Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:00:58.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seamen's Organizations and Social Protest in Europe, c. 1300–1825*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2009

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The friend of Havelock Wilson, the founder of the National Union of Seamen, who once told him that true unity among seamen would never be achieved because seamen were like “a rope of sand”, washed away with every tide, would no longer be considered a sage. It was not only Wilson who, during his career as trade unionist, proved beyond any doubt that the “rope of sand” could indeed hold together. The seamen, too, had shown long before the rise of the new unions at the end of the nineteenth century that they possessed more cohesive power than Havelock's friend was prepared to credit them with – at least, if British employers are to be believed. One of the first occasions on which British employers appealed to the Combination Act of 1799 was during a labour dispute in December 1799, when coal merchants (through the intermediary of the Mayor of London) urged the Home Secretary to take action against an alleged combination of seamen in Shields. The Coal Trade Committee of 1800 blamed combinations of seamen for the high wages, which had reached an unprecedented level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1994

References

1 Wilson, Havelock, My Stormy Voyage through Life (s.l., 1925), p. 67Google Scholar, quoted in Marsh, Arthur and Ryan, Victoria, The Seamen. The History of the National Union of Seamen (Oxford, 1989), p. 1Google Scholar.

2 Marsh and Ryan, The Seamen, chs 2–7.

3 Moher, James, “From Suppression to Containment: Roots of Trade Union Law to 1825”, in Rule, John (ed.), British Trade Unionism 1750–1850 (London and New York, 1988), Pp. 7497, esp. p. 85Google Scholar.

4 Ville, Simon P., English Shipowning during the Industrial Revolution. Michael Henley and Son, London Shipowners, 1770–1830 (Manchester, 1987), p. 105Google Scholar.

5 Rediker, Marcus, Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea. Merchant Seamen, Pirates and the Anglo-American Maritime World, 1700–1750 (Cambridge, 1987), pp. 291, 294Google Scholar.

6 Rowe, D. J., “A Trade Union of the North-East Coast Seamen in 1825”, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 25 (1972), pp. 8198CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 G. Bakker, “Een onderlinge verzekering voor bootsgezellen te IJlst uit 1693”, Jaarboek Fries Scheepvaartmuseum en Oudheidkamer 1966, pp. 38–43, csp. p. 38.

8 A general overview: Unger, R. W., “Regulation and Organisation of Seamen in the Netherlands and Germany before the Industrial Revolution”, in Adam, Paul (ed.), Seamen in Society/Gens de mer en Société (s.l., 1980), II, pp. 6674Google Scholar. In the interest of brevity, guild-like organizations of seamen in Antiquity are not included here.

9 Kresse, Walter, Von armen Seefahrern und den Schifferalten zu Hamburg (Hamburg, 1981), pp. 910Google Scholar; Scholl, Lars U., “100 Jahre See-Berufsgenossenschaft”, in Kiedel, Klaus-Peter, Schnall, Uwe and Scholl, Lars U. (eds), Arbeitsplatz Schiff: 100 Jahre SeeBerufsgenossenschaft 1887–1987 (Hamburg, 1987), pp. 1048Google Scholar, esp. p. 12.

10 van Eeghen, I. H., De gilden (Bussum, 1965), pp. 11Google Scholar,15–16; Ravestcyn, Van, Onderzoekingen over de economische en sociale ontwikkeling van Amsterdam gedurende de 16e en 17e eeuw (Amsterdam, 1906), pp. 5665Google Scholar; Lourens, Piet and Lucassen, Jan, “Ambachtsgilden in Nederland: een eerste inventarisatie”, NEHA-Jaarboek, 1 (1994)Google Scholar (forthcoming) and data base prepared by Jan Lucassen and Piet Lourens at the IISG, Amsterdam.

11 Simson, P., Geschichte der Stadt Danzig, 2 vols (Danzig, 19181924), vol. I, p. 88Google Scholar; Vandewalle, A., “Schippers, scheepsbouwers en havenarbeiders”, in Vermeersch, V. (ed.) Brugge en de zee (Antwerp, 1982), pp. 99118, esp. p. 99Google Scholar; Asaert, G., De Antwerpse scheepvaart in de XVe eeuw (1394–1480) (Brussels, 1973), pp. 196197Google Scholar; Unger, “Regulation”, II, pp. 70–71; Slootmans, K., “Bergse schippers vóór 1540”, Oudheidkundige kring “De Ghulden Roos”, 35 (1975), pp. 114176Google Scholar, esp. pp. 114–115.

12 Scholl, “100 Jahre See-Bruderschaft”, p. 12; Kresse, Von armen Seefahrern, p. 16.

13 Sjöstaden Norrköping. Skeppare gillet & skeppare societeten 1641–1991 (Norrköping, 1991), p. 9. According to the data assembled by Lucassen and Lourens at the IISG, the number of skippers' guilds in the Dutch Republic also increased in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; most of the skippers organized in these guilds were probably involved in the inland trade.

14 Lane, F. C., Venice. A Maritime Republic (Baltimore, 1973), p. 420Google Scholar; Rapp, R. T., Industry and Economic Decline in Seventeenth Century Venice (Cambridge, Mass, and London, 1976), pp. 2325Google Scholar. Considering the distinction between arti and scuole made by Black and Mackenney, this seamen's guild might also be called a “guild confraternity”, cf. Black, Christopher F., Italian Confraternities in the Sixteenth Century (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 25, 39Google Scholar; Mackenney, Richard, Tradesmen and Traders. The World of the Guilds in Venice and Europe, c. 1250-c. 1650 (London and Sydney, 1987), pp. 410Google Scholar.

15 See for instance Slootmans, “Bergse schippers”, pp. 153–156; Vandewalle, “Schippers”, pp. 107–108; Kresse, Von armen Seefahrern, pp. 18–30; Simson, Geschichte, vol. I, pp. 88, 383; Lane, Venice, p. 420; van der Poel, J. M. G., “Scheepsmodellen in Nederlandse kerken”, Volkskundig Bulletin, 14 (1988), pp. 188202Google Scholar, esp. pp. 190–191; Frijhoff, Willem, “Scheepsmodellen in Nederlandse kerken. Kanttekeningen vanuit een semiotische benade-ring”, Volkskundig Bulletin, 14 (1988), pp. 203218, esp. p. 213Google Scholar; Frijhoff, Willem, “Barquettes votives ou maquettes profanes? Eléments pour une solution du problème des navires figures dans les églises protestantes des Pays-Bas”, in Cabantous, A. and Hildesheimer, F. (eds), Foi chrétienne et milieux maritimes (XVe-XXe siècles) (Paris, 1989), pp. 189208Google Scholar.

16 Lane, Venice, p. 106.

17 Catherine Vincent, “Les gens de mer dans le fait associatif religieux éa la fin du Moyen Age”, in Cabantous and Hildesheimer, Foi chrétienne, pp. 261–273; Cabantous, Alain, Le del dans la mer, Christianisme et civilisation maritime XVIe-XIXe siècle (Paris, 1990), pp. 192201Google Scholar; Heers, Jacques, Gênes au XVe siècle. Activité économique et problémes sociaux (Paris, 1961), p. 560Google Scholar; Russell-Wood, A. J. R., “Seamen Ashore and Afloat: The Social Environment of the Carreira da India, 1550–1750”, The Mariner's Mirror, 69 (1983), pp. 3552, esp. p. 42CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bernard, Jacques, Navires et gens de mer à Bordeaux (vers 1400-vers 1550) (Paris, 1968), pp. 660670Google Scholar; Kresse, Von alten Seefahrern, p. 12; Simson, Geschichte, vol. II, p. 518; Maria Bogucka, “Les gens de mer à Gdansk aux XVIe-XVIIIe siècles. Horizons et structures mentales”. Revue du Nord, No. 1 Spécial hors sine 1986, pp. 443–454, esp. pp. 448–450.

18 Russell-Wood, “Seamen ashore”, p. 42.

19 Bernard, Navires, p. 662.

20 Bowens, Jan Jacobus, Nauwkeurige beschrijving der oude en beroemde zee-stad Oostende, 2 vols (Bruges, 1792), vol. I, p. 114Google Scholar; Hambye, E., L'aumônerie de la Flotte de Flandre au XVlle siècle (Louvain and Paris, 1967), pp. 116117Google Scholar; Roland Baetens, “La population maritime de la Flandre. Une réligiosité en question (XVIe-XVIIIe siécles)”, in Cabantous and Hildesheimer, Foi chrétienne, pp. 85–108, esp. p. 97; Cabantous, Le ciel, pp. 192–201.

21 Vincent, “Les gens de mer”, p. 262.

22 Bowens, Nauwkeurige beschrijving, vol. I, p. 114.

23 Moschetti, Cesare Maria, “Aspetti organizzativi e sociali della gente di mare el Golfo di Napoli nei secoli XVII e XVHI”, in Ragosta, Rosalba (ed.), Le genti del mare mediterraneo, 2 vols (Naples, 1981), vol. I, pp. 937973Google Scholar, esp. pp. 940–953.

24 Baasch, E., Die Hansestädte und die Barbaresken (Kassel, 1897), pp. 202215Google Scholar.

25 Scholl, “100 Jahre See-Berufsgcnossenschaft”, p. 13.

26 Johnston, Thomas, The Records of an Ancient Friendly Society. The Bo'ness United General Herald (s.l., 1890), pp. 59Google Scholar.

27 Johnston, The Records, pp. 38–41.

28 Archiefdienst Westfriese Gemeenten, Oud-Archief Enkhuizen, 243, fo. 62v–65v (1635) (I am grateful to Dr Piet Boon for providing this reference); Bakker, “Een onderlinge verzekering”; Boon, P., “De sociale en economische positie van schippers in het Westfriese dorp Schellinkhout rond 1700”, Mededelingen van de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Zeegeschiedenis, 39 (1979), pp. 414, esp. p. 5Google Scholar; Bossen, P., Kroniek van de dorpen Aartswoud en Hoogwoud (Alkmaar, 1938), pp. 3638Google Scholar; van den Does, J. C., “Een eigenaardige assurantie”, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis, 45 (1930), pp. 5363Google Scholar; van Hoboken, J. W., “De zeevarende beurs van Buiksloot”, Maandblad Amstelodamum, 40 (1953), pp. 141142Google Scholar; de Jong, C., Geschiedenis van de oude Nederlandse walvisvaart. Vol. I, Grondslagen, ontstaan, en opkomst 1612–1642 (Pretoria, 1972), pp. 115Google Scholar,120–122, 372–374; Lootsma, S., “‘Draeght elckanders lasten’. Bijdrage tot de geschiedenis der ‘zeevarende beurzen’ in Noord-Holland”, West-Frieslands Oud en Nieuw, 3 (1929), pp. 1261Google Scholar; Lootsma, S., “Nog eens over ‘Zeevarende buidels’”, West-Frieslands Oud en Nieuw, 10 (1936), pp. 7173Google Scholar; van Royen, P. C., Zeevarenden op de koopvaardijvloot omstreeks 1700 (Amsterdam, 1987), pp. 118120Google Scholar, 213; Wzn., J. Schot, “De slavenkas' te Zierikzee”, Zeeuws Tijdschrift, 21 (1970), pp. 2122Google Scholar; Smit, W. (ed.), De Buul. 400 jaar zeeverzekering op Terschelling 1587–1987 (Urk and Terschelling, 1987), pp. 1223Google Scholar(and review byBoon, P. in Tijdschrift voor Zeegeschiedenis, 11 (1992), pp. 168169)Google Scholar; van Vliet, A. P., “Kapers op de kust: Maassluis en de Duinkerker kapers”, 6 (1987), pp. 312Google Scholar, esp. p. 9; van Vliet, A. P., “‘Ruïner les pêcheries’. Een aanval van Duinkerker kapers op de Nederlandse vissersvloot in 1600”, Tijdschrift voor Zeegeschiedenis, 12 (1993), pp. 311Google Scholar, p. 11, n. 30.

29 Foundation by period: 1610–1629: Maassluis; 1630–1649: Graft, Landsmeer, Zunderdorp, Buiksloot, Broek in Waterland, Ooster- en Westerblokker, Bovenkarspel, Westwoud, Enkhuizen, Westzaandam, Edam, Warder, Wormer, Harlingen, Oost-TerscheUing; 1650–1669: Hauwert; 1690–1709: Aartswoud, Hem, Venhuizen, IJlst; 1730–1740: Zierikzee; 1750–1769: Flushing; unknown: Schellinkhout, Oostwoud, Kwadijk, Opperdoes, Oudendijk.

30 Van Vliet, “Kapers”, p. 9; Van Vliet, “‘Ruïner les pêcheries”’, p. 11, n. 30; De Jong, Geschiedenis, vol. 1, pp. 121–122.

31 Lootsma, ‘;”Draeght elckanders lasten’”, pp. 22–31; Bakker, “Een onderlinge verzeke-ring”, p. 40; De Jong, Geschiedenis, vol. 1, pp. 121–122.

32 Johnston, The Records, pp. 5, 46; van Vliet, A. P., Vissers en kapers. De zeevisserij vanuit het Maasmondgebied en de Duinkerker kapers (ca. 1580–1648) (The Hague, 1994), pp. 46Google Scholar, 145–150, 174–177.

33 Lucassen, Jan, Jan, Jan Salie en diens kinderen. Vergelijkend onderzoek naar continuiteit en discontinuiteit in de ontwikkeling van arbeidsverhoudingen (Amsterdam, 1991), pp. 2728Google Scholar.

34 Davis, Ralph, The Rise of the English Shipping Industry in the 17th and 18th Centuries (2nd ed., Newton Abbot, 1972), pp. 58Google Scholar, 144–145, 157; Rodger, N. A. M., Tlie Wooden World. An Anatomy of the Georgian Navy (2nd ed., Glasgow, 1988), pp. 125Google Scholar,127; Marsh and Ryan, The Seamen, pp. 4–5.

35 Marsh and Ryan, The Seamen, pp. 4–5; Press, Jon, “Philanthropy and the British Shipping Industry, 1815–1860”, International Journal of Maritime History, 1 (1989), pp. 107128CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. pp. 108–109, 119.

36 Jones, “The Community”, p. 54; Marsh and Ryan, The Seamen, p. 8.

37 Johnston, The Records, pp. 56–60, 76,

38 Sjösladen Norrköping, p. 15.

39 Kress, Von armen Seefahrern, pp. 57–61; Scholl, “100 Jahre See-Berufsgenossenschaft”, pp. 13–14.

40 GA Amsterdam PA 1 No. 5 resolutieboek Administrateurs van 't opgeregt Fonds door de hoofd-officieren ter zee in dienst van d e Oost-Indische Compagnie, fo. 3–4, 31, 52, 70–71.

41 Davids, Karel, “Technological Change and the Professionalism of Masters and Mates in the Dutch Mercantile Marine, 1815–1914”, Collectanea Maritima, 5 (1989), pp. 282303Google Scholar, esp. p. 289; whether there has been any continuity between the first zeemanscollege, founded in Amsterdam in 1795, and the fund referred to in the previous note, is not yet clear; Burton, Valerie, “The Making of a Nineteenth-Century Profession: Shipmasters and the British Shipping Industry”, Journal of the Canadian Historical Association (1990), pp. 97118Google Scholar, esp. p. 116. The marine societies formed in Boston, Salem, Philadelphia, New York and other port towns of Colonial America after about 1740 “for the relief of distressed shipmasters and their widows and children” also appear to have been new foundations, see Morris, Richard B., Government and Labor in Early America (New York, 1946), p. 199Google Scholar.

42 Davids, “Technological Change”, pp. 289–291; Sjöstaden Norrköping, pp. 23–27; Burton, “The Making”, p. 116; Craig, Robin, “Printed Guides for Mariners as a Source of Productivity Change in Shipping”, Journal of Transport History, 3rd ser., 3 (1982), pp. 2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. p. 27.

43 Davids, “Technological Change”, pp. 295–303; Burton, “The Making”, pp. 116–117.

44 Cf. Andrews, K. R., “The Elizabethan Seaman”, The Mariner's Mirror, 68 (1982), pp. 245262CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. pp. 247, 259–260; Friedland, Klaus, “Schiff und Besatzung: Seemännische Berufcgemeinschaften im spätmittelalterlichen Nordeuropa”, in Adam, Paul (ed.), Seamen in Society/Gens de mer en socéité” (s.l., 1980), II, pp. 13231Google Scholar; Timothy J. Runyan, “Mariners and the Law of the Sea in Later Medieval England”, in Adam, Seamen in Society/Gens de mer en société, pp. 1–12.

45 Dekker, Rudolf, “Labour Conflicts and Working-Class Culture in Early Modern Holland”, International Review of Social History, 35 (1990), pp. 377420CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. pp. 405–407.

46 Bruijn, J. R. and van Heslinga, E. S. van Eyck, Muiterij. Oproer en benefiting op schepen van de VOC (Bussum, 1980), pp. 8, 21Google Scholar.

47 Eenvoudig verhael der gemeene boots-gesellen van het schip Hollandia gedaen aen sijn Hoogheyt den Heere Prince van Orangie wegens de beroerten in 't herwaerts komen, in dat schip zijn geresen (s.l., 1672) (copy in the Library of the Instituut voor Maritieme Historie, The Hague).

48 Bruijn and Van Eyck van Heslinga, Muiterij, p. 8.

49 Capp, Bernard, Cromwell's Navy. The Fleet and the English Revolution, 1648–1660 (Oxford, 1989), pp. 286289CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Capp, Cromwell's Navy, pp. 228–230, 286–290; Davies, J. D., Gentlemen and Tarpaulins. The Officers and Men of the Restoration Navy (Oxford, 1991), p. 85Google Scholar.

51 Rediker, Between the Devil, pp. 227–228.

52 Dobson, C. R., Masters and Journeymen. A Prehistory of Industrial Relations 1717–1800 (Londonz, 1980), pp. 2425Google Scholar.

53 Roland Baetens, “Le comportement des marins sur les navires ostendais vers 1'Orient”, Revue du Nord, No. 1 spécial hors série 1986, pp. 385–403, esp. pp. 398–399.

54 Timothy J. A. le Goff, “Les gens de mer devant le système de classes (1755–1763): resistance ou passivité?”, Revue du Nord, No. 1 spécial hors série 1986, pp. 463–479, esp. pp. 465–475; Pritchard, James, Louis XV's Navy. 1748–1762. A Study of Organization and Administration (Montreal, 1987), pp. 8487Google Scholar; Zysberg, André, Les galériens. Vies et destins de 60000 forçats sur les galères de France 1680–1748 (Paris, 1987), p. 170Google Scholar.

55 Van der Docs, “Een eigenaardige assurantie”, p. 60; also see Boon, P., “Zeelieden te Schellinkhout omstreeks 1700”, Tijdschrift voor Zeegeschiedenis, 6 (1987), pp. 107123Google Scholar, esp. p. 112.

56. Dekker, “Labour Conflicts”, p. 407.

57. Ibid., p. 406, incorrectly speaks of “the head offices of the VOC; after 1631 local private navies were created by several cities in Holland and administered by burgomasters and merchants.

58 Gemeentearchief Amsterdam (GAA), PA 5061/581, fo. 159–159v, 309 fo. 92–92v, 94, 97; Wagenaar, Jan, Amsterdam in zijne opkomst, aanwas, geschiedenissen enz., 4 vols (Amsterdam, 17601788), vol. I, p. 585Google Scholar.

59 Het ontroerd Holland (Harderwijk, s.a. [1749]), vol. I, pp. 293–297; Wagenaar, Amsterdam, vol. IV, p. 75.

60 According t o the anonymous author of Het ontroerd Holland, vol. I, pp. 256–257.

61 Rediker, Between the Devil, pp. 234–235.

62 Capp, Cromwell's Navy, p. 286.

63 Roland Baetens, “Le comportement des marins sur les navires ostendais vers l'Orient”, Revue du Nord, No. 1 spétial hors série 1986, pp. 385–403, esp. p. 399; Bruijn and Van Eyck van Heslinga, Muiterij, pp. 44–57, 63–6; Algemeen Rijksarchief The Hague, Admiraliteitsarchieven Collectie Van der Velden XXVII No. 42, Archief VOC No. 2269 fo. 6582 and no. 2322 fo. 202.

64 Davies, Gentlemen, p. 75; Davis, The Rise, pp. 326–327.

65 Rediker, Between the Devil, p. 156; Rodger, The Wooden World, p. 158.

66 Bruijn, J. R. and Lucassen, J., Op de schepen der Oost-Jndische Compagnie. Vijf artikelen van J. de Hullu (Groningen, 1980), pp. 1924Google Scholar, 139–140.

67 Bruijn and Van Eyck van Heslinga, Muiterij, pp. 25–26, 148–163.

68 Cf. ibid., p. 26.

69 GA Amsterdam PA 5061/309 fo. 97.

70 Dobson, Masters, p. 25.

71 Davis, The Rise, pp. 152–153; Stevenson, J., “The London ‘Crimp’ Riots of 1794”, International Review of Social History, 16 (1971), pp. 4058CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. pp. 41–42; Bruijn, J. R., Het gelag der zeelieden (Leiden, 1978), pp. 710Google Scholar; van Alphen, Marc A., “The Female Side of Dutch Shipping: Financial Bonds of Seamen Ashore in the 17th and 18th Centuries”, in Bruijn, J. R. and Bruyns, W. F. J. Mörzer (eds), Anglo-Dutch Mercantile Marine Relations 1700–1850. Ten Papers (Leiden, 1991), pp. 125132Google Scholar, esp. pp. 125–128.

72 Stevenson, “The London ‘Crimp’ Riots”, pp. 43–58.

73 GA Amsterdam PA 5061/309 fo. 97; Het ontroerd Holland, vol. I, pp. 255–256, 297.

74 GA Amsterdam PA 5061/719 No. 9, 720 No. 18, 725 No. 6, petitions to the magistrates of Amsterdam from “people interested in the lodging and equipment of seamen”, c. 1777, 1778 and 1790/1791.

75 Rowe, “A Trade Union”, pp. 81–98.

76 Jones, “Community”, pp. 53–54.

77 Ibid., p. 51; cf. McCord, Norman and Brewster, David E., “Some Labour Troubles of the 1790's in North East England”, International Review of Social History, 13 (1968), pp. 366383CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. p. 366.

78 McCord and Brewster, “Some Labour Troubles”, pp. 366–370; Aspinall, A., The Early English Trade Unions. Documents from the Home Office Papers in the Public Record Office (London, 1949), pp. 918Google Scholar.

79 Moher, “From Suppression”, p. 85; Ville, English Shipowning, p. 105; Aspinall, The Early English Trade Unions, pp. 32–33.

80 McCord, Norman, “The Seamen's Strike o f 1815 in North-East England”, Economic History Review, 2nd ser., 21 (1968), pp. 127143CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. pp. 129, 133 and 141.

81. Davis, The Rise, pp. 3–4, 32–39; Jones, “Community”, pp. 35–36.

82 McCord and Brewster, “Some Labour Troubles”, p. 366; Marsh and Ryan, The Seamen, p. 7 and Ville, English Shipowning, pp. 98–99, argue in the same vein.

83 Levine, David and Wrightson, Keith, The Making of an Industrial Society, Whickham 1560–1795 (Oxford, 1989), pp. 392, 406Google Scholar.

84 David Levine and Keith Wrightson, The Making, pp. 391–394, 406–407; Jones, “Community”, p. 42.

85 Levine and Wrightson, The Making, p. 406; Jones, “Community”, p. 42.

86 As far as the evidence presented in Jones, “Community”, pp. 53–55 makes it possible to conclude.

87 Ibid., pp. 41, 53.

88 Johnston, The Records, pp. 56–60, 69–79, 83.

89 Jones, “Community”, p. 40; also see Whatley, Christopher A., “‘The Fettering Bonds of Brotherhood’: Combination and Labour Relations in the Scottish Coal-Mining Industry circa 1690–1775”, Social History, 12 (1987), pp. 139154CrossRefGoogle Scholar, on colliers' organization in Scotland in the eighteenth century, including evidence on pp. 144–145 on an insurance box and quasi-masonic brotherhood in Midlothian in 1728.

90 Starkey, David J., “British Seafaring Employment Levels in Peace and War, 1739–1792”, in Fischer, Lewis R. and Nordik, Helge W. (eds), Shipping and Trade (1750–1950) (Louvain, 1990), pp. 2837Google Scholar; Ville, English Shipowning, pp. 100–101; Rodger, The Wooden World, pp. 145–182; Lloyd, C., The British Seaman, 1200–1860, A Social Survey (London, 1968), pp. 198199Google Scholar; Kindleberger, Charles P., Mariners and Markets (New York, 1992), pp. 1619Google Scholar.

91 McCord and Brewster, “Some Labour Troubles”, pp. 377–382; Lewis, The British Seaman, p. 199.

92 Starkey, “British Seafaring Employment Levels”, pp. 35–36.

93 Jones, “Community”, p. 46.

94 Gill, Conrad, The Naval Mutinies of 1797 (Manchester, 1913)Google Scholar, especially books V and VI; Manwaring, G. E. and Dorée, Bonamy, The Floating Republic (London, 1966)Google Scholar; Thompson, E. P., The Making of the English Working Class (2nd ed., Harmondsworth, 1968), pp. 183184Google Scholar; Lewis, The British Seaman, pp. 198–201. I have not been able to consult the recent article on the linkage between merchant seamen's strikes and the mutinies on the Nore by Moore, Joseph Price in Howell, Colin and Twomey, Richard (eds), Jack Tar in History. Essays in the History of Maritime Life and Labour (Fredericton, 1991)Google Scholar.

95 McCord, “The Seamen's Strike”, p. 128; Jones, Stephen, “Bloody Red Roses. The Supply of Merchant Seamen in the Nineteenth Century”, The Mariner's Mirror, 58 (1972), pp. 429442CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. pp. 430–433.

96 van Royen, P. C., “Manning the Merchant Marine: The Dutch Maritime Labour Market around 1700”, International Journal of Maritime History, 1 (1989), pp. 128CrossRefGoogle Scholar, esp. pp. 17–20.

97 Ville, English Ship owning, pp. 68–86, esp. p. 71; Davis, The Rise, pp. 159–174; Craig, “Printed Guides”.