2010. “Freedom as Non-Domination or How to Throw the Agent Out of the Space of Reasons.” Journal of Power 3(1).Google Scholar
Erman, Eva 2012. “The Right to have Rights’ to the Rescue: From Human Rights to Global Democracy.” In Human Rights at the Crossroads, edited by Goodale M., 72–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fabry, Mikulas. 2010. Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States Since 1776. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Thomas. 1999. The Recognition of States: Law and Practice in Debate and Evolution. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen 1998. On the Pragmatics of Communication, edited by M. Cooke. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What?. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. 1967. Philosophy of Right, trans. T.M. Knox. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1996. The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 1997. “Recognition and Moral Obligation.” Social Research 64(1):16–35.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2003. “Redistribution as Recognition: A Response to Nancy Fraser.” In Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange, edited by Fraser N., and Honneth A., 110–197. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel 2011. “Recognition between States: On the Moral Substrate of International Relations.” In The International Politics of Recognition, edited by Lindemann T. and Ringmar E. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Hurley, Susan. 1989. Natural Reasons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, Hans. 1941. “Recognition in International Law: Theoretical Observations.” The American Journal of International Law 35(4):605–617.Google Scholar
Kreijen, Gérard. 2004. State Failure, Sovereignty and Effectiveness: Legal Lessons from the Decolonization of Sub-Saharan Africa. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kukla, RebeccaLance, Mark. 2008. ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: the Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch. 1944. “Recognition of States in International Law.” The Yale Law Journal 53(3):385–458.Google Scholar
Lauterpacht, Hersch 1947. Recognition in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard. 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Thomas. 2010. Causes of War: The Struggle for Recognition. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Thomas 2011. “Concluding Remarks on the Empirical Study of International Recognition.” In The International Politics of Recognition, edited by Lindemann T. and Ringmar E. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Markell, P. 2003. Bound by Recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1978. “Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary 52:13–29.Google Scholar
McDowell, J 1979. “Virtue and Reason.” Monist 62:331–350.Google Scholar
McDowell, J 1981. “Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following.” In Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, edited by Holtzman S. and Leich C. 141–162. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Mead, George H. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society, edited by C.W. Morris. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Möller, Niklas. 2012. “The Concepts of Risk and Safety.” In Handbook of Risk Theory, edited by Roeser S., Hillerbrand R., Peterson M. and Sandin P. 55–85. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Murray, Michelle. 2010. “Identity, Insecurity, and Great Power Politics: The Tragedy of German Naval Ambition Before the First World War.” Security Studies 19(4):656–688.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry. 1992. “International Ethics and International Law.” Review of International Studies 18:19–30.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Lassa. 1912. International Law: A Treatise, Vol. 1. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Peterson, Martha. 1997. Recognition of Governments: Legal Doctrine and State Practice, 1815–1995. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raič, David. 2002. Statehood and the Law of Self-Determination. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik. 1995. “The Relevance of International Law: A Hegelian Interpretation of a Peculiar Seventeenth-Century Preoccupation.” Review of International Studies 21(1):87–103.Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik 1996. “On the Ontological Status of the State.” European Journal of International Relations 2(4):439–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringmar, Erik 2011. “Introduction: The International Politics of Recognition.” In The International Politics of Recognition, edited by Lindemann T. and Ringmar E. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Ringmar, ErikLindemann, Thomas. eds. 2011. The International Politics of Recognition. Boulder: Paradigm.Google Scholar
Roth, Brad. 2011. Sovereign Equality and Moral Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 2007. In the Space of Reasons, edited by Scharp K. and Brandom R. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University press.Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm. 2003. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmon, Stefan. 2005. “The Constitutive versus the Declaratory Doctrine of Recognition: Tertium Non Datur?.” In The British Year Book of International Law 2004. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. “Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, edited by Gutmann A., 25–74. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 2000. “Struggles over recognition and distribution.” Constellations 7(4):469–482.Google Scholar
von Glahn, Gerhard. 1992. Law Among Nations: An Introduction to Public International Law. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1994. “Collective Identity Formation and the International State.” American Political Science Review 88(2):384–396.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 1999. Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander 2004. “The State as Person in International Theory.” Review of international Studies 30(2):289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar