Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T00:17:29.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The discourse of anarchy in IR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 September 2015

Jack Donnelly
Jack Donnelly*
Affiliation:
Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Contemporary International Relations (IR) typically treats anarchy as a fundamental, defining, and analytically central feature of international relations. Furthermore, it is usually held that IR since its inception has been structured around a discourse of anarchy. In fact, however, until the 1980s anarchy was rarely employed as a central analytical concept, as I show by examining 145 books published between 1895 and 1978. The conceptual and analytic centrality of anarchy is not imposed on us by international reality. Rather, it is a recent and contingent construction. Given the shortcomings of standard uses of ‘anarchy’ – especially the facts that there is no clear, generally agreed upon definition, that ‘the effects of anarchy’ are not effects of anarchy (alone), and that anarchy is not the structural ordering principle of international systems – I argue for returning to earlier practice and putting anarchy back in the background of IR.

Keywords

anarchyhistory of IRstructure
Type
Original Papers
Information
International Theory , Volume 7 , Supplement 3 , November 2015 , pp. 393 - 425
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angell, Norman. 1921. The Fruits of Victory: A Sequel to “The Great Illusion”. New York: The Century Co. [12].Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 2003 [1966]. Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. [11].Google Scholar
Ashley, Richard K. 1988. “Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique.” Millennium 17(2):227–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1981. “The Emergence of Cooperation Among Egoists.” American Political Science Review 75(2):306–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press. [100+].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, J. W. 1965. International Relations: A General Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [7].Google Scholar
Butterfield, Herbert, and Wight, Martin. 1966. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [31].Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, and Waever, Ole. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., eds. 2002. Handbook of International Relations. London: SAGE Publications. [86].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas, and Simmons, Beth A., eds. 2013. Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications. [86].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, Edward Hallett 1964 [1946]. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations, 2d ed. New York: Harper Collins. [2].Google Scholar
Claude, Inis L. 1962. Power and International Relations. New York: Random House. [16].Google Scholar
Copeland, Dale C. 2003. “A Realist Critique of the English School.” Review of International Studies 29(3):427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, Dale C. 2006 [2000]. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay.” In Constructivism and International Relations: Alexander Wendt and His Critics, edited by Stefano Guzzini and Anna Leander, 1–20. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dickinson, G. Lowes. 1917 [1916]. The European Anarchy. New York: The Macmillan Company. [100+].Google Scholar
Dickinson, G. Lowes. 1920. Causes of International War. London: Swathmore Press. [1].Google Scholar
Dickinson, G. Lowes. 1926. The International Anarchy, 1904–1914. New York: The Century Co. [100+].Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2006. “Sovereign Inequalities and Hierarchy in Anarchy: American Power and International Society.” European Journal of International Relations 12(2):139–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2009. “Rethinking Political Structures: From ‘Ordering Principles’ to ‘Vertical Differentiation’ – and Beyond.” International Theory 1(1):49–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 2012. “The Elements of the Structures of International Systems.” International Organization 66(4):609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dougherty, James, and Pfatzgraff, William. 1971. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James, and Pfatzgraff, William. 1981. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James, and Pfatzgraff, William. 1990. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 3rd ed. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dougherty, James, and Pfatzgraff, William. 1997. Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey, 4th ed. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Doyle, Michael W. 1983. “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 12(3):205–235.Google Scholar
Duggan, Stephen Pierce, ed. 1919. The League of Nations: The Principle and the Practice. Boston: The Atlantic Monthly Press.Google Scholar
Earle, Edward Mead, Craig, Gordon A., and Gilbert, Felix, eds. 1943. Makers of Modern Strategy: Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [3].Google Scholar
Elman, Colin, and Elman, Miriam Fendius, eds. 2003. Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, Charles G. 1934. International Law, 2nd ed. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company. [12].Google Scholar
Follett, M. P. 1920. The New State: Group Organization the Solution of Popular Government. New York: Longmans, Green and Co. [11].Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne. 1986. “Anarchy, Egoism, and Third Images: The Evolution of Cooperation in International Relations.” International Organization 40(1):167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenstein, Fred I., and Polsby, Nelson W., eds. 1975. Handbook of Political Science, Volume 8: International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. [11].Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism.” International Organization 42(3):485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulick, Edward Vose. 1943. The Balance of Power. Philadelphia: The Pacifist Research Bureau. [8].Google Scholar
Herz, John H. 1959. International Politics in the Atomic Age. New York: Columbia University Press. [11].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, Frederick Charles. 1920. The “New World Order:” International Organization, International Law, International Cooperation. Garden City: Doubleday, Page & Company. [2].Google Scholar
Hill, David Jayne. 1911. World Organization as Affected by the Nature of the Modern State. New York: Columbia University Press. [11].Google Scholar
Hinsley, F. H. 1963. Power and the Pursuit of Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [9].Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1902. Imperialism: A Study. New York: James Pott Company. [2].Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1915. Towards International Government. London: George Allen & Unwin. [0].Google Scholar
Hobson, John M. 2014. “The Twin Self-Delusions of IR: Why ‘Hierarchy’ and Not ‘Anarchy’ is the Core Concept of IR.” Millennium 42(3):557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, John M., and Sharman, J. C.. 2005. “The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change.” European Journal of International Relations 11(1):63–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddie, Mathew, and Hartzell, Caroline. 2005. “Signals of Reconciliation: Institution-Building and the Resolution of Civil Wars.” International Studies Review 7(1):21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, Charles. 1931. The Background of International Relations: Our World Horizons, National and International. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [5].Google Scholar
Holmes, Marcus. 2011. “Something Old, Something New, Something Borrowed: Representations of Anarchy in International Relations Theory.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11(2):279–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoguchi, Takashi, and Bacon, Paul. 2001. “The Study of International Relations in Japan: Towards a More International Discipline.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 1(1):1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [10].Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. “Cooperation under the Security Dilemma.” World Politics 30(2):167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A. 1957. System and Process in International Politics. New York: John Wiley & Sons. [2].Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O., and Krasner, Stephen D.. 1999. “ International Organization and the Study of World Politics.” International Organization 52(4):645–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennan, George F. 1951. American Diplomacy, 1900–1950. New York: New American Library. [2].Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O, ed. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O——. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little, Brown. [0].Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., and Nye, Joseph S.. 1987. “ Power and Interdependence Revisited.” International Organization 41(4):725–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Philip Henry (Marquis of Lothian). 1935. Pacifism is Not Enough, Nor Patriotism Either. Oxford: Clarendon Press. [11].Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry A. 1957. A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace, 1812–22. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [2].Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1992. “Realism, Imperialism, and Democracy: A Response to Gilbert.” Political Theory 20(1):38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [27].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, T. J. 1898 [1895]. The Principles of International Law, 2nd ed. Boston: D. C. Heath & Co. [5].Google Scholar
Leacock, Stephen. 1906. Elements of Political Science. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. [6].Google Scholar
Lentner, Howard H. 2006. “Hegemony and Power in International Relations.” In Hegemony and Power: Consensus and Coercion in Contemporary Politics, edited by Mark Haugaard and Howard H. Lentner, 89–108. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1974. “The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 18(1):41–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, Walter. 1915. The Stakes of Diplomacy. New York: Henry Holt and Company. [4].Google Scholar
Little, Richard. 2007. The Balance of Power in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, David. 1995. “Conclusion: Inter-War Idealism, Liberal Internationalism, and Contemporary International Theory.” In Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-war Idealism Reassessed, edited by David Long and Peter Wilson, 302–328. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, David, and Wilson, Peter, eds. 1995. Thinkers of the Twenty Years’ Crisis: Inter-war Idealism Reassessed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinder, H. J. 1919. Democratic Ideals and Reality: A Study in the Politics of Reconstruction. New York: Henry Holt and Company. [2].Google Scholar
Mahan, A. T. 1912. Armaments and Arbitration or the Place of Force in the International Relations of States. New York: Harper & Brothers. [1].Google Scholar
Mares, David R. 1988. “Middle Powers under Regional Hegemony: To Challenge or Acquiesce in Regional Enforcement.” International Studies Quarterly 32(4):453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton. [46].Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2006. “Conversations in International Relations: Interview with John J. Mearsheimer (Part II).” International Relations 20(2):231–243.Google Scholar
Miller, Benjamin. 2002. When Opponents Cooperate: Great Power Conflict and Collaboration in World Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen. 1991. “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique.” Review of International Studies 17(1):67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitrany, David. 1933. The Progress of International Government. New Haven: Yale University Press. [7].Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2003. “Liberal International Relations Theory: A Scientific Assessment.” In Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, edited by Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman, 159–204. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1946. Scientific Man Versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [1].Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. [10].Google Scholar
Morgenthau, Hans J. 1951. In Defense of the National Interest: A Critical Examination of American Foreign Policy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. [2].Google Scholar
Mowat, R. B. 1931. International Relations. New York: The Macmillan Company. [4].Google Scholar
Murphy, John F. 1983. The United Nations and the Control of International Violence: A Legal and Political Analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 1932. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons. [16].Google Scholar
Olson, William, and Onuf, Nicholas. 1985. “The Growth of a Discipline: Reviewed.” In International Relations: British and American Perspectives, edited by Steve Smith. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas Greenwood. 1989. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. [48].Google Scholar
Osgood, Robert E., and Tucker, Robert W.. 1967. Force, Order, and Justice. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. [2].Google Scholar
Osiander, Andreas. 1998. “Reading Early Twentieth-Century IR Theory: Idealism Revisited.” International Studies Quarterly 42:409–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oye, Kenneth A, ed. 1986. Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. [100+].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polat, Necati. 2012. International Relations, Meaning and Mimesis. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Politis, Nicolas. 1926. New Aspects of International Law. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. [3].Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 1922. An Introduction to the Study of International Organization. New York: The Century Company. [13].Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B. 1929. This World of Nations: Foundations, Institutions, Practices. New York: The Macmillan Company. [2].Google Scholar
Potter, Pitman B., and West, Roscoe L.. 1927. International Civics: The Community of Nations. New York: The Macmillan Company. [2].Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1991. “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory.” American Political Science Review 85(4):1303–1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1993. “Guns, Butter, and Anarchy.” American Political Science Review 87(1):115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate.” International Organization 48(2):313–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian, and Snidal, Duncan, eds. 2008. Oxford Handbook of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [100+].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reus-Smit, Christian, and Snidal, Duncan. 2009. “Overview of International Relations: Between Utopia and Reality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, edited by Robert C. Goodin, 3–37. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1983. “Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis.” World Politics 35(2):261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. London: Routledge. [33].Google Scholar
Russell, Frank M. 1936. Theories of International Relations. New York: D. Appelton-Century Company. [14].Google Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C. 1998. The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Schuman, Frederick Lewis. 1933. International Politics: An Introduction to the Western State System. New York: McGraw-Hill. [16].Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall L., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2002. “Power Test: Evaluating Realism in Response to the End of the Cold War.” Security Studies 9(3):60–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Walter R., and Kirk, Grayson L.. 1940. Contemporary International Politics. New York: Farrar & Rinehart. [10].Google Scholar
Simonds, Frank H., and Emeny, Brooks. 1935. The Great Powers and World Politics: International Relations and Economic Nationalism. New York: American Book Company. [14].Google Scholar
Smuts, Jan C. 1918. The League of Nations: A Practical Suggestion. New York: The Nation Press. [2].Google Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991a. “International Cooperation Among Relative Gains Maximizers.” International Studies Quarterly 35(4):387–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snidal, Duncan. 1991b. “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 85(3):701–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Glenn H., and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1988. “Science and Sovietology: Bridging the Methods Gap in Soviet Foreign Policy.” World Politics 40(2):169–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 2002. “Anarchy and Culture: Insights from the Anthropology of War.” International Organization 56(1):7–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spykman, Nicholas J. 1942. America’s Strategy in World Politics: The United States and the Balance of Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. [8].Google Scholar
Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. 2000–2001. “Security Seeking Under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited.” International Security 25(3):128–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Michael. 1976. Anarchy and Cooperation. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Trueblood, Benjamin Franklin. 1899. The Federation of the World. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin and Company. [1].Google Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambribge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1998. The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vucetic, Srdjan. 2011. “Bound to Follow? The Anglosphere and US-Led Coalitions of the Willing, 1950–2001.” European Journal of International Relations 17(1):27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 1983. “The Theory of Games and the Problem of International Cooperation.” American Political Science Review 77(2):330–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. Harrison. 2007. War and the State: The Theory of International Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [39].Google Scholar
Walsh, Edmund A, ed. 1922. The History and Nature of International Relations. New York: The Macmillan Company. [4].Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2002. “Keeping the World ‘Off-Balance’: Self-Restraint and U. S. Foreign Policy.” In America Unrivaled: The Future of the Balance of Power, edited by G. John Ikenberry, 121–154. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1959. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press. [39].Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1975. “Theory of International Relations.” In Handbook of Political Science, Volume 8: International Politics, edited by Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby. Reading: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House. [48].Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1986. “Reflections on Theory of International Politics: A Response to My Critics.” In Neo-Realism and Its Critics, edited by Robert O. Keohane. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1990. “Realist Thought and Neo-Realist Theory.” Journal of International Affairs 44(1):21–37.Google Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N. 1999. “Globalization and Governance.” PS: Political Science and Politics 32(4):693–700.Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander. 1992. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46(2):391–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1978 [1946]. Power Politics. Leicester: Leicester University Press. [11].Google Scholar
Willoughby, Westel Woodbury. 1896. An Examination of the Nature of the State: A Study in Political Philosophy. New York: Macmillan and Co. [6].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woolf, Leonard. 1916. International Government: Two Reports. London: George Allen & Unwin. [1].Google Scholar
Woolf, Leonard. 1940. The War for Peace. London: G. Routledge & Sons. [8].Google Scholar
Wright, Quincy. 1964 [1942]. A Study of War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [18].Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1978. “Anarchy and Social Choice: Reflections on the International Polity.” World Politics 30(2):241–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmern, Alfred E. 1936. The League of Nations and the Rule of Law, 1918–1935, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan and Company. [2].Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Donnelly supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Donnelly supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 159.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Donnelly supplementary material

Appendix 2

Download Donnelly supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 117.9 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Donnelly supplementary material

Appendix 3

Download Donnelly supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 99.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Donnelly supplementary material

Appendix 4

Download Donnelly supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 118.5 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Donnelly supplementary material

Appendix 5

Download Donnelly supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 112.1 KB