Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:55:52.296Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kant and Herder on colonialism, indigenous peoples, and minority nations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2015

Vicki A. Spencer
Vicki A. Spencer*
Affiliation:
Department of Politics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is the orthodox view in the cosmopolitan and normative international relations literature that Immanuel Kant is a staunch critic of European colonialism. This paper offers a far more critical stance towards Kant’s position with respect to minority nations and stateless Indigenous peoples through an analysis that draws on the criticisms developed by his contemporary and former student, Johann Gottfried Herder. The paper proceeds in three parts. In the first section, I present the evidence in favour of seeing both Kant and Herder as strident opponents of colonialism. In the second section, I then show the problems that arise in Kant’s position when his views on the state and property rights are taken into consideration. Kant’s coupling of the nation and state in contrast to Herder’s insistence that they are separate entities is highlighted as a crucial distinguishing point in their positions. In the third and final section, I indicate how Herder provides a far deeper critique of colonialism than Kant, also due to his recognition of the problematic nature of ideological pronouncements of progress.

Keywords

KantHerdercolonialismindigenous peoplesminority nationscosmopolitanism
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , July 2015 , pp. 360 - 392
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Ian, and Dyson, R.W.. 2003. Fifty Major Political Thinkers. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, Hans. 1994. “Johann Gottfried Herder’s Concept of Humanity.” Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 23:55–74.Google Scholar
Adler, H. 2000. “Nation: Johann Gottfried Herders Umgang mit Konzept und Begriff.” In Unerledigte Geschichte: der literarische Umgang mit Nationalität und Internationalität, edited by G. Von Essen, and H. Turk, 39–56. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Adler, H. 2009. “Herder’s Concept of Humanität.” In A Companion to the Works of Johann Gottfried Herder, edited by Hans Adler, and Wulf Koepke, 93–116. Rochester, NY: Camden House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities, revised edition. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Barkawi, Tarak, and Laffey, Mark. 1999. “The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization.” European Journal of International Relations 5(4):403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, F.M. 1965. Herder’s Social and Political Thought: From Enlightenment to Nationalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beier, Marshall. 2009. International Relations in Uncommon Places: Indigeneity, Cosmology, and the Limits of International Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 2002. “Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Racism.” In Philosophers on Race: Critical Essays, edited by Julie K. Ward, and Tommy L. Lott, 145–166. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bernasconi, Robert. 2001. “Who Invented the Concept of Race? Kant’s Role in the Enlightenment Construction of Race.” In Race, edited by Robert Bernasconi, 11–36. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace. 2009. Grounding Cosmopolitanism: From Kant to the Idea of a Cosmopolitan Constitution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett Wallace, and Held, David. 2010. “Editors’ Introduction.” In The Cosmopolitan Reader, edited by Garrett Wallace Brown, and David Held, 1–14. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Bull, H. 1995. The Anarchical Society: A Study of World Order, 2nd ed.New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cavallar, Georg. 1999. Kant and the Theory and Practice of International Right. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Cheah, Pheng. 1998. “Rethinking Cosmopolitical Freedom in Transnationalism.” In Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation, edited by Pheng Cheah, and Bruce Robbins, 290–328. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Collingwood, R.G. 1946. The Idea of History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Connor, Walker. 1978. “A Nation is a Nation, is a State, is an Ethnic Group, is a ….” Ethnic and Racial Studies 1(4):377–400.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 2010. “On Cosmopolitanism.” In The Cosmopolitan Reader, edited by Garrett Wallace Brown, and David Held, 413–422. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Dietz, Mary. 1998. “Patriotism.” In Political Innovation and Conceptual Change, edited by Terence Ball, James Farr, and Russell L. Hansen, 177–193. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbek, Wilhelm. 1959. “Johann Gottfried Herders Haltung im Politischen Leben Seiner Zeit.” Zeitschrift für Ostforschung 8:321–387.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(3):205–235.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics.” The American Science Review 80(4):1151–1169.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1993. “Liberalism and International Relations.” In Kant and Political Philosophy: The Contemporary Legacy, edited by Ronald Beiner, and William James Booth, 173–203. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dreitzel, Horst. 1987. “Herders Politische Konzepte.” In Johann Gottfried Herder, 1744–1803, edited by Gerhard Sauder, 267–298. Hamburg: Meiner.Google Scholar
Eggel, Dominic, Liebich, Andre, and Mancini-Griffoli, Deborah. 2007. “Was Herder a Nationalist?” The Review of Politics 69(1):48–78.Google Scholar
Ellis, Elisabeth 2005. Kant’s Politics: Provisional Theory for an Uncertain World. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. (ed.) 1997. Race and the Enlightenment: A Reader. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Truth and Method, translated by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gaier, Ulrich. 2006. “Herders Volksbegriff und seine Rezeption.” In Herder im Spiegel der Zeiten: Verwerfungen der Rezeptionsgeschichte und Chancen einer Relektüre, edited by Tilman Borsche, 32–57. Munich: W. Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1994. “The Nation as Power-Container.” In Nationalism, edited by John Hutchinson, and Anthony D. Smith, 34–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Paul. 1998. The Philosophy of Nationalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Goldie, Mark, and Wokler, Robert. 2006. “Biographies.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, edited by Mark Goldie, and Robert Wokler, 711–786. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guibernau, Montserrat. 2004. “Anthony D. Smith on Nations and National Identity: a Critical Assessment.” Nations and Nationalism 10(1–2):125–141.Google Scholar
Hall, Martin, and Hobson, John M.. 2010. “Liberal International Theory: Eurocentric but not Always Imperialist?” International Theory 2(2):210–245.Google Scholar
Hayden, Patrick. 2005. Cosmopolitan Global Politics, Aldershot. Hants, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Heinz, Marion. 1996. “Kulturtheorien der Aufklärung: Herder und Kant.” In Nationen und Kulturen: Zum 250. Geburtstag Johann Gottfried Herder, edited by Regine Otto, 139–152. Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1800. Outlines for a Philosophy of the History of Man, translated by T. Churchill. London: Printed for J Johnson by L Hansard.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1880. “Vom Geist der Ebraischen Poesie.” In Sämmtliche Werke Vol. 12, edited by Bernhard Suphan, 1–308. Berlin: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1887. “Idee Zum Ersten Patriotischen Institut Für den Allgemeingeist Deutschlands.” In Johann Gottfried Herder, Sämmtliche Werke Vol. 16, edited by Bernhard Suphan, 600–616. Berlin: Weidmann’sche Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1985. “Über die Neuere Deutsche Literatur. Erste Sammlung von Fragmenten. Eine Beilage zu den Briefen, die Neueste Literatur Betreffend.” In Johann Gottfried Herder, Frühe Schriften 1764–1772, edited by U. Gaier. Vol. 1 of Werke in zehn Bänden, edited by Günter Arnold et al. 161–259. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1989. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit, edited by Bollacher Martin. Vol. 6 of Werke in zehn Bänden, edited by Günter Arnold et al. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1991. Briefe zu Beförderung der Humanität, edited by Hans Dietrich Irmscher. Vol. 7 of Werke in zehn Bänden, edited by Günter Arnold G et al. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1994. “Auch eine Philosophie der Geschichte zur Bildung der Menschheit.” In Schriften zu Philosophie, Literatur, Kunst und Altertum 1774–1787, edited by Jiirgen Brummack, and Martin Bollacher. Vol. 4 of Werke in zehn Bänden, edited by G. Arnold et al. 9–107. Frankfurt am Main: Deutscher Klassiker Verlag.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 2002. Philosophical Writings, edited and, translated by Michael N. Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, John, and Smith, Anthony D.. 1994. “The Rise of Nations: Introduction.” In Nationalism, edited by John Hutchinson, and Anthony D. Smith, 132–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irmscher, Hans Dietrich. 1977. “Johann Gottfried Herder.” In Deutsche Dichter des 18, Jahrhunderts: Ihr Leben und Werk, edited by Benno von Wiese, 524–550. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jahn, Beate. 2006. “Classical Smoke, Classical Mirror: Kant and Mill in Liberal International Relations Theory.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Beate Jahn, 178–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1956. “Die Metaphysic der Sitten.” In Werke in sechs Bänden, vol. 4, Schriften zur Ethik und Religionsphilosophie, edited by wilhelm Weischedel, 303–634. Weisbaden: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1964. “Zum Ewigen Frieden. Ein Philosophischer Entwuf.” In Werke in sechs Bänden, vol. 6 Schriften zur Anthropologie, Geschichtsphilosophie, Politik und Pädagogik, edited by wilhelm Weischedel, 191–251. Frankfurt am Main: Insel Verlag.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991a. “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” In Kant’s Political Writings, translated by H.B. Nisbet, edited by Hans Reiss. 2nd ed.41–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991b. “The Metaphysics of Morals.” In Kant’s Political Writings, edited by Hans Reiss, translated by H.B. Nisbet. 2nd ed.131–175. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991c. “On the Common Saying: “this May be True in Theory, but it does not Apply in Practice”.” In Kant’s Political Writings, edited by Hans Reiss, translated by H.B. Nisbet. 2nd ed.61–92. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1991d. “Perpetual Peace: a Philosophical Sketch.” In Kant’s Political Writings, edited by Hans Reiss, translated by H.B. Nisbet. 2nd ed.93–130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2007a. “Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, edited by Günter Zöller, and Robert B. Louden, translated by Paul Guyer, 23–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 2007b. “On the Use of Teleological Principles in Philosophy.” In Anthropology, History, and Education, edited by Günter Zöller, and Robert B. Louden, translated by Günter Zöller, 195–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keal, Paul. 2003. European Conquest and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: The Moral Backwardness of International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keal, Paul. 2008. “Indigenous Sovereignty.” In Re-envisioning Sovereignty: The End of Westphalia?, edited by Trudy Jacobson, Charles Sampford, and Ramesh Thakur, 316–330. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kedourie, Elie. 1966. Nationalism, 3rd ed.London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Keene, Edward. 2005. International Political Thought: A Historical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline. 2012. Kant and Cosmopolitanism: The Philosophical Ideal of World Citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koepke, Wulf. 1987. Johann Gottfried Herder. Boston: Twayne.Google Scholar
Koepke, Wulf. 1996. “Kulturnation and Its Authorization through Herder.” In Johann Gottfried Herder: Academic Disciplines and the Pursuit of Knowledge, edited by Wulf Koepke, 177–198. Columbia: Camden House.Google Scholar
Kohn, Hans. 1945. The Idea of Nationalism. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kuehn, Manfred. 2001. Kant: A Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 2000. “American Multiculturalism.” In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, edited by Duncan Ivison, Paul Patton, and Will Sanders, 216–236. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Löchte, Anne. 2005. Johann Gottfried Herder: Kulturtheorie und Humanitätsidee der Ideen, Humanitätsbriefe und Adrastea. Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann.Google Scholar
MacMillan, John. 1995. “A Kantian Protest Against the Peculiar Discourse of Peace.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 24(3):549–562.Google Scholar
MacMillan, John. 2006. “Immanuel Kant and the Democratic Peace.” In Classical Theory in International Relations, edited by Beate Jahn, 52–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich. 1970 [1907]. Cosmopolitanism and the National State, translated by Robert B. Kimber. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl. 1998. ““Sinn” and “Besonnenheit”: The Meaning of “Meaning” in Herder.” In Herder Jahrbuch/Herder Yearbook 1998, edited by Hans Adler, and Wulf Koepke with Samson B. Knoll, Vol. 4:157–175. Stuttgart and Weimar: Verlag J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Menze, Ernest A. 2002. “Herder and Prejudice: Insights and Ambiguities.” In Herder Jahrbuch/Herder Yearbook 2002, edited by Karl Menges, and Regine Otto, Vol. 6:83–96. Stuttgart and Weimar: Verlag J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Morton, Michael. 1989. Herder and the Poetics of Thought: Unity and Diversity in On Diligence in Several Learned Languages. University Park, PA and London: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Muthu, Sankar. 2003. Enlightenment against Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Neocleous, Mark. 2013. “O Effeminacy! Effeminacy! War, Masculinity and the Myth of Liberal Peace.” European Journal of International Relations 19(1):93–113.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha C. 2010. “Kant and Cosmopolitanism.” In The Cosmopolitanism Reader, edited by Garrett Wallace Brown, and David Held, 27–44. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Pizer, John. 2007. “The German Response to Kant’s Essay on Perpetual Peace: Herder Contra the Romantics.” The Germanic Review 82(4):353–368.Google Scholar
Proß, Wolfgang. 2006. “Nationalism, Anthropology, and Culture.” In The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, edited by M. Goldie, and R. Wokler, 218–247. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reid, Julian. 2004. “War, Liberalism, and Modernity: the Biopolitical Provocations of “Empire”.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(1):63–79.Google Scholar
Reiss, Hans. 1991. “Introduction.” In Kant’s Political Writings, edited by Hans Reiss, translated by H.B. Nisbet, 2nd ed.1–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seton-Waton, Hugh. 1977. Nations and States: An Enquiry into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Shaw, Karena. 2008. Indigeneity and Political Theory: Sovereignty and the Limits of the Political. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Sikka, Sonia. 2006. “Herder and the Concept of Race.” In Herder Jahrbuch/Herder Yearbook, edited by Wulf Koepke, and Karl Menges, Vol. 8:133–157. Heidelberg: Synchron.Google Scholar
Snow, Dean R. 1994. The Iroquois. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spencer, Vicki A. 2012. Herder’s Political Thought: A Study of Language, Culture, and Community. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Vicki A. 2014. “Indigenous Inspiration and Herder’s Peace Woman.” In Visions of Peace: Asia and the West, edited by Takashi Shogimen, and Vicki A. Spencer, 139–160. Farnham, Surrey, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard. 2001. The Rights of War and Peace: Political Thought and the International Order from Grotius to Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 2002. “The Kantian Idea of Europe.” In The Idea of Europe: From Antiquity to the European Union, edited by Anthony Pagden, 331–358. Cambridge and Washington: Cambridge University Press and Woodrow Wilson Center Press.Google Scholar
van de Haar, Edwin. 2009. Classical Liberalism and International Relations Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Van Dyke, Vernon. 1977. “The Individual, the State, and Ethnic Communities in Political Theory.” World Politics 45(2):275–295.Google Scholar
Waligore, Timothy. 2009. “Cosmopolitan Right, Indigenous Peoples, and the Risks of Cultural Interaction.” Public Reason 1(1):27–56.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard. 1983. Kant’s Political Philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, Howard. 2012. Kant and the End of War: A Critique of Just War Theory. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Worsley, Peter. 1985. “The Three Modes of Nationalism.” In The Challenge of Social Change, edited by Orlando Fals Borda, 39–56. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen W. 1998. “Kant’s Project for Perpetual Peace.” In Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling beyond the Nation, edited by Pheng Cheah, and Bruce Robbins, 59–76. Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar