Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:23:39.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

1949 and 1999: Making the Geneva Conventions relevant after the Cold War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

David Forsythe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of the Red Cross , Volume 81 , Issue 834: 100 ans: Droit de La Haye (1899) 50 ans: Conventions de Genève de 1949/100 years: Law of The Hague (1899) 50 years: Geneva Conventions of 1949 , June 1999 , pp. 265 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Henkin, Louis, «The Universal Declaration andthe U.S. Constitution», Political Science: The Magazine of the American Political Science Association, September 1998, pp. 512–515.Google Scholar

2 For the /Avenir statement see «InternationalCommittee of the Red Cross, ‘Avenir’ Study: Strategic content«, IRRC, No. 322, March 1998, pp. 127–136. For the UN's Agenda for Peace, see »Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to the statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992», United Nations, New York, 1992.

3 See Barber, Benjamin R., jihad vs. McWorld: How Globalism and Tribalism Are Reshaping the World, Ballantine Books, New York, 1996.Google Scholar

4 IRRC, No. 324, September 1998.

5 See further Moorehead, Caroline, Dunant's Dream: War, Switzerland, and the History of the Red Cross, HarperCollins, New York, 1998.Google Scholar

6 Tansley, Donald D., Final Report: An Agenda for Red Cross, Henry Dunant Institute, Geneva, 1975.Google Scholar

7 See, for example, Maren, Michael, The Road man to Hell: The Ravaging Effects of Foreign Aid and International Charity, The Free Press, New York, 1997.Google Scholar

8 See, for example, Brauman, Rony, «Refugee camps, population transfers, and NGOs», in Moore, Jonathan (ed.), Hard choices: Moral Dilemmas in Humanitarian Intervention, Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, MD, 1998, pp. 177–194Google Scholar, and Roberts, Adam, «Humanitarian war: Military intervention and human rights», International Affairs, No. 69, 3 July 1993, p. 429 ss.Google Scholar

9 Jonathan Moore (ed.), Hard Choices, ibid.

10 Michael Ignatieff, «The stories we tell«, in Hard Choices, ibid., pp. 287–302.

11 See further Alexander Natsios, U.S. Foreign Policy and the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse: Humanitarian Relief in Complex Emergencies, Praeger, Westport, 1997.Google Scholar