Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T17:07:42.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Manchester and Salford Politics and the Early Development of the Independent Labour Party

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Jeffrey Hill
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The grass-roots activities of the Independent Labour Party have been the subject of increased scrutiny from historians over the past few years, especially in the pages of this journal. Consequently we can now be a little surer about the contribution of the party to the development of an independent labour movement in Britain at the end of the nineteenth century, though with every fresh case-study a different local strategy seems to come to light. The one outstanding profile in this field is the closely observed account of the ILP in Bradford by J. Reynolds and K. Laybourn, who identify several key features in the party's growth in that city, notably the reformist nature of ILP socialism and the close associations with local trade unionism. “From the outset”, they tell us, “Bradford trade unionism and the Bradford ILP were seen as two aspects of a single homogeneous labour movement aimed at the emancipation of the working class from poverty and exploitation.”

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 26 , Issue 2 , August 1981 , pp. 171 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1981

References

1 In the International Review of Social History. for example: Deian, Hopkin, “The Membership of the Independent Labour Party, 1904–10: A Spatial and Occupational Analysis”, XX (1975), pp. 175–97;CrossRefGoogle Scholar Reynolds, J. and Laybourn, K., “The Emergence of the Independent Labour Party in Bradford”, XX (1975), pp. 313–46;CrossRefGoogle Scholar David, Rubinstein, “The Independent Labour Party and the Yorkshire Miners: The Barnsley By-Election of 1897”, XXIII (1978), pp. 102–34.Google Scholar In the Bulletin of the North West Labour History Society (Manchester): Carter, S., “The Independent Labour Party in Ashton-under-Lyne, 1893–1900”, No 4 (1977–1978). pp. 63–91;Google Scholar Reid, N., “Manchester and Salford ILP: A more controversial aspect of the pre-1914 era”, No 5 (1978–1979), pp. 25–31.Google Scholar

2 Reynolds, and Laybourn, . “The Emergence of the Independent Labour Party in Bradford”, p. 346.Google Scholar

3 Rubinstein, “The Independent Labour Party and the Yorkshire Miners”. passim.

4 Reid, “Manchester and Salford ILP”. passim: Carter. “The Independent Labour Party in Ashton-under-Lyne”, passim.

5 Frederick, Engels, The Condition of the Working Class in England (London, 1969). p. 266.Google Scholar

6 Methodist Times, 18 July 1895.

7 Taylor, W. Cooke. Notes of a Tour in the Manufacturing Districts of Lancashire (London, 1842), p. 19.Google Scholar

8 Lord, Egerton of Tatton, “The Manchester Ship Canal”, in: The Nineteenth Century, XXXV (1894), p. 19.Google Scholar

9 See Appendix I.

10 John, Denvir, The Irish in Britain, from the earliest times to the fall and death of Parnell (London. 1892), p. 432; Manchester Guardian. 16 11 1885.Google Scholar

11 See John, Tatham, Report on the Health of Greater Manchester, 1891–1893 (Manchester, 1894),Google Scholar and Marr, T. R., Housing Conditions in Manchester and Salford (Manchester, 1904).Google Scholar

12 Katharine, Chorley, Manchester Made Them (London, 1950). pp. 137–38.Google Scholar

13 In the case of Sir Charles Macara, see Clarke, P. F., Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971), p. 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Chorley, , Manchester Made Them, p. 138.Google Scholar

15 Shena, D. Simon, A Century of City Government: Manchester 1838–1938 (London, 1938), map facing p. 112.Google Scholar

16 Chorley, , Manchester Made Them, pp. 234, 236.Google Scholar

17 See Manchester Guardian surveys of 14–25 November 1885.

18 See Appendix II. Of the eleven constituencies in the immediate area of Manchester and Salford only Manchester North-West. containing the business vote, and Manchester South, and to a lesser extent Salford North and Stretford, were middle-class in character.

19 Cf., Paul Thompson, Socialists, Liberals and Labour: The Struggle for London, 1885–1914 (London, 1967), pp. 69–70.Google Scholar

20 For the development of “New” Toryism in Manchester and its personnel see Hanham, H. J., Elections and Party Management: Politics in the Time of Disraeli and Gladstone (London, 1959), pp. 314–22.Google Scholar

21 For a fuller discussion of these issues see Clarke, Lancashire and the New Liberalism. op. cit., chs 2 and 3, and Jeffrey, Hill. “Working Class Politics in Lancashire, 1885–1906: A Regional Study in the Origins of the Labour Party” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Keele, 1971), chs 5 and 6.Google Scholar

22 “There is perhaps no diocese in England better provided in respect to its parochial schools”, recorded Herbert Vaughan on the work of his predecessor. Bishop Turner of Salford. Vaughan himself supervised major advances in school building and teacher training. See John, Snead Cox, The Life of Cardinal Vaughan (2 vols; London, 1910), I, pp. 252, 270, 374, 380, 390 and 414.Google Scholar

23 Thomas, Hughes, James, Fraser. Second Bishop of Manchester. A Memoir. 1818–1885 (London, 1888). pp. 246–57; Manchester Guardian, 23 September 1885.Google Scholar

24 See Clarke, , Lancashire and the New Liberalism. pp. 34–36.Google Scholar

25 Benjamin, Nightingale, Lancashire Nonconformity (6 vols; Manchester, 1890–1893). V. pp. 62ff.Google Scholar

26 Methodist Monthly, February 1900.

27 For example S. F. Collier at Central Hall and the Wesleyan Mission in Oldham Street, and Mr Broxap at Gravel Lane. See George, Jackson, Collier of Manchester: A Friend's Tribute (London, 1923),Google Scholar and Methodist Monthly, ibid.

28 See Leslie, Bather, “A History of the Manchester and Salford Trades Council” (unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Manchester University, 1956), pp. 89ff.Google Scholar

29 Manchester Guardian, 17, 19, 20 and 25 November 1885. Radical working men's clubs were active in Hulme, Newton, Pendleton and Bradford, among other places.

30 Workman's Times, 28 May 1892.

31 Labour Prophet. February 1892.

32 See article by Alex, Thompson in Manchester Guardian, 1 01 1944.Google Scholar

33 Clarion, , 12 12 1891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34 Ibid., 11 02 1893.

35 Ibid., 28 05 1892.

36 Ibid., 11 02 1893.

37 For example, Justice, 19 January, 12 February and 10 December 1887.

38 Ibid., 1 01.

39 Ibid., 10 11 1888, 6 April and 14 09 1889.

40 Labour Prophet, February 1894.

41 Salford, Chronicle. 12 03 and 9 04 1892. HaIl propounded Home Rule for Ireland, old-age pensions and payment of MPs as his main policies.Google Scholar

42 Workman's Times, 28 May 1892. They were Leonard Hall. W. K. Hall, Tom Purves, Alf Settle and G. Evans.

43 Robert, Blatchford to Shaw, G. B., 18 08 1892, Shaw Correspondence, Series I. British Library, Add. Mss 50512.Google Scholar

44 Reid, , “Manchester and Salford ILP”, p. 26.Google Scholar

45 Workman's Times, 11 September 1891.

46 The principal new unions in the Manchester area by 1900 were: Dock Labourers (total national membership 14,493), Labour Amalgamation (1,608), Tramway Employees (national, 7,536), Quay and Railway Porters (3,400). Board of Trade, Labour Department, Report on Trades Unions in 1899 [Cd 422].

47 Manchester and Salford Trades Council, Annual Reports. 1892, 1895. 1897–99, Manchester Public Library.

48 On Clynes see Clynes, J. R., Memoirs (2 vols; London, 1937);Google Scholar Edward, George, From Mill Boy to Minister (London, n.d.), chs V-VIII:Google Scholar Will, Thorne, My Life's Battles (London, n.d.), pp. 114–16.Google Scholar

49 Clynes, , Memoirs, I. p. 69.Google Scholar

50 Workman's Times, 5 09 1890 and 17 03 1894.Google Scholar

51 Bolton Weekly Guardian, 2 and 9 07 1887;Google Scholar James, Glegg, Annals of Bolton (Bolton, 1888), p. 227.Google Scholar

52 Workman's Times, 26 September and 24 October 1890.

53 Joseph, Burgess, A Potential Poet? His Autobiography and Verse (Ilford, 1927), passim.Google Scholar

54 Workman's Times, 3 April 1891.

55 Ibid.

56 Ibid., 16 01 1892.

57 Ibid., 27 03 1891.

58 Manchester Liberal Union. Minute Book of Liberal 1200, 29 04 and 27 07 1886. Offices of Manchester Liberal Federation.Google Scholar

59 Workman's Times, 24 October 1890.

60 For details ibid., 28 08 1891.

61 Ibid., 7 08.

62 Ibid., 18 09.

63 Ibid., 7 08.

64 Ibid., 21 08.

65 Ibid., 7 09.

66 Ibid., 12 03 1892. Hall received 553 votes, less than 8% of the poll.

67 Pankhurst, E. Sylvia, The Suffragette Movement (London, 1931). p. 128.Google Scholar

68 Clarion, , 28 05 1892.Google Scholar

69 There were 26 branches of the ILP reported in Lancashire in January 1894, 45 the following year. Workman's Times. 13 01 1894: Labour Annual 1895, pp. 103ff. In February 1894 the SDF reported 27 branches in Lancashire, Justice. 19 May 1894. The ILP Directory and Branch Returns for 1897 listed membership of branches in the Manchester district at 693. In 1898 the financial membership of the Manchester and Salford ILP was estimated at 268. by March 1899 at 401, Manchester, December 1900.Google Scholar

70 Manchester Liberal Union, General Committee Minutes, 17 11 1893, letter of 16 11.Google Scholar

71 Ibid.

72 Ibid.

73 Manchester Liberal Union, Programme Sub-Committee Minutes. 2 03. 28 03 and 13 06 1894; General Committee Minutes, 5 05.Google Scholar

74 Clarke, . Lancashire and the New Liberalism. pp. 164–65.Google Scholar

75 Manchester Liberal Union, General Committee Minutes. 26 07 1894.Google Scholar

76 Ibid., 1 and 14 08.

77 Ibid., report of sub-committee meeting. 19 12.

78 The ILP put up two candidates in the immediate area of Manchester and Salford. R. M. Pankhurst. an erstwhile Liberal, received 4,261 votes at Gorton. but had no Liberal opponent; James Johnston at Manchester North-East received only 546 votes, whilst in nearby Ashton-under-Lyne and Hyde ILP candidates similarly polled badly. less than 500 votes in both cases.

79 Manchester, July and October 1899: Manchester Liberal Union. General Committee Minutes, 17 06 and 6 10 1898.Google Scholar

80 Details in Herbert Gladstone Papers, British Library, Add. Mss 46105. 46106 and 46454.

81 In 1893 he wrote: “We want no leaders, and should be ill-advised to tolerate any”, a remark ostensibly prompted by his distaste for C. S. Parnell, the Irish Nationalist leader, but implicitly referring to Keir Hardie. Clarion, , 11 02 1893.Google Scholar

82 Ibid., 11 08 1894.

83 For details see ibid., 25 08, 24 11, 1 and 8 12; 29 06 1895.

84 Manchester and Salford Trades Council, Annual Reports, 1892 and 1895.Google Scholar

85 Manchester Guardian, 2 November 1893; Pankhurst, , The Suffragette Movement, op. cit., pp. 95, 129–30.Google Scholar

86 Ibid., p. 125.

87 Colliery Workman's Times, 9 09 1893.Google Scholar

88 Manchester Guardian, 2 November 1894.

89 Manchester and Salford Trades Council, Annual Report, 1896: Manchester Guardian, 2, 3, and 20 11 1894;Google Scholar Clarion, , 27 10:Google Scholar Pankhurst, , The Suffragette Movement. p. 119.Google Scholar

90 Workman's Times, 5 08 1893.Google Scholar

91 Manchester, August and December 1900.

92 In 1897 the Trades Council-ILP alliance had returned Nuttall and Brocklehurst to the School Board, Manchester and Salford Trades Council, Annual Report, 1897. The journal Manchester (from 1901 The Social Reformer) was launched in the summer of 1899 to promote the idea of municipal socialism, and in October 1900 the United Workers' Municipal Election Committee arose out of discussions held the previous July among a wide range of local working-class groups.Google Scholar

93 Manchester and Salford Trades Council, Annual Reports, 1900–1906.Google Scholar

94 Ibid., 1902.

95 Ibid., 1903.

96 Ibid.

97 Ibid.

98 Justice, 8 August 1903.

99 Cited in Bather, , “A History of the Manchester and Salford Trades Council”. op. cit., p. 166.Google Scholar

100 Manchester and Salford Trades Council, Annual Report, 1903.Google Scholar

101 Ibid.

102 Manchester and Salford Labour Representation Committee, Annual Report, 1906, Manchester Public Library.Google Scholar

103 Ibid., 1905, 1908, 1910 and 1912.

104 Ibid., 1906; Cotton Factory Times, 6 11 1903.Google Scholar

105 Between 1906 and 1914 the Labour Party representation in Manchester City Council (including ILP members) was as follows: 1906 – 11; 1907–11; 1908 – 10: 1909 – 8; 1910 – 10; 1911 – 14; 1912 – 16: 1913 – 16: 1914 – 15. During the same period Conservative strength ranged from 38 to 57 and Liberal from 19 to 33. This information kindly supplied by the Local History Library, Manchester Public Library.

106 Reynolds, and Laybourn, , “The Emergence of the Independent Labour Party in Bradford”, pp. 336–37.Google Scholar