Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T08:40:08.846Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rhetoric, Social History, and Contentious Politics: Reply to Critics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2004

Charles Tilly
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aristotle's vigorous vindication of rhetoric pairs it with dialectic. Dialectic, for Aristotle, combines logical propositions with induction from rigorous evidence in an effort to prove a case beyond doubt. Rhetoric parallels dialectic, but combines arguments with examples in an effort to persuade. Neither one amounts to science, which for Aristotle requires irrefutable establishment of general principles.

  1. political: arguing for or against a proposed course of action;

  2. forensic: attacking or defending someone;

  3. ceremonial: praising or condemning someone.

Type
REVIEW SYMPOSIUM
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , April 2004 , pp. 132 - 141
Copyright
© 2004 Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis