Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:11:13.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Labor and the Political Leadership of New Deal America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 February 2009

David Montgomery
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This essay examines the relationship between popular initiatives and government decision-makers during the 1930s. The economic crisis and the reawakening of labor militancy before 1935 elevated men and women, who had been formed by the workers' movement of the 1910s and 1920s, to prominent roles in the making of national industrial policies. Quite different was the reshaping of social insurance and work relief measures. Although those policies represented a governmental response to the distress and protests of the working class, the workers themselves had little influence on their formulation or administration. Through industrial struggles, the Committee for Industrial Organization (CIO) mobilized a new cadre, trained by youthful encounters with urban ethnic life, expanding secondary schooling and subordination to modern corporate management, in an unsuccessful quest for economic planning and universal social insurance through the agency of a reformed Democratic Party.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Review of Social History , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 335 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Internationaal Instituut voor Sociale Geschiedenis 1994

References

1 The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, With a Special Introduction and Explanatory Notes by President Roosevelt. 1937 Volume. The Constitution Prevails (New York, 1941), pp. 272–274.

2 Schlesinger, Arthur M. Jr, The Age of Roosevelt: The Coming of the New Deal (Boston, 1959)Google Scholar; Bernstein, Irving, Turbulent Years: A History of the American Worker, 1933–1941 (Boston, 1970)Google Scholar; Auerbach, Jerold S., Labor and Liberty: The La Follette Committee and the New Deal (Indianapolis, 1966)Google Scholar.

3 Staughton Lynd (ed.), The Alternative Unionism of the Early 1930s (Urbana, III., forthcoming); Davis, Mike, Prisoners of the American Dream: Politics and Economy in the History of the American Working Class (London, 1986)Google Scholar; Faue, Elizabeth, Community of Suffering and Struggle: Women, Men, and the Labor Movement in Minneapolis, 1915–1945 (Chapel Hill, NC, 1991)Google Scholar; Rachleff, Peter, Hard-Pressed in the Heartland: The Hormel Strike and the Future of the Labor Movement (Boston, 1993)Google Scholar.

4 Brody, David, Workers in Industrial America: Essays on the Twentieth Century Struggle (2nd ed., New York, 1993), p. 151Google Scholar.

5 Cohen, Lizabeth, Making a New Deal: Industrial Workers in Chicago, 1919–1939 (New York, 1990)Google Scholar; Goldfield, Michael, Skocpol, Theda and Finegold, Kenneth, “Explaining New Deal Labor Policy”, American Political Science Review, 84 (12 1990), pp. 1298–1317Google Scholar. See also, Michael Goldfield, “Worker Insurgency, Radical Organization, and New Deal Labor Legislation”, ibid., 83 (12 1989), pp. 1257–1282.

6 Fraser, Steven, Labor Will Rule: Sidney Hillman and the Rise of American Labor (New York, 1991), p. 329Google Scholar.

7 Beaver Valley Labor History Journal, 1 (September 1979), p. 4; Lynd, Robert S. and Lynd, Helen Merrell, Middletown in Transition: A Study in Cultural Conflict (New York, 1937), pp. 402–486Google Scholar. On the Right of the 1930s, see Burk, Robert F., The Corporate State and the Broker State: The Du Ponts and American National Politics, 1925–1940 (Cambridge, Mass., 1990)Google Scholar; Smith, Geoffrey S., To Save a Nation: American Countersubversives, the New Deal, and the Coming of World War II (New York, 1973)Google Scholar.

8 Millis, Harry A. and Brown, Emily C., From the Wagner Act to Taft Hartley: A Study of National Labor Policy and Labor Relations (Chicago, 1950), pp. 316–322Google Scholar. The relevant supreme court cases were NLRB v. Mackay Radio and Telegraph Co. 304 US 333 (1938) and NLRB v. Fansteel Metalurgical Corporation 306 US 240 (1939).

9 Montgomery, David, The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865–1925 (Cambridge and New York, 1987), pp. 403–407, 417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

10 Montgomery, David, “Thinking about American Workers in the 1920s”, International Labor and Working-Class History, 32 (Fall 1987), pp. 4–24Google Scholar; Vittoz, Stanley, New Deal Labor Policy and the American Industrial Economy (Chapel Hill and London, 1987), pp. 18–19Google Scholar.

11 Quoted in Palladino, Grace, Dreams of Dignity, Workers of Vision: A History of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (Washington, DC, 1991), p. 151Google Scholar. The vocabulary of this resolution is that of the famous 1923 resolution of the AFL, “Industry's Manifest Duty”, but that resolution had warned against “state invasion” of economic life. See Montgomery, “Thinking”, pp. 15–16.

12 Vittoz, New Deal Labor Policy, pp. 43–44, 60–69. The quotation from Taplin is on p. 64. Taplin's argument was also the theme of Michael Musmanno's novel (later movie), Black Fury.

13 Perlman, Selig, A Theory of the Labor Movement (New York, 1928), p. 232Google Scholar.

14 Fraser, Labor Will Rule, pp. 261–277.

15 Van Tine, Warren R., The Making of a Labor Bureaucrat: Union Leadership in the United States, 1870–1920 (Amherst, Mass., 1973)Google Scholar examines the emergence of long-term leadership, but its reinvigoration has been best captured by Bucki, Cecelia F., “The Pursuit of Political Power: Class, Ethnicity, and Municipal Politics in Interwar Bridgeport, 1915–1936” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1991Google Scholar), and by such biographies as Fraser, Labor Will Rule; Melvyn Dubofsky and Van Tine, Warren, John L. Lewis: A Biography (New York, 1977)Google Scholar; and Johnson, Christopher H., Maurice Sugar: Law, Labor, and the Left in Detroit, 1912–1950 (Detroit, 1988)Google Scholar.

16 Kelley, Robin D. G., Hammer and Hoe: Alabama Communists during the Great Depression (Chapel Hill, NC, 1990), pp. 60–69Google Scholar. The Communist Party's decision to supplement its dual unions in favor of aggressive work within the AFL had been reached in July 1933 at an Extraordinary National Conference in New York, two years before the Seventh World Congress of the Comintern. Prickett, James R., “Communists and the Communist Issue in the American Labor Movement, 1920–1950” (unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1975), pp. 142–161Google Scholar.

17 Nelson, Steve, Barrett, James R., and Ruck, Rob, Steve Nelson: American Radical (Pittsburgh, 1981), pp. 167–173Google Scholar; Christopher Sterba, “Textile Labor Conflict in the Anthracite: The General Labor Holiday in Hazleton, Pennsylvania, September 12, 1934”, 19 (unpublished paper, cited by permission of author); Lynch, Patrick M., “Pennsylvania Anthracite: A Forgotten IWW Venture, 1906–1916” (unpublished M.A. thesis, Bloomsburg State College, 1974)Google Scholar.

18 Sterba, “Textile Labor Conflict”, pp. 29–37.

19 Cohen, Making a New Deal; Bodnar, John, Immigration and Industrialization: Ethnicity in an American Mill Town, 1870–1940 (Pittsburgh, 1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gerstle, Gary, Working-Class Americanism: The Politics of Labor in a Textile City (Cambridge and New York, 1989)Google Scholar; Bukowczyk, John J., And My Children Did Not Know Me: A History of the Polish-Americans (Bloomington, Ind., 1987), pp. 65–84Google Scholar; , Bucki, “Bridgeport”; Adamic, Louis, My America, 1928–1938 (New York and London, 1938)Google Scholar.

20 Morawska, Ewa, For Bread with Butter: The Life-Worlds of East Central Europeans in Johnstown, Pennsylvania, 1890–1940 (Cambridge and New York, 1985), pp. 252–265Google Scholar.

21 Cerullo, John and Delana, Gennaro, “The Kelayres Massacre”, Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, 57 (07 1983), pp. 331–361Google Scholar. The quotation is on p. 337.

22 Gerstle, Working'Class Americanism, pp. 230–259; Berman, Hyman, “Political Antisemitism in Minnesota during the Great Depression”, Jewish Social Studies, 38 (Summer-Fall 1976), pp. 247–264Google Scholar. Oddly, Cohen, Making a New Deal, has little t o say about either the local officials or Congressional rcprsentatives elected by Chicagoans during the New Deal era.

23 Skocpol, Theda, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, Mass, and London, 1992), pp. 161–310Google Scholar; Montgomery, Fall of the House of Labor, pp. 410–416, 438–457; Schatz, Ronald W., The Electrical Workers: A History of Labor at General Electric and Westinghouse, 1923–60 (Urbana, III., 1983), pp. 11–24Google Scholar; Cohen, Making a New Deal, pp. 160–211. On voters and taxes, see Bucki, “Bridgeport”, pp. 244–267, 371–379.

24 Lubove, Roy, The Struggle for Social Security, 1900–1935 (Cambridge, Mass., 1968), pp. 164–170Google Scholar; Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, pp. 157–158, 198, 237.

25 Quoted in Casebeer, Kenneth, “The Workers' Unemployment Insurance Bill: American Social Wage, Labor Organization, and Legal Ideology”, in Tomlins, Christopher L. and King, Andrew J. (eds), Labor Law in America: Historical and Critical Essays (Baltimore and London, 1992), p. 250Google Scholar.

26 Casebeer, “Workers' Unemployment Bill”, pp. 250, 232, 247.

27 Ibid., p. 232; Faue, Suffering and Struggle, p. 149; Nelson, Barrett and Ruck, Steve Nelson, p. 160; Harris, Herbert, American Labor (New Haven, 1939), pp. 403–405, 410nGoogle Scholar; Derickson, Alan, “Health Security for All? Social Unionism and Universal Health Insurance, 1935–1958”, Journal of American History, 80 (03 1994), pp. 1333–1356CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Final Proceedings of the Eighth Constitutional Convention of the Congress of Industrial Organizations, November 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 1946 (n.p., n.d.), pp. 81–83. On European social insurance, see Steinmetz, George, “Workers and the Welfare State in Imperial Germany”, International Labor and Working-Class History, 40 (Fall 1991), pp. 18–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; James E. Cronin and Peter Weiler, “Working-Class Interests and the Politics of Social Democratic Reform in Britain, 1900–1940”, Ibid., pp. 47–66.

28 Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, pp. 321–479. On the campaign against outdoor relief in the nineteenth century, see Montgomery, David, Citizen Worker: The Experience of Workers in the United States with Democracy and the Free Market during the Nineteenth Century (Cambridge and New York, 1993), pp. 71–82Google Scholar.

29 Skocpol, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, pp. 520–522; Brock, William R., Welfare, Democracy, and the New Deal (Cambridge and New York, 1988), pp. 27–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For a perceptive analysis of professionalization, see Kunzel, Regina G., Fallen Women, Problem Girls: Unmarried Mothers and the Professionalization of Social Work, 1890–1945 (New Haven, 1993)Google Scholar.

30 Brock, Welfare, Democracy, p. 174.

31 Ibid., pp. 259–260; “Leah” to United Action, 16 September 1935, quoted in Faue, Suffering and Struggle, p. 63. See Le Sueur, Meridel, The Girl (Minneapolis, 1978)Google Scholar. There were instances of workers being elected to poor boards, but they seem to have been less numerous than such elections had been during the late nineteenth century.

32 Keyssar, Alexander, Out of Work: The First Century of Unemployment in Massachusetts (Cambridge and New York, 1986)Google Scholar; Hunnicutt, Benjamin Kline, Work without End: Abandoning Shorter Hours for the Right to Work (Philadelphia, 1988), pp. 147–250Google Scholar; Millis, Harry A., How Collective Bargaining Works: A Survey of Experience in Leading American Industries (New York, 1942), pp. 213, 223Google Scholar.

33 Anderson, Nels, The Right to Work (New York, 1938), p. 135Google Scholar.

34 Patterson, James, “Comparative Welfare History: Britain and the United States, 1930–1945”, in Cohen, Wilbur (ed.), The Roosevelt New Deal: A Program Assessment Fifty Years After (Austin, Tex., 1986), p. 136Google Scholar.

35 Montgomery, David and Schatz, Ronald, “Facing Layoffs”, in Montgomery, Workers' Control in America (Cambridge and New York, 1979), pp. 146–147Google Scholar; Faue, Suffering and Struggle, pp. 154–164; Painter, Nell Irvin, The Narrative of Hosea Hudson: His Life as a Negro Communist in the South (Cambridge, Mass., 1979), pp. 298–302Google Scholar; Cooke, Morris Llewellyn and Murray, Philip, Organized Labor and Production: Next Steps in Industrial Democracy (New York, 1940), p. 227; Art Preis, America's Permanent Depression: The Truth about Unemployment (New York, n.d.), p. 18Google Scholar.

36 Fraser, Labor Will Rule, pp. 335–336.

37 Ibid., pp. 349–352, 404; Goldfield, “Worker Insurgency”, p. 1268; Dubofsky and Van Tine, Lewis, pp. 211–232.

38 Quoted in Harris, American Labor, p. 408.

39 Ibid., pp. 410–411. On radio communications, see McChesney, Robert W., Telecommunications, Mass Media, and Democracy: The Battle for the Control of U.S. Broadcasting, 1928–1935 (New York, 1993)Google Scholar.

40 Wilcox, Richard C., “Industrial Management's Policies Toward Unionism”, in Derber, Milton and Young, Edwin (eds), Labor and the New Deal (Madison, Wis., 1957), p. 288Google Scholar; Jensen, Richard J., “The Causes and Cures of Unemployment in the Great Depression”, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 19 (Spring 1989), pp. 557–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Ibid., pp. 563–571; Licht, Walter, Getting Work: Philadelphia, 1840–1950 (Cambridge. Mass, and London, 1992), pp. 44–55Google Scholar; Vargas, Zaragosa, Proletarians of the North: A History of Mexican Industrial Workers in Detroit and the Midwest, 1917–1933 (Berkeley, 1993), pp. 105–112Google Scholar; Yale researchers found a strong preference of New Haven employers for white workers. Bakke, E. Wright, The Unemployed Worker: A Study of the Task of Making a Living without a Job (New Haven, 1940), pp. 247–248Google Scholar.

41 Cohen, Making a New Deal, pp. 333–349.

43 Vittoz, New Deal Labor Policy, pp. 149–150.

44 Klare, Karl E., “Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937–1941”, Minnesota Law Review, 62 (1978), pp. 275, 286Google Scholar; Lewis, John L., quoted in Sidney Fine, Sit-Down: The General Motors Strike of 1936–1937 (Ann Arbor, 1970), p. 256Google Scholar.

45 A good discussion of the restrictive rulings, which assessed their early impact more severally than I do, is Atleson, James B., Values and Assumptions in American Labor Law (Amherst, Mass., 1983), pp. 19–66Google Scholar. The Supreme Court decisions on public space and free speech are Hague v. CIO 307 US 469 (1939) and Thornhill v. Alabama 310 US 88 (1940).

46 For most of this information I am deeply indebted to an unpublished paper by Eric Leif Davin of the University of Pittsburgh, “The Littlest New Deal; SWOC Takes Power in Steeltown, A Possibility of Radicalism in the Late 1930s”. See also Powers, George, Cradle of Steel Unionism: Monongahela Valley, Pa. (East Chicago, Ind., 1972)Google Scholar.

47 Tomlins, Christopher L., “AFL Unions in the 1930s: Their Performance in Historical Perspective”, Journal of American History, 65 (03 1979), pp. 1021–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Newell, Barbara Warne, Chicago and the Labor Movement: Metropolitan Unionism in the 1930s (Urbana, III., 1961), pp. 205, 208Google Scholar.

48 Milton, David, The Politics of U.S. Labor: From the Great Depression to the New Deal (New York and London, 1982), pp. 117–120Google Scholar; Nelson, Daniel, American Rubber Workers and Organized Labor, 1900–1941 (Princeton, NJ, 1988), pp. 223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Meyer, Gerald, Vito Marcantonio: Radical Politician, 1902–1954 (Albany, NY, 1989), pp. 25–26Google Scholar; Fraser, Labor Will Rule, pp. 430–440.

49 Tomlins, Christopher L., The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880–1960 (Cambridge and New York, 1985), pp. 204–224Google Scholar.

50 Nelson, Bruce, Workers on the Waterfront: Seamen, Longshoremen, and Unionism in the 1930s (Urbana, III., 1988), pp. 202–244Google Scholar; Faue, Suffering and Struggle, pp. 111, 134–145; Gieske, Millard L., Minnesota Farmer-Laborism: The Third Party Alternative (Minneapolis, 1979), pp. 244–261Google Scholar; Buhle, Paul, Marxism in the United States: Remapping the History of the American Left (London, 1987), pp. 146–147Google Scholar.

51 Naison, Mark, “Remaking America: Communists and Liberals in the Popular Front”, in Brown, Michael E., Martin, Randy, Rosengarten, Frank and Snedeker, George (eds), New Studies in the Politics and Culture of U.S. Communism (New York, 1993), pp. 65–69Google Scholar; Rosswurm, Steve (ed.), The CIO's Left-led Unions (New Brunswick, NJ, 1992)Google Scholar.

52 Party affiliations are my calculations, based on figures in Mills, C. Wright, The New Men of Power: America's Labor Leaders (New York, 1948), p. 183Google Scholar; United Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers of America, Proceedings, Fifth Convention (New York, 1939), p. 87Google Scholar; Isserman, Maurice, Which Side Were You On? The American Communist Party During the Second World War (Middletown, Conn., 1982), pp. 9–14Google Scholar; Schatz, Electrical Workers, pp. 80–101.

53 Varbero, Richard A., “Philadelphia's South Italians in the 1920s”, in Davis, Allen F. and Haller, Mark H. (eds), The Peoples of Philadelphia: A History of Ethnic Groups and Lower-Class Life, 1790–1940 (Philadelphia, 1973), pp. 255–275Google Scholar; Lynd and Lynd, Middletown in Transition, pp. 230–241; Garcia, Mario T., Mexican Americans: Leadership, Ideology, and Identity, 1930–1960 (New Haven, 1989), pp. 145–165Google Scholar; , Garcia, Memories of History: The Life and Narrative of Bert Corona (Berkeley, 1994)Google Scholar; Altenbaugh, Richard J., Education for Struggle: The American Labor Colleges of the 1920s and 1930s (Philadelphia, 1990)Google Scholar; Williams, Cleophas quoted in Howard Kimeldorf, Reds or Rackets? The Making of Radical and Conservative Unions on the Waterfront (Berkeley, 1988), p. 147Google Scholar.