Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:45:00.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

War and media: Constancy and convulsion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2005

Arnaud Mercier
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To consider the relationship between war and the media is to look at the way in which the media are involved in conflict, either as targets (war on the media) or as an auxiliary (war thanks to the media). On the basis of this distinction, four major developments may be cited that today combine to make war above all a media spectacle: photography, which opened the door to manipulation through stage-management; live technologies, which raise the question of journalists' critical distance vis-à-vis the material they broadcast and which can facilitate the process of using them; pressure on the media and media globalization, which have led to a change in the way the political and military authorities go about making propaganda; and, finally, the fact that censorship has increasingly come into disrepute, which has prompted the authorities to think of novel ways of controlling journalists.

Type
Communication
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 87 , Issue 860: Communication , December 2005 , pp. 649 - 659
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chaliand, Gérard, La persuasion de masse – Guerre psychologique, guerre médiatique, Robert Laffont, Paris, 1992Google Scholar.

2 On 2 April, the Associated Press quoted an anonymous official to the effect that Private Lynch had been shot and The New York Times reported that she had been “shot multiple times.” On 3 April, The Washington Post put the story on its front page and wrote, likewise quoting anonymous officials, that she had been “fighting to the death” and that “she did not want to be taken alive.” Other stories followed. Some journalists went so far as to claim that she had been raped, though Lynch herself said that she had no memory of such an incident. To this day the media and the public continue to believe in and perpetuate the myth of Private Lynch, with books and television drama taking up where the news outlets left off. See <http://www.journalism.org/resources/research/reports/war/postwar/lynch.asp> (last visited on 17 January 2006).

3 For recent analyses, see: Michel Mathien, L'information dans les conflits armés – du Golfe au Kosovo, L'Harmattan, Paris, 2001; Claude Beauregard, Alain Canuel, Jérôme Coutard, Les médias etla guerre – de 1914 au World Trade Center, Editions du Méridien, Montréal, 2002.

4 Knightley, Philip, The First Casualty – The War Correspondent as Hero & Myth-Makerfrom the Crimea to Iraq, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, 2004Google Scholar.

5 This led, in the case of France, to the founding by anarchists in 1915 of Le Canard enchalne, a satirical weekly that is the bane of dishonest politicians to this day.

6 Chrétien, Jean-Pierre, “Rwanda, la propagande du génocide”, in Reporters sans frontieres, Les médias de la haine, La Découverte, Paris, 1995, p. 25Google Scholar.

7 Report of T. Mazowiecki, E/CN.4/1995/54. See also: the International Centre against Censorship, Forging War: The Media in Serbia, Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina, The Bath Press, May 1994.

8 December 13, 1993, Vreme News Digest Agency, No. 116.

9 Perlmutter, David D., Photojournalism and Foreign Policy – Icons of outrage in international crises, Praeger Publishers, Westport, 1998Google Scholar.

10 Quoted by Peter Johnson, “Amanpour: CNN practiced self-censorship,” USA Today, 14/09/2003.

11 Mércier, Arnaud, “Medias et violence durant la guerre du Golfe”, in Braud, Philippe, La violence politique dans les démocraties européennes occidentals, L'Harmattan, Paris, 1993, pp. 377–388Google Scholar.

12 On this conflict see Ferro, Marc, L'information en uniforme, Ramsay, Paris, 1991Google Scholar; MacArthur, John R., Second Front – Censorship and Propaganda in the Gulf War, Hill & Wang, New York, 1992Google Scholar; Keeble, Richard, Secret State, Silent Press – New Militarism, the Gulfand the Modern Image of Warfare, University of Luton Press, Luton, 1997Google Scholar.

13 Wolton, Dominique, War game – L'information et la guerre, Flaramarion, Paris, 1991Google Scholar.

14 Portes, Jacques, “La presse et la guerre du Vietnam“ in: Centre d'études des relations interculturelles, L'opinion américaine devant la guerre du Vietnam, Presses de la Sorbonne, Paris, 1992, pp. 113–139Google Scholar.

15 Delahaye Paine, Katie, “Army Intelligence. Army public affairs gets it right this time,“ The Measurement Standard, March 28, 2003Google Scholar.

16 Quoted by Reporters Sans Frontieres on its website, March 28,2003. On the role played by public relations i n US management of that war, see Rampton, S., Stauber, J., Weapons of Mass Deception – the Uses of Propaganda in Bush's War in Iraq, New York, Jeremy P. Tarcher, 2003Google Scholar.