Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:21:09.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hard choices in global deliberative system reform: functional fragmentation, social integration, and cosmopolitan republicanism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2018

Ben Thirkell-White
Ben Thirkell-White*
Affiliation:
Politics and International Relations, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ‘systems turn’ amongst deliberative democrats advocates incremental institutional reform guided by deliberative democratic ideals. Whilst ideal global democracy is beyond our reach, incremental reforms can improve the quality and inclusiveness of global deliberation. However, incremental reform in non-ideal circumstances involves trade-offs between competing normative goals. The paper highlights a neglected purpose of democratic deliberation: the integration of highly fragmented technocratic deliberation on isolated issues with more holistic social perspectives emerging from the public sphere. As global governance has shifted beyond the nation state, jurisdictions have become functionally fragmented encouraging issue-specific technical framings of problems (trade policy is institutionally separated from labour, the environment and development). Fragmentation across the domestic executive is mitigated by the legislature’s role in bringing isolated technical perspectives together and subjecting them to wider public scrutiny. No analogous institution exists internationally. Highlighting functional fragmentation is important because dominant concerns with cosmopolitanism (unsettling state-centric issue framing) and republicanism (the need for institutional variety to combat the potential domination of a world state) in global governance lead to an active enthusiasm for overlapping functional jurisdictions in much of the literature, obscuring important trade-offs with the need for social integration.

Keywords

deliberative systemsHabermasdeliberative democracyglobal governancepublic sphere
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , July 2018 , pp. 253 - 284
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth, and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. “Hard and soft law in international governance.” International Organization 54(3):421–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, Andre, Niemeyer, Simon, Neblo, Michael, Steenbergen, Marco, and Steiner, Jürg. 2010. “Disentangling Diversity in Deliberative Democracy: Competing Theories, Their Blind Spots and Complementarities.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1):32–63.Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, Karen. 2006. “Democratizing global environmental governance? Stakeholder governnace in the world summit on sustainable development.” European Journal of International Relations 12(4):476–498.Google Scholar
Baker, Andrew. 1999. “Nebuleuse and the ‘Internationalization of the state’ in the UK? The Case of HM Treasury and the Bank of England.” Review of International Political Economy 6(1):79–100.Google Scholar
Baker, Andrew. 2000. “The G7 as Global ‘Ginger Group’: Plurilateralism and Four-Dimensional Diplomacy.” Global Governance 6:165–189.Google Scholar
Baker, Andrew. 2007. “Global Financial Governance and Theories of Group Polarization”. Paper presented at ‘Pathways to Legitimacy? The Future of Global and Regional Governance’, Warwick, 17–19th September. Accessed September 21, 2015. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/239929551.Google Scholar
Baker, Andrew. 2009. “Deliberative equality and the transgovernmental politics of the global financial architecture.” Global Governance 15(2):195–218.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2004. “Constitution Making and Democratic Innovation: The European Union and Transnational Governance.” European Journal of Political Theory 3(3):315–337.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2007. Democracy Across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2010. “Democratising the Global Order: From Communicative Freedom to Communicative Power.” Review of International Studies 36:431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, James. 2012. “Representation in the deliberative system.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by John Parkinson, and Jane Mansbridge, 72–94. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John, and Drahos, Peter. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, Hauke. 2002. “Globalising democracy without a state: weak public, strong public, global constitutionalism.” Millennium 31(3):675–690.Google Scholar
Busby, Joshua W. 2007. “Bono Made Jesse Helms Cry: Jubilee 2000, Debt Relief and Moral Action in International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 51(2):247–275.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 1995. “Discourse and Democratic Practices.” In The Cambridge Companion to Habermas, edited by Stephen White, 233–259. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2012. “Deliberation and Mass Democracy”. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge, 52–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2012. “Rational Deliberation Among Experts and Citizens”. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by John Parkinson and Jane Mansbridge, 27–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chwieroth, Jeffrey M. 2014. “Professional Ties That Bind: How Normative Orientations Shape IMF Conditionality.” Review of International Political Economy 22(4):757–787.Google Scholar
Cohen, Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”. In The Good Polity: Normative Analysis of the State, edited by Alan Hamlin and Phillip Petit, 17–34. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cutler, Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony. Eds. 1999. Private Authority in International Affairs. New York: SUNY press.Google Scholar
De Burca, Grainne. 2008. “Developing Democracy Beyond the State.” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 46(2):221–278.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Muller, Harald. 2005. “Theoretical Paradise – Empirically Lost? Arguing With Habermas.” Review of International Studies 31(1):167–179.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel. W. 2007. All politics is global : explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2006. Deliberative Global Politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2008. “Two Paths to Global Democracy.” Ethical Perspectives 15(4):469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckersley, Robyn. 2007. “A Green Public Sphere in the WTO?: The amicus curiae Interventions in the Transatlantic Biotech Dispute.” European Journal of International Relations 13(3):329–356.Google Scholar
Erman, Eva. 2012. “In Search of Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance.” European Journal of International Relations 19(4):847–868.Google Scholar
Erman, Eva, and Higgott, Richard. 2010. “Deliberative global governance and the question of legitimacy: what can we learn from the WTO.” Review of International Studies 36(2):449–470.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 109–142. Cambridge Mass: MIT press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2009. “Abnormal Justice.” In Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, edited by Nancy Fraser, 48–75. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2014. “Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World”. In Transnationalizing the Public Sphere, edited by Kate Nash, 8–42. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Germain, Randall. 1997. The international organization of credit: states and global finance in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Germain, Randall. 2004. “Globalising Accountability Within the International Organisation of Credit: Financial Governance and the Public Sphere.” Global Society 18(3):217–242.Google Scholar
Germain, Randall. 2005. “Global modalities of financial governance: the public sphere and civil society.” In The idea of global civil society: politics and ethics in a globalizing era, edited by R. Germain, and M. Kenny, 175–191. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Germain, Randall. 2012. “Governing Global Finance and Banking.” Review of International Political Economy 19(4):530–535.Google Scholar
Gutman, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy?. Ithaca: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1971. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science and Politics. London: Heinemann Educational.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992c. “Further reflections on the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 421–461. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008a. “The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society.” In Europe: The Faltering Project, edited by Jürgen Habermas, 109–130. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008b. “A Political Constitution for the Pluralist World Society.” In: Between Nationalism and Religion, edited by Jürgen Habermas, 312–352. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2009. “Political Communication in Medai Society: Does Democracy Still Have An Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory On Empirical Research.” In Europe: The Faltering Project, edited by Jürgen Habermas, 138–184. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2015. The Lure of Technocracy. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hameiri, Shahar and Jones, Lee. 2015. “Global governance as state transformation.” Political Studies 64(4):793–810.Google Scholar
Helleiner, Eric, and Cameron, Geoffrey. 2006. “Another World Order? The Bush Administration and HIPC Debt Cancellation.” New Political Economy 11(1):125–140.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2007. “Happy Anniversary: Time and Critique in International Relations Theory.” Review of International Studies 33(S1):71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independent Evaluation Office. 2004. Evaluation of the IMF’s Role in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) and The Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF). Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
Kanbur, Ravi. 2001. “Economic Policy, Distribution and Poverty: The Nature of Disagreements.” World Development 29(6):1083–1194.Google Scholar
Kuo, Ming-Sung. 2008. “Between fragmentation and unity: the uneasy relationship between global administrative law and global constitutionalism.” San Diego Intertional Law Journal 10:439–468.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan. 2014a. “The Democratic Potential of Systemic Pluralism.” Global Constitutionalism 3(2):170–199.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan. 2014b. “Global Democratization and International Regime Complexity.” European Journal of International Relations 20(3):620–646.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan. 2015. “Democratic Deliberation in the Modern World: The Systemic Turn.” Critical Review 27(1):49–63.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan. 2016. “Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation and Nonelectoral Representatives.” American Political Science Review 110(2):308–324.Google Scholar
Lafont, Cristina. 2015. “Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-Publics Shape Public Policy?” Journal of Political Philosophy 23(1):40–63.Google Scholar
Linklater, Andrew. 1998. The Transformation of Political Community: Ethical Foundations of the Post-Westphalian Era. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Terry. 2008. Global Stakeholder Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Estlund, David, Føllesdal, Andreas, Fung, Archon, Lafont, Cristina, Manin, Bernard and Martí, José Luis. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy.” Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1):64–100.Google Scholar
Mattli, Walter, and Woods, Ngaire, eds. 2009. The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Momani, Bessma. 2005. “Recruiting and Diversifying IMF Technocrats.” Global Society 19(2):167–187.Google Scholar
Nanz, Patricia, and Steffek, Jens. 2004. “Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere.” Government and Opposition 39(2):314–355.Google Scholar
Niemeyer, Simon. 2011. “The Emancipatory Effect of Deliberation: Empirical Lessons From Mini-Publics.” Politics and Society 39(1):103–140.Google Scholar
Niesen, Peter, and Herborth, Benjamin. 2007. Anarchie der kommunikativen Freiheit: Jurgen Habermas und die Theorie der internationalen Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Nowzad, Bahram. 1982. “The IMF and its Critics.” Essays in International Finance 146.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Robert, Goetz, Anne-Marie, Scholte, Jan-Aart, and Williams, Marce. 2000. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, Yannis. 2012. “On the Embeddedness of Deliberative Systems: Why Elitist Innovations Matter More.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by John Parkinson, 125–150. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Park, Susan, and Vetterlein, Antje. 2012. Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John. 2012. “Democratizing Deliberative Systems.” In Deliberative Systems, edited by John Parkinson, and Jane Mansbridge, 151–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John, and Mansbridge, Jane, eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “‘Let’s Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics.” International Organization 54(1):1–39.Google Scholar
Rodrik, Dani. 2001. “The Global Governance of Trade as if Development Really Mattered”. Mimeo. Harvard, Boston Mass. https://drodrik.scholar.harvard.edu/publications/global-governance-trade-if-development-really-mattered (last accessed December 20, 2017).Google Scholar
Rosenau, James N. 1992. “Governance order and change in world politics.” In Governance without government: order and change in world politics, edited by James. N. Rosenau, and Ernst-Otto. Czempiel, 1–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Kate. 2018. “‘The Tree Is Really Rooted in the Sky’: Beside Difficulty in Gillian Rose’s Political Theology”. In Misrecognitions: Gillian Rose and the Task of Political Theology, edited by Joshua B. Davis. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2005. A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens. 2003. “The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach?” European Journal of International Relations 9(2):249–275.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens. 2015. “The Output Legitimacy of International Organizations and the Global Public Interest.” International Theory 7(2):263–293.Google Scholar
Streeck, Wolfgang. 2014. “Small? State Nostalgia? The Currency Union, Germany, and Europe: A Reply to Jürgen Habermas.” Constellations 21(2):213–221.Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass. 2002. “The Law of Group Polarization.” Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2):175–195.Google Scholar
Thirkell-White, Ben. 2005a. The IMF and the Politics of Financial Globalisation: From the Asian Crisis to a New International Financial Architecture?. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Thirkell-White, Ben. 2005b. “The Wall-Street-Treasury-IMF Complex After Asia: Neoliberalism in Decline?” In The Neo-liberal Revolution: Forging the Market State, edited by R. Robison, 135–155. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Thirkell-White, Ben. 2013. “Ambitious Goals, Limited Tools? The IMF and Poverty Reduction.” In Poverty and the International Economic Legal System: Duties to the World’s Poor, edited by K. N. Schefer, 256–277. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torres Perez, Aida. 2006. “The Internationalization of Law Making Processes: Constraining or Empowering the Executive?” Tulsa Journal of Comparative and International Law 14(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Underhill, Geoffrey, and Zhang, Xiaoke. 2008. “Setting the Rules: Private Power, Political Underpinnings, and Legitimacy in Global Monetary and Financial Governance.” International Affairs 84(3):535–554.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto. 1997. Democracy Realized. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Wade, Robert. 2001. “The US Role in the Malaise at the World Bank: Get up Gulliver!” G24 Discussion Papers. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark. 2011. “Voting with your feet: exit-based empowerment in democratic theory.” American Political Science Review 105(4):683–701.Google Scholar
Wheelen, Charles. 2010. Naked Economics: Undressing the Dismal Science. New York: W.W Norton.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Rorden. 2000. Multilateralism and the World Trade Organisation: the architecture and extension of international trade regulation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woods, Ngaire. 2000. “The challenge of good governance for the IMF and the World Bank themselves.” World Development 28(5):823–841.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2002. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2004. “Global governance and legitimacy problems.” Government and Opposition 39(2):260–287.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael, Binder, Martin, and Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias. 2012. “International authority and its politicization.” International Theory 4(1):69–106.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael Faude, Benjamin. 2013. “On Fragmentation, Differentiation, and Coordination.” Global Environmental Politics 13(3):119–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar