Neutrality as a Fundamental Principle of the Red Gross
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 January 2010
Extract
The word “neutral” comes from the Latin ne-uter and means: neither one thing nor the other. An institution or a movement is neutral when it refrains from participating in a conflict or altercation and abstains from any interference. Refraining from participation and abstaining from interference can be for various reasons: it may be a question of self-preservation and self-assertion, of the judgement that good and bad, true and false are to be found on both sides, of holding back in the interests of a higher purpose or a special task. Neutrality may however have its origin in indifference, fear and cowardice. Neutrality in itself is therefore not a virtue.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- International Review of the Red Cross (1961 - 1997) , Volume 36 , Issue 315 , December 1996 , pp. 627 - 630
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Committee of the Red Cross 1996
Footnotes
Hans Haug, Humanity for All: The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, Henry Dunant Institute/Paul Haupt Publishers, Berne/Stuttgart/Vienna, 1993, pp. 461–464. Footnotes omitted.
- 8
- Cited by